❗️Russia's response to the Kiev regime's use of long-range missiles on the country's territory will be adequate and tangible, the Russian Foreign Ministry stated

📌Subscribe to @SputnikInt

❗️Russian Foreign Ministry's key statements on the information about Ukraine being allowed to strike deep into Russia with Western weapons:

▪️If Ukraine strikes Russia with long-range Western missiles, it will radically change the essence of the conflict;

▪️Kiev's use of missiles to attack Russian territory will mean direct participation by the US and its allies in the conflict against Russia, the ministry added;

▪️Moscow does not yet know whether the information about Ukraine being allowed to strike deep into Russia with Western weapons is based on official sources;

▪️No Western "miracle weapon" is capable of influencing the course of the special operation.

📌Subscribe to @SputnikInt

White House mumbles when asked to confirm US approval on deep strikes on Russia

The White House has failed to directly confirm reports that the Biden administration has allowed Ukraine to use ATACMS missiles to strike Russian territory.

US Deputy National Security Adviser Jonathan Finer evaded questions from reporters about Biden's authorization during a briefing on the sidelines of the G20 Summit in Rio de Janeiro.

"I am not confirming any decisions that have or have not been made about US assistance when it comes to these operational questions," Finer said.

Finer elaborated that the US government makes political decisions "based on the circumstances" on the battlefield.

“The United States has been clear throughout this conflict that we will make our policy decisions based on the circumstances we identify on the battlefield, including in recent days and weeks,” Finer said vaguely.

📌Subscribe to @SputnikInt

The US, UK and Australia have signed an agreement to jointly test hypersonic weapons as part of the AUKUS partnership, the Pentagon said.

📌Subscribe to @SputnikInt

Rising gas prices to curb Europe's economic growth in 2025 – energy expert

"The gas dynamics in 2025 will be influenced by a tighter gas market as a result of rising global demand, particularly from China and the Asia-Pacific region, Trump’s tariffs and EU boycotting Russian gas and also a cold winter," Dr. Mamdouh G. Salameh, an international oil economist and a global energy expert, tells Sputnik.

Salameh projects that European consumers will see a price rise of 3%-5% from €37-€38 ($39-$40) per megawatt-hour (MWh) in 2025.

Presently, gas prices have exceeded $500 per thousand cubic meters in Europe, with European gas futures reaching around €46 ($48.6) per MWh as Russia suspended fuel deliveries to Austria's OMV.

“The recent spike in gas prices in Europe is due to worry about gas supplies in this coming winter particularly if it is a cold winter”, Salameh continues. “At the heart of this worry is the expiration of the contract on January 1 between Ukraine and Gazprom allowing shipments of Russian gas via Ukraine.”

"There is another major factor, namely the head of the EU Commission Ursula von der Leyden talking about total banning of both Russian piped gas and LNG,” continues the pundit.

“However, increases in EU imports of American LNG will cause the economic outlook for the EU economy to worsen further, particularly that the price of US LNG is estimated at 2-3 times higher than Russian piped gas. The EU projected economic growth in 2024 is 0.5% but it is doubtful it will make it."

📌Subscribe to @SputnikInt

AI shouldn't be allowed to push a nuclear button – military expert

US President Joe Biden and his Chinese counterpart, Chairman Xi Jinping, agreed on November 16 that humans, not artificial intelligence (AI), should control nuclear weapons. There is a good reason for that, given that the two powers are increasingly competing in the AI field, Alexei Leonkov, a veteran Russian military analyst, tells Sputnik.

"Even in the most peaceful scenario, sooner or later AI will unleash a global war in which most of humanity will perish," Leonkov says.

Leonkov notes that the US military started to use AI in the army from 2018. It was expected that the tool could be integrated into nuclear deterrence architecture, including intelligence, surveillance and reconnaissance systems and even nuclear command, control and communications.

However, authorities soon realized that AI is prone to errors and can be disrupted by cyber-attacks or confused by incoming contradictory data. It also has limitations when it comes to decision-making in a chaotic battlefield environment, the expert points out. "In these conditions, artificial intelligence does not work at all," he says.

"Therefore, putting [AI] into service, given all the shortcomings that it has, is pure madness," the pundit says.

"[While] Americans, give [AI] the right to make decisions... [Russians] use artificial intelligence not as the main and dominant technology, but as an auxiliary one," Leonkov concludes.

📌Subscribe to @SputnikInt

THROWBACK: Vladimir Putin said nuclear energy and artificial intelligence pose a threat, stressing that the main question is how to use them.

