Forwarded from Health Freedom for Humanity
Forwarded from GreenMedInfo
LIVESTREAM in 3 minutes!: Sayer Ji with Creators of the People's Internet (Decentralized Web 3.0)
Is there an uncensorable and unhackable way to communicate and share value peer-to-peer, without needing 3rd parties? Centralized services, or individuals, whose decisions and failabilities can literally affect the lives of billions in an instant? Could there be a way to run an internet without governments or corporations harvesting the data without your permission and using it against you? YES is the answer! Join me today as I interview two of the founders of the powerful, open source project known as Qortal.....an internet created by the people, for the people; owned by everyone, yet not proprietary and to be used to profit off of human suffering: "The Dangers of the Centralized Internet....and An Alternative You've Never Heard About" https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_xj_domWhXw
Is there an uncensorable and unhackable way to communicate and share value peer-to-peer, without needing 3rd parties? Centralized services, or individuals, whose decisions and failabilities can literally affect the lives of billions in an instant? Could there be a way to run an internet without governments or corporations harvesting the data without your permission and using it against you? YES is the answer! Join me today as I interview two of the founders of the powerful, open source project known as Qortal.....an internet created by the people, for the people; owned by everyone, yet not proprietary and to be used to profit off of human suffering: "The Dangers of the Centralized Internet....and An Alternative You've Never Heard About" https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_xj_domWhXw
Forwarded from Deleted Account
Hey just to let everyone know the following (I get Supreme Court cases updated every week to my email, used to work in law)
We should all know that the Supreme Court in the USA just ruled against Cuomo!! Yes I know this sounds spammy but it’s true, here’s the official case trannoscript: and it’s the text within the judgement that’s crucial. This is a hugely important case in my opinion because of the language used for passing the judgement
https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/592/20a87/?utm_source=summary-newsletters&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=2021-02-04-us-supreme-court-53c15503df&utm_content=text-case-noscript-3
“Members of this Court are not public health experts, and we should respect the judgment of those with special expertise and responsibility in this area. But even in a pandemic, the Constitution cannot be put away and forgotten. The restrictions at issue here, by effectively barring many from attending religious services, strike at the very heart of the First Amendment’s guarantee of religious liberty. Before allowing this to occur, we have a duty to conduct a serious examination of the need for such a drastic measure.”
They also state in the judgement for their reasons to rule against Cuomo:
“Irreparable harm. There can be no question that the challenged restrictions, if enforced, will cause irreparable harm. “The loss of First Amendment freedoms, for even minimal periods of time, unquestionably constitutes irreparable injury.” Elrod v. Burns, 427 U.S. 347, 373 (1976) (plurality opinion)”
This last sentence is huge. I honestly think that’s a huge statement they’ve just made. I think this is a landmark case because this judgement opens the gates, through its language, to further appeals and cases......
We should all know that the Supreme Court in the USA just ruled against Cuomo!! Yes I know this sounds spammy but it’s true, here’s the official case trannoscript: and it’s the text within the judgement that’s crucial. This is a hugely important case in my opinion because of the language used for passing the judgement
https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/592/20a87/?utm_source=summary-newsletters&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=2021-02-04-us-supreme-court-53c15503df&utm_content=text-case-noscript-3
“Members of this Court are not public health experts, and we should respect the judgment of those with special expertise and responsibility in this area. But even in a pandemic, the Constitution cannot be put away and forgotten. The restrictions at issue here, by effectively barring many from attending religious services, strike at the very heart of the First Amendment’s guarantee of religious liberty. Before allowing this to occur, we have a duty to conduct a serious examination of the need for such a drastic measure.”
They also state in the judgement for their reasons to rule against Cuomo:
“Irreparable harm. There can be no question that the challenged restrictions, if enforced, will cause irreparable harm. “The loss of First Amendment freedoms, for even minimal periods of time, unquestionably constitutes irreparable injury.” Elrod v. Burns, 427 U.S. 347, 373 (1976) (plurality opinion)”
This last sentence is huge. I honestly think that’s a huge statement they’ve just made. I think this is a landmark case because this judgement opens the gates, through its language, to further appeals and cases......
Justia Law
Roman Catholic Diocese of Brooklyn v. Cuomo, 592 U.S. ___ (2020)
Roman Catholic Diocese of Brooklyn v. Cuomo: Supreme Court enjoins the enforcement of a New York Executive Order that imposed restrictions on attendance at religious services.
🤦🏼♂️ please read this:
https://www.oralhealthgroup.com/features/face-masks-dont-work-revealing-review/
https://www.oralhealthgroup.com/features/face-masks-dont-work-revealing-review/
Oral Health Group
Update: Why Face Masks Don’t Work: A Revealing Review
For at least three decades face masks has been deemed an essential component of the personal protective equipment worn by dental personnel.
