The truth about the Pfizer BioNTech mRNA product
The media is literally lying to the public. The only phase of the trials that have been completed by Pfizer is Phase 1.
https://off-guardian.org/2021/01/03/what-vaccine-trials/
The Phase 3 trials they claim 95% efficacy will not conclude until Feb 2023.
Just so you know this 95% number is a relative risk reduction not an absolute risk reduction. What does that mean you ask.
Here is the study https://www.fda.gov/media/144245/download
They had 18,900 people in the vaccine group of that group they diagnosed 8 people with covid 19.
They had 18,890 people in the placebo group of that group they diagnosed 162 people with covid 19.
There for they are claiming that this vaccine reduces your likelihood of getting covid 19 by 154 out of 162. That is the 95% risk reduction.
But what they don't tell you is that this is a relative risk reduction and what your actually seeing is an absolute risk reduction from .85% to .04%. An absolute risk reduction of .81% give or take.
Meanwhile the data from the first 4 days of the vaccine roll out showed that 2.8% of people had a health impact event.
https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/acip/meetings/downloads/slides-2020-12/slides-12-19/05-COVID-CLARK.pdf
They describe a health impact event as follows;
*unable to perform normal daily activities, unable to work, required care from doctor or health care professional
If your doctor or health professional does not share this information with you before they attempt to get you to sign a consent form, they are violating the Nuremberg code and this is a crime against humanity.
The media is lying to you by omission. It is now our jobs to inform ourselves of the real facts of these experimental cellular technologies they are presenting as vaccines.
The media is literally lying to the public. The only phase of the trials that have been completed by Pfizer is Phase 1.
https://off-guardian.org/2021/01/03/what-vaccine-trials/
The Phase 3 trials they claim 95% efficacy will not conclude until Feb 2023.
Just so you know this 95% number is a relative risk reduction not an absolute risk reduction. What does that mean you ask.
Here is the study https://www.fda.gov/media/144245/download
They had 18,900 people in the vaccine group of that group they diagnosed 8 people with covid 19.
They had 18,890 people in the placebo group of that group they diagnosed 162 people with covid 19.
There for they are claiming that this vaccine reduces your likelihood of getting covid 19 by 154 out of 162. That is the 95% risk reduction.
But what they don't tell you is that this is a relative risk reduction and what your actually seeing is an absolute risk reduction from .85% to .04%. An absolute risk reduction of .81% give or take.
Meanwhile the data from the first 4 days of the vaccine roll out showed that 2.8% of people had a health impact event.
https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/acip/meetings/downloads/slides-2020-12/slides-12-19/05-COVID-CLARK.pdf
They describe a health impact event as follows;
*unable to perform normal daily activities, unable to work, required care from doctor or health care professional
If your doctor or health professional does not share this information with you before they attempt to get you to sign a consent form, they are violating the Nuremberg code and this is a crime against humanity.
The media is lying to you by omission. It is now our jobs to inform ourselves of the real facts of these experimental cellular technologies they are presenting as vaccines.
OffGuardian
What Vaccine Trials?
Iain Davis COVID 19 vaccine trials appear to have caused some confusion. Hopefully, this article might help clear things up a bit. People genuinely appear to believe that the COVID 19 vaccines have…
Try to use Apple Maps to get directions to Washington D.C. and see what happens...
Forwarded from Tommy John III
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
A highlight of my @chefpeteevans podcast that releases tomorrow. If you jam with me there’s a really good chance I will reference an 80’s movie. But when you get someone with the child like soul and energy of a Pete Evans, you get this. Lolol. So fun. Tune in tomorrow. The Dr Tommy John Podcast. @stevemartintogo @chevychase
.
.
.
Our immune systems end “pandemics.” This is not a pandemic. It’s worse.
.
.
.
#masksareuseless #whatvirus #tvneverlies #iheartpharma #germtheoryiscool #sleepisbad #sunshineisdevil #fastfoodfasthealth #nogodonlyshots #agendasaresafe #tvwhatdoidonext #breathisoverrated #maskyourkids #noforrealmaskyourkids #factcheckershavesmalldicks #anddryvajays #zuckernuts #notadoctorgates #fauciblowsgoats #godblessgerms #godblessviruses
.
.
.
Our immune systems end “pandemics.” This is not a pandemic. It’s worse.
.
.
.
#masksareuseless #whatvirus #tvneverlies #iheartpharma #germtheoryiscool #sleepisbad #sunshineisdevil #fastfoodfasthealth #nogodonlyshots #agendasaresafe #tvwhatdoidonext #breathisoverrated #maskyourkids #noforrealmaskyourkids #factcheckershavesmalldicks #anddryvajays #zuckernuts #notadoctorgates #fauciblowsgoats #godblessgerms #godblessviruses
Telegram founder’s message:
“I hear Facebook has an entire department devoted to figuring out why Telegram is so popular. Imagine dozens of employees working on just that full-time.
I am happy to save Facebook tens of millions of dollars and give away our secret for free: respect your users.
Millions of people are outraged by the latest change in WhatsApp Terms, which now say users must feed all their private data to Facebook’s ad engine. It’s no surprise that the flight of users from WhatsApp to Telegram, already ongoing for a few years, has accelerated.
At about 500 million users and growing, Telegram has become a major problem for the Facebook corporation. Unable to compete with Telegram in quality and privacy, Facebook’s WhatsApp seems to have switched to covert marketing: Wikipedia editors have recently exposed multiple paid bots adding biased information into the WhatsApp Wikipedia article [1].
