Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Google gave global search in pixel 10 series!
Apple and Samsung sued Xiaomi
Apple and Samsung have issued separate legal notices to Xiaomi for making disparaging comparisons between its own phones and those of its bigger rivals in advertisements in India.
Xiaomi came out with full-page print advertisements in March and April, directly targeting Apple's then latest smartphone model iPhone 16 Pro Max and iPad Pro with its cheap tablets and flagship and questioned if the iPhone was really the best.
Xiaomi adopted a similar strategy against Samsung on social media, directly hitting Galaxy A series. Not only smartphones, Xiaomi targeted Samsung’s LED televisions (TVs) as well in the similar manner. Subsequently, both Apple and Samsung served cease-and- desist notices to the Chinese company
As per IDC, Apple and Samsung command around 95% share of the smartphone market above 500$ while Xiaomi has less than 1%.
Apple and Samsung have issued separate legal notices to Xiaomi for making disparaging comparisons between its own phones and those of its bigger rivals in advertisements in India.
Xiaomi came out with full-page print advertisements in March and April, directly targeting Apple's then latest smartphone model iPhone 16 Pro Max and iPad Pro with its cheap tablets and flagship and questioned if the iPhone was really the best.
Xiaomi adopted a similar strategy against Samsung on social media, directly hitting Galaxy A series. Not only smartphones, Xiaomi targeted Samsung’s LED televisions (TVs) as well in the similar manner. Subsequently, both Apple and Samsung served cease-and- desist notices to the Chinese company
As per IDC, Apple and Samsung command around 95% share of the smartphone market above 500$ while Xiaomi has less than 1%.
🤪4❤1
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Dynamic AI lock screens on HyperOS 3.0
❤3❤🔥1
💥 Android’s Great Lockdown: How Google’s New Rules Could End the Era of True Phone Ownership
---
📌 Executive Summary
Core Thesis:
Android’s early promise of true user ownership is being chipped away by OEM restrictions, Google’s device integrity systems, and the upcoming sideloading verification — shifting control from you to the platform.
Key Mechanisms:
- 🔒 Bootloader unlocking limits — block deep customization, performance tweaks, and lifespan extension.
- 🛡 SafetyNet / Play Integrity — flag modified devices, block certain apps.
- 📜 2026 sideloading verification — forces off‑Play developers to verify identity with Google.
Impact:
Less freedom to modify, repair, and extend devices; Android inches toward iOS‑style lockdown.
---
🧩 Core Claims & Examples
1. Android as “PC in your pocket” (Past)
- Unlock bootloader, flash ROMs/kernels, install from any source, tweak performance, run emulators.
- iOS felt rented; Android felt owned.
2. Bootloader Unlock Restrictions
- Many OEMs deny unlock codes.
- Results:
- Performance lock‑in (e.g., boosts whitelisted games, throttles others).
- Short support life (e.g., Oppo K13 Turbo Pro ~2 yrs OS, ~3 yrs patches; no custom ROM path).
3. SafetyNet & Play Integrity
- Unlock/root = “insecure.”
- Breaks banking, DRM streaming, and some games.
- Workarounds: hide mods + spoof status — fragile, high‑maintenance.
4. 2026 Sideloading Verification (Claimed)
- Off‑Play devs must submit name, phone, address, possibly ID to Google.
- Affects GitHub/self‑hosted APKs.
- Could endanger tools like ad blockers, emulators, YouTube frontends if devs want anonymity.
---
⚖ Security vs Control
Pro‑restriction points:
- Shields users from malicious APKs.
- Unified app trust system.
- Meets banking/DRM compliance.
Critics’ view:
- Unsafe apps/extensions exist inside Google’s own stores.
- Centralizes power over software distribution.
- Punishes informed modders alongside risky users.
---
🔍 How It All Fits Together
Bootloader Unlock
- Controlled by OEMs.
- Decides if root/ROM possible.
