🆃🅲🅽 ⸗Λʟᴘʜᴀ⸗ 🆂ᴏᴠᴇʀᴇɪɢɴ – Telegram
🆃🅲🅽 ⸗Λʟᴘʜᴀ⸗ 🆂ᴏᴠᴇʀᴇɪɢɴ
28 subscribers
88 photos
51 videos
118 links
Sov's custom post's channel.
Download Telegram
Twitter Files 3

41. Meanwhile, there are multiple instances of involving pro-Biden tweets warning Trump “may try to steal the election” that got surfaced, only to be approved by senior executives. This one, they decide, just “expresses concern that mailed ballots might not make it on time.”

﴾ꕷѺṾⵟⱤⵟÌĠṆ﴿
Twitter Files 3

42. “THAT’S UNDERSTANDABLE”: Even the hashtag #StealOurVotes – referencing a theory that a combo of Amy Coney Barrett and Trump will steal the election – is approved by Twitter brass, because it’s “understandable” and a “reference to… a US Supreme Court decision.”

﴾ꕷѺṾⵟⱤⵟÌĠṆ﴿
Twitter Files 3

43. In this exchange, again unintentionally humorous, former Attorney General Eric Holder claimed the U.S. Postal Service was “deliberately crippled,”ostensibly by the Trump administration. He was initially hit with a generic warning label, but it was quickly taken off by Roth:

﴾ꕷѺṾⵟⱤⵟÌĠṆ﴿
Twitter Files 3

44. Later in November 2020, Roth asked if staff had a “debunk moment” on the “SCYTL/Smartmantic vote-counting” stories, which his DHS contacts told him were a combination of “about 47” conspiracy theories:

﴾ꕷѺṾⵟⱤⵟÌĠṆ﴿
Twitter Files 3

45. On December 10th, as Trump was in the middle of firing off 25 tweets saying things like, “A coup is taking place in front of our eyes,” Twitter executives announced a new “L3 deamplification” tool. This step meant a warning label now could also come with deamplification:

﴾ꕷѺṾⵟⱤⵟÌĠṆ﴿
Twitter Files 3

46. Some executives wanted to use the new deamplification tool to silently limit Trump’s reach more right away, beginning with the following tweet:

﴾ꕷѺṾⵟⱤⵟÌĠṆ﴿
👍1
Twitter Files 3

47. However, in the end, the team had to use older, less aggressive labeling tools at least for that day, until the “L3 entities” went live the following morning.

﴾ꕷѺṾⵟⱤⵟÌĠṆ﴿
Twitter Files 3

48. The significance is that it shows that Twitter, in 2020 at least, was deploying a vast range of visible and invisible tools to rein in Trump’s engagement, long before J6. The ban will come after other avenues are exhausted

49. In Twitter docs execs frequently refer to “bots,” e.g. “let’s put a bot on that.” A bot is just any automated heuristic moderation rule. It can be anything: every time a person in Brazil uses “green” and “blob” in the same sentence, action might be taken.

﴾ꕷѺṾⵟⱤⵟÌĠṆ﴿
Twitter Files 3

50. In this instance, it appears moderators added a bot for a Trump claim made on Breitbart. The bot ends up becoming an automated tool invisibly watching both Trump and, apparently, Breitbart (“will add media ID to bot”). Trump by J6 was quickly covered in bots.

51. There is no way to follow the frenzied exchanges among Twitter personnel from between January 6thand 8th without knowing the basics of the company’s vast lexicon of acronyms and Orwellian unwords.

﴾ꕷѺṾⵟⱤⵟÌĠṆ﴿
Twitter Files 3

52. To “bounce” an account is to put it in timeout, usually for a 12-hour review/cool-off:

53. “Interstitial,” one of many nouns used as a verb in Twitterspeak (“denylist” is another), means placing a physical label atop a tweet, so it can’t be seen.

﴾ꕷѺṾⵟⱤⵟÌĠṆ﴿
Twitter Files 3

[Image connected to this post]
54. PII has multiple meanings, one being “Public Interest Interstitial,” i.e. a covering label applied for “public interest” reasons. The post below also references “proactive V,” i.e. proactive visibility filtering.

55. This is all necessary background to J6. Before the riots, the company was engaged in an inherently insane/impossible project, trying to create an ever-expanding, ostensibly rational set of rules to regulate every conceivable speech situation that might arise between humans.

56. This project was preposterous yet its leaders were unable to see this, having become infected with group thing, coming to believe – sincerely – that it was Twitter's responsibility to control, as much as possible, what people could talk about, how often, and with whom.

57. The firm’s executives on day 1 of the January 6th crisis at least tried to pay lip service to its dizzying array of rules. By day 2, they began wavering. By day 3, a million rules were reduced to one: what we say, goes

﴾ꕷѺṾⵟⱤⵟÌĠṆ﴿
⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯
So John Podesta’s niece was on Twitter’s Trust and Safety Council…
⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯
➠Confirmation Article

Twitter Files Part 3 shows Lesley Podesta, who served on the Twitter censorship board ("Trust & Safety") was behind censorship efforts re: child trafficking etc. John Podesta's niece. Musk just said the coverup is a CRIME.

﴾ꕷѺṾⵟⱤⵟÌĠṆ﴿
The left is trying to make excuses for their handlers that censor conservative, Republican, Anons, researchers etc.