"There are nuclear weapons, that pose great threats to humanity. It is the same with artificial intelligence. The question is how to regulate this and how people use it.," the Russian president said.

📌Subscribe to @SputnikInt

❗️Ukraine has received permission from the US to strike deep into Russia "up to 300 km," EU foreign policy chief Josep Borrell has said.

📌Subscribe to @SputnikInt

Ukraine’s plans to strike deep into Russia with ATACMS missiles: What is the catch?

As the US reportedly green-lights Ukraine to use ATACMS for long-range strikes deep into Russian territory, questions arise: does Kiev have what it takes to conduct such attacks and how can Russia counter them?

1. Russia has advanced air defenses

Various Russian air defense systems such as Buk-M2, Buk-M3 and Tor-M2 have successfully intercepted ATACMS on more than one occasion, Alexei Leonkov, a veteran Russian military analyst, tells Sputnik.

“Russian air defense systems have a very high intercept probability rate. Where our systems spend one missile per target, American Patriot systems use two missiles to accomplish the same task.”

2. The West doesn’t have enough long-range missiles

Though the US and its allies have been generous in their military supplies to Ukraine, little has been left of what stocks of ATACMS, Storm Shadow and Scalp missiles that were provided to Kiev, Leonkov says.

“Even the shipments of F-16 jets that can be used to launch Storm Shadow missiles did not reverse this trend,” he remarks. “The number of launches has been dwindling and has practically reached zero by now.”

Prior to the escalation of the Ukrainian conflict in February 2022, the West possessed over 3,000 ATACMS missiles (including all of their available modifications), Leonkov estimates. With all the ATACMS missiles that have since been used up in the Ukrainian conflict or simply decommissioned due to their advanced age, that number has been reduced to somewhere between 1,500 and 2,000, he calculates.

3. West doesn’t have enough missile launchers either

Lack of missiles aside, Ukraine suffers from a lack of missile launchers as well, Leonkov remarks.

The problem, he explains, stems from the fact that the West supplied a very limited amount of weapon systems capable of launching ATAMCS - such as HIMARS, MLRS and MARS.

Meanwhile, Russian forces have been very effective in tracking down these weapons using counter-battery radars and destroying them using tactical missile systems of their own.

📌Subscribe to @SputnikInt

The US State Department is currently unable to confirm a change in US policy on allowing Ukraine to launch long-range weapons strikes against Russia.

📌Subscribe to @SputnikInt

▪️Ukraine’s plans to strike deep into Russia with ATACMS missiles: What is the catch?

▪️Biden’s nod for Ukraine’s strikes deep into Russia: How world reacts

▪️Biden’s APEC Summit visit results in ‘one more backhanded slap in face to Western empire’

▪️AI shouldn't be allowed to push a nuclear button – military expert

▪️Rising gas prices to curb Europe's economic growth in 2025 – energy expert

▪️Sizing up the G20's economic power as the Group’s summit kicks off in Brazil

📌Subscribe to @SputnikInt

Why does Russia’s Su-57 fighter jet get the better of the US’ F-35?

Russia’s Su-57 fifth-generation fighter jet recently made a splash at an international air show in the Chinese city of Zhuhai. What is so unique about this warplane’s characteristics and why does it outshine the US-made F-35?

▪️The Su-57 significantly surpasses the F-35 in terms of weapons (various short, medium and long-range air-to-air missiles plus guided aerial bombs against a small array of air-to-air missiles and bombs), speed (2,600 km per hour against 1,900) and maneuverability, experts say.

▪️The Su-57’s advantage is the latest Russian long-range missile R-37M, which has already been effectively used in the special operation.

▪️The missile allows the Su-57 to hit air targets at a distance twice as large as the F-35, according to the Military Watch magazine.

Russian military expert Alexey Leonkov said that the Su-57’s stealth features don’t affect its speed and maneuverability. According to him, the warplane can carry all types of serial weapons as well as new types of munitions, for example, the Kinzhal (lit. Dagger) missiles.

Notably, the one-seater Su-57 has a “second pilot” option, an AI system that helps a pilot monitor the operation of all units of the warplane when he is engaged in combat work, per Leonkov.

Head of the Sukhoi Design Bureau Mikhail Strelets explained that the F-35 was designed with a focus on its capabilities to strike ground targets, but lacks acceleration and maneuverability, while the Su-57 is a versatile fighter jet capable of fulfilling multiple roles.

📌Subscribe to @SputnikInt