- Impact: no custom recovery/mods; tied to OEM updates & performance.
SafetyNet / Play Integrity
- Controlled by Google & app devs.
- Flags modified devices.
- Impact: breaks banking, DRM, games; deters modding.
Sideloading Verification (2026)
- Controlled by Google.
- Requires developer identity for APK installs.
- Impact: blocks unverified devs; chills open‑source/privacy‑focused tools.
---
🛠 Practical Advice for Ownership‑Focused Users
- Shop smart: Pick brands still offering bootloader unlocks (OnePlus, Nothing, Xiaomi — for now).
- Expect friction: Banking/DRM/gaming issues after unlocking; maintenance needed.
- Advocate: Push for strong warnings over hard blocks.
---
📌 Executive Summary
Core Thesis:
Android’s early promise of true user ownership is being chipped away by OEM restrictions, Google’s device integrity systems, and the upcoming sideloading verification — shifting control from you to the platform.
Key Mechanisms:
- 🔒 Bootloader unlocking limits — block deep customization, performance tweaks, and lifespan extension.
- 🛡 SafetyNet / Play Integrity — flag modified devices, block certain apps.
- 📜 2026 sideloading verification — forces off‑Play developers to verify identity with Google.
Impact:
Less freedom to modify, repair, and extend devices; Android inches toward iOS‑style lockdown.
---
🧩 Core Claims & Examples
1. Android as “PC in your pocket” (Past)
- Unlock bootloader, flash ROMs/kernels, install from any source, tweak performance, run emulators.
- iOS felt rented; Android felt owned.
2. Bootloader Unlock Restrictions
- Many OEMs deny unlock codes.
- Results:
- Performance lock‑in (e.g., boosts whitelisted games, throttles others).
- Short support life (e.g., Oppo K13 Turbo Pro ~2 yrs OS, ~3 yrs patches; no custom ROM path).
3. SafetyNet & Play Integrity
- Unlock/root = “insecure.”
- Breaks banking, DRM streaming, and some games.
- Workarounds: hide mods + spoof status — fragile, high‑maintenance.
4. 2026 Sideloading Verification (Claimed)
- Off‑Play devs must submit name, phone, address, possibly ID to Google.
- Affects GitHub/self‑hosted APKs.
- Could endanger tools like ad blockers, emulators, YouTube frontends if devs want anonymity.
---
⚖ Security vs Control
Pro‑restriction points:
- Shields users from malicious APKs.
- Unified app trust system.
- Meets banking/DRM compliance.
Critics’ view:
- Unsafe apps/extensions exist inside Google’s own stores.
- Centralizes power over software distribution.
- Punishes informed modders alongside risky users.
---
🔍 How It All Fits Together
Bootloader Unlock
- Controlled by OEMs.
- Decides if root/ROM possible.
- Impact: no custom recovery/mods; tied to OEM updates & performance.
SafetyNet / Play Integrity
- Controlled by Google & app devs.
- Flags modified devices.
- Impact: breaks banking, DRM, games; deters modding.
Sideloading Verification (2026)
- Controlled by Google.
- Requires developer identity for APK installs.
- Impact: blocks unverified devs; chills open‑source/privacy‑focused tools.
---
🛠 Practical Advice for Ownership‑Focused Users
- Shop smart: Pick brands still offering bootloader unlocks (OnePlus, Nothing, Xiaomi — for now).
- Expect friction: Banking/DRM/gaming issues after unlocking; maintenance needed.
- Advocate: Push for strong warnings over hard blocks.
❤2👏2
Tech Office : Updates & Tech News ~1
💥 Android’s Great Lockdown: How Google’s New Rules Could End the Era of True Phone Ownership --- 📌 Executive Summary Core Thesis: Android’s early promise of true user ownership is being chipped away by OEM restrictions, Google’s device integrity systems…
Change.org
Sign the Petition
Stop Google from limiting APK file usage