مطلب بعد مطالعه شود.

📚🗺 آکادمی علم تهران 🎓🌍

@Tehran_Science_IR

Integrating Theory into Your Manunoscript

By Co-Editors-In-Chief, Journal of Travel Research: McGehee and Petrick (2024, June 19)


Theory: it begins in your lit review

Researchers typically learn very early about the importance of theory as a means of setting the foundation for research. However, there seems to be some variation as to how to appropriately write this component of a lit review.

Arguing for a theoretical perspective is more than just a brief and superficial definition of your theoretical approach. Authors should demonstrate a deep knowledge of the theory in a concise manner.

Manunoscripts should include the who, what, when, where, and how of a theory. Who has used it? In what fields? When was it first used? Where has it been used (e.g. Western vs Eastern thought) How has it evolved and how is it being used now?

While some research begs for a poly-theoretical approach, this is more the exception than the rule. Resist playing “theory bingo” by including many theories (e.g. one for each set of survey items) and instead read deeply enough that you are able to focus on 1 or 2 theories or theoretical perspectives.

Be sure to include other theories considered and justify why the theory chosen is the best for the research problem. Sometimes researchers “fall in love” with one theoretical perspective without surveying the greater theoretical landscape. Other times they may feel rushed and don’t take the time to explore the various options. The difference between good and great research is often in this detail. Take the time to read deeply across various theoretical areas and think deeply about which perspective is the most informative.

What are the shortcomings of the theory chosen and how can they be overcome? This is a section that is quickly disappearing from manunoscripts. There are no perfect theories; understanding the shortcomings of the theory selected and being transparent about them will make the work stronger.

Theory: it’s not just for your lit review

Far too many manunoscripts include a denoscription of the theoretical perspective in the literature review, only to have the theory disappear from the rest of the paper. This is a fatal flaw for a potential JTR manunoscript.

A successful manunoscript needs to show how the theory informs the research questions, hypotheses if applicable, the methodological approach, and the findings. Be specific and clear, use citations and reference other similar work. If it’s a ground-breaking approach, even better, but explain why and how.

Don’t forget to include how the research findings impact and contribute to the theory in the conclusions section of the manunoscript. What aspects of the theory were supported? What aspects were not supported? How has it expanded or changed the theory?

Include discussion of theory in the limitations and future research. What were the shortcomings of the theoretical perspective used? Could another theory have been useful? Should future work consider the theory used or are there other possibilities?


For JTR submissions it is vital to thread the theoretical perspective throughout the manunoscript.

کتاب‌نگاشت:

Hammond, M. (2018). ‘An interesting paper but not sufficiently theoretical’: What does theorising in social research look like? Methodological Innovations, 11(2).

Huff, A. S. (2009). Designing research for publication. Sage.

Oswick, C., Fleming, P., & Hanlon, G. (2011). From borrowing to blending: Rethinking the processes of organizational theory building. Academy of Management Review, 36(2), 318–337.

Ravitch, S. M., & Riggan, M. (2016). Reason & rigor: How conceptual frameworks guide research. Sage Publications.

📚🗺 آکادمی علم تهران 🎓🌍

@Tehran_Science_IR

John Dewey’s 4 Principles of Progressive Education

چهار اصل جان دیویی/دوئی در زمینهٔ آموزش‌ و‌ پرورش:

1. Learning by doing
2. Discussions
3. Interactive
4. Interdisciplinary

📚🗺 آکادمی علم تهران 🎓🌍

@Tehran_Science_IR

🔘انجمن علمی-دانشجویی جغرافیا و برنامه‌ریزی گردشگری دانشگاه تهران

نگاهی به سفرنامه‌نویسی: روایت سفر برادران امیدوار

📆پنجشنبه ۳۱ خرداد ساعت ۱۶–۱۸
🌐لینک ورود به جلسه
meet.google.com/ioy-sobf-cxj

🔰 همراه با بازدید از موزه برادران امیدوار
🔵 یکشنبه ۳ تیرماه از مبدا کاخ سعدآباد
💎 با حضور افتخاری عیسی امیدوار

هزینه: ۱۹۵ هزارتومان
ویژه دانشجویان: ۱۲۵ هزار تومان
ثبت‌نام گروهی ۴ نفر به بالا: یک نفر رایگان

🔴ثبت نام:

forms.gle/1ZKNGRLbWMTK7zTv6

🟡کسب اطلاعات بیشتر:

09016609964
@panteatourism
@minasadat_sadati
@gtpa_ut

📚🗺 آکادمی علم تهران 🎓🌍

@Tehran_Science_IR

گذار به پایداری در گردشگری

What are sustainability transitions in tourism?

