So nothing happened. Manchin won't cave on socialist programs.
WH on Pres. Biden’s breakfast with Manchin/Schumer: “They continued to make progress, will have their staffs work on follow-ups from the meeting, and agreed to stay in close touch with each other and the wide range of members who have worked hard on these negotiations.” https://t.co/e6SM2GMHcY
WH on Pres. Biden’s breakfast with Manchin/Schumer: “They continued to make progress, will have their staffs work on follow-ups from the meeting, and agreed to stay in close touch with each other and the wide range of members who have worked hard on these negotiations.” https://t.co/e6SM2GMHcY
Twitter
Phil Mattingly
WH on Pres. Biden’s breakfast with Manchin/Schumer: “They continued to make progress, will have their staffs work on follow-ups from the meeting, and agreed to stay in close touch with each other and the wide range of members who have worked hard on these…
Now the bill is called "Social safety net" smh.
Manchin signaling he’s open to $1.75T for social safety net bill, per source briefed on matter, but it’s unclear where the price tag will end up and what they’ll settle on after today’s meeting.
Manchin signaling he’s open to $1.75T for social safety net bill, per source briefed on matter, but it’s unclear where the price tag will end up and what they’ll settle on after today’s meeting.
See it? Social safety net. That's new wording.
https://twitter.com/mkraju/status/1452260460556914691?s=19
https://twitter.com/mkraju/status/1452260460556914691?s=19
Twitter
Manu Raju
Pelosi says she expects a deal on the larger social safety net plan this week and that the infrastructure bill will pass the House this week. “That’s the plan,” she tells @jaketapper on @CNNSotu
Forwarded from The Post Millennial
The 'F*ck Joe Biden' trend continues to sweep America as college stadiums erupt in chant
https://postmillennialnews.com/ZDZXLM
https://postmillennialnews.com/ZDZXLM
Forwarded from TheStormHasArrived17 (TheStormHasArrived17)
This is the greatest correction in the history of journalism! 😂
Forwarded from Arturius
I've posted in the past on Pfizer blackmailing Brazil and Argentina as conditions for delivering the vaccine. There are now leaks of contracts the company was able to bully other countries to sign off on in exchange for what they consider life-saving medication. These include
- Pfizer mandating government silence on any information about the content of the contracts or any relationship with the company, thus avoiding all public scrutiny
- Pfizer decides on who the shots get distributed to, not the government. This includes a ban on accepting vaccine donations from 3rd parties - in other words, pay up or no shots from anyone.
- Pfizer gets an intellectual property waiver, so if the company is accused of IP theft, the government is on the hook not the company. And the government would be forced to defend the company in court for any theft committed by Pfizer. If the government loses, it would have to pay the victim, not Pfizer.
- Any disputes must be handled by private arbitrators not public courts. So if a government wants to contest any part of the contract, they would have to go to a secret 3 arbitrator panel in New York under New York laws.
- Pfizer can pursue state assets such as military bases, financial reserves, embassies, state-owned companies, etc. as collateral for any compensation. This includes any losses in arbirtration
- Pfizer has full control of all key decisions such as delivery timelines, etc.
This may be one case where I would support going Hugo Chavez on their ass.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nYIJxoh7gqw
- Pfizer mandating government silence on any information about the content of the contracts or any relationship with the company, thus avoiding all public scrutiny
- Pfizer decides on who the shots get distributed to, not the government. This includes a ban on accepting vaccine donations from 3rd parties - in other words, pay up or no shots from anyone.
- Pfizer gets an intellectual property waiver, so if the company is accused of IP theft, the government is on the hook not the company. And the government would be forced to defend the company in court for any theft committed by Pfizer. If the government loses, it would have to pay the victim, not Pfizer.
- Any disputes must be handled by private arbitrators not public courts. So if a government wants to contest any part of the contract, they would have to go to a secret 3 arbitrator panel in New York under New York laws.
- Pfizer can pursue state assets such as military bases, financial reserves, embassies, state-owned companies, etc. as collateral for any compensation. This includes any losses in arbirtration
- Pfizer has full control of all key decisions such as delivery timelines, etc.
This may be one case where I would support going Hugo Chavez on their ass.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nYIJxoh7gqw
YouTube
Gravitas: Revealed: How Pfizer blackmails countries for shots
Is Pfizer putting profits above lives? Public Citizen, a non-profit organization says that Pfizer can stop countries from speaking about contracts, block vaccine donations, unilaterally change delivery schedules & demand public assets as collateral. Palki…
Forwarded from Glenn Greenwald
This article -- examining the new proof that research funded by Dr. Fauci did exactly what he's spent 18 months vehemently denying and calling everyone a liar for suggesting: making bat coronaviruses more contagious -- is absolutely crucial to read:
https://t.co/sngyge177q?amp=1
https://t.co/sngyge177q?amp=1
Vanity Fair
In Major Shift, NIH Admits Funding Risky Virus Research in Wuhan
A spokesman for Dr. Fauci says he has been “entirely truthful,” but a new letter belatedly acknowledging the National Institutes of Health’s support for virus-enhancing research adds more heat to the ongoing debate over whether a lab leak could have sparked…
Forwarded from The Federalist
YouTube Nukes Video Of GOP Lawmakers Discussing Constitutional Limits To COVID Vaxx Mandates
READ: https://thefederalist.com/2021/10/21/youtube-nukes-video-of-gop-lawmakers-discussing-constitutional-limits-to-covid-vaxx-mandates/ • @FDRLSTT
READ: https://thefederalist.com/2021/10/21/youtube-nukes-video-of-gop-lawmakers-discussing-constitutional-limits-to-covid-vaxx-mandates/ • @FDRLSTT
The Federalist
YouTube Nukes Video Of Lawmakers Talking Limits For Vaccine Mandates
YouTube took down a video posted from the House Freedom Caucus of lawmakers discussing the constitutional limits to vaccine mandates.
Forwarded from The Federalist
Biden’s White House Colluded With School Boards Association To Launch Attack On Parents
READ: https://thefederalist.com/2021/10/21/bidens-white-house-colluded-with-school-boards-association-to-launch-attack-on-parents/ • @FDRLSTT
READ: https://thefederalist.com/2021/10/21/bidens-white-house-colluded-with-school-boards-association-to-launch-attack-on-parents/ • @FDRLSTT
The Federalist
Biden Admin Colluded With School Boards Association To Attack Parents
Biden's White House colluded with the National School Boards Association to launch a war on parents who want to hold their school districts accountable.
Forwarded from The Federalist
Biden Forced Americans Into A Game Of Chicken Over Their Livelihoods, And They’re Not Flinching
READ: https://thefederalist.com/2021/10/21/biden-forced-americans-into-a-game-of-chicken-over-their-livelihoods-and-theyre-not-flinching/ • @FDRLSTT
READ: https://thefederalist.com/2021/10/21/biden-forced-americans-into-a-game-of-chicken-over-their-livelihoods-and-theyre-not-flinching/ • @FDRLSTT
The Federalist
Biden Forced Americans Into A Game Of Chicken. They're Not Flinching
Somebody's got to give in this game of chicken, and Biden is gambling that it will be you. It's time to make sure he loses that bet.
Forwarded from The Western Journal
Content Warning: What They're Showing Schoolchildren Is So Disgusting the Law Requires It to Be Blurred on Television
READ: http://w-j.co/s/762bc
READ: http://w-j.co/s/762bc
The Western Journal
Content Warning: What They're Showing Schoolchildren Is So Disgusting the Law Requires It to Be Blurred on Television
When a protesting parent described the contents of one book, a school board member interrupted to remind her there were children present.