Sputnik International
🇷🇺🪖More statements from the Russian Defense Ministry's weekly briefing on the special military operation's progress:
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🫡34👍24❤5🔥5
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
'Why wouldn't you want to hear from the other side?' - US journo on EU ban of Sputnik and RT
The journalist to whom Edward Snowden gave his dossier in 2013 noted that the European Union "didn't want their citizens hearing any information from the Russian perspective."
📌 Subscribe to @SputnikInt
"One of the very first steps they [EU] took legislatively was to ban the platforming, to criminalize the platforming of Russian media like RT and Sputnik," Glenn Greenwald said in an interview with Tucker Carlson.
The journalist to whom Edward Snowden gave his dossier in 2013 noted that the European Union "didn't want their citizens hearing any information from the Russian perspective."
"You can think whatever you want about Russia, but why wouldn't you want to hear from the other side?" he asked.
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
👍66👌8🫡1
Russia’s Oreshnik strike is ‘sending a message’: How has the West reacted?
Western politicians and media have erupted in a flurry of responses to Russia’s Oreshnik medium-range hypersonic ballistic missile strike on a Ukrainian defense manufacturer. The move was announced by President Vladimir Putin as a response to US and British weapon strikes on Russian territory.
What has the media said?
⚪️ AP: Russia was “sending a message.” “Signaling — signaling to the Ukrainians. We’ve got stuff that outrages you. But really signaling to the West ‘We’re happy to enter into a competition around intermediate range ballistic missile. P.S.: These could be nuclear tipped. Do you really want to take that risk?’”
⚪️ Washington Post: Russian employment of novel firepower is a “threat of more to come”;
⚪️ New York Times: Russia’s use of a missile from its strategic arsenal to target a site within range of conventional weapons was meant as “clear warning” to Kiev and its Western patrons;
⚪️ Forbes: “After warning US officials of its intention to launch, Russia lobbed a mysterious new ballistic missile,” adding that the attack came “in retaliation for Ukraine’s own deep strikes targeting arms depots and command posts in western Russia”;
⚪️ BBC: Use of the Oreshnik was “symbolically important.” This was a “reminder that Russia has a wider arsenal of different and larger missile types and is ready to develop more,” it quoted a military scholar as saying;
⚪️ Le Parisien: Putin’s stern face left no doubt: Russia is “ready” for all scenarios in the West’s proxy conflict.
What have politicians said?
🗣 Olaf Scholz: Russia's missile strike was a “terrible escalation,” adding that Germany has to work with its allies “to do what prevents an escalation in this war to a war between Russia and NATO”;
🗣 Viktor Orban: “If the president says something in Russia, these are not empty words. This is not a communications ploy.” He emphasized that countries providing military assistance to Ukraine must exercise prudence, “otherwise there may be problems”;
🗣 Keir Starmer: The strike was “reckless and dangerous,” omitting the fact that UK-made Storm Shadow missiles had attacked Russia's Bryansk and Kursk regions, triggering the Russian response;
🗣 White House: The US “will not alter its policy regarding the Ukraine conflict”;
📌 Subscribe to @SputnikInt
Western politicians and media have erupted in a flurry of responses to Russia’s Oreshnik medium-range hypersonic ballistic missile strike on a Ukrainian defense manufacturer. The move was announced by President Vladimir Putin as a response to US and British weapon strikes on Russian territory.
What has the media said?
What have politicians said?
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🔥41😁18👍14🤔1
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
❤67👍26🔥9🫡2
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
👍48❤3😁1
Russia’s strike on a Ukrainian defense facility using its new Oreshnik hypersonic medium-range ballistic missile is a “a serious warning to NATO,” Robinson Farinazzo, a retired Brazilian officer, told Sputnik.
He underscored that US President Joe Biden crossed "a red line" by authorizing the Kiev regime to strike Russia with long-range American weapons. "Moscow is perfectly aware that this type of attack, technically difficult, can only be carried out with the support of NATO, in this case the US," he said.
Other analysts agree:
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
👍68❤9🔥3👌3🫡3
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
👍59👌13❤2
Hezbollah fighters struck an Israeli Air Force technical personnel training base in Haifa with a series of rockets, the movement announced.
The base is located 35 kilometers from the Lebanese border.
📌 Subscribe to @SputnikInt
The base is located 35 kilometers from the Lebanese border.
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
❤63👍21💩3
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
How US deploys previously-banned medium-range missiles in Europe and Asia-Pacific
Russia developed intermediate-range missiles in response to US withdrawal from the Intermediate-Range Nuclear (INF) Treaty and deployment of the previously banned weapons with a range of between 500 and 5,000 km in Europe and the Asia-Pacific region, Russian President Vladimir Putin noted on November 21 after the launch of Russia's newest Oreshnik hypersonic ballistic missile.
