I’m all for questioning things. I don’t believe Charlie Kirk’s death was a “staged psyop” in the sense that it didn’t happen and was faked.

I believe it happened. I believe he was shot and killed. I’m open to changing my mind.

For those questioning the apparent change of his ring—I questioned this too. But it is easily explained: https://x.com/xx17965797n/status/1966022189422911575?s=46

Pre-shot, the ring is open but resting on ring finger. Post shot, hand tenses up, ring—still open—lays over top of pinky finger.

For those questioning the supposed “tube” under his shirt, that is a lapel microphone. I wear those pretty frequently on stage if another camera crew is wanting to pick up additional audio for their own cameras.

What is in question is the person who killed him. The individual did not seem like a crazed random leftist, but rather a well trained marksman.

And his security detail appeared to possibly give a signal to the shooter.


But all of these details are far less relevant when we know that, whether staged or real, this will be used to conjure more chaos, division, etc. that’s what matters. So don’t add to it

Mass Prayer & Meditation Tonight — Becoming the Points of Coherence

In times of deep division, confusion, and chaos, we are called to become the points of clarity, compassion, love, and coherence.

Tonight at 7:30 PM Central, join me, Michael Jaguar, Lauren Lee, and others around the world for a collective meditation and prayer—focused on cultivating deep internal stillness, emotional clarity, and radiating peace outward.

This is not just a “feel good” practice.

If you’re familiar with the work of Veda Austin or Dr. Masaru Emoto, you know that focused attention, intention, and prayer have a measurable effect on water, and water permeates all of reality.

Our inner state matters, and collective coherence amplifies its impact. (Think: Maharishi Effect).

We’re not here to bypass the pain or ignore the darkness. We’re here to feel it, face it, transmute it, and deliberately choose another way.

Tonight, we focus not on reacting with rage or fear—but on anchoring peace, love, and coherence into the field.

Join us: https://us02web.zoom.us/webinar/register/WN_1ALPSsPOSZ6dDz3NB6lOAg#/registration

Best,

Alec & The Way Forward Team

It is important to question everything, and I’ll never dismiss those who do.

What bothers me is the black-and-white thinking and lack of critical thought from people who assert with 100% certainty, “It is definitely a psyop/staged.” How do you know that? Do you really know? Here’s my current position on the Charlie Kirk footage, and I’m open to changing my mind:

I think it’s legit. I think he was legitimately assassinated, and I’ve analyzed it from many angles. Again, open to changing my mind.

The supposed “switching ring finger”? Easily explained by the hinge ring he always wears. You can see it in several other videos from other events. It didn’t switch fingers; it popped open on impact and slipped off the ring finger, momentarily catching between the ring and pinky. I’ve watched it multiple times. You can actually see it decouple.

Hair or shirt movement? That can be explained by the ballistics and impact of the round. The “black thing” hanging from his shirt? I use those myself—could easily b a lapel microphone for recording/video, while handheld mics are for the crowd. He could have been wearing a bulletproof vest too.

As for blood, the catastrophic damage to the carotid arteries explains the gush. Multiple angles show his body reacting exactly as you’d expect after being hit by a large round from a high-powered rifle—and that kind of reaction isn’t easy to fake.

The only thing I can’t currently explain is the apparent glitch in the print on his shirt in one circulating video.

And I say this as someone who still questions the legitimacy of the Trump/Butler, PA situation.

What does stand out to me is the possible signaling from the security detail behind him. One could argue he was signaling to the shooter that it was a good time to fire. I don’t know that for sure, but it’s worth noting.

Is it possible this assassination—which, if real, was in my opinion done by a well-trained marksman rather than a crazed “leftist”—was orchestrated my Israel, since Charlie has been slowly changing his perspective on Israel and he’s consistently been an Israeli mouthpiece? Especially given that, supposedly, sources close to Charlie said he was scared for his safety if he were to change his perspective on Israel?

But what’s even more disturbing to me, is the reality that millions and millions of people—just within the span of a few days—have watched cold blooded knife attacks and assassinations over and over and over again. Are our psyches meant for this? What does this do to us on a deep level? What does that proliferate into the field? What does that do to us subconsciously?

Guess what? I don’t know for sure, and I’m okay with that. My identity isn’t attached to my perspective, and I know the perspective of others isn’t who they truly are.

