Forwarded from Tracy Beanz (Tracy Beanz)
Ok everyone, buckle up. This was the response filed by the government today in the case we’ve been talking about - they are essentially saying that while a decision is being made on a religious exemption, the plaintiffs won’t be terminated, but if a decision is made to not accept an exemption, the plaintiff would have a certain number of days to get into compliance. It’s a mish mosh of word salad and no real protection against the heart of the matter, which is what this case is about in the first place. There is still an appeals process for redress etc, but stand by a second, because the judge just issued ANOTHER ORDER.
@TracyBeanzOfficial
@TracyBeanzOfficial
Forwarded from Tracy Beanz (Tracy Beanz)
Essentially the judge just said, “not good enough”. The court is ordering the government to file another notice by 12PM tomorrow - indicating that they will agree that no plaintiff on the lawsuit will be disciplined or terminated pending the courts review on TRO - absent that, the court will likely GRANT the TRO - huge deal. Mike Yoder will be on the podcast tomorrow to discuss all of this, including instructions on how YOU should move forward if you are a government employee of any kind. Don’t miss it tomorrow at 2:30 ET. This is a huge development and great news.
@TracyBeanzOfficial
@TracyBeanzOfficial
Forwarded from 🗽@Maximus_4EVR 🍎 (♘ Sιr Mαχιмυs Ɗeʀʀιdα ♞)
FYI Virginia Update 2
-Youngkin pulls way ahead of McAuliffe among VA Likely Voters (LV).
-FOX News (Left-leaning) VA Poll:
Youngkin 53%
McAuliffe 45%
-This is the first time Youngkin has polled above 50%; while it shows McAuliffe fading fast.
-Among "VA Parents" it's brutal:
Youngkin 56%
McAuliffe 42%
-Who do you trust (LV)?
Youngkin 52%
McAuliffe 44%
That is landslide territory, folks. *IF* true, you can expect a GOP sweep down-the-ballot.
Start spreading the news...🎵
~@Maximus_Forever 😎
-Youngkin pulls way ahead of McAuliffe among VA Likely Voters (LV).
-FOX News (Left-leaning) VA Poll:
Youngkin 53%
McAuliffe 45%
-This is the first time Youngkin has polled above 50%; while it shows McAuliffe fading fast.
-Among "VA Parents" it's brutal:
Youngkin 56%
McAuliffe 42%
-Who do you trust (LV)?
Youngkin 52%
McAuliffe 44%
That is landslide territory, folks. *IF* true, you can expect a GOP sweep down-the-ballot.
Start spreading the news...🎵
~@Maximus_Forever 😎
Joe Biden wants $70M to help the migrant workforce Build Back Better. https://t.co/b48Xk2qTyK
Twitter
Joe Biden wants $70M to help the migrant workforce Build Back Better.
Forwarded from Tracy Beanz (Tracy Beanz)
See below for relevant text. This is the CORRECT response and it is what SHOULD happen in a just court. We are so used to corruption the right thing is an overwhelming victory. This is, so far, proving to be huge victory.
“Defendants indicate that plaintiffs will not be disciplined by their employers while their employers consider their exception requests. However, Defendants' notice provides no guarantee of what will happen to plaintiffs if their exception requests are denied and if they reach the point of being disciplined or terminated pending briefing of Plaintiffs' [5] Motion for Temporary Restraining Order ("TRO Motion") and Defendants' forthcoming motion to dismiss. Defendants indicate merely that they shall "notify the Court" if any plaintiff receives a final determination denying his or her request for a religious exception pending the briefing of and the Court's resolution of Plaintiffs' TRO Motion and Defendants' proposed motion to dismiss. It is not clear to the Court that this Notice sufficiently addresses the Court's concern that the Plaintiffs will not be disciplined or terminated while briefing is completed pursuant to the extended scheduled requested by Defendants. It therefore appears that Plaintiffs may be prejudiced by the proposed extended briefing schedule.”
“Defendants indicate that plaintiffs will not be disciplined by their employers while their employers consider their exception requests. However, Defendants' notice provides no guarantee of what will happen to plaintiffs if their exception requests are denied and if they reach the point of being disciplined or terminated pending briefing of Plaintiffs' [5] Motion for Temporary Restraining Order ("TRO Motion") and Defendants' forthcoming motion to dismiss. Defendants indicate merely that they shall "notify the Court" if any plaintiff receives a final determination denying his or her request for a religious exception pending the briefing of and the Court's resolution of Plaintiffs' TRO Motion and Defendants' proposed motion to dismiss. It is not clear to the Court that this Notice sufficiently addresses the Court's concern that the Plaintiffs will not be disciplined or terminated while briefing is completed pursuant to the extended scheduled requested by Defendants. It therefore appears that Plaintiffs may be prejudiced by the proposed extended briefing schedule.”
