https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1jJXPlBgrUI Maybe they have a point, maybe not? Must say I do like the British Pakistani gentleman, he has some very good interviews on his channel.

OK, this opinion, is going to be a little controversial and extremely hard to swallow, but... this needs saying,

ANTI-ZIONISM IS INHERENTLY ANTI-WHITE AND ANTI-BRITISH / EUROPEAN

I don't say this to be pro-Jewish/Israel, I've talked endlessly about why the Jew/Israel narrative is completely false, so instead I think it's time to go for the throat.
So why do I say that anti-zionism is anti-white?
It's simple. What you're saying, what you're doing, by placing the Jews at the head of the snake, is stating that white people, who LITERALLY ruled every corner of the world. Gave the world civilisation (as told by every ancient culture, as every figure from antiquity that gave the world civilisation was BLONDE / RED HAIRED AND BLUE / GREEN / AQUAMARINE / GREY EYED AND PALE SKINNED EVERYWHERE, yet are a massive minority on the planet (whites make up 8% of the globes population) is you're saying we were beaten and conquered by a race of people who're still under the thumb of their mothers, in most part and can be influenced by tying a pound coin to piece of string and a stick and led to wherever you want them (stereotypes are there for a reason).
They aren't cunning.
They aren't even a strong people.
They're slaves of the system.
Usery means nothing if you can't enforce it. Interest can accumulate all you want, if we refuse to pay it. Finance for anything can be taken, if you refuse to lend it.
Yet we were conquered by these fucktards?
Gimme a break.
You people are the weakest fuckers alive, if you believe that.
Our kings, they never allowed that (our true rulers, not those front and centre like Charlie III 😂🤣😂) they instead orchestrated the deaths of millions of them, every time they believed they held more power than they did and still do it today.
The reckoning is coming.
Their usefulness is up and those rulers are starting to show their faces again. You're being prepped to commit genocide, not only of the Jewish people, but their next scapegoat in line, Muslims.

The signs are obvious and clear. But the majority of you will only believe the lie, because not doing so will make you have to admit something you're reluctant to do...
Admit you were wrong and admit you were fooled, before learning everything from scratch again.

You've let yourselves be conditioned into believing that the Jews Rule the world is the case too, because youve never been truly challenged on it, never had someone point out the inconsistencies and that's because you've shit yourself off from anyone that will do that. You don't want to admit that everything you project on them, is in reality a reflection of yourself and your own inadequacies, so what does that say about you?

The true power. Their real rule. Doesn't work how you think and that's why, if we continue down this road you all want us to, we are doomed to be forever under the ACTUAL ruling class' control and forever a slave. Because that's what you're projecting onto the world, your willingness to be a slave!

That's all I've gotta say

So a Oz of fine silver is now 121 pounds, around a 165 dollars. To be clear I dont care about your individual wealth, but IMO you are currently in the middle of one of the biggest transfers of wealth in history, of course you all need to do your own research and decide for yourselves, but where is the harm in getting some if you can actually get physical silver as a hedge against your neo nazi WEF regime

Google:

Entelechy is a philosophical term for the realization of potential, representing the vital force or internal drive that directs an organism or system toward its full, intended purpose (actuality)
. Coined by Aristotle to describe the completion of potentiality, it implies a "becoming" or "having the goal within".
Definition

Philosophy: The complete attainment or actualization of a form or potential; the inner principle that guides development.
Vitalism: A, often non-scientific, hypothetical agency that directs the growth and functioning of living organisms (e.g., healing).
General: The fulfillment of a potentiality or the ultimate goal/perfection of a concept.

Etymology

Originates from Aristotle’s Greek term entelécheia.
Composed of: en (within) + telos (end, goal, perfection) + echein (to have or hold).
Literal meaning: "having the end/perfection within".
First known use in English was around 1593.

Usage

Aristotelian Philosophy: Used to distinguish a thing's final, active state from its mere potential.
Biology (Vitalism): Historically used by Hans Driesch to describe an organism's capacity for regeneration.
Psychology/Self-Development: Refers to the internal motivation and guiding force for self-actualization, or becoming all one is capable of being.
Literature/Philosophy: Describes the inherent, driving force behind development or the attainment of an, often, unattainable perfection.