Either way, all of this pales in comparison to the larger reality: whether real or staged, it has the potential to generate more chaos, division, despair, unrest, and worse, which then provides the perfect justification for government to enact more tyrannical measures.

How are you digesting and transmuting that which you’ve been exposed to?

Are you adding to chaos and division? Or are you choosing stillness, awareness, and coherence?

Are you remembering who you are? Are you remembering who we all are, behind the superficial red, blue, black, white, pro-, anti- labels thrown on top of us? Where is your heart?

Are you loving your neighbor?
Are you loving God?
Are you loving yourself?

This was tragic. He was a father, a husband, and seemed like a great dude.

Did I agree with him on everything? HELL no. Absolutely not.

But the lack of empathy and humanity regarding this whole situation is absolutely insane--regardless of whether or not you agreed with him.

And, with that, don’t allow the lack of empathy, dehumanization, and chaos from others to breed the same in you.

Love others. Love God. Love yourself. Represent the love of Christ on Earth as best you can.

I’m so sorry to those who couldn’t get in… it turns out 1,314 people registered but I only have a zoom plan for 500…. I will increase capacity for the next one!

Hey y’all,

If you have my number or username on Telegram, please do not take personal offense if I don’t respond immediately. I get lots of messages and I don’t wanna be on this device more than I already am. If you really need something, email my assistant or double text me to push your message to the top. Much love.

As I sit back and observe, I genuinely think that, at some level, those who wish to dominate and control us don’t actually care what we believe about the Charlie Kirk situation—or any situation, for that matter.

What matters to them is that
we’re flooding these platforms with conflicting
narratives the reaffirm our own worldviews,
we’re at each other’s throats,
we’re blaming everyone outside of ourselves,
we’re failing to take responsibility for our own lives,
we’re in constant nervous-system dysregulation.
we’re attacking and demonizing each other,
we’re overlooking empathy, compassion and forgiveness,
and we’re obsessively glued to our devices while doing it.

They don’t have to do much anymore.
They set the algorithm, they initiate an event, and we do their bidding for them.

We are dividing and conquering ourselves now.
It’s too easy.

I think I’m gonna start a Coherence Accountability Group. Call it “CAG” or something, idk.

Taking back control of your own attention, focusing on what you can control, doing the little daily things consistently and cultivating deep, consistent, inner coherence are revolutionary acts right now.

The idea is that you and a friend would hold each other accountable on:

—getting morning and evening sunlight
—putting your bear feet on the earth daily
—walking at least one mile a day
—moving your body at least 5 days a week
—spending 1 hour or less on social media
—spending at least 30 min praying/meditating
—eating organic, nutrient dense foods
—being incredibly mindful of what we give attention to
—feeling our feelings as they arise, not suppressing.

And then 2x a month, gathering with everyone else in the group for a group prayer/mediation. Let me know if this interests you. I’m gonna do it myself with friends either way.

Join us tonight at 7pm ET for the premiere of episode Ep 189: Subtle Energy, Resonance & the Cosmic Tower with Nico Martens

Nico Martens joins Alec for a deep conversation on his journey from engineer to seeker, exploring the unseen forces that shape our lives. After the death of his mother, Nico’s worldview shifted from materialism to spiritual awakening—through meditation, dreams, and teachings from shamans and Taoist masters. His path eventually led to the Cosmic Tower project, where science and subtle energy converge.

Nico is a former engineer and IT professional who shifted his life after a profound awakening. Today, he teaches about subtle energy, vibrational physics, and resonance. Through the Cosmic Tower project, he offers a vision for restoring harmony between people and the environment. Nico helps others release blocks and return to their natural state of balance.

Youtube: https://youtu.be/2upYzYd0iEM

For timestamps, links, and resources, visit our website: https://thewayfwrd.com/content/

I am not in the camp that blindly asserts:

•“EVERY major event is completely staged and faked.”
•“EVERY health or freedom figure with a platform is controlled op.”
•“EVERY celebrity is a Freemason.”
•“EVERY sporting event is rigged.”
•“EVERY out-of-context image of someone scratching their eye is proof of a Masonic hand signal.”

…all without evidence.

If that’s your worldview, that’s fine. But I hope you seriously examine your foundational assumptions and ask yourself how you actually know what you claim to know.

And if you’re in that camp and you shame, mock, or attack others who aren’t, I want nothing to do with you. That posture is antithetical to real, open truth-seeking.

