This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
In relation to alec's last post: In order to move forward: we need to know the truth on how the flexner report of 1913 forcefully ended natural healing practices, caused the closure of multiple natural medical schools, changed the curriculum, and more. The war on microbes began the war against humanity.
💯33👍14❤7🔥4
Hey everyone! Gilbert here. Happy Saturday! Who’s tapping into the TWF summit replay this weekend? What new things have you learned? Has anyone recommended any specific segments to others and received feedback yet? Let us know your thoughts in the comments 👇
❤10👍4🔥1
Forwarded from Ali Zeck
My account isn’t a deep dive into topics like others are that do a lot of research, but even then, it’s still quite easy to find information on Musk and his parents and lineage.
And then you just observe.
And when you take not a narrow view of him, not just the reductionist view of the guy that came to liberate Twitter, but you pan out and take a very broad one and look at his entire life, all of his holdings, his friendships, his parents, his quotes, his business developments…then you can see it all. You can see the common theme.
Or you can’t.
Either way…it’s still happening.
And then you just observe.
And when you take not a narrow view of him, not just the reductionist view of the guy that came to liberate Twitter, but you pan out and take a very broad one and look at his entire life, all of his holdings, his friendships, his parents, his quotes, his business developments…then you can see it all. You can see the common theme.
Or you can’t.
Either way…it’s still happening.
🔥34👍18❤1
Dark agendas are real. Dark people are real. But my god, some of these “truther” accounts have become absolutely ridiculous with their level of delusional, self-righteous, conjecture-based paranoia in calling virtually anyone that simply disagrees with them on one or two things controlled opposition. Taking one picture out of context, one statement out of context, one past mistake, running someone’s pet ferret’s name through an online gematria calculator, seeing “symbolism” where there clearly isn’t, asserting that someone is something based on literally no knowledge of their life. I’m convinced the most pervasive and effective elements of controlled op are those who constantly call others controlled op based on literally zero real evidence of it.
I get it— I get the paranoia. I’ve been there. There was a period in early 2021 when I didn’t wanna talk with/associate with anyone because I was so paranoid that anyone around me could be co-opted. It was honestly pretty debilitating.
My approach now? I do me. I focus on my message. I don’t need to attack the individuals I *believe* are controlled, because I can simply just attack the misunderstandings that they spew instead, helping others focus on learning the material rather than wasting energy on the one saying it. When people are attuned to the truth of a given topic, they will simply just tune out those who aren’t speaking it.
I have my thoughts on some people, but I generally keep my thoughts to myself unless there is repeated, undeniably questionable things that someone says/does that they won’t allow people to question them about, or if there is someone that I’ve personally had multiple sketchy experiences with.
If you’re certain of something (like, really certain— let’s say it’s something that really is true) and someone else is preaching something opposite of it, more often than not they simply just haven’t broken through their own conditioning. We all have it, and we’d be super fucking naive to think that we don’t. This is why I always try to approach those I disagree with to have a conversation with them, like… I don’t know… a human being trying to help a human being would do? Idk. Maybe I’m different.
Differentiating between controlled op and conditioning requires discernment. Do you have it?
Just my thoughts. Take it or leave it. Or run it through an online gematria calculator and assert your self-righteousness or something 🥴
Another addition— the ones who are constantly attacking others and calling others controlled op are usually those who are too afraid to acknowledge or look at something within themselves… and to be clear, again, I say this while acknowledging there are real elements of controlled op. Again— discernment.
“Why do you look at the speck of sawdust in your brother’s eye and pay no attention to the plank in your own eye? How can you say to your brother, ‘Let me take the speck out of your eye,’ when all the time there is a plank in your own eye? You hypocrite, first take the plank out of your own eye, and then you will see clearly to remove the speck from your brother’s eye.”
-Matthew 7:3-5
I get it— I get the paranoia. I’ve been there. There was a period in early 2021 when I didn’t wanna talk with/associate with anyone because I was so paranoid that anyone around me could be co-opted. It was honestly pretty debilitating.