We have also detected bots which spread inaccurate information about Telegram on social media. Here are the 3 myths they are pushing:
Myth 1. “Telegram’s code is not open-source”. In reality, all Telegram client apps have been open source since 2013 [2]. Our encryption and API are fully documented and have been reviewed by security experts thousands of times. Moreover, Telegram is the only messaging app in the world that has verifiable builds both for iOS and Android [3]. As for WhatsApp, they intentionally obfuscate their code, making it impossible to verify their encryption and privacy.
Myth 2. “Telegram is Russian”. In fact, Telegram has no servers or offices in Russia and was blocked there from 2018 to 2020 [4]. Telegram is still blocked in some authoritarian countries such as Iran, while WhatsApp and other “supposedly secure” apps have never had any issue in these places.
Myth 3. “Telegram is not encrypted”. Every chat on Telegram has been encrypted since launch. We have Secret Chats that are end-to-end and Cloud Chats that also offer real-time secure and distributed cloud storage [5]. WhatsApp, on the other hand, had zero encryption for a few years, and then adopted an encryption protocol funded by the US Government [6]. Even if we assume that the WhatsApp encryption is solid, it’s invalidated via multiple backdoors and reliance on backups [7].
In 2019 alone, Facebook spent almost 10 billion dollars on marketing [8] (I guess this includes paid bots on Wikipedia and other sites).
Unlike Facebook, Telegram doesn't spend any money, let alone billions of dollars, on marketing. We believe that people are smart enough to choose what is best for them. And, judging by the half a billion people using Telegram, this belief is justified.
[1] – WhatsApp Gives Users Ultimatum – Share Data with Facebook or Lose Access
[2] – In December 2020, the Wikipedia article about WhatsApp had the label “This article may have been created or edited in return for undisclosed payments, a violation of Wikipedia's terms of use”. Related investigation is discussed here.
[3] – Telegram Source Code
[4] – Reproducible Builds for Telegram Apps
[4] – On Digital Resistance in Russia
[5] – On Telegram Encryption
[6] – U.S. Government Funded The WhatsApp Encryption
[7] – Why WhatsApp Will Never Be Secure
[8] – Facebook Marketing Spending from 2010 to 2019”
“I hear Facebook has an entire department devoted to figuring out why Telegram is so popular. Imagine dozens of employees working on just that full-time.
I am happy to save Facebook tens of millions of dollars and give away our secret for free: respect your users.
Millions of people are outraged by the latest change in WhatsApp Terms, which now say users must feed all their private data to Facebook’s ad engine. It’s no surprise that the flight of users from WhatsApp to Telegram, already ongoing for a few years, has accelerated.
At about 500 million users and growing, Telegram has become a major problem for the Facebook corporation. Unable to compete with Telegram in quality and privacy, Facebook’s WhatsApp seems to have switched to covert marketing: Wikipedia editors have recently exposed multiple paid bots adding biased information into the WhatsApp Wikipedia article [1].
We have also detected bots which spread inaccurate information about Telegram on social media. Here are the 3 myths they are pushing:
Myth 1. “Telegram’s code is not open-source”. In reality, all Telegram client apps have been open source since 2013 [2]. Our encryption and API are fully documented and have been reviewed by security experts thousands of times. Moreover, Telegram is the only messaging app in the world that has verifiable builds both for iOS and Android [3]. As for WhatsApp, they intentionally obfuscate their code, making it impossible to verify their encryption and privacy.
Myth 2. “Telegram is Russian”. In fact, Telegram has no servers or offices in Russia and was blocked there from 2018 to 2020 [4]. Telegram is still blocked in some authoritarian countries such as Iran, while WhatsApp and other “supposedly secure” apps have never had any issue in these places.
Myth 3. “Telegram is not encrypted”. Every chat on Telegram has been encrypted since launch. We have Secret Chats that are end-to-end and Cloud Chats that also offer real-time secure and distributed cloud storage [5]. WhatsApp, on the other hand, had zero encryption for a few years, and then adopted an encryption protocol funded by the US Government [6]. Even if we assume that the WhatsApp encryption is solid, it’s invalidated via multiple backdoors and reliance on backups [7].
In 2019 alone, Facebook spent almost 10 billion dollars on marketing [8] (I guess this includes paid bots on Wikipedia and other sites).
Unlike Facebook, Telegram doesn't spend any money, let alone billions of dollars, on marketing. We believe that people are smart enough to choose what is best for them. And, judging by the half a billion people using Telegram, this belief is justified.
[1] – WhatsApp Gives Users Ultimatum – Share Data with Facebook or Lose Access
[2] – In December 2020, the Wikipedia article about WhatsApp had the label “This article may have been created or edited in return for undisclosed payments, a violation of Wikipedia's terms of use”. Related investigation is discussed here.
[3] – Telegram Source Code
[4] – Reproducible Builds for Telegram Apps
[4] – On Digital Resistance in Russia
[5] – On Telegram Encryption
[6] – U.S. Government Funded The WhatsApp Encryption
[7] – Why WhatsApp Will Never Be Secure
[8] – Facebook Marketing Spending from 2010 to 2019”
Trusted Reviews
WhatsApp gives users ultimatum – share data with Facebook or lose access
WhatsApp users are being informed they must consent to sharing their data with Facebook if they wish to continue using the app | Trusted Reviews