Here is my response to Mercola’s article (2/2)
Stefan Lanka, a virologist, has conducted the first ever *proper* control experiments of both virology’s vero cell culture virus isolation experiments and the so-called genomic sequencing of SARS-COV-2— the foundational evidence for all of COVID19.
First, for context, I will explain the procedure used by all virologists to “isolate” a virus.
If you read the methodology of any “SARS-COV-2 virus isolation paper”, you will find that the procedure is as follows:
Minimally filtered snot from a sick host is added to a vero cell culture (monkey kidney cell) alongside cytotoxic antibiotics like gentamicin/amphotericin (usually at 3x normal concentration). They also add “minimal nutrient medium,” which is the minimal amounts of nutrients— DMEM (Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle Medium) and fetal bovine serum— to keep the cell alive. They also sometimes add trypsin. The cell breaks down into a bunch of fragments— called the cytopathic effect. They then stain and heat the fragments to prepare them for electron microscopy, take pictures of them and call them “viruses.”
In phase 1 of Stefan’s control experiment, he followed the exact same procedure except that he did not introduce a sample from a sick host (which virologists presuppose contains the virus, but never validate) to the culture, but used all of the other same ingredients. The exact same cytopathic effect happened, thus proving that the foundational evidence used by virologists to claim the existence of a pathogenic virus is pure pseudoscience.
In phase 2 of the control experiment, Stefan used all of the same ingredients as in the control (antibiotics, minimal nutrient medium, etc.), except that he added yeast to take the place of the snot that supposedly contains the virus and the supposed virus RNA that is uploaded into a computer program to generate a so-called “viral genome.” As Dr. Cowan describes in his recent book, Breaking the Spell, “the reason for adding the yeast RNA is because of the way that the genome of a ‘virus’ is found, a computerized process called ‘alignment.’ The alignment process starts with fragments of RNA and constructs a theoretical genome—one that never exists at any point in the actual sample. This genome never exists in any person, and it never exists intact even in the culture results; it exists only inside the computer, based on an alignment process that arranges these short pieces into an entire ‘genome.’ It is for this reason that every complete genome of SARS-CoV-2 is referred to as an ‘in silico’ genome, meaning a genome that exists only in the computer. As long as you have enough of these RNA fragments and provide the template, the computer can recreate any genome.”
Stefan was able to recreate 100% of the so-called SARS-Cov-2 genome without any clinical sample from a sick person present, but rather a random sample of yeast.
Could there be a pathogenic disease causing virus? Absolutely. Has the existence of one been scientifically established? No. The evidence is severely lacking at best and completely pseudoscientific and fraudulent at worst, especially given we’ve flipped the entire world upside down over it.
Stefan Lanka, a virologist, has conducted the first ever *proper* control experiments of both virology’s vero cell culture virus isolation experiments and the so-called genomic sequencing of SARS-COV-2— the foundational evidence for all of COVID19.
First, for context, I will explain the procedure used by all virologists to “isolate” a virus.
If you read the methodology of any “SARS-COV-2 virus isolation paper”, you will find that the procedure is as follows:
Minimally filtered snot from a sick host is added to a vero cell culture (monkey kidney cell) alongside cytotoxic antibiotics like gentamicin/amphotericin (usually at 3x normal concentration). They also add “minimal nutrient medium,” which is the minimal amounts of nutrients— DMEM (Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle Medium) and fetal bovine serum— to keep the cell alive. They also sometimes add trypsin. The cell breaks down into a bunch of fragments— called the cytopathic effect. They then stain and heat the fragments to prepare them for electron microscopy, take pictures of them and call them “viruses.”
In phase 1 of Stefan’s control experiment, he followed the exact same procedure except that he did not introduce a sample from a sick host (which virologists presuppose contains the virus, but never validate) to the culture, but used all of the other same ingredients. The exact same cytopathic effect happened, thus proving that the foundational evidence used by virologists to claim the existence of a pathogenic virus is pure pseudoscience.
In phase 2 of the control experiment, Stefan used all of the same ingredients as in the control (antibiotics, minimal nutrient medium, etc.), except that he added yeast to take the place of the snot that supposedly contains the virus and the supposed virus RNA that is uploaded into a computer program to generate a so-called “viral genome.” As Dr. Cowan describes in his recent book, Breaking the Spell, “the reason for adding the yeast RNA is because of the way that the genome of a ‘virus’ is found, a computerized process called ‘alignment.’ The alignment process starts with fragments of RNA and constructs a theoretical genome—one that never exists at any point in the actual sample. This genome never exists in any person, and it never exists intact even in the culture results; it exists only inside the computer, based on an alignment process that arranges these short pieces into an entire ‘genome.’ It is for this reason that every complete genome of SARS-CoV-2 is referred to as an ‘in silico’ genome, meaning a genome that exists only in the computer. As long as you have enough of these RNA fragments and provide the template, the computer can recreate any genome.”