Example: An acorn has the potential to become an oak tree, but the entelechy is the internal blueprint driving it to actually become that tree.

I Am As I Am
https://youtube.com/watch?v=_Nm9RwNfCU8&si=pVOP82W7ImnxX9Oq

Epistemic Collapse: or, 'Why some people will never leave their beliefs behind?'

Epistemic collapse is a real psychological condition. It occurs at the precise moment a person realizes that the framework they relied on to determine what is true ie: institutions, education, media, authority... is fundamentally false.

This is not a matter of changing opinions or learning new information. It is an existential event. When the structure that answers the question “How do I know what I know?” fails, the mind enters free-fall.

Reality loses coherence. Meaning fragments. People experience it as everything I thought was true was a lie, the floor dropped out, nothing makes sense anymore.

From that moment, there are only two possible outcomes.

If epistemic collapse happens with an anchor, the person can pass through it without psychological fracture. An anchor must be external, transcendent, and independent of the systems that just failed.

If epistemic collapse occurs without an anchor, the result is far more dangerous. A person raised inside a closed, system-approved worldview who experiences collapse without a transcendent truth to fall back on faces two outcomes: psychological fragmentation, anxiety, nihilism, dissociation, despair... or defensive re-attachment to the lie they already know.

Most choose the second. They cling to falsehoods not because they believe them, but because abandoning them would mean psychological disintegration. That is why people defend absurdities with religious intensity. It is not belief. It is self-preservation.

What epistemic collapse primarily damages is not the intellect, but conation... the will. When truth frameworks collapse repeatedly, the person loses confidence in their ability to choose truth at all. The will becomes hijacked and redirected away from truth-seeking and toward psychological survival: belonging, identity preservation, safety. At that point, reasoning no longer persuades, evidence no longer penetrates, and debate becomes impossible... because reasoning assumes a functioning will oriented toward truth.

That is why this is not a thinking problem. It is a captured-will problem. And that is why argument fails. Until conation is restored, no amount of logic can pull someone out... because the battleground is no longer the mind. It is the will. - Stay anchored in TRUTH.

“Only the dead have seen the end of war”

The famous quote is almost always attributed to Plato. However, no such sentence is found in the philosopher's writings. In fact, it comes from George Santayana (1863–1952), a Spanish-American philosopher, who formulated it in his Soliloquies in England in 1917:

“Only the dead have seen the end of war.”

The false attribution 👎

In 1962, General Douglas MacArthur cited the words in his farewell speech at West Point Military Academy and named Plato as the source. From then on, the legend spread. Later, popular media such as the film Black Hawk Down (2001) also picked up the quote, again with Plato's name. Thus, a modern reflection became a seemingly ancient truth.

The meaning of the quote 📜

– Santayana wanted to respond to the experience of the First World War: Wars do not really end, they return in new forms

– The false attribution to Plato reinforced the effect: If even the philosopher of antiquity had said this, it must be a natural law of history

"War is merely the continuation of politics by other means."
- Carl von Clausewitz; On War, 1st Book, 1st Chapter, Subchapter 24

The picture 🖼

The painting Death Rides Over the Battlefield by Werner Wilhelm Schuch (1843–1918) was created around 1890. It shows the personified Death, in a red cloak, riding a black horse over a battlefield - an allegory reminiscent of the Thirty Years' War. Schuch, originally an architect, turned to painting in the 1870s and specialized in historical and landscape depictions. His "riding Death" is part of a long European tradition in which war and death appear as inseparable companions.

#IMPERIUM

⚔️ HISTORIA MUNDI ⚔️
https://news.1rj.ru/str/historiamundi/1963

In 1905 George Santayana published “The Life of Reason, or The Phases of Human Progress”.

Progress, far from consisting in change, depends on retentiveness. When change is absolute there remains no being to improve and no direction is set for possible improvement: and when experience is not retained, as among savages, infancy is perpetual. Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it.

https://bsky.app/profile/airplaney.bsky.social/post/3mbprbrfo4s2a

Microzymas: The Life Forms that Rewrite the Rules of Reality with Dr. Marizelle Arce
👁 5.2K 👍 390
📥 20.01.2026
👤 Andrew Kaufman
🕒 01:03:25
https://youtube.com/watch?v=ETjYwztslOM
📼 720p, 💾 460.4MB, @Gozilla_bot