According to Docsend, the exchange comparison section was very popular. So, for ease, feel free to check out this 5-page extract, which only features the exchanges compared against each other.
Report: https://docsend.com/view/7i643ye9yzfqx6zs
Report: https://docsend.com/view/7i643ye9yzfqx6zs
❤5🤝5🔥2
Real Look at Listings: Charts Only
We took all the charts from our report and put them into this 20 page summary, with the hottest stuff at the start. This one should be easily digestible 🤝
Report: https://docsend.com/view/z8uwdvpch8fusjz5
We took all the charts from our report and put them into this 20 page summary, with the hottest stuff at the start. This one should be easily digestible 🤝
Report: https://docsend.com/view/z8uwdvpch8fusjz5
❤9🙏3🤝3
Polkadot just launched Agile Coretime, revamping how projects scale and use resources in the Polkadot 2.0 ecosystem.
Do you think the move to Polkadot 2.0 will give $DOT a shot at being top 10 coin by market cap?
Do you think the move to Polkadot 2.0 will give $DOT a shot at being top 10 coin by market cap?
❤6👎4👏3🥱1
Crypto is volatile, but our dedication to simplicity remains unshakeable. Thus, to further align our brand with our vision of elegance and professionalism, we have revamped our services, assets, and website.
🌍 You can find our client examples, updated services, and more on: www.simplicitygroup.xyz
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🔥8❤4 3
1️⃣ Let's do some quick maths:
• You're a new NFT marketplace on an unlaunched chain.
• You want to sell 5,000 Access Tier NFTs at $250 each.
• You charge 5% fees on transactions.
• You give 20% of that fee to NFT holders.
How much volume would you need to have in order to make your NFT buyers profitable?
$125M.
That's more than Opensea in the last 3 months, with a volume of $122.9M.
2️⃣ Now, let's do a quick thought experiment:
What do you think will happen when these NFT buyers realise it will take them ∞ months to become profitable?
You'll drown in FUD.
Token ⤵️
Reputation ⤵️
Your future ⤵️
Regulators 👊🚪
• You're a new NFT marketplace on an unlaunched chain.
• You want to sell 5,000 Access Tier NFTs at $250 each.
• You charge 5% fees on transactions.
• You give 20% of that fee to NFT holders.
How much volume would you need to have in order to make your NFT buyers profitable?
$125M.
That's more than Opensea in the last 3 months, with a volume of $122.9M.
2️⃣ Now, let's do a quick thought experiment:
What do you think will happen when these NFT buyers realise it will take them ∞ months to become profitable?
You'll drown in FUD.
Token ⤵️
Reputation ⤵️
Your future ⤵️
Regulators 👊🚪
❤6👍3👏3🔥1
Which type of token modelling is better for you?
→ Deterministic: $ w/ Excel. Ok for a high-level overview.
→ Stochastic: $$ w/ Machinations. Allows randomness and recursion to see how variables affect a token.
→ Agent-based: $$$ w/ cadCAD. Models individual actions with capacity for super complex systems.
Full article
→ Deterministic: $ w/ Excel. Ok for a high-level overview.
→ Stochastic: $$ w/ Machinations. Allows randomness and recursion to see how variables affect a token.
→ Agent-based: $$$ w/ cadCAD. Models individual actions with capacity for super complex systems.
Full article
👍6❤5🤝3
Can you spot the 2 problems?
1. Obvious - very short vestings. Inherently not a concern if the FDV is small and allocation minimal, but given the $30M FDV and average 22% allocation, can cause sell pressure problems.
Solution: lengthen vestings, or if raise confirmed already (like with our client above), then increase liquidity allocation to absorb selling.
2. Strategic round has less discount, but total vesting is almost half of Private, making the latter extremely unattractive.
Solution: lengthen Strategic vesting, as shortening Private would cause greater problems a la point 1.
1. Obvious - very short vestings. Inherently not a concern if the FDV is small and allocation minimal, but given the $30M FDV and average 22% allocation, can cause sell pressure problems.
Solution: lengthen vestings, or if raise confirmed already (like with our client above), then increase liquidity allocation to absorb selling.
2. Strategic round has less discount, but total vesting is almost half of Private, making the latter extremely unattractive.
Solution: lengthen Strategic vesting, as shortening Private would cause greater problems a la point 1.
❤6🔥3🤝1
Token holders (random traders, speculators, etc.) can be acquired very quickly & cheaply, and they add a lot of initial value (token holders, DAU, volume, TVL, lower sell pressure), however, you have limited time to get real users to take over token holders before the latter leave for a shinier project, dumping your token to $0.
Full article
Full article
❤7🔥6👍3
Dual token economies are useful in cases when your token, that typically will experience significant price volatility, needs to be stable. But how do you get around the conflict of interest between different token holders?
You have to tie their values together directly or indirectly - e.g. don't split up the token holders in governance proposals, or make the actions of one boost rewards for the other and vice versa.
Or force them.
Full article
You have to tie their values together directly or indirectly - e.g. don't split up the token holders in governance proposals, or make the actions of one boost rewards for the other and vice versa.
Or force them.
Full article
🤝6🆒5👍2