Forwarded from The Justice League (Toria Brooke)
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
NEW — Nicki Minaj on why she began supporting President Trump:
"When I saw how he was being treated over, and over, and over, I just couldn't handle it... and I didn't think he deserved it, and it made me think, 'I can't do this anymore.'"
"When I saw how he was being treated over, and over, and over, I just couldn't handle it... and I didn't think he deserved it, and it made me think, 'I can't do this anymore.'"
❤1
Dr. Peter Attia issues a statement regarding his relationship with Jeffrey and the Epstein files.
The following email is what I sent my team last night. I sent a similar version to my patients, also.
***
You’ve put your trust, your credibility, and your hard work into what we have built together, and I take that responsibility seriously. You deserve a complete and honest account of what did and did not happen. I apologize that I did not get this out sooner, but I want to be thorough.
The purpose of the DOJ releasing these documents is clear: to identify individuals who participated in criminal activity, enabled it, or witnessed it. I am not in any of those categories, and there is no evidence to the contrary.
To be clear:
1. I was not involved in any criminal activity.
2. My interactions with Epstein had nothing to do with his sexual abuse or exploitation of anyone.
3. I was never on his plane, never on his island, and never present at any sex parties.
That said, I apologize and regret putting myself in a position where emails, some of them embarrassing, tasteless, and indefensible, are now public, and that is on me. I accept that reality and the humiliation that comes with it.
***
I want to start by directly addressing the email thread that I’ve been asked about the most.
In June 2015, I sent Epstein an email with the subject line “Got a fresh shipment.” The email contained a photograph of bottles of metformin, a medication I had just received from the pharmacy for my own use. The subject line referred to the picture of the bottles of medication.
He replied with the words “me too” and attached a photograph of an adult woman. I responded with crude, tasteless banter. Reading that exchange now is very embarrassing, and I will not defend it. I’m ashamed of myself for everything about this. At the time, I understood this exchange as juvenile, not a reference to anything dark or harmful.
At that point in my career, I had little exposure to prominent people, and that level of access was novel to me. Everything about him seemed excessive and exclusive, including the fact that he lived in the largest home in all of Manhattan, owned a Boeing 727, and hosted parties with the most powerful and prominent leaders in business and politics. I treated that access as something to be quiet about rather than discussed freely with others. One line in that exchange, about his life being outrageous and me not being able to tell anyone, is being interpreted as awareness of wrongdoing. That is not how I meant it at all. What I was referring to, poorly and flippantly, was the discretion commanded by those social and professional circles–the idea that you don’t talk about who you meet, the dinners you attend and the power and influence of the people in those settings. What I wrote in that email reads terribly, and I own that.
***
I met Epstein in 2014 through a prominent female healthcare leader while I was raising funds for scientific research. At that time, he was widely known in academic and philanthropic circles as a funder of science and moved openly among credible institutions and public figures.
Between summer 2014 and spring 2019, I met with him on approximately seven or eight occasions at his New York City home, regarding research studies and to meet others he introduced me to. I never visited his island or ranch, and I never flew on any of his planes. When I was at his home, it was either meeting with him directly, meeting with small groups of scientists, doctors, or business leaders, and once at a dinner in 2015 with a number of guests including prominent heads of state. In retrospect, the presence and credibility of such venerable people in different orbits led me to make assumptions about him that clouded my judgment in ways it shouldn’t have.
I was not his doctor, though several times I answered general medical questions and recommended other providers to him.
Shortly after we met, I asked him directly about his 2008 conviction. He characterized it as prostitution-related charges.
The following email is what I sent my team last night. I sent a similar version to my patients, also.
***
You’ve put your trust, your credibility, and your hard work into what we have built together, and I take that responsibility seriously. You deserve a complete and honest account of what did and did not happen. I apologize that I did not get this out sooner, but I want to be thorough.
The purpose of the DOJ releasing these documents is clear: to identify individuals who participated in criminal activity, enabled it, or witnessed it. I am not in any of those categories, and there is no evidence to the contrary.