Markard et al. (2012, p. 956) define sustainability transition as “long-term, multi-dimensional, and fundamental transformation process through which established socio-technical systems shift to more sustainable modes of production and consumption.”

📚🗺 آکادمی علم تهران 🎓🌍

@Tehran_Science_IR

Publishing in Top SSCI Journals and Getting Recognition for Your Research through Citations

Date: 23 July 2024, Tuesday

Time: 08:00 - 10:00 AM London Time

Speaker: Prof. Dimitrios Buhalis

——————————-

🔹The Social Sciences Citation Index (SSCI)

a commercial citation index product of Clarivate Analytics originally developed by the Institute for Scientific Information.

📚🗺 آکادمی علم تهران 🎓🌍

@Tehran_Science_IR

10 Breakthrough Technologies 2024

۱۰ فناوری خط‌شکن ۲۰۲۴ از نظر MIT Technology Review

گردشگری از این فناوری‌ها چه استفاده‌هایی می‌تواند بکند؟
گردشگری چگونه می‌تواند بخشی از راه حل گرمایش زمین باشد، نه یکی از عاملان آن؟

پرسشهایی کلان و مناسب برای کارآفرینی و پژوهش.

📚🗺 آکادمی علم تهران 🎓🌍

@Tehran_Science_IR

🔻به اطلاع کلیه اساتید، دانشجویان و پژوهشگران محترم دانشگاه تهران می رساند دسترسی آزمایشی دانشگاه تهران به پایگاه مجلات ScienceDirect و پایگاه استنادی Scopus برقرار شده است.

✅ این دسترسی بصورت آزمایشی و به مدت دو ماه، تعیین شده است.  

🔅 برای جستجو و دانلود متن کامل مقالات مورد نیاز خود از داخل شبکه دانشگاه، از لینکهای زیر استفاده نمایید:

https://www.sciencedirect.com
https://www.scopus.com


🌐https://library.ut.ac.ir/fa/news/42916

@ut_newss

Call for contributors - Handbook of children and families in tourism destinations

📚🗺 آکادمی علم تهران 🎓🌍

@Tehran_Science_IR

Cogito ergo sum.

–René Descartes. (1637).
Discourse on Method.

I think, therefore I am.

این جملهٔ دکارت که بصورت می‌اندیشم پس هستم مشهور شده، جمله‌ای ادبی یا انگیزشی برای دعوت به اندیشیدن نیست؛ ماحصل روش شکاکیت‌مداری است که او دربارهٔ اساس معرفت و هستی به کار می‌بست.

ترجمه‌های بدیلی که معنا را پوست‌کنده‌تر منتقل می‌کند:

چون تفکر دارم، معلوم می‌شود که وجود دارم.
اینکه فکر می‌کنم، یعنی وجود دارم.
تفکر دارم؛ لذا هستم.

✍️ امیرحسین ایمانی‌زاده

📚 آموزش ترجمه: تَرزَبانی

@TarZabani

نشست تخصصی گردشگری و صلح
۹ مهر: ۸–۱۲:۳۰
دانشکدهٔ جغرافیا

📚🗺 علم تهران 🎓🌍

@Tehran_Science_IR

Fuzzy-set Qualitative Comparative Analysis (fsQCA) is a set-theoretic and asymmetric analysis technique that was initially developed during the 1980s to analyse complex social and political conditions with a small number of cases.

However, applications of fsQCA are not limited to small sample size, but extend to large datasets in different disciplines. In an asymmetric approach like fsQCA, the aim is to explore how various combinations of independent variables generate specific levels of outcome(s), for different groups of cases.

These combinations of predictors can be categorized as sufficient or necessary conditions based on number and ratio of supported cases.

In this webinar, the basic definition and component of fsQCA, necessary steps to perform this asymmetric analysis techniques will be explained.

ثبت نام

📚🗺 علم تهران 🎓🌍

@Tehran_Science_IR

انجمن علمی گردشگری ایران:

دولت چهاردهم و گردشگری

دوشنبه - ۱۶ مهر - ساعت ۱۴–۱۶
پژوهشگاه میراث فرهنگی و گردشگری

📚🗺 علم تهران 🎓🌍

@Tehran_Science_IR