As promised.

Highly recommend my recent episode with trained molecular biologist Jerneja Tomsic. 🙂

https://www.bitchute.com/video/fXMwlsUj4ITX/

I've just posted Part 2 of my article

https://dawnlester.substack.com/p/its-all-getting-so-ridiculous-part-d5f

Thoughts on this?

And to be clear, not once have I ever said that the labs are “filled with scientists doing nothing but laughing at the public,” or anything like it.

In fact, in most cases I’ve said that the overwhelming majority of “experts” in these labs likely believe what they’re doing is “gain of function.”

And the millions of dollars of research likely deals with sequencing and the creation of the real bio-weapons— the shots.

Friends,

While I am open to the idea that Sars-Cov-2 has never been isolated, I also don't believe that crowd has debunked the existence of weaponized pathogens, biowarfare, gain of function etc.

Yes, I have watched discussion's with the Baileys and Tom Cowan and Alec Zeck and others dismissing the area of research, but I don't think anyone has done a great job proving that the research into bioweapons is fake. Or that the millions of dollars going to the research is fake, or that the buildings where the research is said to be taking place is filled with scientists doing nothing but laughing at the public.

Is it possible that the lab leak theory is a limited hangout to distract from an alleged deeper truth of "no virus"? Sure. (However, I tend to think the limited hangout is pointing the finger at China rather than Fauci and US funding)

Also, I dont think the crowd who would love to convince us to ignore the gain of function research has done an adequate job refuting bioweapons labs etc.

These are my current thoughts. I will be doing a whiteboard next week outlining these competing theories.

Now, feel free to attack me because I have a different take than your favorite content creator.

Also here, from Dr. Mark & Sam Bailey RE: “lab made viruses”: https://drsambailey.substack.com/p/lab-leaks-and-other-legends

Symptoms of COVID according to the CDC:

•Fever or chills
•Cough
•Shortness of breath
•Fatigue
•Muscle or body aches
•Headache
•New loss of taste or smell
•Sore throat
•Congestion or runny nose
•Nausea or vomiting
•Diarrhea

Nothing about the symptoms of COVID are “new,” and even if they were, claiming them as proof of a virus would be an affirming the consequent logical fallacy.

Additionally, here’s the data RE: “COVID,” straight from the CDC:

95% of COVID deaths had an average of 4 comorbidities, most being lifestyle or nutrition related:
https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/nvss/vsrr/covid_weekly/index.htm

75% of deaths were in people age 65+

50% of deaths were in people age 75+

79% of hospitalizations were in overweight or obese people: https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/volumes/70/wr/mm7010e4.htm?s_cid=mm7010e4_w

The 2nd strongest risk factor for death was fear/anxiety related disorders: https://www.cdc.gov/pcd/issues/2021/pdf/21_0123.pdf

If there was a “bioweapon” or a “lab leaked viruses” (and there’s no proof that there is), it was a shitty one.

https://youtu.be/xdxlT68ygt8 what do you take away from this video?

Gardening 101: first rule— get dirty

A little more of my thoughts on “gain of function.”

“Well what the hell are they doing in these labs?”

First, I’d like to start with this comment left by my buddy James:

“I have an older cousin who has spent a couple decades doing cancer research. He is not sitting around laughing at the public; he truly believes what he’s been told about cancer and that genetic research could reveal the “cure” to it. Billions (trillions?) of dollars and countless lives can be wasted by well-meaning people who never question the foundational assumptions of their fields and only research the minutia built on top of it.”

Now to my thoughts:

molecular biologists & virologists legitimately believe they’re dealing with viruses in labs, and in this case they likely really believe they’re increasing the pathogenicity of “viruses” in labs. They do tinkering in cell cultures, sometimes inserting synthetic proteins/nucleic acids based on the assumption they’re coming from “virus” particles, take the resultant substance and inject it into a mouse/ferret that’s been raised in an unnatural environment, fed an unnatural diet, in a perpetual state of fight/flight and sometimes exposed to previous experiments, the ferret/mouse gets sick and sometimes dies, and they then claim an increase in pathogenicity. They’re tricking themselves.

And aside from that, possibly (and for some of these very likely):

-money laundering: we know the government does this, and this is likely what they’re doing in Ukraine.

-Nanoparticle R&D: per the work of Dr. Ana Mihalcea, Dr. David Nixon, La Quinta Columna, and several others, this seems to be the new unknown frontier. What better way to distract from the reality of these nanoparticles than to keep pushing the unproven idea of gain of function viruses?

-vaccine production/R&D: these are the real bio weapons. And of course, they require lab time and tons of funding to create.

The last thing I’ll say is this: how can we possibly conduct gain of function on “viruses” when they first have not been demonstrated to exist? Creating toxic, synthetic proteins/nucleic acids is a separate discussion, but even that would have to be proven. And we have countless studies now showing that disease is not passed via the fluids of sick people. So again, where’s the proof?

That’s all for now.