Genetically Engineered, Sound-Controlled Bacteria That Seek and Destroy Cancer Cells

Full blown DARPA developed DREADDS technology, has now gone mainstream!
Told you all it was on play and this article confirms it. It may no longer carry the same name, but this is them admitting it exists!
Sooner or later, they're going to have to admit where else it is being and indeed, already has been, used?


https://scitechdaily.com/genetically-engineered-sound-controlled-bacteria-that-seek-and-destroy-cancer-cells/

Why no deal is the only option to take?

A little bit of a history lesson, featuring interviews and lectures from high level, UK military joint chiefs of staff and strategic committee members, detailing the efforts the EU, through Theresa May, went through?
(It was also the first compilation video, I ever edited together. Still quite proud of what I managed to do, even now! 😎)
Not made any compilations for a good long while, as it got infuriating putting in all that effort editing them together, for YouTube to then take them down soon after!
Might have to start doing them again maybe?

https://youtu.be/mMJY5OHazcA

Agendas (pt 2): The Science is not settled, the argument is not done

Another classic compilation, removed after only 4 and a half hours by YouTube, so i put it up on ShitBoot instead!

<iframe width="640" height="360" scrolling="no" frameborder="0" style="border: none;" src="https://www.bitchute.com/embed/Z8jujTrnn02H/"></iframe>

The counter argument: The voice of the silent.

Another old compilation of mine, removed by YouTube when it was released, that BitChute got instead.

<iframe width="640" height="360" scrolling="no" frameborder="0" style="border: none;" src="https://www.bitchute.com/embed/xDgkt2HC8Q3G/"></iframe>

This isn't about a virus

This was another compilation that, like an Essex girls knickers, was taken down faster than a jet powered yo-yo.
All it did was point out the military connection to the covid narrative in the US, with footage of the massive army vehicle trains and troop movements across the US, along with the hidden quarryfulls of humvees, APC's, armoured trucks just outside of most major cities in the US too, so I've no idea why it was taken down at all?

<iframe width="640" height="360" scrolling="no" frameborder="0" style="border: none;" src="https://www.bitchute.com/embed/91JLXZnAXakp/"></iframe>

https://youtu.be/AbGtoc37rSc My latest video on the intelligence cycle

Uvalde, that footage and YouTube, what gives?

Since the, hour and a half long, footage of the Uvalde school shooting, was released on every social media platform with a video function, known to man a couple of nights ago, it's been bothering me?
You see there's a very glaringly apparent, nonsensical element with this whole thing and that's what occurred with YouTube.
Most, if not all of you, have experienced the censorship measures that YouTube employs and against seemingly the most arbitrary and inconsequential of infringements, on a regular basis. So, naturally, when that footage not only appeared on YouTube, but managed to gather millions of views without being taken down, something really did not add up for me and I was immediately suspicious.
Now I've heard any number of opinions on this, the most prevalent being, that they want to cause chaos between left and right, anti-gun and pro-gun, Democrat and Republican, etc etc. All in an effort to engineer a firearms ban in the US.
Now, admittedly that is a fairly valid and plausible line of reasoning... Which is the line that, thankfully, the majority of people are taking. (you should hear some of the takes I've heard... This:
🤦‍♂️
Doesn't come close to describing those explanations?)
However, doesn't this footage, kind of works against that narrative too?
Showing the ease at which the gunman was able to gain access to the school and the length of time he was left unchallenged?
I get what they're saying, but most people, who have children themselves (and this is true of most who would consider themselves democrat voters and anti-gun too!) are likely to reassess their opinions on guns and indeed are doing just that.
Like i said, it just has positive and negative aspects, each of an equally high degree of preference and this is true for all sides too.
The release of this footage and YouTube's inaction, can be viewed as being of huge benefit and also, paradoxically, a massive detriment, to either side of the argument. Because of this it can only be seen as, not really helping, or hindering either of them and in any real, or significant way, with both sides probably preferring no one saw it and it remain unreleased?
The fact that YouTube let it accrue as many views as it possibly could and in an incredibly short period of time, the channel I saw it on was easily past 400,000 views at least, when I saw it, I haven't checked recently but I believe it's still up on the platform too, only increases my suspicion.
So, again it makes absolutely no sense, because they'll know it doesn't help their agenda and is especially noticeable because of the strict and rapid deployment of those censorship methods, prior to this video.
Soooooo... Why're they doing that then, if it benefits no one?
Well...
The only thing that enters my mind, is that they know YouTube is still a massive hindrance to any narrative they attempt to portray and this will only continue, irrespective of how ever much censorship they employ?
People can be very creative, when it comes to finding ways that they can bypass the censorship algorithms?
This pandemic has proven to them, that YT's become, essentially, a liability and in an enormous way and this outweighs any kind of benefits they got for bolstering their narrative on the platform (which was it's intended goal, to help propagate propaganda!) then there's the other video platforms, YT's competition, to consider too. They're supposedly not under their control and allow their users to post what they like? When in reality, they're used to ghettoise those that they ban from YT, in order to keep an eye on them and what they're saying?
Non of their attempts to control the narrative with social media, have appeared to be working. This is a huge problem.
For a good while they've considered some social media platforms, including those that they created themselves, now as more of a threat, than as a useful or beneficial tool.

So what can they do to solve this problem?
They can't just outright pull the plug on it and for what will only look like to everyone, seemingly no good reason can they?
Why not?
Because that risks further exposing them and also turning more of the gerbils against them.
As always, in order to do it without drawing any kind of unwanted suspicion, they would need us to pull the plug for them, like a good little helper monkey and for that they would need the outrage mob to be sufficiently... Well... Outraged and demanding the head of YouTube on a plate!
Now, admittedly, this video alone probably isn't enough to warrant the levels of outrage needed for those standard, empassioned celebrity demands we also seem to see first and then that be rapidly followed by the resulting virtue signalling gerbilista's to cry out for a possible ban / some sort of takedown, of the platform, to be justified just yet?
I have a sneaking suspicion though, that this could perhaps be the beginning of their attempt at a planned demolition of social media video platforms. After all children and the easily offended may witness this kind of material and of course we must do everything to prevent that ever occurring... It's them that we must think about?

Why this Native American language was never to be written?

https://youtu.be/NOWmLKtR32Q