To be clear:
1. I was not involved in any criminal activity.
2. My interactions with Epstein had nothing to do with his sexual abuse or exploitation of anyone.
3. I was never on his plane, never on his island, and never present at any sex parties.
That said, I apologize and regret putting myself in a position where emails, some of them embarrassing, tasteless, and indefensible, are now public, and that is on me. I accept that reality and the humiliation that comes with it.
***
I want to start by directly addressing the email thread that I’ve been asked about the most.
In June 2015, I sent Epstein an email with the subject line “Got a fresh shipment.” The email contained a photograph of bottles of metformin, a medication I had just received from the pharmacy for my own use. The subject line referred to the picture of the bottles of medication.
He replied with the words “me too” and attached a photograph of an adult woman. I responded with crude, tasteless banter. Reading that exchange now is very embarrassing, and I will not defend it. I’m ashamed of myself for everything about this. At the time, I understood this exchange as juvenile, not a reference to anything dark or harmful.
At that point in my career, I had little exposure to prominent people, and that level of access was novel to me. Everything about him seemed excessive and exclusive, including the fact that he lived in the largest home in all of Manhattan, owned a Boeing 727, and hosted parties with the most powerful and prominent leaders in business and politics. I treated that access as something to be quiet about rather than discussed freely with others. One line in that exchange, about his life being outrageous and me not being able to tell anyone, is being interpreted as awareness of wrongdoing. That is not how I meant it at all. What I was referring to, poorly and flippantly, was the discretion commanded by those social and professional circles–the idea that you don’t talk about who you meet, the dinners you attend and the power and influence of the people in those settings. What I wrote in that email reads terribly, and I own that.
***
I met Epstein in 2014 through a prominent female healthcare leader while I was raising funds for scientific research. At that time, he was widely known in academic and philanthropic circles as a funder of science and moved openly among credible institutions and public figures.
Between summer 2014 and spring 2019, I met with him on approximately seven or eight occasions at his New York City home, regarding research studies and to meet others he introduced me to. I never visited his island or ranch, and I never flew on any of his planes. When I was at his home, it was either meeting with him directly, meeting with small groups of scientists, doctors, or business leaders, and once at a dinner in 2015 with a number of guests including prominent heads of state. In retrospect, the presence and credibility of such venerable people in different orbits led me to make assumptions about him that clouded my judgment in ways it shouldn’t have.
I was not his doctor, though several times I answered general medical questions and recommended other providers to him.
Shortly after we met, I asked him directly about his 2008 conviction. He characterized it as prostitution-related charges.
In 2018, I came to learn this was grossly minimized (more on this below). I was incredibly naïve to believe him. I mistook his social acceptance in the eyes of the credible people I saw him with for acceptability, and that was a serious error in my judgment. To be clear, I never witnessed illegal behavior and never saw anyone who appeared underage in his presence.
***
In November 2018 I read the Miami Herald investigative article. I was repulsed by what I learned. Nauseated. It marked a clear and irreversible line between what I knew before and what I understood afterward.
At that point, I told him directly he needed to accept responsibility for what he did.
Hoping to provide the victims from the Herald piece with support, I contacted a residential trauma facility to understand what funding comprehensive care for many victims would require. (Those communications were between me and the facility and were therefore not part of the document release.) I spoke with him and shared that information and insisted that he fund their care, beginning with residential treatment and followed by lifelong therapy.
In hindsight, even attempting to facilitate accountability was a mistake and once again reflected just how naïve I was at the time. Once the full scope of his actions was clear, disengagement should have been the only appropriate response. My intent does not change that, and I regret not drawing that boundary immediately.
***
Nothing in this letter is meant to minimize the harm suffered by the young women Epstein abused. Their trauma is permanent.
I am not asking for a pass from you. I am not asking anyone to ignore the emails or pretend they aren’t ugly. They simply are.
The man I am today, roughly ten years later, would not write them and would not associate with Epstein at all. Whatever growth I’ve had over the past decade does not erase the emails I wrote then.