Where are US mid-range missile installations planned or already located?
Europe
◼️ Deveselu Military Base, Romania the US Aegis Ashore Ballistic Missile Defense System, which is potentially capable of firing the Tomahawk land-attack cruise missiles with a maximum striking range of 2,500 km
◼️ Redzikowo Military Base, Poland the US Aegis Ashore Ballistic Missile Defense System potentially capable of launching Tomahawk cruise missiles
◼️ Wiesbaden Multi-Domain Task Force, Germany starting from 2026 will be capable of launching:
➖ Tomahawk cruise missiles
➖ Raytheon Standard Missile 6 (SM6) missiles with a range of up to 460 km
➖ Lockheed Martin Long-Range Hypersonic Weapon (LRHW) or Dark Eagle (over 2,770 km)
Asia-Pacific
◼️ Laoag, northern Philippines the Lockheed Martin Mid-Range Capability (MRC) Typhon missile system capable of launching:
➖ SM6 missiles
➖ Tomahawk cruise missiles
◼️ Japan
➖ Japan is due to receive 400 US-made Tomahawk Block 4 and Block 5 cruise missiles with a range of up to 1,600 km between 2025 and 2027. Eight Japanese Aegis destroyers will be armed with Tomahawks.
◼️ Guam, a US territory the US Aegis Ashore Ballistic Missile Defense System potentially capable of launching Tomahawk cruise missiles
◼️ In April, the Pentagon announced plans to deploy Typhon land-based launchers for Tomahawks and SM-6s in the region, with the Asahi Shimbun newspaper naming Japan and Guam as potential sites.
◼️ In September, the Pentagon showed interest in deploying the Typhon missile system to Japan, under the pretext of joint military exercises.
📌 Subscribe to @SputnikInt
Russia developed intermediate-range missiles in response to US withdrawal from the Intermediate-Range Nuclear (INF) Treaty and deployment of the previously banned weapons with a range of between 500 and 5,000 km in Europe and the Asia-Pacific region, Russian President Vladimir Putin noted on November 21 after the launch of Russia's newest Oreshnik hypersonic ballistic missile.
Where are US mid-range missile installations planned or already located?
Europe
Asia-Pacific
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
👍37💩17👎8🌚3❤2🔥2
Schmidt fled to Belarus in early May after facing political persecution in Poland. On May 7, he said he was seeking political asylum in Minsk. On May 15, he was arrested in absentia for three months on espionage charges by a Polish court. In early June, Interpol refused to issue a red notice against Schmidt, as it does not allow the processing of data through its channels for actions against the security of the state, which are considered political crimes.
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
👍63❤8🤔1
Russian President Vladimir Putin’s Thursday speech unveiling the Oreshnik missile left Western observers scrambling to decode the meaning behind its name, which translates to 'hazel' - a flowering plant in the birch family.
But anyone familiar with Russian weapons design knows that there’s nothing Russian engineers enjoy more than giving their terrifying creations names that sound deceptively harmless or mundane:
Deadly bouquets and children’s stories
This includes Russia’s lineup of artillery, like the 2S1 Gvozdika (lit. ‘Carnation’), 2S3 Akatsiya (Acacia), 2S4 Tyulpan (Tulip), 2S5 Giatsint (Hyacinth), 2S7 Pion (Peony) - which shoots nuclear artillery rounds, and the 2B9 Vasilek (Cornflower) gun-mortar.
Animals, smiles, grumps, goblins and orphans
Grandmas and little ballerinas
👉🏻 Part 2
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
👍50❤8😁5🔥1💩1
NATO weapons names: wrapped up in images of power, glory, shock and awe
These names stand in stark contrast to those bestowed on many of NATO's more pretentious and grandiose-sounding armaments, with the US weapon-naming tradition in particular seemingly aimed at evoking ancient empires and great conquerors, or striking terror in the hearts and minds of the enemy.
Birds of prey
Swords and flesh-eating animals
👉🏻 Part 1
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
👍37😁7👌5❤1💩1
Sputnik International
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Hyacinths, peonies, cornflowers, and carnations aren't just wonderful, sweet-smelling flowers; they're also the names of some of Russia's deadliest weapons systems.
On Thursday, Russia added the Oreshnik (lit. Hazel) hypersonic missile system to the list.
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
👍60❤11🫡3
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
👍54❤15🫡5
Sputnik International
Putin congratulated the Ministry of Defense leadership on the successful testing of the Oreshnik complex.
