Masking, lockdowns, social distancing, business closures, P€R tests, hospital protocols, quackcines, discrimination, segregation, passports, The Great Reset, avian flu, Monkeypox, and everything else from the last 2 1/2 years all rest on a foundational lie:
The germ theory.
I’m sorry if you think I’m “beating a dead horse”, but the reality is, this horse isn’t dead. It’s alive, and it’s a triple crown winner at this point.
The overwhelming majority of society isn’t aware that it’s a lie, and a very large portion of the “freedom movement” isn’t either.
Everything that has happened the last 2 years is based on this lie, and that is precisely why I continue to talk about it.
It is all based in flawed reasoning, pseudoscientific and unproven presuppositions, and fraud. There is no proof that strictly adheres to the scientific method backing the claim that pathogenic particles are transmitted.
We will be playing this game forever until we attack the root of the fraud.
Sure, raising awareness to the inefficacy/dangers for all of the things established upon this initial fraud is important, but it only removes the branches. Why not chop the entire freaking tree down?
And, regardless of whether you *believe* that these pathogenic particles exist, can we at least agree that the evidence for them— for which everything else has been established upon— is shaky at best, and pseudoscientific/fraudulent at worst?
Why wouldn’t we want to address it?
Pseudoscience is anything that claims to be science but does not strictly adhere to the scientific method.
Virology does not clearly identify an IV, alleviating concerns for confounding variables, before proceeding with experimentation, and does not conduct proper controls.
And if you think I’m wrong (which is fine), answer this:
Via what methods do virologists ensure they have “the virus” (the independent variable), alleviating any concerns for confounding variables, before proceeding with experimentation and attempting to validate the hypothesis?
Also:
where did they conduct proper control experiments? Before you say “the mock”— did the mock include sputum from a healthy host? Did the mock include the same cell line? The same amount of trypsin, amphotericin, etc.? Did the mock still experience a CPE at any point?
I hope more people start raising awareness to this lie. It needs to end.
The germ theory.
I’m sorry if you think I’m “beating a dead horse”, but the reality is, this horse isn’t dead. It’s alive, and it’s a triple crown winner at this point.
The overwhelming majority of society isn’t aware that it’s a lie, and a very large portion of the “freedom movement” isn’t either.
Everything that has happened the last 2 years is based on this lie, and that is precisely why I continue to talk about it.
It is all based in flawed reasoning, pseudoscientific and unproven presuppositions, and fraud. There is no proof that strictly adheres to the scientific method backing the claim that pathogenic particles are transmitted.
We will be playing this game forever until we attack the root of the fraud.
Sure, raising awareness to the inefficacy/dangers for all of the things established upon this initial fraud is important, but it only removes the branches. Why not chop the entire freaking tree down?
And, regardless of whether you *believe* that these pathogenic particles exist, can we at least agree that the evidence for them— for which everything else has been established upon— is shaky at best, and pseudoscientific/fraudulent at worst?
Why wouldn’t we want to address it?
Pseudoscience is anything that claims to be science but does not strictly adhere to the scientific method.
Virology does not clearly identify an IV, alleviating concerns for confounding variables, before proceeding with experimentation, and does not conduct proper controls.
And if you think I’m wrong (which is fine), answer this:
Via what methods do virologists ensure they have “the virus” (the independent variable), alleviating any concerns for confounding variables, before proceeding with experimentation and attempting to validate the hypothesis?
Also:
where did they conduct proper control experiments? Before you say “the mock”— did the mock include sputum from a healthy host? Did the mock include the same cell line? The same amount of trypsin, amphotericin, etc.? Did the mock still experience a CPE at any point?
I hope more people start raising awareness to this lie. It needs to end.
👍52🔥18❤17🥰1
There Are No Such Things as Constitutional Rights
“Some have forgotten, and most have no understanding of the history of the Constitutional Convention. This was a coup completed by Hamilton and his followers to create a strong central governing system, where most all power was given to a federal or national government instead of to the individual and the states. Those attending the convention had claimed their task as only to alter and improve the Articles of Confederation, not to scrap the current Constitution of the United States. But there was never any intention of improving upon the current “law of the land,” but only to set up a new federal state with unlimited power. Keep in mind that the Articles of Confederation did not allow for a president, did not allow the federal government any power whatsoever to tax, so it was extremely restrictive of any executive or federal power whatsoever.
So if freedom were desired, why then would a new constitution that gave immense powers to the federal government over states and individuals be so revered by those calling themselves Constitutionalists? Why do any that have read Article 1, Section 8 of the Constitution, the power’s clauses, claim that this document was ever meant to protect the rights of man? How is an unlimited power to tax, to control all commerce, foreign and domestic, to coin and control all money, to provide for the general welfare, to borrow money on the credit of the United States, to declare and prosecute war, to raise and support militaries, and to make all laws necessary to enforce all these powers and more?
The Constitution is a contradiction at every level, as granting these unlimited powers to the federal nationstate, and then at the same time claiming to protect the freedom of the the individual, is not possible. Every single power “granted” in this horrendous document negates any protection of liberty.”
https://www.lewrockwell.com/2020/04/gary-d-barnett/there-are-no-such-things-as-constitutional-rights/
“Some have forgotten, and most have no understanding of the history of the Constitutional Convention. This was a coup completed by Hamilton and his followers to create a strong central governing system, where most all power was given to a federal or national government instead of to the individual and the states. Those attending the convention had claimed their task as only to alter and improve the Articles of Confederation, not to scrap the current Constitution of the United States. But there was never any intention of improving upon the current “law of the land,” but only to set up a new federal state with unlimited power. Keep in mind that the Articles of Confederation did not allow for a president, did not allow the federal government any power whatsoever to tax, so it was extremely restrictive of any executive or federal power whatsoever.
So if freedom were desired, why then would a new constitution that gave immense powers to the federal government over states and individuals be so revered by those calling themselves Constitutionalists? Why do any that have read Article 1, Section 8 of the Constitution, the power’s clauses, claim that this document was ever meant to protect the rights of man? How is an unlimited power to tax, to control all commerce, foreign and domestic, to coin and control all money, to provide for the general welfare, to borrow money on the credit of the United States, to declare and prosecute war, to raise and support militaries, and to make all laws necessary to enforce all these powers and more?
The Constitution is a contradiction at every level, as granting these unlimited powers to the federal nationstate, and then at the same time claiming to protect the freedom of the the individual, is not possible. Every single power “granted” in this horrendous document negates any protection of liberty.”
https://www.lewrockwell.com/2020/04/gary-d-barnett/there-are-no-such-things-as-constitutional-rights/
LewRockwell
There Are No Such Things as Constitutional Rights - LewRockwell
“A man’s natural rights are his own, against the whole world; and any infringement of them is equally a crime, whether committed by one man, or by millions; whether committed by one man, calling himself a robber, (or by any other name indicating his true…
👍16🔥1
Alec posted a Falicious Argument he encountered on Twitter regarding Chicken Pox and the assumption that it is contagious. He explained why this wasn't the case and honestly for us, In the beginning of exposing Germ theory, it seemed like a decent question. That is, until you look at the methodology of experiments done, the inability to isolate any virus particles directly from the fluids and cause disease with them, as well as contagion experiments failing. Check out my Chicken Pox post here, also found on my Instagram: UnderCoverVirologist. The last slide is yet another experiment that showed the fraudulent contagion model even more, regarding Chicken Pox, provided by our friend Jordan Grant. -Jacob Diaz
👍10