NEW BOT Телеграм, страница

4.65K views23:01

Forwarded from Robin Monotti + Cory Morningstar

I responded to a person who remarked that surely those advancing the vaccines knew they weren’t well designed. I’m sharing my reply because it’s quite a good summary of how they couldn’t NOT know. I use reasoning well within the usual thinking of biological sciences possessed by folk like me inside the industry:

“I’m also quite sure they knew. I recall noticing with surprise & alarm that all the leading vaccine projects used related, gene-based technology which was unprecedented in a public health context. In public health, the topmost requirement is safety. Not even “does it work?”, but “is it safe?”. That’s because so many people are to be in contact with that product, if there was a safety issue, you could easily harm more people that the natural hazard being faced. New technology doesn’t fit there. It’s not possible to adequately test the safety ahead of massive scale use. Then to the details. I think Sucharit Bhakdi called it early, but pointing out what I’ve mentioned here. Finally, as a toxicologist / biochemist / drug discovery person, I knew there were no control systems, no brakes & no guidance systems attached to the shiny technology. How was the treatment going to produce the appropriate amount of foreign, pathogen-derived spike protein as “immunogen”? That’s the function of whatever is to be presented to our immune systems, so that it learns what to assign the molecular label “pathogen-related”. I immediately saw that normal, biological diversity meant that some people would make little of the spike protein, others more & some, very large amounts. Another lurch when I appreciated that where in the body that foreign protein was made would probably matter. In the tiny blood vessels of the heart? That could set up autoimmune & inflammatory responses in the muscle of the heart. Or in the blood circulation in the brain, might not that lead to a stroke? Finally, for how long would the genetic code for spike protein continue forcing its instructions to be followed? A day? A week? A month? Permanently? Again, I couldn’t see a control mechanism within the product, so the answer will probably follow the decay probability distribution curve. Now blend just those four properties. Spike protein isn’t just to educate our immune systems (which it might well do, albeit in the wrong place & do not be effective in providing artificial immunity). It’s also going to do whatever the virus protein’s outermost functions are. It’s a pathogen. It’s evolved to have a chance of beating our defences from time to time. There will be human biology-specific ways to accomplish that goal. It turns out that, as a class of external, human host-facing proteins, these spike proteins are complex, three-stranded constructions, capable of triggering cells to stick to one another and, when that happens in the blood, that initiates blood clotting. They also trigger an arm of the innate immune system, called “the complement system”. Both cascade-based, self-amplification systems are likely to be triggered. And so it went on, worrying findings really weren’t hard to find. In conclusion, it was unlikely that the products could function as vaccines because they’d cause the wrong kind of immune response. Worse, the chances that the variable amounts of spike protein to be made, in uncontrolled locations in our bodies & for unregulated amounts of time meant there was no likelihood that the things would be safe. And so it proved.”

Best wishes
Mike

Dr Mike Yeadon

2.85K views00:00