Here’s link

https://x.com/rach_ic/status/1707531855904592317?s=46&t=PbD1KD2K2hvlXAmFc3osDg

BREAKING 🚨 Russia, Azerbaijan to decide future of Karabakh peacekeeping mission: Kremlin

READ: https://insiderpaper.com/russia-azerbaijan-to-decide-future-of-karabakh-peacekeeping-mission-kremlin/

Follow Insider Paper for more news

DJT saying motherfucker 😂

For the sake of argument:

Can an elected representative delegate their duty or privilege to another?

If so, to what extent?

Do [THEY] do it anyway?

Is that how [THEY] “pass the buck” for internal investigations, before circling back to their oversight committees, inspector generals, and ombudsmen?

Whistleblower pRoTeCtiON

What’s more important:

The “public trust”?
Or
“Protecting the integrity of the public trust” [Protecting Appearances]?

Define:
TRUST
Black's Law Dictionary:
1. An equitable or beneficial right or noscript to land or other property, held for the beneficiary by another person, in whom resides the legal noscript or ownership, recognized and enforced by courts of chancery.
See Goodwin v. McMinn, 193 Pa. 046, 44 Atl. 1094, 74 Am. St. Rep. 703; Beers v. Lyon, 21 Conn. 613; Seymour v. Freer, 8 Wall. 202, 19 L. Ed. 300.

An obligation arising out of a confidence reposed in the trustee or representative, who has the legal noscript to property conveyed to him, that he will faithfully apply the property according to the confidence reposed, or, in other words, according to the wishes of the grantor of the trust.
4 Kent Comm. 304; Willis, Trustees, 2; Beers v. Lyon, 21 Conn. 613; Thornburg v. Buck, 13 Ind. App. 446, 41 N. E. 85.

An equitable obligation, either express or Implied, resting upon a person by reason of a confidence reposed in him, to apply or deal with the property for the benefit of some other person, or for the benefit of himself and another or others, according to such confidence.
McCreary v. Gewinner, 103 Ga. 528, 29 S. E. 9G0.

A holding of property subject to a duty of employing it or applying its proceeds ac- cording to directions given by the person from whom it was derived. Munroe v. Crouse.
59 Hun. 248, 12 N. Y. Supp. 815.

The question is, are “We the People” actually the beneficiaries, or is that in name only?

Congress has until midnight on spending bill….

Clay Higgins is correct. How do you feel about your government partnering with the most violent criminals on earth - these cartels - without the your consent? Leaders spending hard-earned tax dollars without the consent of the governed while they lie about it? They have to lie because no decent human being, regardless of who they voted for, would vote for this if they were told the truth & given a choice. You can tell yourself those kids aren’t missing, but imagine if you were a sponsor & gave a contact number to the government & you never answered the phone when they called. Does that really sound true to you? For 85 000 people? If you buy that, you need to take a long hard look in the mirror. Because one child being raped for money until they die is too many & accepting that as a fact of life you can do nothing about makes you part of the problem.

You know what’s fun? Archiving your dms and thinking to yourself, I have it all bitch, delete away.
Ahh yep. That’s fun. 🛻 🛻