Forwarded from Health Freedom for Humanity
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Episode #9 of the Health Freedom for Humanity podcast is live!
Please follow us at @healthfreedomforhumanity
Our guest this episode is Dr. Andrew Kaufman, MD
Follow this link to listen or watch:
https://linktr.ee/HFFH
Andrew Kaufman, M.D. is a natural healing consultant, inventor, public speaker, forensic psychiatrist, and expert witness. He completed his psychiatric training at Duke University Medical Center after graduating from the Medical University of South Carolina, and has a B.S. from M.I.T. in Molecular Biology.
Please follow us at @healthfreedomforhumanity
Our guest this episode is Dr. Andrew Kaufman, MD
Follow this link to listen or watch:
https://linktr.ee/HFFH
Andrew Kaufman, M.D. is a natural healing consultant, inventor, public speaker, forensic psychiatrist, and expert witness. He completed his psychiatric training at Duke University Medical Center after graduating from the Medical University of South Carolina, and has a B.S. from M.I.T. in Molecular Biology.
Forwarded from Dr. Melissa Sell
Negative emotions do not cause disease in the way most people think...
Many people have the idea that negative emotion is like a poison which corrodes the body causing breakdown, dysfunction, and disease.
It is easy to see why this connection was made, but as new discoveries come to light we must evolve our understanding.
Dr. Hamer discovered that a biologically shocking event causes specific tissue adaptations.
If the shocking event is still occurring or if the individual is reliving it mentally and emotionally, they can go through a period of months or even years of biological tissue adaptations.
If the tissue adaptation persists for an extended period of time, adaptation symptoms and depletion symptoms begin and may be diagnosed as "disease".
Then if/when the person resolves their Biological Conflict, their body shifts into the Healing Phase where the tissue that was adapted needs to be returned to normal function many symptoms set in, again these symptoms are diagnosed as "disease".
While a person is in Conflict they, very often, are experiencing negative emotions due to the unresolved issue in their life experience.
It may seem like the negative emotion "caused" the disease, but it was the normal biological process which followed the Biological Conflict Shock that brought about the symptoms of adaptation or healing which was diagnosed as "disease".
This is a subtle, but very important distinction that sets Germanic New Medicine apart from other schools of mind body healing.
Many people have the idea that negative emotion is like a poison which corrodes the body causing breakdown, dysfunction, and disease.
It is easy to see why this connection was made, but as new discoveries come to light we must evolve our understanding.
Dr. Hamer discovered that a biologically shocking event causes specific tissue adaptations.
If the shocking event is still occurring or if the individual is reliving it mentally and emotionally, they can go through a period of months or even years of biological tissue adaptations.
If the tissue adaptation persists for an extended period of time, adaptation symptoms and depletion symptoms begin and may be diagnosed as "disease".
Then if/when the person resolves their Biological Conflict, their body shifts into the Healing Phase where the tissue that was adapted needs to be returned to normal function many symptoms set in, again these symptoms are diagnosed as "disease".
While a person is in Conflict they, very often, are experiencing negative emotions due to the unresolved issue in their life experience.
It may seem like the negative emotion "caused" the disease, but it was the normal biological process which followed the Biological Conflict Shock that brought about the symptoms of adaptation or healing which was diagnosed as "disease".
This is a subtle, but very important distinction that sets Germanic New Medicine apart from other schools of mind body healing.
Forwarded from Awake in the Dream
An older article criticizing the flaws of the peer review process in scientific journals. His critique is good to keep in mind when we read any peer reviewed studies.
Peer review: a flawed process at the heart of science and journals
Richard Smith, 2006
“People have a great many fantasies about peer review, and one of the most powerful is that it is a highly objective, reliable, and consistent process. I regularly received letters from authors who were upset that the BMJ rejected their paper and then published what they thought to be a much inferior paper on the same subject. Always they saw something underhand. They found it hard to accept that peer review is a subjective and, therefore, inconsistent process. But it is probably unreasonable to expect it to be objective and consistent. If I ask people to rank painters like Titian, Tintoretto, Bellini, Carpaccio, and Veronese, I would never expect them to come up with the same order. A scientific study submitted to a medical journal may not be as complex a work as a Tintoretto altarpiece, but it is complex. Inevitably people will take different views on its strengths, weaknesses, and importance.”
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1420798/
Peer review: a flawed process at the heart of science and journals
Richard Smith, 2006
“People have a great many fantasies about peer review, and one of the most powerful is that it is a highly objective, reliable, and consistent process. I regularly received letters from authors who were upset that the BMJ rejected their paper and then published what they thought to be a much inferior paper on the same subject. Always they saw something underhand. They found it hard to accept that peer review is a subjective and, therefore, inconsistent process. But it is probably unreasonable to expect it to be objective and consistent. If I ask people to rank painters like Titian, Tintoretto, Bellini, Carpaccio, and Veronese, I would never expect them to come up with the same order. A scientific study submitted to a medical journal may not be as complex a work as a Tintoretto altarpiece, but it is complex. Inevitably people will take different views on its strengths, weaknesses, and importance.”
