BLACKOUT OF MILLIONS IN CALIFORNIA AS MASSIVE SUBSTATION FIREBALLS

Emergency crews fighting the fires in San Francisco — unverified breaking911 footage/reports

UPD: Now being reported 130,000 residents currently without power

🎙Subscribe @TheIslanderNews

Donate - Support Our Work

US armsmakers bribe Dems AND GOP with 'statistically' IMPOSSIBLE 17,000%+ gains to vote for Ukraine death — hero congresswoman at TPUSA

Pray for Luna's safety as deep state HATE exposure

🎙Subscribe @TheIslanderNews

Donate - Support Our Work

🚨#BREAKING: Epstien ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇ ▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇ ▇▇, ▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇ ▇ ▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇. ▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇ pay your taxes pleb.

🎙Subscribe @TheIslanderNews

Donate - Support Our Work

TULSI 'CANNOT ALLOW DEEP STATE to pull US military into direct conflict with Russia'

🎙Subscribe @TheIslanderNews

Donate - Support Our Work

This is how wars are prolonged in the 21st century. Not with declarations. Not with parliamentary votes. But with anonymous intelligence leaks, laundered through Mockingbird media, timed precisely to suffocate diplomacy before it can breathe.

Reuters is a case in point, laundering intel narratives as journalism. It selected the most escalation-friendly interpretation available and wrapped it in the authority of anonymity — six sources “familiar with U.S. intelligence,” one citing a most-recent report from late September, to claim that Vladimir Putin intends not only to seize all of Ukraine, but to "reclaim" parts of Europe. This was not analysis. It was a threat narrative: maximal, apocalyptic, and conveniently untestable. The kind that turns negotiation into appeasement and restraint into treason. The kind that boxes the elected leaders into war without ever asking the public.

That specificity matters. Anonymous intelligence leaks are not neutral artifacts, they are policy instruments. They shape public emotion, narrow political horizons, and manufacture inevitability. Once a population is convinced that continental war is pre-programmed, diplomacy becomes illegitimate by definition. That is how peace is killed without debate.

This pattern is not unique to one newsroom. It is systemic and by design. Across the Western media ecosystem, escalation narratives are routinely laundered through anonymity, authority, and urgency, creating a closed loop in which fear generates headlines, headlines manufacture consent, and consent generates policy momentum that no single elected official appears able to stop. Reuters is not the disease. It is a symptom of a larger architecture that rewards alarm and punishes restraint. Again, all by design.

This is precisely why the response from the sitting U.S. Director of National Intelligence matters.

Gabbard did not hedge. She accused Reuters of pushing “lies and propaganda” on behalf of warmongers, warned that such narratives are being used to “foment hysteria and fear” to block peace, and stated, that they're using intelligence briefings delivered to lawmakers, that Russia seeks to avoid a larger war with Europe and does not possess the desire to conquer all of Ukraine, let alone Europe.

That phrasing is crucial, because it is Reuters’ own reporting of what she said. The contradiction is devastating: the same intelligence community being anonymously cited to inflate the threat is, according to its own Director, delivering a far more restrained assessment behind closed doors.

This exposes the fraud at the heart of the escalation narrative. Even if one assumes Russia’s objectives in Ukraine are maximalist, it does not follow—logically, militarily, or materially, that Russia intends to wage a continental war against NATO Europe. That leap is not intelligence analysis. It is psychological conditioning.

After years of attritional warfare, Russia controls a little more than one-fifth of Ukrainian territory. That reality does not support fantasies of armored divisions rolling toward Paris or Berlin. To insist otherwise is to substitute fear for facts, which is precisely how war is sold.

Now place this alongside Gabbard’s public remarks at the TPUSA Summit, where she stated:

“The deep state is fighting us every step of the way, and it exists within every single federal agency.”

That sentence is not rhetorical. It is a denoscription of institutional behavior. Bureaucracies whose budgets, prestige, and careers depend on permanent confrontation do not quietly accept peace. They resist it, by leaking selectively and out of context, reframing assessments, delaying negotiations, and redefining threats until escalation appears not only necessary, but moral.

But this is where discernment matters, because survival depends on discernment, not vibes. Is Gabbard the real deal, or is she being permitted to play dissident inside a controlled theater? That is not a smear. It is due diligence.

Part 2/2 👇

🎙Subscribe @TheIslanderNews

Donate - Support Our Work

Part 2/2— Modern empires do not always silence critics, they often curate them, allow limited transgression, keep dissent inside the ring, and use managed opposition to re-legitimate systems that never actually change course. Words alone are not proof. The responsible posture is to take the intervention seriously, verify what can be verified, and watch what happens next: does this rhetoric translate into real policy friction, institutional consequences, budgetary restraint, and a genuine off-ramp... or does it remain a pressure-release valve while the war machine continues marching?