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
❤55👌18👍10🫡5
Sputnik International
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
👍54❤17🫡6
Sputnik International
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
👍60❤6🫡5
🇷🇺 Vladimir Putin held a meeting at the Kremlin with the leadership of the Ministry of Defense. Here are the key statements:
🔸 The achievements and pace of development of the Oreshnik missile system inspire pride and admiration
🔸 Russia already has a stockpile of Oreshnik missiles
🔸 The country will continue testing this complex
🔸 The results and speed of Oreshnik development demonstrate that the domestic missile engineering school is fully capable of ensuring Russia's sovereignty
🔸 The Oreshnik system is not a modernization of old Soviet systems but a product of specialists from the new Russia
🔸 Developments like the Oreshnik system are of vital importance to Russia
🔸 It is significant that Russia already possesses the Oreshnik system today, unlike other nations
🔸 The Oreshnik system is another guarantor of Russia's sovereignty and territorial integrity
🔸 When used en masse against enemy targets, the Oreshnik system is comparable to strategic weaponry
🔸 There is currently no countermeasure to the Oreshnik system, and its testing will continue
🔸 A decision on the serial production of the Oreshnik system has been made and is practically underway
🔸 Several systems similar to Oreshnik are undergoing testing in Russia
📌 Subscribe to @SputnikInt
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
❤66👍12🫡5
Sputnik International
🇷🇺 Vladimir Putin held a meeting at the Kremlin with the leadership of the Ministry of Defense. Here are the key statements: 🔸 The achievements and pace of development of the Oreshnik missile system inspire pride and admiration 🔸 Russia already has a…
During a meeting with President Vladimir Putin, Sergei Karakayev, Commander of the Russian Strategic Rocket Forces, highlighted the unparalleled capabilities of the Oreshnik missile system.
He confirmed that recent tests validated the system's technical solutions and performance characteristics.
Karakayev emphasized that the Oreshnik has no global analogs and is capable of striking targets across all of Europe.
He proposed the adoption of the system into Russia's arsenal, a recommendation approved by President Putin.
📌 Subscribe to @SputnikInt
He confirmed that recent tests validated the system's technical solutions and performance characteristics.
Karakayev emphasized that the Oreshnik has no global analogs and is capable of striking targets across all of Europe.
He proposed the adoption of the system into Russia's arsenal, a recommendation approved by President Putin.
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
👍66❤14🫡6👌2
Pepe Escobar: Oreshnik - the 3 km per second plot twist
The “hypersonic demo” Russia gave NATO and its client regime in Kiev with the combat test firing of the Oreshnik hypersonic intermediate-range missile at a major aerospace and defense enterprise in Ukraine on Thursday is a major gamechanger, says Sputnik columnist Pepe Escobar.
Putin’s televised address in the strike’s aftermath “established that Russia in fact used a completely new medium range (1,000 to 3,000 km) missile, the Oreshnik (‘Hazelnut’). Even US officials admitted it’s an ‘experimental’ system; that implies they knew something about it. Putin himself also referred to ‘combat testing’. What is established beyond any testing, in Putin’s own words, is that ‘Hazelnut’ may be sent as a gift to any target across NATO,” the international affairs observer emphasized.
“Oreshnik is as badass as missiles get,” Escobar added. “It may reach the UK in only 19 minutes; Brussels in 14; Berlin in 11; and Warsaw in 8 minutes. And, of course, traveling at over Mach 10, it simply cannot be intercepted by anything in the collective West arsenal. That includes the US.”
“High destructive power is a given – already guaranteed by the surprise factor; you only know what hits you after you get hit (maybe),” he noted. “Oreshnik in fact is a tacit demo that Russia does not need nuclear power to solve anything in the Ukrainian theater of war.”
📌 Subscribe to @SputnikInt
The “hypersonic demo” Russia gave NATO and its client regime in Kiev with the combat test firing of the Oreshnik hypersonic intermediate-range missile at a major aerospace and defense enterprise in Ukraine on Thursday is a major gamechanger, says Sputnik columnist Pepe Escobar.
Putin’s televised address in the strike’s aftermath “established that Russia in fact used a completely new medium range (1,000 to 3,000 km) missile, the Oreshnik (‘Hazelnut’). Even US officials admitted it’s an ‘experimental’ system; that implies they knew something about it. Putin himself also referred to ‘combat testing’. What is established beyond any testing, in Putin’s own words, is that ‘Hazelnut’ may be sent as a gift to any target across NATO,” the international affairs observer emphasized.
“Oreshnik is as badass as missiles get,” Escobar added. “It may reach the UK in only 19 minutes; Brussels in 14; Berlin in 11; and Warsaw in 8 minutes. And, of course, traveling at over Mach 10, it simply cannot be intercepted by anything in the collective West arsenal. That includes the US.”
“High destructive power is a given – already guaranteed by the surprise factor; you only know what hits you after you get hit (maybe),” he noted. “Oreshnik in fact is a tacit demo that Russia does not need nuclear power to solve anything in the Ukrainian theater of war.”
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
❤58👍26🔥2