Ribbit.

ad
ig: attuningforks

The system is corrupt to the core. There are no political saviors. There are no sides. Both are bought out to multinational corporations.

There are no real choices, just the illusion of choice.

There is, however, the reality of energetically giving your power away and consciously choosing another human to rule over your life.

Your power is yours. Rule over your own life. Your power is inherent to your being, and it comes from God who dwells in you, around you, and as you. Let God flow through you.

Be conscious not to give your power away.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9pq2TBNp134&t=10s

Here's my first podcast episode with Alec. Hopefully it's enjoyable and not bad for a first ep.

There will be another voice chat tomorrow at 10am central time. The banner at the top of this channel shows the countdown to it. This has been a fun way to hear from people living in different parts of the world, and have a spontaneous inspired conversation. Different themes or topics of exploration arise each time but there isn’t one established beforehand. It’s primarily about getting to say hi, tune in, connect, be together and express whatever feels most pertinent and relevant to each of us. Looking forward to it.

~Christine

Terrain theory on Herpes.

@AntiMaskNYC

Full explanation of the “genomic sequencing” for SARS-CoV-2 from my brother Jacob:

The Corman-Drostan team developed the Test for Covid-19 based on an In-silico Genetic Sequence (from a computer simulation). They did not have any Viral Isolates of Covid-19 available, nor any clinical samples of anyone sick with the new disease. Simply based on that, the test is invalid.

A new medical test must be validated against a 'Gold Standard", that is, a test which is 100% Accurate. The PCR test has not undergone any Validation study, it has no known error rate/accuracy rate, therefore it is not a valid test, as it has not undergone the basic testing every medical test goes through routinely.

The Corman-Drostan team, used the SARS sequence from 2003 (which was never properly purified or isolated, the same procedure was done with this virus as well), they then used the PCR primer related to that sequence, amplified it using PCR, sequenced what they amplified (they did this multiple times) and used the sequences that were different from the SARS sequence to develop primers for the diagnostic test. However, since there were no purified samples or Isolates of any kind, this entire experiment is made up.

A PCR test is not a diagnostic test, as it does not test for the presence of a virus, it simply tests for genetic material/genetic debri and must be coupled with Clinical Representation of a specific set of symptoms. The test must go through a specific set of "Cycles" which double the amount of genetic material being tested. The Cycle Threshold for these tests usually span between 10-25, on average usually a 17 CT. During this Pandemic, the Cycle Threshold has been anywhere from 35-50 plus. The WHO has an average CT of 40. Per the words of the creator of this method of testing, Kary Mullis, you can make anybody test positive for anything using PCR. "You can make a whole lot of something out of something". He also stated, testing positive with PCR, does not equate to the presence of a virus, nor does it mean you are sick. This test has not been FDA approved, and therefore, is an experimental test.


In the Test, the team identifies these 2 snippets of genetic material, they say must be coming from the Theoretical virus. It turns out, when you input the sequences that are being tested for, to show a positive case, the sequences show up 93 times in the Human genome, and approximately 91 times from Bacteria/Fungi (Microbes). These supposed "New" sequences show up in nature and are not new at all. Nevermind, you cannot possibly say these sequences are coming from a "new virus" if you don't have the virus in the first place.


The team then sends this test to China, to test for this "Novel" virus that they created a test for, with none of the "Novel" virus at their disposal. The Chinese find these sequences in their 'Atypical Pneumonia" patients with non-specific respiratory symptoms, (obviously being that these sequences show up in humans), and they create an entire "Genome" based off of 1 Clinical Sample. In order to create a Genome correctly, you would need hundreds upon thousands of samples to develop an actual accurate "Viral Genome", they took 1 person that tested positive with a PCR test created without any virus.

They take a Clinical Sample from a PCR Positive person's lung fluid, with symptoms consistent to "Atypical Pneumonia". They take only the Short RNA strands from the clinical sample, and put them into a Computer Program, these Programs being: Megahit and Trinity. These two programs assemble a bunch of Contigs (Possible Genome structures) made up of all the short RNA strands from the person, which number 56 Million. The Trinity computer came up with 1,329,960 Contigs ranging from 201-11,760 base pairs, the Megahit computer came up with 384,096 contigs ranging from 200-30,474 base pairs. In layman, the computer generated almost 2 Million possible Genome Structures. /1

The longest contig (30,474 base pairs) was chosen, simply because it was the longest one. Upon further investigation, this genome was only 80% similar to SARS-COV 1 bat-like sequence. They then add some Sars 1 Sequences to make it look more like a SARS virus. 80%, is less similar than what humans are to house cats. The claim was the Genome totaled to 29,903 bases long, which negates 571 bases from the contig, if those weren't valid how do we know this entire contig is valid? The Contig chosen, was created out of 123,613 different pieces of short RNA from the clinical genetic sample. They don't know where these sequences are coming from, they don't know if the genome is real, they don't know the amount of error in the process, they don't know how many "reads" were correct, this entire thing is theoretical and computer generated.

What is a supposed 'Variant'? It is an attempt to repeat the original experiment. Instead of templating it against the Bat SARS 1 virus, they template it against the Genomic Sequence result of the first initial study. (The 29,903 base long genome). They are not getting the same results because they are not getting a sample from an intact isolated/Pure organism/sample that would have the same sequence. Each time the experiment is done, the results can be extremely different or a fraction of a percent different. A variant is the inability to replicate the initial experiment, and thereby, invalidates the initial results. There have been well over 5000 "variants" reported. /2

Thank you everyone who joined in for the voice chat today. I appreciate you all and I’m grateful to be hearing from so many wonderful people. It’s a great reminder that there are many who are thinking deeply, asking for the truth, and making courageous choices in life.

There will be another voice chat on Tuesday at 5pm central and again on Saturday at 10am central.