Sam Fisher (Data Drops) pinned «https://www.fiercebiotech.com/biotech/fda-frees-pfizers-hemophilia-gene-therapy-clinical-hold»
Why Putin may be MORE LIKELY to use nukes against Ukraine? - Jack Carr interview
Interesting take on the Ukraine situation, that I'd not heard before, will raise some eyebrows that's for sure?
("Better dust off your eyebrow tethers and strap em' down!! You're gonna need em'!!")
https://youtu.be/c7j3VNOtS0k
Interesting take on the Ukraine situation, that I'd not heard before, will raise some eyebrows that's for sure?
("Better dust off your eyebrow tethers and strap em' down!! You're gonna need em'!!")
https://youtu.be/c7j3VNOtS0k
YouTube
Why Putin may be ‘MORE LIKELY’ to use nukes against Ukraine
Author and former Navy SEAL Jack Carr knows a little something about Russia. With several published thriller novels that focus on geopolitical issues, he’s certainly done his research. So, he joins Glenn to war-game possible scenarios from the current situation…
Sam Fisher (Data Drops) pinned «Why Putin may be MORE LIKELY to use nukes against Ukraine? - Jack Carr interview Interesting take on the Ukraine situation, that I'd not heard before, will raise some eyebrows that's for sure? ("Better dust off your eyebrow tethers and strap em' down!! You're…»
Sri Aurobindo 1872-1950
Probably the key (but less acknowledged) figure in Hindu renaissance,
including the renaissance of eastern religions.
36 volumes of all his writings (in one 71MB file, you may find it difficult to open in some pdf viewers).
Tibetan Buddhism uniquely had uninterrupted isolation and preservation tradition throughout the middle ages.
Indian Hinduism has not been so fortunate, due to waves of immigration and invasion.
Muslim and British (mainly, but there were many others as well) with more visible, wider impact
If you want to understand all eastern religions (and they are all based on Hinduism) all you need to read is within Aurobindo’s writings.
You can safely consider Aurobindo as the primary source of info used by all other western and Indian writers/teachers…they all merely come up with ways to rehash Aurobindo’s words.
In this context, the word “all” is totally justified.
I am not saying they “all” plagiarise Aurobindo.
I am saying you only need to read one prolific and eloquent writer.
His key writings are
Synthesis of Yoga 1914-1921 (900 pages)
Life Divine 1914-1919 (1130 pages)
Secret of the Veda 1914-1917 (580 pages)
Essays on the Gita 1916-1920 (590 pages)
Probably the key (but less acknowledged) figure in Hindu renaissance,
including the renaissance of eastern religions.
36 volumes of all his writings (in one 71MB file, you may find it difficult to open in some pdf viewers).
Tibetan Buddhism uniquely had uninterrupted isolation and preservation tradition throughout the middle ages.
Indian Hinduism has not been so fortunate, due to waves of immigration and invasion.
Muslim and British (mainly, but there were many others as well) with more visible, wider impact
If you want to understand all eastern religions (and they are all based on Hinduism) all you need to read is within Aurobindo’s writings.
You can safely consider Aurobindo as the primary source of info used by all other western and Indian writers/teachers…they all merely come up with ways to rehash Aurobindo’s words.
In this context, the word “all” is totally justified.
I am not saying they “all” plagiarise Aurobindo.
I am saying you only need to read one prolific and eloquent writer.
His key writings are
Synthesis of Yoga 1914-1921 (900 pages)
Life Divine 1914-1919 (1130 pages)
Secret of the Veda 1914-1917 (580 pages)
Essays on the Gita 1916-1920 (590 pages)
👍2
Pope Francis blames NATO for Ukraine war - Jimmy Dore
Could it be, that we're seeing the 3rd prophecy of Fatima, playing out before our eyes?
(I can't believe I've never done a drop on this, but if you can't wait that long, you might wanna look it up?)
The same prophecy, that the Vatican sealed and were supposed to make public by 1960?
The same prophecy, that is alleged to have stated, that the Vatican needed to have made peace with the Russian Orthodox Church and have consecrated the ground of Russia and Ukraine by the turn of the millennium?
Is this why the pope was in Kiev, a month or 2 ago, conducting a hastily put together consecration ceremony, to try and prevent what's coming, according to the 3rd Fatima Prophecy?
Or is it all just a load of bollocks and he's just acting edgy, in order to appear cool in front of the cardinals, nuns and choir boys?
