Because I’m always open to questioning, this video ALSO brings up some good points too: https://youtu.be/AQl8h7Aa75s

It’s all a mystery

NEW - Former U.S. President George W. Bush: "The decision of one man to launch a wholly unjustified and brutal invasion of Iraq. I mean, of the Ukraine."

@disclosetv

Melissa is 🔥

“First, I am an anarchist, pure and simple, which means I am not conservative or “liberal,” (a misused word) not right or left, Republican or Democrat, or Libertarian for that matter. For those unable to comprehend proper language, or who are not willing to do the five minutes of research necessary to understand the real meaning of words, I will explain. Anarchy, from the Greek, French, and Latin roots of our language, means in essence, “without rulers or without rule,” nothing more. In other words, it means no belief in government, or any one or any group ruling over another. It does not mean total chaos, rioting, property destruction, violence, lawlessness, or any other such bastardized meanings falsely attributed by political propagandists and accepted by the ignorant populations of today.

Because of this, I also believe in total non-aggression, or no use of force against another without legitimate cause. Cause does not mean the state warring against its own or other countries, it means in actual defense of self and family in the presence of active or physical threat, or intent to cause harm to person or property, or infringement on liberty. Self defense has no limits in my opinion, other than once the threat is squelched; all force must cease. Some, like the great Murray Rothbard, understood in realty the idea of “non-aggression,” but many take the term too literally and simplistically, usually in an effort to destroy the very essence of the axiom. They desire to search for alternative methods and exceptions in order to destroy the very natural idea of non-aggression. This is a gross contradiction. All boils down to the individual, not the ridiculous collective ‘common good,’ and that is why those who disagree with non-aggression are always politically motivated.

It stands to reason then, that I abhor war; all war. War is brutal and murderous aggression by nation-states. Considering this country called the ‘United’ States of America, it has always initiated and participated in aggression and war; at least 94% of its existence. It matters not which war is considered, whether the heinous war against American Indians, the war of Northern aggression called the ‘Civil’ War, World War I, World War II, the Vietnam War, the Middle Eastern War or so-called war on (of) terror, or any other war or conflict purposely manufactured and prosecuted by the ruling classes. War is simply a tool used by the state to acquire money and property by theft, to advance geo-political agendas, to gain power and control over not only the pretended ‘enemy,’ but in most cases to gain power over its own people, to extinguish freedom of the individual, and to eliminate populations. There is no such thing as a good war.”

https://www.lewrockwell.com/2022/05/gary-d-barnett/i-do-not-give-a-damn-what-other-people-think-this-an-indication-of-respect/?fbclid=IwAR2WPXVqTcL_FmYgw6OsanV2bQ86yq7AIcLlRNU4DS5W6rvvODfRwydb8ug

Crazy how much your perceptions, and life in general, can change in 6 years.

I am anti-war, anarchist/voluntaryist. I think well intentioned people join the military and are sent off to war to kill others, thinking they’re “fighting for freedom”, but in reality they’re just fighting for the banking cartel and the military industrial complex.

“Finest army in the world”. Lol. More like most invasive, exploitative and destructive army in the world.

“Monkeypox.”

Episode #74 of the Health Freedom for Humanity podcast is now live!

Follow this link to listen or watch:

https://www.flowcode.com/page/healthfreedomforhumanity

In this episode, Alec talks with Greg Paul, co-creator of the course, Law for Mankind, about taking control of your own choices and overcoming deep-rooted fears by living a life of sovereignty through the common law of love.

Please join Greg’s FREE Common Law Q&A this Wednesday, May 25th at 11 AM PST!

https://thesovereignsway.com/law-for-mankind-open-q-a-special-may-2022/?link=19641

One of the most important episodes I’ve done. Here’s some extended show notes on it>>

HFfH Episode 74
*Extended Show Notes*

From HFFH Director, Alec Zeck:

Do you really need to fight for your freedom? Or is it something that you already have and you simply need to know how to express it?

We’ve come to understand that the former will lead you down a never-ending path of seeking and the latter is more than likely the truth. Freedom is something you already have, you’ve just been conditioned, propagandized and led to believe that you don’t.

So how do we go about expressing the freedom that is inherent to our BEING?

I consider Jon and Greg‘s course, Law for Mankind, to be the most important material I’ve come across in the last 2 1/2 years.
https://thesovereignsway.com/?link=19641

Jon Little and Greg Paul, the men who developed the course, are hosting a live, open-to-all Q&A on Wednesday the 25th of May at 11AM PST. I highly, highly recommend signing up to give you a sense of what their course is about.

You want to be able to hold those who commit trespasses against you— especially in the COVID era— accountable for their actions, right?

You want to be able to navigate the legal system while asserting your rights, right?

You want to be able to avoid controversy, seek remedy and handle things outside of court, right?

And, most importantly, you want to know how to be free, both internally and externally, right?

I cannot stress enough the importance of the material offered by Greg Paul and Jon Little at The Sovereign’s Way.

This course is worth ALL of the bangs for ALL of the bucks.

But don’t take it from me, sign up for the free Q&A here and find out for yourself!
https://thesovereignsway.com/law-for-mankind-open-q-a-special-may-2022/?link=19641

If you’ve been educated, informed and enriched by this podcast and would like to help support the fight for health freedom, please visit:
https://healthfreedomforhumanity.org/donate/

Masking, lockdowns, social distancing, business closures, P€R tests, hospital protocols, quackcines, discrimination, segregation, passports, The Great Reset, avian flu, Monkeypox, and everything else from the last 2 1/2 years all rest on a foundational lie:

The germ theory.

I’m sorry if you think I’m “beating a dead horse”, but the reality is, this horse isn’t dead. It’s alive, and it’s a triple crown winner at this point.

The overwhelming majority of society isn’t aware that it’s a lie, and a very large portion of the “freedom movement” isn’t either.

Everything that has happened the last 2 years is based on this lie, and that is precisely why I continue to talk about it.

It is all based in flawed reasoning, pseudoscientific and unproven presuppositions, and fraud. There is no proof that strictly adheres to the scientific method backing the claim that pathogenic particles are transmitted.

We will be playing this game forever until we attack the root of the fraud.

Sure, raising awareness to the inefficacy/dangers for all of the things established upon this initial fraud is important, but it only removes the branches. Why not chop the entire freaking tree down?

And, regardless of whether you *believe* that these pathogenic particles exist, can we at least agree that the evidence for them— for which everything else has been established upon— is shaky at best, and pseudoscientific/fraudulent at worst?

Why wouldn’t we want to address it?

Pseudoscience is anything that claims to be science but does not strictly adhere to the scientific method.

Virology does not clearly identify an IV, alleviating concerns for confounding variables, before proceeding with experimentation, and does not conduct proper controls.

And if you think I’m wrong (which is fine), answer this:

Via what methods do virologists ensure they have “the virus” (the independent variable), alleviating any concerns for confounding variables, before proceeding with experimentation and attempting to validate the hypothesis?

Also:
where did they conduct proper control experiments? Before you say “the mock”— did the mock include sputum from a healthy host? Did the mock include the same cell line? The same amount of trypsin, amphotericin, etc.? Did the mock still experience a CPE at any point?

I hope more people start raising awareness to this lie. It needs to end.

Context. See voice message below.