The only political compass that matters

I've been corrected.

Ickism is the fool's Posadism.

I cry

Big difference between saying this and PICKING A COP FOR VP. If/when he gets removed from office for dementia related reasons we will set a new standard as a POLICE STATE.

Perseid meteor shower tonight. Enjoy.

Bunpile is a channel run by an active, rifle toting, community building, Kurdish revolutionary. He is compassionate and insightful. He is very likely to die in a firefight protecting the autonomy of his region and his people. These are his words.

I don't want to create more infighting but...

I see a lot of folks around, and i personally have some friends, that while defining themselves as "Anarchist", at the same time they oppose (or directly refuse) the argument that we should be able to inflict extreme violence to the elements in our society that are actively trying to eliminate us.

A lot of them define themselves (and we should also define them in such way) as "Punk-anarchist" or some other dumb label.
They embrace the ideology without having a clear understanding of the basic values and concepts of it. They are not willing to fight for it, and they mentality refuse to understand it more deeply.
Their ideological approach is completely corrupted by their liberal mentality, they use the ideology as a way to personalize more their (probably shallow) personality. These individuals should not be taken in consideration and shall be ostracized and removed from our dialog, they are not comrades, they are liberal in disguise, they are wearing the symbols without being willing to give blood for them.

Others, while being anarchist, so while having a more clear and genuine understanding of the ideology, they still fall in the same trap.
The root of the problem still lays in the liberal ideology that surround us and is deep marked in our brain. But it's still possible to leave this mental trap, the only way is to understand deeply what is liberalism and in which way it affects our mind. There's no such things as Pacifist-anarchism, pacifism itself as a form of struggle against the system is a lie.
The idea that we are able to struggle against the system without the use of violence is a malicious idea that the system itself (Capitalist modernity) wants to spread with its official ideology (liberalism).
It's not obvious that a system that maintains with all its strength the monopoly on violence would profit by spreading the lie that non-violence could be the answer?

I laugh when i find "comrades" that think that dehumanizig the enemy is wrong and at the same time they call themselves revolutionary or at least they say that they would support a revolution as a way to impose our system.

We cannot fall in the wrong mindset of considering the enemy human, how can the enemy be even human?
The financial elites and their drones are, consciously or not, actively working in destroying the planet and our society, they want to erase the moral values that define our essence as human beings and they want to replace them with false values in order to support and stabilize the system that keep them in place.

It's clear that the continuing of capitalist modernity will cause our extinction, by creating a natural catastrophe and by erasing our natural moral values.
So how can we see them as members of our race? They are a malicious parasitic element inside us. And this kind parasites should be eliminated before it is too late.
It's not a matter of violence, it's a matter of self defense.

We have to understand that if we are willingly talking about revolutionary struggle, we must accept the revolutionary reality of it. If you are not willing to take up a rifle, if you are not even willing to accept the truth that you will be required to do violence, what revolutionary are you?
The sooner we resolve and we escape from this mental trap of Pacifism and non commitment the better, the time for saving our race and our society is not infinite.

The noblest fate that a human should pursue is to use his own invidual mortal self in order to save, protect and maintain the collective well-being of the human race and planet

I have mixed feelings about this, but feel there is insight to be gained in analyzing where my views differ and why they may differ.

I'd first like to agree that people demanding pacifism of a movement are not to be trusted. Strict pacifists are willing to die to see that the oppressing class is unharmed, and not willing to intervene to protect an oppressed class. This puts them firmly in the camp of the oppressors.

However, dismissing nonviolent individuals as wholly ineffective liberal infiltration ignores the effectiveness of underground railroads, information warfare, community support, and labor sabotage. All forms of resistance are valid so long as all participants are willing to support one another. In a setting where acts of physical resistance are provoked as a way to excuse executions and incarceration, nonviolent resistance becomes the predominant form of resistance.