(fyi: What I've just said there, bares no relation, to what Jimmy talks about in the video and I dare say, I doubt he has the slightest clue what I'm on about either?)
https://youtu.be/-faLoCQU8w4
Could it be, that we're seeing the 3rd prophecy of Fatima, playing out before our eyes?
(I can't believe I've never done a drop on this, but if you can't wait that long, you might wanna look it up?)
The same prophecy, that the Vatican sealed and were supposed to make public by 1960?
The same prophecy, that is alleged to have stated, that the Vatican needed to have made peace with the Russian Orthodox Church and have consecrated the ground of Russia and Ukraine by the turn of the millennium?
Is this why the pope was in Kiev, a month or 2 ago, conducting a hastily put together consecration ceremony, to try and prevent what's coming, according to the 3rd Fatima Prophecy?
Or is it all just a load of bollocks and he's just acting edgy, in order to appear cool in front of the cardinals, nuns and choir boys?
(fyi: What I've just said there, bares no relation, to what Jimmy talks about in the video and I dare say, I doubt he has the slightest clue what I'm on about either?)
https://youtu.be/-faLoCQU8w4
YouTube
Pope Francis Blames NATO for Ukraine War!
Few would describe Pope Francis as a Russia apologist or a puppet of Vladimir Putin, yet the pontiff recently adopted the same line as many who HAVE been so accused, arguing that the Ukraine war was the fault of NATO and not simply an act of aggression from…
Sam Fisher (Data Drops) pinned «Pope Francis blames NATO for Ukraine war - Jimmy Dore Could it be, that we're seeing the 3rd prophecy of Fatima, playing out before our eyes? (I can't believe I've never done a drop on this, but if you can't wait that long, you might wanna look it up?) …»
Life insurance when you're vaxed and it's further implications?
Something occurred to me, as I was talking to a mate on here, about the life insurance claims for the vaccinated.
You see, back when the vaccines were being rolled out, I tackled this issue, in one of my YouTube videos and then, just like everyone else, got distracted by everything else and forgot about it.
This is what I said to him, after he asked me what happens if you die from the vax, with regards to life insurance:
I was saying this exact same thing, when they'd just brought the vaccines out, that the life insurance companies would refuse to pay out. Simply because you'd put your own life at risk, by taking an experimental drug.
How do you think that they got all those families, of the people that died, to stay quiet?
Technically, it's classed under the same clause as suicide, because when you commit suicide you willingly and consciously put yourself in a dangerous situation that ended your life. Therefore, if you have a regular life insurance policy, because high risk professions, usually have specialised life insurance, so they work a little differently, you'll end up nullifying your policy.
I don't know if it's the same in the US, but if you take part in a clinical trial over here, I don't think life insurance companies have ever paid out if you take part in a trial? It's why they used to pay you so much for taking part, along with the fact the government made them do it, until the beginning of 2020 funnily enough, when they changed the rules and pharmaceutical companies
didn't have to pay the massive fees anymore.
Funny that eh?
I'm sure it's just a coincidence though?
🤔🤫😶😳😁😳😶🤫🤔
He then asked me whether the people giving the shots etc, could be prosecuted for, 'Assisting your suicide'?
So i elaborated further:
No. Not really.
You see, like i said, it's only classed as suicide under the insurance policy, likely because it's such a random and unlikely cause of death really, that they didn't know how else to deal with it?
The lab techs / nurses / doctors, are given automatic immunity from prosecution anyway during a clinical trial. This is because, most trials are conducted double blind, so they wouldn't have any clue whether they were administering a real vaccine, or a placebo. It also gets the pharmaceutical company running the trial off the hook, as they don't know either?
Then something hit me, pretty much straight away after I pressed send. This is what I said:
Oh my god, that's why they're keeping it under trial conditions and still giving people placebos?
Well not the sole reason, but one of the many at least? Lol
What it definitely is however, is their legal loophole they'll use to get out of being prosecuted?
As soon as it's approved they're fucked, as soon as it's out from under the EUA's they're then bound by regular laws.
This was the legal indemnity they were looking for, not for when they're under the EUA's, because they would be under the clinical trial rules. When they're approved they aren't and that's the legal indemnity they needed?
That part never made sense to me, why they'd need immunity when it's not even been approved yet, just like the placebos still being dished out, never made sense either?
This way, they can still class it as a trial in court and then they're off the hook.
This created a line of thinking that, when he stated that it's just a matter of closing up that loophole, I was suddenly struck by the following:
I know... You star!