Stefan was able to recreate 100% of the so-called SARS-Cov-2 genome without any clinical sample from a sick person present, but rather a random sample of yeast.
Could there be a pathogenic disease causing virus? Absolutely. Has the existence of one been scientifically established? No. The evidence is severely lacking at best and completely pseudoscientific and fraudulent at worst, especially given we’ve flipped the entire world upside down over it.
👍4🔥2
I’m sorry, but “This is the new definition of isolation only used by virologists because virologists are experts and they say so” does not equate to science, nor does it prove “virus.”
Alec_Zeck's_response_to_the_statement_made_by_Joseph_Mercola_regarding.pdf
35.5 KB
PDF version of my response to Joe Mercola’s article “Yes, SARS-CoV-2 Is a Real Virus.”
Christine here. I’ll be hosting a voice chat again tomorrow, Jan 18th at 3pm Pacific, 5pm Central, 6pm Eastern or whatever time it converts to in your time zone. For those who haven’t attended one before they’re an informal chance to say hi, connect, acknowledge where we’re at and explore whatever topics or themes feels most relevant for us. The banner at the top of the channel shows the countdown to it and you can click on that banner at the time of to join. Looking forward to it.
Discernment. Cleverly crafted disinformation that seems to be “exposing corruption” but is simply perpetuating the narrative in a different way for future scenarios. As Dr. Sam Bailey has stated, “just because it was written down on paper doesn’t mean it’s true or biologically possible.” Also, as she states, content on GOF seems to be promoted while content on lack of proof of viruses is scrubbed from the internet… hmmm….
Did something happen in a lab? Yes, I do believe so. Was a “bio-weapon” created in a lab? Yes, I do believe so. But it wasn’t a 🦠, it was the shot.
Did something happen in a lab? Yes, I do believe so. Was a “bio-weapon” created in a lab? Yes, I do believe so. But it wasn’t a 🦠, it was the shot.
👍14
What does the scientific evidence tell us about the shape of the earth? What about your personal observations?
Anonymous Poll
25%
Evidence: round | Observations: flat
39%
Evidence: round | Observations: round
31%
Evidence: flat | Observations: flat
5%
Evidence: flat | Observations: round
👍4🔥2
Albert-Einstein-The-Earth-Mover-1.pdf
1.3 MB
Interesting information. Keep an open mind. Keep exploring.
❤1
Christine here. The voice chat I’m hosting today is starting in 5 minutes. You can click on the banner at the top of the channel to join. For those who haven’t attended one before they’re an informal chance to say hi, connect, acknowledge where we’re at and explore whatever topics or themes feels most relevant for us.
Thank you all who joined in for the voice chat today. I appreciate you and what becomes available as we come together.
I’ll be back to host another voice chat next Tuesday, Jan 25th at 3pm Pacific, 5pm Central, 6pm Eastern or whatever time that converts to for you. You’re welcome to join in for that.
~Christine
I’ll be back to host another voice chat next Tuesday, Jan 25th at 3pm Pacific, 5pm Central, 6pm Eastern or whatever time that converts to for you. You’re welcome to join in for that.
~Christine
👍4
As an aside, if anyone could use some support with invigorating the heart, or connecting with your vitality, I explored this theme during a recent meditation/healing session I facilitated. You’re welcome to listen in: https://soundcloud.com/cyole/invigorating-the-heart-meditation-healing-session
~Christine
~Christine
SoundCloud
Hear the world’s sounds
Explore the largest community of artists, bands, podcasters and creators of music & audio
❤7👍1
TICKETS HERE: https://healthfreedomforhumanity.brushfire.com/conference/525542
if you’re in Kansas City or the surrounding area on January 29th, please come join us!
$99 ticket includes:
•6-8 speakers (3:00-7:30)
•Catered Dinner provided by Enjoy Pure Food and Drink
•A DJ, dance party, cash bar, and meet/greet with other local Health Freedom Oriented People (7:30-10:00)
if you’re in Kansas City or the surrounding area on January 29th, please come join us!
$99 ticket includes:
•6-8 speakers (3:00-7:30)
•Catered Dinner provided by Enjoy Pure Food and Drink
•A DJ, dance party, cash bar, and meet/greet with other local Health Freedom Oriented People (7:30-10:00)
👍1
Going live for my first livestream on Sayer Ji's new platform, Be Sovereign, on Monday at 9:00 AM CST! I will be discussing the Nature of Reality with Dawn Lester and David Parker!: https://besovereign.com/the-way-forward/the-way-forward/24-jan-09-00-the-nature-of-reality-with-dawn-lester-and-david-parker
Unite
The Nature of Reality with Dawn Lester and David Parker
https://unite.live/s/jVCT34
.
Date: 24 Jan 09:00 AM CST
.
Date: 24 Jan 09:00 AM CST
👍9