🚨🇻🇪 🇺🇸BREAKING: MADURO COULD APPEAR IN U.S. COURT AS SOON AS MONDAY

Maduro is en route to the United States at this hour, according to multiple officials briefed on the matter.

Upon arrival at a New York-area airport, he will be helicoptered to a location in New York City for processing, then transported to the Metropolitan Detention Center in Brooklyn.

Officials expect a court appearance as soon as Monday evening.

Less than 48 hours from dictator to defendant.

Source: CBS

~ Mario Nawfal

Bad ass op - Unmatched by any adversary in terms of capability.

Did Trump go after Maduro first to make sure Khamenei & the terrorist Islamic Republic occupying Iran can't escape to Venezuela when the Islamic Regime falls & Iran is freed?

Maduro was a CIA/Deep State asset, has the house been cleaned?

Mamdani chimes in 😂

I was briefed this morning on the U.S. military capture of Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro and his wife, as well as their planned imprisonment in federal custody here in New York City.

Unilaterally attacking a sovereign nation is an act of war and a violation of federal and international law.

This blatant pursuit of regime change doesn’t just affect those abroad, it directly impacts New Yorkers, including tens of thousands of Venezuelans who call this city home. My focus is their safety and the safety of every New Yorker, and my administration will continue to monitor the situation and issue relevant guidance.

https://x.com/nycmayor/status/2007513875709669540?s=46&t=PbD1KD2K2hvlXAmFc3osDg

The 2017 Las Vegas massacre was by far the deadliest mass shooting in American history. The official explanation for it makes no sense. Ian Carroll explains what we know for sure.

(0:00) What Was the Las Vegas Shooting?
(10:43) The Active Shooter at McCarran Airport
(16:40) The Suspicious Deaths of Witnesses
(18:49) The Independent Journalists Dedicated to This Story
(25:30) What Was Stephen Paddock's Motive?
(27:59) Were There Multiple Shooters?
(34:37) What Happened to Jose Campos?
(41:25) Was Stephen Paddock Dead Before the Shooting Started?
(46:09) Why Is This Story Being Censored?
(50:52) Who Tampered With the Locks?
(56:47) Who Actually Was Stephen Paddock?
(1:05:18) How Did America Change After the Shooting?
(1:11:40) Was Saudi Arabia Involved?
(1:32:43) The Assassination Attempt on Mohammed bin Salman
(1:38:16) Why Were There Helicopters in the Area?
(1:47:18) The Shootings in the Helicopter Hangars
(1:51:02) Donald Trump's Visit to Saudi Arabia
(1:53:36) Was This a Diversion?
(1:58:53) Has the Hotel Ever Released Surveillance Footage?
(2:00:30) Has Anyone Ever Questioned the Saudi Government?
(2:03:45) Where Was the SWAT Team?
(2:06:26) Have Any Victims Been Questioned?
(2:11:01) The Assassination of Charlie Kirk
(2:21:39) Mass Formation Psychosis
(2:25:12) Where Did Ian Carroll Come From?
(2:35:22) Ian's Next Research Project

https://x.com/TuckerCarlson/status/2007149893891277240

JUST IN: United States sent warnings to governments of Mexico, Cuba, and Colombia that their countries could be next, hours after the Venezuela operation, Axios reports.

@BRICSNews

JUST IN: 🇻🇪🇺🇸 Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro transported to US Drug Enforcement Administration office in NYC.



@BRICSNews

Dis ‘dem right now 😂

Quietly tucked in a new spending bill is Section 453 granting immunity to pesticide companies. It blocks updated health warnings and gives chemical manufacturers immunity even when people are harmed.

https://docs.house.gov/meetings/AP/AP06/20250715/118507/BILLS-119-SC-AP-FY2026-Interior-FY26InteriorEnvironmentandRelatedAgenciesBill.pdf

He’s not to “deez nuts”
level, but he’s heading down the right path.

https://fxtwitter.com/newsmax/status/2007235885117358441

Senator Slotkin:

President Trump's decision to bomb targets in Venezuela, depose Nicolas Maduro, and "run" Venezuela continues the signature trend of his presidency: relentless focus on foreign entanglements and looking tough abroad, to distract from what’s happening to Americans' pocketbooks.