Can't believe it never even occurred to me before?
I never could understand why they needed the indemnity? If it's under a trial, they don't need it. When it's approved, they won't be under that protection. With the indemnity they get that protection still, well the government would have to pay. That's more what the EUA's are doing, not so much the pharmaceutical companies at this point?
Something occurred to me, as I was talking to a mate on here, about the life insurance claims for the vaccinated.
You see, back when the vaccines were being rolled out, I tackled this issue, in one of my YouTube videos and then, just like everyone else, got distracted by everything else and forgot about it.
This is what I said to him, after he asked me what happens if you die from the vax, with regards to life insurance:
I was saying this exact same thing, when they'd just brought the vaccines out, that the life insurance companies would refuse to pay out. Simply because you'd put your own life at risk, by taking an experimental drug.
How do you think that they got all those families, of the people that died, to stay quiet?
Technically, it's classed under the same clause as suicide, because when you commit suicide you willingly and consciously put yourself in a dangerous situation that ended your life. Therefore, if you have a regular life insurance policy, because high risk professions, usually have specialised life insurance, so they work a little differently, you'll end up nullifying your policy.
I don't know if it's the same in the US, but if you take part in a clinical trial over here, I don't think life insurance companies have ever paid out if you take part in a trial? It's why they used to pay you so much for taking part, along with the fact the government made them do it, until the beginning of 2020 funnily enough, when they changed the rules and pharmaceutical companies
didn't have to pay the massive fees anymore.
Funny that eh?
I'm sure it's just a coincidence though?
🤔🤫😶😳😁😳😶🤫🤔
He then asked me whether the people giving the shots etc, could be prosecuted for, 'Assisting your suicide'?
So i elaborated further:
No. Not really.
You see, like i said, it's only classed as suicide under the insurance policy, likely because it's such a random and unlikely cause of death really, that they didn't know how else to deal with it?
The lab techs / nurses / doctors, are given automatic immunity from prosecution anyway during a clinical trial. This is because, most trials are conducted double blind, so they wouldn't have any clue whether they were administering a real vaccine, or a placebo. It also gets the pharmaceutical company running the trial off the hook, as they don't know either?
Then something hit me, pretty much straight away after I pressed send. This is what I said:
Oh my god, that's why they're keeping it under trial conditions and still giving people placebos?
Well not the sole reason, but one of the many at least? Lol
What it definitely is however, is their legal loophole they'll use to get out of being prosecuted?
As soon as it's approved they're fucked, as soon as it's out from under the EUA's they're then bound by regular laws.
This was the legal indemnity they were looking for, not for when they're under the EUA's, because they would be under the clinical trial rules. When they're approved they aren't and that's the legal indemnity they needed?
That part never made sense to me, why they'd need immunity when it's not even been approved yet, just like the placebos still being dished out, never made sense either?
This way, they can still class it as a trial in court and then they're off the hook.
This created a line of thinking that, when he stated that it's just a matter of closing up that loophole, I was suddenly struck by the following:
I know... You star!
Can't believe it never even occurred to me before?
I never could understand why they needed the indemnity? If it's under a trial, they don't need it. When it's approved, they won't be under that protection. With the indemnity they get that protection still, well the government would have to pay. That's more what the EUA's are doing, not so much the pharmaceutical companies at this point?
These shots, they're never going to be approved, because that same legal protection that the trials give pharma, also extend to the government. Just in case someone attempts to circumvent the trials protections, by suing the government instead, which is basically what would happen, if it was approved anyway?
This way pharma, the trials personnel and the government, are all covered and protected by the clinical trial.
I'll need to speak to my lawyer friend and check, but if I'm right it means that everyone, who's had the shot, is up shit creak with no legal standing to build a case on!
They can't sue any of the parties, because it's a clinical trial! So prosecuting them might actually be completely impossible, because a judge will take one look at the case and say, "Well it was a clinical trial, case dismissed!" and that'd be it!
That's why Fuelmich is attacking the PCR, because if he can prove the testing is bogus, it proves that so is the virus, then there is no need for the trial as there isn't a virus to base the trial on!
No virus = no trial = illegal trial = illegal injections.
He just has to prove that they did all that, knowing that there wasn't a virus in the first place and basically, deliberately injected people with a known toxin, under the guise of a clinical trial? Which can also be considered as illegally, conducting human experimentation, using the false pretext of a global pandemic, under the Nuremberg code and according to international law.