I recognize that my actions and words have consequences for the people I care deeply about, including all of you. I regret the cost this has placed on you, and I take responsibility for it.
I won’t ask anyone to defend me or explain this on my behalf. If you have questions or concerns, I’ll address them directly with you, my team.
***
In November 2018 I read the Miami Herald investigative article. I was repulsed by what I learned. Nauseated. It marked a clear and irreversible line between what I knew before and what I understood afterward.
At that point, I told him directly he needed to accept responsibility for what he did.
Hoping to provide the victims from the Herald piece with support, I contacted a residential trauma facility to understand what funding comprehensive care for many victims would require. (Those communications were between me and the facility and were therefore not part of the document release.) I spoke with him and shared that information and insisted that he fund their care, beginning with residential treatment and followed by lifelong therapy.
In hindsight, even attempting to facilitate accountability was a mistake and once again reflected just how naïve I was at the time. Once the full scope of his actions was clear, disengagement should have been the only appropriate response. My intent does not change that, and I regret not drawing that boundary immediately.
***
Nothing in this letter is meant to minimize the harm suffered by the young women Epstein abused. Their trauma is permanent.
I am not asking for a pass from you. I am not asking anyone to ignore the emails or pretend they aren’t ugly. They simply are.
The man I am today, roughly ten years later, would not write them and would not associate with Epstein at all. Whatever growth I’ve had over the past decade does not erase the emails I wrote then.
I recognize that my actions and words have consequences for the people I care deeply about, including all of you. I regret the cost this has placed on you, and I take responsibility for it.
I won’t ask anyone to defend me or explain this on my behalf. If you have questions or concerns, I’ll address them directly with you, my team.
Forwarded from Rybar in English
In Texas, a special Senate election in the 9th district was won by a Democrat — an absolutely unprecedented situation for the Texas political landscape.
Republicans had dominated this district since 1991, and in the 2024 elections, Donald Trump took 17 points here.
Conservative Republican activist Lee Wamsgans was crushed (57% vs 43%) by 33-year-old Air Force veteran Taylor Remet. Notably, Wamsgans had a mega-budget of $736k compared to Remet's $70k, and received support from Governor Greg Abbott and President Trump.
Wamsgans lost due to low Republican turnout (winter weather + apathy), as well as Trump's harsh immigration policy — Texas, being a border state, has many immigrants.
Meanwhile, the Republican Party is in panic — the Texas election results may serve as a grim harbinger of its total collapse in the November Congressional elections.
#USA
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Telegram
Рыбарь
Военно-аналитический центр.
Вылавливаем интересную нам тему в море сырой информации и пишем о сложном просто.
@ne_rybar — тоже мы
Связь: @rybar_feedback_bot
Сотрудничество: @XIII_thirteenth
Сайт: rybar.ru
MAX: max.ru/Rybar
RuTube: rutube.ru/u/rybar
Вылавливаем интересную нам тему в море сырой информации и пишем о сложном просто.
@ne_rybar — тоже мы
Связь: @rybar_feedback_bot
Сотрудничество: @XIII_thirteenth
Сайт: rybar.ru
MAX: max.ru/Rybar
RuTube: rutube.ru/u/rybar
Forwarded from DD Geopolitics
🇫🇷 Pavel Durov says French police are currently raiding X’s offices in Paris.
🔴 @DDGeopolitics | Socials | Donate | Advertising
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🤬1
Forwarded from 𝕀𝕟 𝕄𝕒𝕘𝕟𝕒 𝔼𝕩𝕔𝕚𝕥𝕒𝕥𝕚𝕠 (_ScalpS_)
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
The rules of perception
Forwarded from 𝕀𝕟 𝕄𝕒𝕘𝕟𝕒 𝔼𝕩𝕔𝕚𝕥𝕒𝕥𝕚𝕠 (_ScalpS_)
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Kids on Roblox are launching ICE raids
Forwarded from Insider Paper
JUST IN - Norway crown princess's son pleads not guilty to four counts of rape https://bit.ly/4qeDJxG
Follow @InsiderPaper for more news
Follow @InsiderPaper for more news