Unnamed, anonymous sources are talking to media people claiming and i quote ‘Trump mulling replacing Hegseth with….Ron DeSantis.’
We’ve seen this movie before & you know it’s click bait.
Unless it comes from VERIFIED sources, on the record, it’s an information op. A psyop to screw with you, & the votes.
Don’t feed clickbait.
We’ve seen this movie before & you know it’s click bait.
Unless it comes from VERIFIED sources, on the record, it’s an information op. A psyop to screw with you, & the votes.
Don’t feed clickbait.
🔥36💯27❤4
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
On the same night a known smear artist fake journalist drops these false accusations from…anonymous sources…the rumors about DeSantis also drop?
What a coincidence!
What a coincidence!
🔥35😁11
Forwarded from Charlie Kirk
The New Yorker has a bunch of lurid claims about Pete Hegseth, all anonymously sourced from people at Concerned Veterans for America.
The ONLY person willing to go on the record and risk his reputation, Sean Parnell, says it’s all bogus, that the allegations are “complete fabrications,” and come from disgruntled employees at CVA fired by Hegseth because they weren't doing their jobs.
Another unnamed source, when contacted by the New Yorker, said that any claims he made about Hegseth in the past are false and made up. But then the New Yorker published them anyway!
The Sixth Amendment protects the right to confront one’s accusers at trial for a reason: It’s impossible to respond to or rebut anonymous attacks from unnamed people.
So it’s telling that those are the exact attacks the press is using to smear Hegseth.
Why are US Senators wasting a single moment talking about tabloid innuendo nonsense like this?
https://compactmag.com/article/smearing-pete-hegseth/
The ONLY person willing to go on the record and risk his reputation, Sean Parnell, says it’s all bogus, that the allegations are “complete fabrications,” and come from disgruntled employees at CVA fired by Hegseth because they weren't doing their jobs.
Another unnamed source, when contacted by the New Yorker, said that any claims he made about Hegseth in the past are false and made up. But then the New Yorker published them anyway!
The Sixth Amendment protects the right to confront one’s accusers at trial for a reason: It’s impossible to respond to or rebut anonymous attacks from unnamed people.
So it’s telling that those are the exact attacks the press is using to smear Hegseth.
Why are US Senators wasting a single moment talking about tabloid innuendo nonsense like this?
https://compactmag.com/article/smearing-pete-hegseth/
Compact
Smearing Pete Hegseth
An essay published by The New Yorker on Monday claims that Pete Hegseth, President-elect Donald Trump’s nominee for secretary of defense, “was forced to step down” as president of the advocacy group Concerned Veterans for America amid “serious allegations”…
🔥28💯11❤2🙏1
Forwarded from Charlie Kirk
People don't fully appreciate the enormity of the Military Industrial Complex. Defense contractors are 100% running an information op against Pete Hegseth. They know he represents an end to business as usual. He's an existential threat to DEI, endless wars, and endless paychecks.
❤62👍15🔥2🙏2💯1