I didn’t arrive at the “no virus” position by default or by parroting the idea that everything is fake. I got there by deeply analyzing virology’s own definitions, claims, and methods—and finding that none of it holds up under the scientific method.

That conclusion just happens to overlap with the “everything is fake” crowd, many of whom landed there not through investigation, but by reflex.

I’d agree it’s safe to assume the media lies, and that we should question everything we’re shown. But the real question is: which parts of any given event are lies? And how do you discern that—what’s your method?

So when I apply that same level of scrutiny to the Charlie Kirk situation, and currently think he was assassinated based on the footage and context I’ve seen (while remaining open to changing my mind), I’m immediately called a “shill,” “puppet,” or “controlled op.” And I also want to be clear: I think he WAS killed, but other than that I don’t blindly trust a lick of what the mainstream is saying about who did it, why they did it, how it was done, etc.

That reveals the exact same logical failure I see in mainstream thinking.

Many “normies” say:
“Trust the experts. Don’t question.”

Many “truthers” say:
“Everything is fake. Don’t question.”

Both are allergic to inquiry.

Here’s where I stand:

I’m not loyal to conclusions.
I’m loyal to the process of truth-seeking.

Sometimes that leads me to overlap with the mainstream. Other times with the contrarians. But the consistent thread is method, not ideology.

I expected the Charlie Kirk situation would be used to inflame tensions between the political left and right.

It did.

What I didn’t expect is that it would spark just as much division among those who already see beyond the left/right illusion—among those who say they’re “questioning everything.”

Within this very crowd—which I’d like to think I’m a part of—I’ve watched a wave of accusations and hostility arise, simply because there are differing perspectives on what happened. Many who believe with certainty that the event was staged are now labeling anyone who disagrees as “controlled opposition,” “shills,” and worse.

Where is the humility?
Where is the genuine truth-seeking?

Do you truly know, with certainty, what happened that day? Was it staged? Was it real? Was it some combination of both? Is it possible he really died but there are other incredibly questionable details? Can a psyop involve a real death? Can something real be manipulated after the fact?

I’m not claiming to know. I’ve said repeatedly: I currently think he was killed, based on the footage, but I’m fully open to being wrong.

And yet, when I laid out clear points and my current perspective focused only on the footage of the shot, I’m not met with counterpoints—I’m met with mockery, personal attacks, and more, ironically the very same behavior I’ve seen for years from those blindly defending mainstream narratives.

Maybe this was the ultimate goal of this event. Not just to stir division between left and right, but to fragment the very people who are waking or have woken up.

To divide and conquer those who already stepped outside thee box.

And if that’s the case, is it working?

Hypothetical:

An event occurs.

Either:
X happened
or
Y happened

But nobody knows with 100% certainty which one it was. At this point, it’s all speculation.

In response, some say:
“I think X happened, but I’m open to being wrong,”
or
“I think Y happened based on the information I’ve seen, but I’m willing to change my mind if better evidence comes along.”

And others say:
“I think X happened, and anyone who doesn’t think X is a brainwashed idiot who’s fallen off the deep end,”
or
“I think Y happened, and anyone who doesn’t think Y is controlled opposition working to mislead you.”

Which of these ways of speaking indicates openness? Which indicates critical thinking? Which indicates genuine truth-seeking? Which shows humility in the face of uncertainty? Which fosters dialogue and growth? Which shuts down inquiry and hardens into dogma?

This is the last thing I’ll say on this.
I’ve given this too much energy, and it IS absolutely because I’ve become frustrated at the countless people who’ve asserted I and others are CO for simply giving my/our honest opinion(s). I acknowledge I was triggered by that.

From my IG stories yesterday.

Was the killing completely staged? Just another trauma-inducing psyop meant to manipulate perception?

Was it real, but wrapped in layers of deception, with the “it was all fake” narrative itself designed to distract us from exposing the forces behind it?

Was the distraction meant to distract us from the distraction that was a distraction?

Was the entire point to keep us glued to our screens, spiraling through footage, theories, and outrage—so endlessly consumed by trying to “figure it all out” that we forget to live?

So caught up in mental loops, so fractured into ideological tribes by algorithmic design, that we lose sight of our humanness and stop seeing the humanness in each other?

Amandha is upset here (which is understandable) but listen to what she’s saying. I agree with a lot of what she’s saying here.