In other words, dissent is only real when it costs power something. When it narrows bad options, disrupts funding streams, forces declassification, or compels institutions to defend themselves in daylight rather than behind anonymity. Anything less may still sound brave, but history has taught us that courage without consequence is often permitted precisely because it changes nothing.

That question is not academic. It is the test.

We must also widen the aperture to Europe, because the transatlantic dynamic is central to this sabotage question. Obama has, since leaving office, continued to make high-level political appearances abroad, including documented visits to 10 Downing Street and meetings with current and future UK leadership, publicly framed as discussions on technology and governance.

No conspiracy is claimed and none is required. What is required is a simple question: by what mandate do unelected former leaders continue to exert geopolitical influence at moments of active war? Who benefits from this continuity of power without accountability? And why is such influence treated as normal while elected leaders are boxed in by fear narratives manufactured elsewhere?

This is the broader pattern. When peace threatens entrenched interests, danger must be amplified. Russia must be cast not as a state with legitimate security interests, but as a civilizational predator with limitless hunger. Only then can censorship be justified, dissent criminalized, emergency budgets passed, and publics herded into fatalism.

And yet, agency still exists. History is not automatic. Narratives only harden into destiny when they go unchallenged, when anonymity is mistaken for authority, and when fear is allowed to outrun verification. The future remains contested precisely because it is still being argued over in public.

That is why the Reuters framing is so dangerous, because it is strategic. It narrows the future until war appears to be the only path left standing.

On the surface, Tulsi Gabbard has disrupted that noscript.

Whether she is allowed to keep disrupting it will tell us everything.

So here is the real-world test that follows, simple, observable, unavoidable... Does Reuters clarify, correct, or double down on anonymous escalation leaks? Do any elected officials demand declassification, or accountability? Do EU leaders moderate rhetoric or accelerate it?

If she is marginalized or smeared, peace crossed a red line. If she is tolerated but ignored, dissent has been absorbed.
If her intervention forces transparency, debate, and a genuine off-ramp, then something rare and genuinely hopeful is happening. But don't hold your breath.

Nearly a century ago, Europe sleepwalked into catastrophe on a tide of miscalculations, rigid alliances, and unchallenged threat narratives. The lesson was supposed to be learned. The warning signs are familiar.

History does not repeat itself because it must. It repeats when people stop insisting on choice.

And the choice, now, as always, belongs not to anonymous sources, but to those still willing to question them and enforce accountability. If this moment matters, it is not because one official spoke, or one article was written, but because a line was drawn between fear treated as fate and fear subjected to reason. Civilizations survive not by believing in inevitability, but by refusing to outsource judgment.

Part 1/2 👆

🎙Subscribe @TheIslanderNews

Donate - Support Our Work

“Pain and suffering are always inevitable for a large intelligence and a deep heart. The really great men must, I think, have great sadness on earth.”

— Fyodor Dostoevsky

t.me/RussianBaZa

Diana Ross' son SLAMS Bondi for REDACTING him as 'EPSTEIN VICTIM'

🎙Subscribe @TheIslanderNews

Donate - Support Our Work

5yo & adult Musk 'Ozempic Santa like cocaine bear' as he dubs it

Gift to humanity?

🎙Subscribe @TheIslanderNews

Donate - Support Our Work

Malaysia plans to launch DIRECT flights with Russia in the first half of 2026, the country’s ambassador in Moscow says

Talks are moving forward to boost travel and tourism

🎙Subscribe @TheIslanderNews

Donate - Support Our Work

SAN FRANCISCO BLACKOUT SENDS WAYMOS HAYWIRE — Saturday evening.

🎙Subscribe @TheIslanderNews

Donate - Support Our Work

All stoplights north of market San Francisco plunge into darkness along with 1 in 3 residents from massive substation blaze Saturday night.

🎙Subscribe @TheIslanderNews

Donate - Support Our Work

Fire crews shoot carbon dioxide on massive substation fire that's left vast swathes of San Francisco in darkness — SF Fire Dept footage

🎙Subscribe @TheIslanderNews

Donate - Support Our Work

TRUMP 'DEMANDS SOUTH KOREAN BLOOD' IN WAR ON CHINA — The Economist

'South Korean officials informed they will not be allowed to sit out the fight'

🎙Subscribe @TheIslanderNews

Donate - Support Our Work