*random posting of highspeed camera specs*

So Uranus was real...

Google got complacent with Pixel OS updates: Now it lags Samsung

https://www.androidpolice.com/google-fumbles-pixel-updates-samsung-edges-in/

Good raw video results always deserve getting featured, especially from cheap phones.
https://youtube.com/watch?v=z8DKaN-8kZA

Didn't intend to send here, but DALL-E 2 is very impressive

"The first prize for the highest points winner is Xiaomi Air2 Pro Earbuds;
The other top four winners can win a Mi Band 6"

Guess the smart toilet seat was too costly.

https://www.ghisler.ch/board/viewtopic.php?t=76643
Classic Google Play dev issues

Oh yes

Is posting about DALL-E 2 too obvious? Naah, the results speak for themselves:
https://twitter.com/alanresnicks/status/1528793316313092096

Mr Craig mounted it wrong btw

https://twitter.com/UniverseIce/status/1536330945904939008

Putting so little effort (if any) in making photo outcomes equal should be forbidden. You literally can't describe the processing of S22 Ultra as a whole, because the variants are completely different.

They're a huge corp, at their disposal are DSPs, GPUs, CPUs and most basically ISP tuning itself. With proper work, basing on the ISP alone, they could reach barely distinguishable difference (at least without looking very close). With help of external block and implementing true raw processing, they could absolutely reach the same kind of output, using the same processing code.
What's more crazy is that it isn't the first generation of Samsung flagships with drastic photo differences.

Nothing phone (1) buyers explaining how awesome the animated rear LEDs are
https://youtu.be/mrkAmmMakMg

My POV: Nothing is yet to prove itself as company providing anything but uncommon design, it's very likely that dev-side stuff won't go any further than OnePlus (despite Nothing *NOT* being owned by Oppo nor BBK as a whole). Squashed kernel source and its extensions and pretty much no other public resources is what I personally expect.