#FLYNN Two big moments from our exclusive AG Barr interview ⁦@CBSNews⁩ “I think a fair history would say that it was a good decision because it upheld the rule of law. It helped, it upheld the standards of the Department of Justice, and it undid what was…

.@KerriKupecDOJ is having to correct @chucktodd because of his hatchet job of the very fine interview by Catherine Herridge. https://t.co/7gi23hXLwV

Developing… The INITIAL Flynn/Kislyak leak was not to David Ignatius – it was to WaPo reporter Adam Entous. The leak came directly from “sources [who] saw a trannoscript and described it to [Entous].”

We suspect the Flynn/Kislyak occurred around 1/5/17 - the same date Obama was allegedly briefed on the call by Clapper. This date coincides with Entous reporting on other "intercepted communications" from Russian officials leaked to Entous.

Entous: "My sources start whispering to me that there were these mysterious communications" between Flynn and Kislyak. This caused an internal WaPo discussion about whether to run the Flynn/Kislyak story. To his credit, Entous didn't find it newsworthy.

Why did the story go to Ignatius? As a columnist, he was about to throw out the Flynn/Kislyak call and ask "What was it about?" I'm not certain the call was ever independently leaked to Ignatius.

Further Flynn/Kislyak leaks to Entous on 2/9/17 - perhaps from the same sources who provided the initial leak, and supported by new sources. "Current and former U.S. officials" confirmed the contents of Flynn's call with Kislyak.

2/13/2017 - likely DOJ leaks related to (or on behalf of) Sally Yates by "an official familiar with her thinking." Curious if that was McCord or Tashina Gauhar.

How close was the source to Yates? Close enough to know exactly when Yates saw the intelligence. "when this intelligence came in, which would be in late December, early January . . . Yates saw the intelligence"

@SidtheKidd87 @HaroldwWren @BrandonHathaw12 LOL

We. Are. The. Media. Come get some #ObamaGate

What astonishes me is how these #FakeNews charlatans will continue to defend very evil people, whose actions were a direct attack on the Constitution. The damage they have caused is incalculable. Not just to the USA, but to freedom-loving nations everywhere.…

Struggle to comprehend how an FBI interview FD-302 of this magnitude, import, consequence, somehow *unavailable* and we’re led to believe that *follow-up interview* 302 — MONTHS later — of Peter Strzok’s recollections of Flynn interview, should somehow suffice.…