We’re actively investigating and taking steps to protect the future of $SKAI. As part of that, we’re planning to leave MEXC and are asking all holders to move on-chain. This will help us collect critical data and identify the early supporters who’ve been here since day one, and weed out anyone who manipulated things from behind an exchange account. All our community will be a part of what is next, but those who have been the most resilient and given us the time and space we need to make the next steps happen, will be at the forefront of our plans.

This is an important moment as we get ready for what’s next. We do not take steps lightly, and we are still here working. The last update taking longer did not help to keep people calm, but the refactors were essential to support dynamic agents and static workflows, as well as make way for larger platform integrations like; discord and whatsapp.

We have been making a great start on our b2b side, with the first clients from May already totalling over $150K, which compared to industry standards is objectively a lot for the first month of a revenue source, since that was never a goal until May. This also helps the platform, as a lot of the general solutions, can then be integrated into the platform. Ensuring the public side of the builder gets stronger with each deal we close. This month is looking to be even larger than may on that front.

We also did not forget our talk to build agents with others and do collaborative efforts. We do not half ass it, you can say "xyz got 20 partners" but what did they really do? What did they create that is useful? Our partners, the people we build with, are building things that do not just get pushed out of an announcement factory on a weekly basis. They take time, research, development effort. They will be worth the wait.

Introducing Passly - Our world coin competitor product

But it goes further than that. When designing something I can not share (BOOOO), the need for differentiating human participants vs AI / Agent actors was needed. For now, Passly only looks towards the human side, but the plan is to expand to having agentic testing and labelling systems too (New branding coming for live launch too, it is pretty snazzy)

https://passly.xyz?referral=XKPO0N1Y - Example with referral link. Please do not share this version though, we want to keep the big push for when it is live on main net.

This version of Passly is on testnet, so any passports made will need to be remade when we go live, but I wanted to give everyone a chance to try it early. As we are in testing, there is no biometric additions to it. There is just the base socials. This is a universal verification layer, so adding biometrics, more social accounts, and more, is coming.

To be clear, this is a VERIFICATION product, and the goals of this product is b2b, to allow other businesses to add verification checks to their systems. Note: We do not store any of these details in a database, the confirmation happens when you confirm your OAuth, and then that is hashed and stored. Only your account can see the details. In the future, products building with passly will be able to request that data e.g. your social details, but it is completely on you as the holder of your passport to decide to give that over, or not.

Physical card and devices are on the roadmap too, the email waitlist for that is on the site

Top 5 Use Cases for Passly

1. Anti-Sybil DeFi Governance
Problem: DAOs and DeFi protocols suffer from governance manipulation through multiple fake wallets
Solution: Verified social passports ensure "one person, one vote" in protocol decisions, treasury allocations, and airdrops

Market: $200B+ DeFi ecosystem needing legitimate governance

2. Fraud-Resistant Airdrop Distribution
Problem: 80%+ of airdrop recipients are bots/farmers gaming systems with multiple wallets
Solution: Social verification ensures tokens reach real humans, preventing multi-wallet exploitation
Market: $10B+ in annual airdrops seeking authentic distribution

3. Cross-Platform Reputation Systems
Problem: Users start from zero reputation on every new Web3 platform
Solution: Portable social credibility that follows users across dApps, enabling reputation-based lending and access
Market: Entire Web3 ecosystem needing trust mechanisms

4. Real-World Identity Bridge (NFC Cards)
Problem: No secure way to prove digital identity in physical spaces
Solution: NFC-enabled cards linking social passport to real-world verification for events, workspaces, and services
Market: $50B+ event/coworking industry + sharing economy

5. Professional Credential Verification
Problem: No way to verify authentic developers, creators, or professionals in Web3
Solution: GitHub commits, Twitter followers, and portfolio verification creating trusted professional networks

Market: $500B+ gig economy transitioning to Web3

TL;DR: Passly solves the fundamental "proof of humanity" problem that every Web3 application faces, creating a universal anti-sybil layer for the decentralized internet.

We have been working hard on the Q4 narrative and plan, we feel really confident that our platform is one of the most powerful out there, and even powerhouse multibillion dollar companies like n8n and Zapier, do not have an agentic framework like we do. So, technically I would not even say it is a direct comparison, as I think agents are the end goal. Workflows like theirs, are for specific tasks, but do not more forward agentic systems with real agency.

That said, we have shown off the first step of how to take this bigger through helping the x1e team. It is still an MVP, and we are working on it with these other teams, but it uses our framework, and showcases how you can build apps AROUND your agent. Also, most of the user accounts are up https://x.com/x1e/status/1960039473191985548, some a very significant amount depending on their settings. This is not easy to do, otherwise everyone would be doing it, and here we are. This and the Business-to-Business work we have been doing is vital. We have anther AI App coming soon, with the addition to mobile on the horizon. This is unorthodox, but we have good reason.

Usually, you would try to get developers to give feedback on how it works, and improve it. Then upgrade it, then get users in to test the parts that are supposed to be "simple". Obviously nothing is simple about this, and the reason we went a unique route is because we think it just works better. Our developers know the product, and the businesses know what they want, so who better to improve the product and how to make it more efficient, than the people who are building for a clear vision and understand the limitations and how to improve them. This means when we open the platform to developers, it will be what we envisioned. Alongside this, we have the non-technical side of the team using the AI builder, ensuring we understand how it can be made easier. If we do not understand the product inside and out, how can we help and collect user feedback. This combined with very targeted feedback (b2b work) has allowed us to create what we know is the most powerful AI builder on the market, for the largest range of people. Developers and enthusiasts will be able to create whole AI products with this framework, and no-code enthusiasts will be able to make some outstanding AI Agents.

Good things take time, and as I said earlier, we should have communicated these steps more so you all understood our mentality better. I thought it was clear, but that is obviously not how everyone else felt. One of my favourite builders in this space, recently made a post about one of their features that was almost never used, but they believed it was important for their vision. 3 YEARS later, it is being used by some of the biggest companies around https://x.com/0xngmi/status/1959676386429575517. We have seen "competitors" come and go, in rapid succession these last few years. We were told as their market caps climbed we should be more like them, but in the end, they all fizzled out and their founder took the money and ran. Higher valuation leads to more people losing when the delivery is not made.

We are getting to the stage now, where the platform exists. The framework exists. This means, no matter what, we can keep pushing. We will not "run out" before getting to a massive milestone. We have been delivering, and are about to deliver some of our biggest updates.

Communication

Do you want to hear founder thoughts? Just updates on the platform? Where we are in the visions and constant next steps?
Should this be once per fortnight? Per week? 2x per week? Is it ok for the discord posts to be more casual, and leave X for the more growth and "advertising" narratives? You can let us know here: https://tally.so/r/npQeDb

Expect more rapid updates and more spaces to come and talk about the platform.

Skillful competes alongside billion dollar companies, and the time to recognise that is coming.