My approach now? I do me. I focus on my message. I don’t need to attack the individuals I *believe* are controlled, because I can simply just attack the misunderstandings that they spew instead, helping others focus on learning the material rather than wasting energy on the one saying it. When people are attuned to the truth of a given topic, they will simply just tune out those who aren’t speaking it.
I have my thoughts on some people, but I generally keep my thoughts to myself unless there is repeated, undeniably questionable things that someone says/does that they won’t allow people to question them about, or if there is someone that I’ve personally had multiple sketchy experiences with.
If you’re certain of something (like, really certain— let’s say it’s something that really is true) and someone else is preaching something opposite of it, more often than not they simply just haven’t broken through their own conditioning. We all have it, and we’d be super fucking naive to think that we don’t. This is why I always try to approach those I disagree with to have a conversation with them, like… I don’t know… a human being trying to help a human being would do? Idk. Maybe I’m different.
Differentiating between controlled op and conditioning requires discernment. Do you have it?
Just my thoughts. Take it or leave it. Or run it through an online gematria calculator and assert your self-righteousness or something 🥴
Another addition— the ones who are constantly attacking others and calling others controlled op are usually those who are too afraid to acknowledge or look at something within themselves… and to be clear, again, I say this while acknowledging there are real elements of controlled op. Again— discernment.
“Why do you look at the speck of sawdust in your brother’s eye and pay no attention to the plank in your own eye? How can you say to your brother, ‘Let me take the speck out of your eye,’ when all the time there is a plank in your own eye? You hypocrite, first take the plank out of your own eye, and then you will see clearly to remove the speck from your brother’s eye.”
-Matthew 7:3-5
❤48👍22🔥14
One man I am personally very skeptical of is Elon Musk (short for Elongated Muskrat, probably).
Starlink, heavily invested in the internet of things and the internet of bodies, neuralink, faux-green movement, openly transhumanistic, openly pro-vax, WEF young global leader, to round out a few reasons why.
It’ll be interesting to see who exactly he reinstates on Twitter, but even more interesting to see who he *doesn’t* reinstate... use discernment.
Starlink, heavily invested in the internet of things and the internet of bodies, neuralink, faux-green movement, openly transhumanistic, openly pro-vax, WEF young global leader, to round out a few reasons why.
It’ll be interesting to see who exactly he reinstates on Twitter, but even more interesting to see who he *doesn’t* reinstate... use discernment.
👍56💯30
I’m open to being wrong. And that would require that you show me proof of a 🦠 that strictly adheres to the scientific method.
Not proof:
—pointing to symptoms of disease, even when experienced amongst multiple people. This is an affirming the consequent logical fallacy. You first need to show X exists to say it causes Y.
—a paper claiming “virus isolation” that doesn’t adhere to the scientific method, is riddled with assumptions, and follows an isolation protocol that is so ass backwards a kindergartener could explain why it doesn’t make sense.
—electron micrograph images post-cell culture isolation. Electron microscopy’s preparation methods negate the significance of the results, but especially so when the results are from multiple things combined on a monkey kidney cell with multiple assumptions.
—an expert opinion. Appeal to authority.
—talking about the characteristics of this supposed 🦠. That’s a reification fallacy.
—saying “where’s your proof there isn’t a 🦠?” That’s a burden of proof reversal fallacy.
Not proof:
—pointing to symptoms of disease, even when experienced amongst multiple people. This is an affirming the consequent logical fallacy. You first need to show X exists to say it causes Y.
—a paper claiming “virus isolation” that doesn’t adhere to the scientific method, is riddled with assumptions, and follows an isolation protocol that is so ass backwards a kindergartener could explain why it doesn’t make sense.
—electron micrograph images post-cell culture isolation. Electron microscopy’s preparation methods negate the significance of the results, but especially so when the results are from multiple things combined on a monkey kidney cell with multiple assumptions.
—an expert opinion. Appeal to authority.
—talking about the characteristics of this supposed 🦠. That’s a reification fallacy.
—saying “where’s your proof there isn’t a 🦠?” That’s a burden of proof reversal fallacy.
👍50🔥13👏8💯6❤5