Forwarded from Kelly Brogan MD
Thanks for keeping us safe Mommy Media! https://www.instagram.com/p/CLDQH8Phr_F/?igshid=12wyfjdx5nael
Abstract:
“According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) on August 23, 2020, “For 6% of the deaths, COVID-19 was the only cause mentioned. For deaths with conditions or causes in addition to COVID-19 , on average, there were 2.6 additional conditions or causes per death.”[1] For a nation tormented by restrictive public health policies mandated for healthy individuals and small businesses, this is the most important statistical revelation of
this crisis. This revelation significantly impacts the published fatalities count due to COVID-19. More importantly, it exposes major problems with the process by which the CDC was able to generate inaccurate data during a crisis. The CDC has advocated for social isolation, social distancing, and personal protective equipment use as primary mitigation strategies in response to the COVID-19 crisis, while simultaneously refusing to acknowledge the promise of inexpensive pharmaceutical and natural treatments. These mitigation strategies were promoted largely in response to projection model fatality forecasts that have proven to be substantially inaccurate. Further investigation into the legality of the methods used to create these strategies raised additional concerns and questions. Why would the CDC decide against using a system of data collection & reporting they authored, and which has been in use nationwide for 17 years without incident, in favor of an untested & unproven system exclusively for COVID-19 without discussion and peer-review? Did the CDC’s decision to abandon a known and proven effective system also breach several federal laws that ensure data accuracy and integrity? Did the CDC knowingly alter rules for reporting cause of death in the presence of comorbidity exclusively for COVID-19? If so, why?”
https://jdfor2020.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/adf864_165a103206974fdbb14ada6bf8af1541.pdf
“According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) on August 23, 2020, “For 6% of the deaths, COVID-19 was the only cause mentioned. For deaths with conditions or causes in addition to COVID-19 , on average, there were 2.6 additional conditions or causes per death.”[1] For a nation tormented by restrictive public health policies mandated for healthy individuals and small businesses, this is the most important statistical revelation of
this crisis. This revelation significantly impacts the published fatalities count due to COVID-19. More importantly, it exposes major problems with the process by which the CDC was able to generate inaccurate data during a crisis. The CDC has advocated for social isolation, social distancing, and personal protective equipment use as primary mitigation strategies in response to the COVID-19 crisis, while simultaneously refusing to acknowledge the promise of inexpensive pharmaceutical and natural treatments. These mitigation strategies were promoted largely in response to projection model fatality forecasts that have proven to be substantially inaccurate. Further investigation into the legality of the methods used to create these strategies raised additional concerns and questions. Why would the CDC decide against using a system of data collection & reporting they authored, and which has been in use nationwide for 17 years without incident, in favor of an untested & unproven system exclusively for COVID-19 without discussion and peer-review? Did the CDC’s decision to abandon a known and proven effective system also breach several federal laws that ensure data accuracy and integrity? Did the CDC knowingly alter rules for reporting cause of death in the presence of comorbidity exclusively for COVID-19? If so, why?”
https://jdfor2020.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/adf864_165a103206974fdbb14ada6bf8af1541.pdf
Forwarded from Health Freedom for Humanity
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Episode #5 of the Health Freedom for Humanity podcast goes live TOMORROW!
Our guest for this episode is Del Bigtree, who was recently removed from Instagram for consistently providing factual, verifiable information on injectable products.
Follow this link to listen or watch:
https://linktr.ee/HFFH
Del Bigtree is one of the preeminent voices of the Vaccine Risk Awareness Movement. His career as an Emmy-winning producer of the CBS talk show, The Doctors, changed profoundly when he produced the documentary, Vaxxed: From Cover-up to Catastrophe, which is credited with igniting a revolution against pharmaceutical tyranny around the world. Now Del’s internet news show, The HighWire, is the fastest-growing program in the natural health arena with over 75 million views. His non-profit, the Informed Consent Action Network, or ICAN, is leading worldwide investigations into drug and vaccine fraud.
Our guest for this episode is Del Bigtree, who was recently removed from Instagram for consistently providing factual, verifiable information on injectable products.
Follow this link to listen or watch:
https://linktr.ee/HFFH
Del Bigtree is one of the preeminent voices of the Vaccine Risk Awareness Movement. His career as an Emmy-winning producer of the CBS talk show, The Doctors, changed profoundly when he produced the documentary, Vaxxed: From Cover-up to Catastrophe, which is credited with igniting a revolution against pharmaceutical tyranny around the world. Now Del’s internet news show, The HighWire, is the fastest-growing program in the natural health arena with over 75 million views. His non-profit, the Informed Consent Action Network, or ICAN, is leading worldwide investigations into drug and vaccine fraud.