The problem being, he has to prove that they deliberately used a fake test, to test for a fake virus, in order to justify those clinical trials, before he can attack them from any other standpoint.
No easy task.
This way pharma, the trials personnel and the government, are all covered and protected by the clinical trial.
I'll need to speak to my lawyer friend and check, but if I'm right it means that everyone, who's had the shot, is up shit creak with no legal standing to build a case on!
They can't sue any of the parties, because it's a clinical trial! So prosecuting them might actually be completely impossible, because a judge will take one look at the case and say, "Well it was a clinical trial, case dismissed!" and that'd be it!
That's why Fuelmich is attacking the PCR, because if he can prove the testing is bogus, it proves that so is the virus, then there is no need for the trial as there isn't a virus to base the trial on!
No virus = no trial = illegal trial = illegal injections.
He just has to prove that they did all that, knowing that there wasn't a virus in the first place and basically, deliberately injected people with a known toxin, under the guise of a clinical trial? Which can also be considered as illegally, conducting human experimentation, using the false pretext of a global pandemic, under the Nuremberg code and according to international law.
The problem being, he has to prove that they deliberately used a fake test, to test for a fake virus, in order to justify those clinical trials, before he can attack them from any other standpoint.
No easy task.
👍3
Sam Fisher (Data Drops) pinned «Life insurance when you're vaxed and it's further implications? Something occurred to me, as I was talking to a mate on here, about the life insurance claims for the vaccinated. You see, back when the vaccines were being rolled out, I tackled this issue…»
WEF stacking the deck against you! - High Impact Flix
I don't normally share any of Brian's stuff because, well... I'm still not sure about him?
Anyway...
I actually found this video of his, really quite funny!
So there you are?
😁
https://youtu.be/d8hVH1ahor4
I don't normally share any of Brian's stuff because, well... I'm still not sure about him?
Anyway...
I actually found this video of his, really quite funny!
So there you are?
😁
https://youtu.be/d8hVH1ahor4
Sam Fisher (Data Drops) pinned «WEF stacking the deck against you! - High Impact Flix I don't normally share any of Brian's stuff because, well... I'm still not sure about him? Anyway... I actually found this video of his, really quite funny! So there you are? 😁 https://youtu.be/d8hVH1ahor4»
https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2009/apr/19/ap-impact-tons-of-released-drugs-taint-us-water/
Sam was talking about drugs in the water, and I have been looking for this article for a while. They have been talking about since 2009.
Don’t know if this is any help?
Sam was talking about drugs in the water, and I have been looking for this article for a while. They have been talking about since 2009.
Don’t know if this is any help?
The Washington Times
AP IMPACT: Tons of released drugs taint US water
U.S. manufacturers, including major drugmakers, have legally released at least 271 million pounds of pharmaceuticals into waterways that often provide drinking water _ contamination the federal govern
👍1
Sam Fisher (Data Drops) pinned «https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2009/apr/19/ap-impact-tons-of-released-drugs-taint-us-water/ Sam was talking about drugs in the water, and I have been looking for this article for a while. They have been talking about since 2009. Don’t know if this…»
Sam Fisher (Data Drops) pinned «Rule By Secrecy - Jim Mars interview https://youtu.be/IE7_2RwVuI0»
The Observers
Hmm?
What starts off as your usual disclosure-lite affair, quickly devolves into pseudo-transhumanism, to Linda Moulton Howe?
Still, there is something of value to be found here. It's just you have to wade through mountains of tripe, stale fart and all that guff, to get there!
🤔
<iframe width="640" height="360" scrolling="no" frameborder="0" style="border: none;" src="https://www.bitchute.com/embed/xQuLbHcIvhsA/"></iframe>
Hmm?
What starts off as your usual disclosure-lite affair, quickly devolves into pseudo-transhumanism, to Linda Moulton Howe?
Still, there is something of value to be found here. It's just you have to wade through mountains of tripe, stale fart and all that guff, to get there!
🤔
<iframe width="640" height="360" scrolling="no" frameborder="0" style="border: none;" src="https://www.bitchute.com/embed/xQuLbHcIvhsA/"></iframe>
BitChute
The Observers (2021)
Sam Fisher (Data Drops) pinned «The Observers Hmm? What starts off as your usual disclosure-lite affair, quickly devolves into pseudo-transhumanism, to Linda Moulton Howe? Still, there is something of value to be found here. It's just you have to wade through mountains of tripe, stale…»