The Library – Telegram
The Library
20.9K subscribers
82.7K photos
6.59K videos
385 files
56.4K links
Harold Finch’s Library
Download Telegram
Forwarded from Brian Cates (Brian Cates)
Yesterday a federal judge held the people holding the J6 defendants in the squalid DC jail in contempt of court. Read all about here in my new Substack post: https://briancates.substack.com/p/the-inexcusable-treatment-of-january
Forwarded from Quite Frankly
I’m not in studio tonight but I curated a great lineup of programming: Conspiracies, culture, comedy and more- and it’s all live now on QuiteFrankly.tv for the rest of the evening.
"My bet is John Durham has Peter Strzok and Lisa Page cooperating, because he's trying to get McCabe. And that's about as high up as you're gonna go. I know people ask me, 'Are they gonna get Comey and Clinton?' No, that's a pipe dream."

Kash Patel

https://t.co/zr0xuTxNUZ https://t.co/G5i60ieoIt
"Whenever any form of government becomes destructive of these ends [life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness] it is the right of the people to alter or abolish it, and to institute new government..." ― Thomas Jefferson
Just WOW
Chicago is about to go full blown Purge.

Their Police Force is roughly 13,000. Chicago’s Metropolitan Population is just over 9 million.

Chicago ALREADY has the highest murder and crime rate in the country.

And now we are looking at a mere 6,500 officers to police a population of 9 million.

This is a powder keg of EPIC proportions.

(h/t for link to @Forecast_432Hz)

https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/chicago-police-union-head-calls-members-defy-vaccine-mandate-warns-chicago-police-force
McConnell on next wk’s procedural vote in Senate on voting bill: Another week, another effort by Washington Democrats to create fake drama over a proposed election takeover that will go nowhere…Schumer wants to stage another political stunt

The grim reaper sending the dems voting bill to its grave
THIS. IS. HUGE! 👇
Fucking arrogance. 👇
Durham is coming. Read this article. Durham is unwinding the DNC hack. That's the key to all of it.
Snippet from the article.

Under questioning, Henry confirmed that CrowdStrike’s examination of the DNC server was done pursuant to its contract with Michael Sussmann of Perkins Coie. Consequently, as explained by the Perkins Coie lawyer, CrowdStrike’s findings were protected by the attorney-client privilege.

https://www.zerohedge.com/geopolitical/john-durham-amazing-disappearing-dnc-hack
Counsel just reminded me that, as it relates to the DNC, we have indicators that data [the DNC emails] was (sic) exfiltrated [taken by hackers off the server]. We did not have concrete evidence that data was (sic) exfiltrated from the DNC, but we have indicators that it was exfiltrated…. There’s not evidence that they were actually exfiltrated. There’s circumstantial evidence … we didn’t have direct evidence. But we made a conclusion that data left the network.”
Okay, there was no direct, concrete, or other proof that the emails were actually taken from the DNC computer. But what were these “indicators” that led CrowdStrike to conclude that the emails were hacked?
According to Henry, CrowdStrike found “indicators of [server] compromise, which are pieces of malware, et cetera.” He then explained that CrowdStrike’s investigative report states that the data [emails] were “staged for exfiltration” by the purported Russian hacker.
He added, “There are times when we can see data exfiltrated, and we can say conclusively. But in this case, it appears that it (sic) was set up to be exfiltrated, but we just don’t have the evidence that says it actually left.”
This is key 🔑


Got that? With no evidence that the emails were actually hacked, CrowdStrike nevertheless concluded that the Russians hacked the emails.
Despite the spin, the whole DNC hack story had just flatlined.
Here we go. Buckle up.

. The questioners kept asking Henry what information CrowdStrike provided to the FBI, and he repeatedly said that they got whatever they asked for.
But the problem with this line of questioning is that it failed to consider the fact that CrowdStrike was working for Perkins Coie. Consequently, the questions should have focused on what information Perkins Coie allowed to be transmitted to the FBI.
The closest anyone came to getting at this issue was when Rep. Mike Conaway (R-TX) asked, “Did the DNC restrict anything that you shared with the FBI or that the FBI asked for? Did they tell you ‘no’ at any point?”
Henry replied, “No, I have no recollection. Again, I know that there are redacted reports and there was some restriction on the reports. That’s the only thing that I can recall.”
Wait. What? Redacted? Restriction? Does this mean that the DNC withheld some of CrowdStrike’s findings and work product from the FBI