So instead of action on health care costs or housing or energy bills, Americans get military action in Iran, Iraq, Nigeria, Somalia, Syria, Yemen, the Caribbean, the Pacific, and now a long-term engagement in Venezuela.

Despite all the talking points to the media — and by Cabinet members directly to senators last month — this was never about stopping the drug cartels. If it were, President Trump wouldn’t have pardoned drug kingpin Juan Orlando Hernández, and he’d be going after Mexican cartels that move the fentanyl that’s killed hundreds of thousands of Americans — not fishing boats full of cocaine or, ultimately, the Venezuelan oil fields.

The President laid out his plan of regime change. He says he now wants to “run” Venezuela and, particularly, Venezuela's vast oil reserves.

Maduro is a bad man, and the people of Venezuela deserve better. But we know that regime change isn’t as simple as removing one leader. While there are comparisons to the arrest of Manuel Noriega in Panama in 1989, let’s not forget that the U.S. sent in over 27,000 troops and lost 23 servicemembers in the process.

The bottom line is that President Trump wants to look tough by attacking countries abroad to distract from his failure to attack the core issue of the cost of living at home.

Data Republican’s response is 🔥:

Hello Senator Slotkin,

I've been waiting for your take on Venezuela. When it comes to regime change, few institutions have a longer and more educational record of failure than the CIA, so your opposition is as reassuring as Jim Cramer's stock picks.

Congratulations on reciting the roll call of countries your own institutions helped ruin. Treating that history as a rhetorical shield doesn't grant you credibility, it just advertises a refusal to learn from it. Now let me explain why Venezuela does not belong in your grab bag of "long-term engagements."

Most of the countries you list were a result of a worldview that any non-democracy is a threat to the stability of the post-Cold War world order.

🔹 Iraq: My book documents how your side eagerly supported the operations, until Iraq turned into a quagmire, and then instead of taking responsibility, the global liberal order threw America under the bus and blamed a lack of "multilateralism."
🔹 Somalia: The United Nations 1993 resolution lists the goal of the Somalian intervention as "recreating a Somali State based on democratic governance and rehabilitating the country's economy and infrastructure."
🔹 Syria: Obama himself celebrated Syria's "peaceful transition to democracy" in the Arab Spring and we all know how that turned out.

Beyond that, the common thread is: you imposed pro-Western views on a non-Western world. You haven't learned from that, because you are still doing that in virtually every country in the world - except over the decades, your meaning of "Western" has morphed to something like "Communism."

The "long-term engagement" framing is a dodge. You've never been afraid of long-term engagements. See: all your chest-beating about Ukraine.

The real question is far darker: if you believe in democracy, why aren't you celebrating the removal of a dictator from the single easiest country on earth to transition back to it?

Venezuela is not Somalia. It has borders, institutions, a literate population, a unified national identity, and a recent democratic memory. Trump just demonstrated how little force was required to remove a narco-state that survived only on inertia.

You are one of these people who idolize democracy, chant "threat to democracy" like it is a holy hymn, who buy into Open Society ideals. And yet, when an actual dictator is removed, your response is anger.

Why?

Because at some point, Venezuelan people became expendable in service of a larger abstraction you call "stability" of the liberal democratic order.

Maduro's Venezuela was useful. It was predictable. It gave BRICS a foothold in the hemisphere, kept drug flows legible and quantifiable, and weakened an increasingly inconvenient United States. It made the region easier to model, easier to manage, easier to explain in policy memos. In short, Maduro made the whole world more legible to you.

A free Venezuela introduces uncertainty. It restores agency to people who were supposed to remain variables.

So now we get lectures about "international law," tantrums from NGOs, and sudden concern for norms that were never extended to the people living under a narco-dictatorship.

We understand the objection. It just isn't the one you say out loud.