[Argument]
➠Twitter is a private company and they can censor whoever they want.

[Reply]
➠Twitter is a private company. Let's think about a local small business for a moment. When you enter this small business you don’t lose your rights and that business has no authority to take your rights. That business can choose not to do business with me and they can ask me to leave.

➠Twitter is a public square. I can enter onto that platform and yes Twitter can ask me to leave or they can kick me out. They can’t take away my right to speak though.Twitter makes money by targeting ads to me, so I am a paying customer on that platform. I have the same rights as a paying customer in any business. Private businesses must be mindful of human rights laws that outlaw discriminatory practices. Shadow banning just because you have different politics than them in a public square where politics and debates are discussed should be discrimination or subversion of your rights. Lets say there's a restaurant and its a leftist restaurant. When a leftist orders a steak they get a whole ribeye. If a conservative orders the same steak for the same price but they cut off half of it first and don't tell you. That's discrimination and that's what shadow banning is.
⭑⭑⭑⭑⭑⭑⭑⭑⭑⭑⭑⭑⭑⭑⭑⭑⭑⭑⭑⭑⭑⭑⭑⭑⭑⭑⭑

﴾ꕷѺṾⵟⱤⵟÌĠṆ﴿
Lɪғᴇ ɪꜱ Bʀᴜᴛᴀʟ, Bᴜᴛ Bᴇᴀᴜᴛɪғᴜʟ
The Mother of all Economic Crises
written by ron paul

Nouriel Roubini, a former advisor to the International Monetary Fund and member of President Clinton’s Council of Economic Advisors, was one of the few “mainstream” economists to predict the collapse of the housing bubble. Now Roubini is warning that the staggering amounts of debt held by individuals, businesses, and the government will soon lead to the “mother of all economic crises.”

Roubini properly blames the creation of a debt-based economy on the near-or-at-zero interest rate and quantitative easing policies pursued by the Federal Reserve and other central banks. The inevitable result of the zero-interest and quantitative easing policies is price inflation wreaking havoc on the American people.

The Fed has been trying to eliminate price inflation with a series of interest rate increases. So far, these rate increases have not significantly reduced price inflation. This is because rates remain at historic lows. Yet the rate increases have had negative economic effects, including a decline in the demand for new homes. Increasing interest rates make it impossible for many middle- and working-class Americans to afford a monthly mortgage payment for even a relatively inexpensive home.

The main reason the Fed cannot raise rates to anywhere near what they would be in a free market is the effect it would have on the federal government’s ability to manage its debt. According to the Congressional Budget Office (CBO), interest on the national debt is already on track to consume 40 percent of the federal budget by 2052 and will surpass defense spending by 2029! A small interest rate increase can raise yearly federal debt interest rate payments by many billions of dollars, increasing the amount of the federal budget devoted solely to servicing the debt.

The federal government’s fiscal picture is made worse by the fact that the Social Security “Trust Fund” will begin to run deficits by 2035 while the Medicare Trust Fund will run deficits by 2028. The looming bankruptcy of the two major ennoscriptment programs, combined with the unwillingness of most in Congress to reduce either welfare or warfare spending, puts the Fed in a bind. If it raises rates to the levels needed to really combat price inflation, the increase in interest payments will impose hardships on individuals and businesses, as well as raise federal interest payments to unsustainable levels. This will cause a major economic crisis including a government default on its debt causing a rejection of the dollar’s world reserve currency status. Also, if the Fed continues to facilitate federal deficits by monetizing the debt, the result will be an economic crisis caused by a collapse in the dollar’s value and rejection of the dollar’s world reserve status.

The crisis will lead to social unrest and violence, as well as increased popularity of authoritarian movements on both the left and the right. This will lead to government crackdowns on civil liberties and increased government control of our economy. The only bright spot is this crisis will also fuel interest in the ideas of liberty and could even help bring about a return to limited, constitutional government, free markets, individual liberty, and a foreign policy of peaceful trade with all. Those of us who know the truth have two responsibilities. The first is to make the necessary plans to ensure our families can survive the forthcoming turmoil. The second is to do all we can to introduce as many people as possible to the ideas of liberty.

Link to Article

﴾ꕷѺṾⵟⱤⵟÌĠṆ﴿ ᴛʜᴇ ᴄᴏʟʟᴇᴄᴛɪᴠᴇ ɴᴇᴛᴡᴏʀᴋ
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
❅❆❅❆❅❆❅❆❅❆❅❆
𝔽𝕣𝕠𝕤𝕥𝕪 𝕋𝕙𝕖 𝕊𝕟𝕠𝕨𝕞𝕒𝕟
❅❆❅❆❅❆❅❆❅❆❅❆
Full Movie

ℳ𝑒𝓇𝓇𝓎 𝒞𝒽𝓇𝒾𝓈𝓉𝓂𝒶𝓈

﴾ꕷѺṾⵟⱤⵟÌĠṆ﴿
ᴛʜᴇ ᴄᴏʟʟᴇᴄᴛɪᴠᴇ ɴᴇᴛᴡᴏʀᴋ
⭑⭑⭑⭑⭑⭑⭑⭑⭑⭑⭑⭑⭑⭑⭑⭑⭑⭑⭑⭑⭑⭑⭑