What would happen if instead you decided to buy two mainstream phones to use during the same timespan? Let's see:
You've bought a Moto G8 Plus in 2019 for 270€. Comparing to FP3 in 2021, before buying Moto G60:
- You have a better SoC
- You have a bigger battery
- You have a modern form factor
- You have a more interesting camera setup
- Your warranty ends, you can probably sell the device around 100€, 120€ doesn't sound impossible
So, in 2021, you buy a Motorola G60 for 300€. In 2023, before buying a next device of your choice:
- You get a much modern SoC than FP3 and 128GB of UFS storage
- You get an even newer form factor
- You get a 120 Hz display
- You get a bigger battery again
- You're on Android 12, it didn't omit you
- Your warranty is ending, but FP3 one was lost two years ago
All of that is a scenario limited to a rather sensible OEM, not known from being worse than Fairphone when it comes to user experience. Stuff like worker wages and mineral sourcing matters, but Fairphone isn't transparent enough about it, their consumers have to rely on trust that it isn't just greenwashing. In the end, one can make a few conclusions:
- The time they support their devices for looks alright, but they need to be faster, especially when SoC isn't EOL-ed yet by the vendor
- As much as their extended warranty on FP4 impacts the example above, the questionable decision of minijack removal forces an accessory change on the user
- The per unit price margin they operate on may need to be lowered to always permit sourcing of the components with longest availability and longest vendor support
- If the above is already done, an end user price that can better compete with two phones, half the price scenario seems necessary – FP4 is currently at 580€, and it's likely to fail even more in this kind of comparison
Image credit: https://www.flickr.com/photos/fairphone/48858510338/
You've bought a Moto G8 Plus in 2019 for 270€. Comparing to FP3 in 2021, before buying Moto G60:
- You have a better SoC
- You have a bigger battery
- You have a modern form factor
- You have a more interesting camera setup
- Your warranty ends, you can probably sell the device around 100€, 120€ doesn't sound impossible
So, in 2021, you buy a Motorola G60 for 300€. In 2023, before buying a next device of your choice:
- You get a much modern SoC than FP3 and 128GB of UFS storage
- You get an even newer form factor
- You get a 120 Hz display
- You get a bigger battery again
- You're on Android 12, it didn't omit you
- Your warranty is ending, but FP3 one was lost two years ago
All of that is a scenario limited to a rather sensible OEM, not known from being worse than Fairphone when it comes to user experience. Stuff like worker wages and mineral sourcing matters, but Fairphone isn't transparent enough about it, their consumers have to rely on trust that it isn't just greenwashing. In the end, one can make a few conclusions:
- The time they support their devices for looks alright, but they need to be faster, especially when SoC isn't EOL-ed yet by the vendor
- As much as their extended warranty on FP4 impacts the example above, the questionable decision of minijack removal forces an accessory change on the user
- The per unit price margin they operate on may need to be lowered to always permit sourcing of the components with longest availability and longest vendor support
- If the above is already done, an end user price that can better compete with two phones, half the price scenario seems necessary – FP4 is currently at 580€, and it's likely to fail even more in this kind of comparison
Image credit: https://www.flickr.com/photos/fairphone/48858510338/
👍8❤1😐1
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Do you remember the days when sliding on an address bar or a different slim text input didn't cause instant cursor movement and you didn't have to stretch your thumb to the edge of display to simply scroll the text? Turns out using
cmd device_config put widget CursorControlFeature__enable_cursor_drag_from_anywhere false in an adb/root shell brings back the pre-R behavior without needing a source patch. Credit goes to @nift4 :)❤11😐1
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Ever dreamed of clean recents whenever you exit an app by using back button? Consider LMODroid at https://libremobileos.com/lmodroid.
Ad funded by my love towards the feature.
Ad funded by my love towards the feature.
❤6😐2
Basically, it brings back the pre-S behavior of finishing an activity when using back button (so you're not "stuck" in the same place all the time as if you used home button), and cleans the app from recents on top. All background processes are unaffected and it won't "kill" an app you don't intend to kill. Your incognito tabs are safe.
❤5🥰2😐1
This is new to me, so may as well be new to you. Finally you can build your own LOS conveniently with firmware images.
https://gitlab.com/the-muppets/proprietary_vendor_firmware
https://gitlab.com/the-muppets/proprietary_vendor_firmware
GitLab
The Muppets / proprietary_vendor_firmware · GitLab
👍2❤1😐1
Forwarded from A
does anyone have an idea of 5g SA crashing the selfie cam?
😐1
Forwarded from A
[ 63.301897] CAM_ERR: CAM-ISP: cam_ife_csid_irq: 5016 CSID:2 RX_ERROR_LANE0_FIFO_OVERFLOW: Skew/Less Data on lanes/ Slow csid clock:300000000Hz
😐1
Forwarded from Tadi
Tadi Channel
does anyone have an idea of 5g SA crashing the selfie cam?
That's damn impressive as hell
😐1
Forwarded from Android - Reddit
My take on the fake moon from Samsung
Just wanted to add some stuff on this "hot" topic.
In short, I managed to obtain a moon by starting with something that isn't even a moon.
I just made a white circle in Photoshop and brushed it a little. Then I also rotated it and created artifacts that would never appear on the moon (through clone-stamp tool).
The picture VS the result
More details, including the files and a video of me producing the image: https://imgur.com/gallery/9uW1JNp
Interesting:...
https://redd.it/11pspfw
@reddit_android
Just wanted to add some stuff on this "hot" topic.
In short, I managed to obtain a moon by starting with something that isn't even a moon.
I just made a white circle in Photoshop and brushed it a little. Then I also rotated it and created artifacts that would never appear on the moon (through clone-stamp tool).
The picture VS the result
More details, including the files and a video of me producing the image: https://imgur.com/gallery/9uW1JNp
Interesting:...
https://redd.it/11pspfw
@reddit_android
👍4😐1
Android - Reddit
My take on the fake moon from Samsung Just wanted to add some stuff on this "hot" topic. In short, I managed to obtain a moon by starting with something that isn't even a moon. I just made a white circle in Photoshop and brushed it a little. Then I also…
Surprising that I didn't forward it here earlier... The algo used on the Moon by Samsung doesn't stamp any moon.png on your picture. It just converts blurry splotches to crater-like texture. It tricks the eye enough, as it creates these "sharp elements" you're normally looking for on the moon, while avoiding the most obvious artifacts of local tone mapping and sharpening. To me, it still counts as fake, but same can be said about any image processing algo capable of misrepresenting the original picture by trying to guess way too much.
👍8😐1