Forwarded from Tracy Beanz (Tracy Beanz)
Twitter
Jenna Ellis
BREAKING: @Yoder_Esq with a HUGE WIN in Church v. Biden. (Yes, that’s the actual case caption. For those playing along, 1:21-cv-2815) This is an amazing development from the DC District Court in the stand for OUR RIGHTS against the unconstitutional vaccine…
It's all fake so biden can go lie at the climate summit.
*PELOSI: HOUSE WILL POSTPONE VOTE ON INFRASTRUCTURE BILL
https://twitter.com/zerohedge/status/1453868900941189123?s=19
*PELOSI: HOUSE WILL POSTPONE VOTE ON INFRASTRUCTURE BILL
https://twitter.com/zerohedge/status/1453868900941189123?s=19
Twitter
zerohedge
*PELOSI: HOUSE WILL POSTPONE VOTE ON INFRASTRUCTURE BILL
😆 🤣 😂 😹 😆 🤣 😂 😹 😆 🤣 😂
*PELOSI: MOST WHO OPPOSED INFRASTRUCTURE BILL NOW SUPPORT IT
Which is why she is postponing the vote
https://twitter.com/zerohedge/status/1453868981702565891?s=19
*PELOSI: MOST WHO OPPOSED INFRASTRUCTURE BILL NOW SUPPORT IT
Which is why she is postponing the vote
https://twitter.com/zerohedge/status/1453868981702565891?s=19
Twitter
zerohedge
*PELOSI: MOST WHO OPPOSED INFRASTRUCTURE BILL NOW SUPPORT IT Which is why she is postponing the vote
House does not have the votes to pass the infrastructure bill. That vote is off for tonight. House will consider ANOTHER stopgap version of the surface transportation bill and send that to the Senate tonight. Surface transportation pgms expire Nov 1.
😆 🤣 😂 Pelosi is full of shit.
😆 🤣 😂 Pelosi is full of shit.
Forwarded from Tracy Beanz (Tracy Beanz)
Here is our story from yesterday:
https://uncoverdc.com/2021/10/27/new-lawsuit-biden-task-force-schemes-to-deny-religious-exemptions-falsifies-medical-records/
https://uncoverdc.com/2021/10/27/new-lawsuit-biden-task-force-schemes-to-deny-religious-exemptions-falsifies-medical-records/
UncoverDC
New Lawsuit: Biden Task Force Schemes to Deny Religious Exemptions, Falsifies Medical Records
A lawsuit filed Oct. 24, 2021, in DC District Court by attorney Michael Yoder details the illegal steps taken by the Biden Administration to unconstitutionally deny religious exemptions to federal employees by using a Task Force and fake deadlines to circumvent…
https://twitter.com/ChadPergram/status/1453870879172145159?s=19
Biden must have sniffed Pelosi. Surely dazzled her. 😆 🤣
Biden must have sniffed Pelosi. Surely dazzled her. 😆 🤣
Twitter
Chad Pergram
A) Pelosi to Dem colleagues: Today, we were honored by the visit from President Joe Biden, who inspired us with his vision and dazzled us with his thorough knowledge of the specifics of the Build Back Better Framework.
C) Progressive Caucus: Members of our Caucus will not vote for the infrastructure bill without the Build Back Better Act. We will work immediately to finalize and pass both pieces of legislation through the House together.
1) Dem MN Rep Dean Phillips to colleague Bret Baier on Hse failing to pass infrastructure bill: I'm disappointed because I'm an American. I'm disappointed because I work with 28 Democrats and Republicans on the Problem Solvers Caucus that help put this bill together.
Hes the president now. She threatening Biden to expose him if he don't stop Durham.
https://twitter.com/dsamuelsohn/status/1453867222749884432?s=19
https://twitter.com/dsamuelsohn/status/1453867222749884432?s=19
Twitter
Darren Samuelsohn
It's unclear whether the senator accused of the assault is still in the Senate, or whether Abedin filed a complaint at the time. Still, the lawmakers said they hoped the predator would be held accountable.
Plausible translation of EcoHealth letter to NIH:
"If you're gonna try to take us down, Collins and Fauci, we're gonna try to take you down with us."
https://twitter.com/R_H_Ebright/status/1453870854039695362?s=19
"If you're gonna try to take us down, Collins and Fauci, we're gonna try to take you down with us."
https://twitter.com/R_H_Ebright/status/1453870854039695362?s=19
Twitter
Richard H. Ebright
Link to EcoHealth letter to NIH: s.wsj.net/public/resourc…