The Way Forward – Telegram
The Way Forward
20.7K subscribers
3.76K photos
882 videos
72 files
3.19K links
Charting the path towards health, liberty, and awareness for all of mankind.
Download Telegram
😭😭😭😭 informed consent is knowing all the details and then being able to choose based off that. But when proper facts aren’t shared and things are covered up, how can people make an informed choice???
L
Forwarded from GreenMedInfo
Are you a domestic terrorist because you do not consent to receiving an experimental mRNA vaccine that VAERS has shown has killed hundreds and perhaps many thousands? This is what the pharma-backed politicians and media is saying. This is a highly concerning development that we should all be aware of... https://off-guardian.org/2021/03/08/called-it-wapo-calls-anti-vaxxers-domestic-terrorists/ Please join www.Standforhealthfreedom.com to stand up for your human, parental, health, and Constitutional rights.
100% organic cotton. More shirts coming soon. 😁 https://mind-body-spirit-gear.myshopify.com
Have you subscribed to our YouTube channel? We have lots of awesome content, including podcast episodes with Dr. Tom Cowan, Dr. Christiane Northrup, Dr. Andrew Kaufman, etc.: https://youtube.com/playlist?list=PLTwXnvKkrg-kLyfuW4ykT8DddhwXpUAvk
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Episode #9 of the Health Freedom for Humanity podcast is live!

Please follow us at @healthfreedomforhumanity

Our guest this episode is Dr. Andrew Kaufman, MD

Follow this link to listen or watch:

https://linktr.ee/HFFH


Andrew Kaufman, M.D. is a natural healing consultant, inventor, public speaker, forensic psychiatrist, and expert witness. He completed his psychiatric training at Duke University Medical Center after graduating from the Medical University of South Carolina, and has a B.S. from M.I.T. in Molecular Biology.
Forwarded from Dr. Melissa Sell
Negative emotions do not cause disease in the way most people think...

Many people have the idea that negative emotion is like a poison which corrodes the body causing breakdown, dysfunction, and disease.

It is easy to see why this connection was made, but as new discoveries come to light we must evolve our understanding.

Dr. Hamer discovered that a biologically shocking event causes specific tissue adaptations.

If the shocking event is still occurring or if the individual is reliving it mentally and emotionally, they can go through a period of months or even years of biological tissue adaptations.

If the tissue adaptation persists for an extended period of time, adaptation symptoms and depletion symptoms begin and may be diagnosed as "disease".

Then if/when the person resolves their Biological Conflict, their body shifts into the Healing Phase where the tissue that was adapted needs to be returned to normal function many symptoms set in, again these symptoms are diagnosed as "disease".

While a person is in Conflict they, very often, are experiencing negative emotions due to the unresolved issue in their life experience.

It may seem like the negative emotion "caused" the disease, but it was the normal biological process which followed the Biological Conflict Shock that brought about the symptoms of adaptation or healing which was diagnosed as "disease".

This is a subtle, but very important distinction that sets Germanic New Medicine apart from other schools of mind body healing.
Forwarded from Awake in the Dream
An older article criticizing the flaws of the peer review process in scientific journals. His critique is good to keep in mind when we read any peer reviewed studies.

Peer review: a flawed process at the heart of science and journals
Richard Smith, 2006

“People have a great many fantasies about peer review, and one of the most powerful is that it is a highly objective, reliable, and consistent process. I regularly received letters from authors who were upset that the BMJ rejected their paper and then published what they thought to be a much inferior paper on the same subject. Always they saw something underhand. They found it hard to accept that peer review is a subjective and, therefore, inconsistent process. But it is probably unreasonable to expect it to be objective and consistent. If I ask people to rank painters like Titian, Tintoretto, Bellini, Carpaccio, and Veronese, I would never expect them to come up with the same order. A scientific study submitted to a medical journal may not be as complex a work as a Tintoretto altarpiece, but it is complex. Inevitably people will take different views on its strengths, weaknesses, and importance.”

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1420798/