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1420798/
It’s no secret that I am very biased on the topic of health and pharmaceutical products.
I dig into research/expert opinions on all sides, listen to the lived experiences of people from multiple perspectives and throw them against the backdrop of my own lived experiences and my intuition. That is how I’ve come to believe what I do about the nature of reality, and I’m always learning, always refining and challenging my own beliefs.
No doubt, I am more likely to listen and accept the expert opinion, the research, the lived experiences within the realm of natural health, allopathic skepticism, and germ theory skepticism. Why? Because my lived experiences have continually shown me that those things make the most sense for me. Confirmation bias? Sure. CONTINUED...
I dig into research/expert opinions on all sides, listen to the lived experiences of people from multiple perspectives and throw them against the backdrop of my own lived experiences and my intuition. That is how I’ve come to believe what I do about the nature of reality, and I’m always learning, always refining and challenging my own beliefs.
No doubt, I am more likely to listen and accept the expert opinion, the research, the lived experiences within the realm of natural health, allopathic skepticism, and germ theory skepticism. Why? Because my lived experiences have continually shown me that those things make the most sense for me. Confirmation bias? Sure. CONTINUED...
CONTINUED... I fully recognize that not everyone has had the same lived experience as me, and for many, their experiences have led them to perceive things in a manner that is diametrically opposed to my perceptions. I do not ever want to deny people of their experience because experience is everything. I also fundamentally believe (really what I call “knowing”) that we are all one, and to deny an aspect of “me” the opportunity to fully explore the infinite possibilities of reality through the free will of “other” is wrong. This is why, as some of you have noticed, I very rarely make statements on what people should/should not do. It goes against my core values. It goes against freedom.
Health freedom, as spelled out by my good friend Sarah Carnes, means the freedom to make one’s own health decisions, without coercion or force. If someone perceives this shot to be necessary/good based on their own experiences, the research they’ve come across, the stories they’ve heard, that’s their choice. If someone believes otherwise, that’s also their choice. I ultimately believe that we should stop telling other people what to do, and instead hold space for people to choose what is best for themselves.
Health freedom, as spelled out by my good friend Sarah Carnes, means the freedom to make one’s own health decisions, without coercion or force. If someone perceives this shot to be necessary/good based on their own experiences, the research they’ve come across, the stories they’ve heard, that’s their choice. If someone believes otherwise, that’s also their choice. I ultimately believe that we should stop telling other people what to do, and instead hold space for people to choose what is best for themselves.
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Honored to be a part of this amazing event. If you’re awake to what’s happening in our world, struggling to navigate this current time and concerned about where it’s headed–you’re not alone.
There are millions of us all over the world, and more and more are waking up. A revolution of consciousness is fully underway. From March 20-26, like-minded and like-hearted people from around the world are gathering in a free, ground-breaking online event called Re:Union Summit 2021.
>>👇sign up here👇<<
https://2021.reunionsummit.com/?sc=qgZk6Dxe&ac=VCJ116sE
There are millions of us all over the world, and more and more are waking up. A revolution of consciousness is fully underway. From March 20-26, like-minded and like-hearted people from around the world are gathering in a free, ground-breaking online event called Re:Union Summit 2021.
>>👇sign up here👇<<
https://2021.reunionsummit.com/?sc=qgZk6Dxe&ac=VCJ116sE
https://www.openvaers.com/covid-data
Remember, according to a Harvard pilgrim health study, nearly 99% of vaccine adverse events go unreported:
https://digital.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/docs/publication/r18hs017045-lazarus-final-report-2011.pdf
Remember, according to a Harvard pilgrim health study, nearly 99% of vaccine adverse events go unreported:
https://digital.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/docs/publication/r18hs017045-lazarus-final-report-2011.pdf
Forwarded from Deleted Account
Forwarded from Health Freedom for Humanity
“Do COVID-19 RNA-based vaccines put at risk of immune-mediated diseases? In reply to “potential antigenic cross-reactivity between SARS-CoV-2 and human tissue with a possible link to an increase in autoimmune diseases”
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7833091/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7833091/
PubMed Central (PMC)
Do COVID-19 RNA-based vaccines put at risk of immune-mediated diseases? In reply to “potential antigenic cross-reactivity between…
PMC Disclaimer
Forwarded from Health Freedom for Humanity
Don’t forget to check out our most recent interview with Dr. Andrew Kaufman! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mErYVKWjhYw