Adams got suckered in and now coming to the realization that he got scammed.

Why does well-informed Bill Gates believe the opposite of what the news is telling me about vaccinations reducing transmission?

I mean, seriously. What's going on here?

https://twitter.com/ScottAdamsSays/status/1459134749524443138?s=19

The booster line never ends.

@KanekoaTheGreat

Think/Speak Freely on @CloutHub https://clouthub.com/p/BvEyMn9d

I WILL NOT BE A COMPLIANT VICTIM. STOP #FIGHTHARDER

💚👊🏻🤘🏻 DO NOT COMPLY

So J&J are splitting up? wonder why? Loss mitigation ? Preparation for massive class action lawsuits?

https://twitter.com/realstevelance/status/1459168905193267200?s=20

As i have theorized in the past about Manafort passing Trump polling data to Kilimnik which went to Derpaska and then to the CLinton campaign. Clinton is the only one who could have wanted that information. Well I think Trump passed misleading polling data to Clinton and thats why she never went out to the Midwest to campaign the last two weeks. That error on her part was said by her own campaign was her undoing in the election.

https://twitter.com/ChuckRossDC/status/1459148506107625479?s=20

Who else remembers the Brooking Institution running to leak to the New York Times so they could whine about having had to surrender documents to Durham’s grand jury in February after having received a subpoena? At the time someone asked me “Why would Durham be interested in documents from Brookings on Danchenko from 2010? Shouldn’t he be focused on more recent stuff that’s not from 11 years ago?” When you remember that Danchenko was caught engaging in espionage activity while working for Brookings, was investigated by the FBI for it, fled the country, but then openly came back to work in DC again by 2016 while he’s right in the middle of the RussiaGate hoax? Why Durham is investigating that is kind of self-explanatory. Here’s the column I wrote at UncoverDC when the NYT’s ran it’s story about Brookings subpoena from Durham: https://uncoverdc.com/2021/04/21/how-worried-is-the-brookings-institute-about-the-subpoenaed-documents-it-just-gave-to-durham/

Oops. I guess trying to use manufactured, doctored photos to frame a kid didn’t work out so well. 👇

BREAKING: Kyle's lawyers just pointed out the prosecutors claims of the doctored photo would require Kyle to be holding the gun left-handed when Kyle is clearly right-handed

DA Lunchbox just confirmed the doctored photos will be a central piece of the closing argument against Kyle Rittenhouse

BREAKING: Kyle Rittenhouse's prosecutors just confirmed the central argument of their closing will be the altered photograph entered into evidence just yesterday

Rittenhouse's lawyers pointing out that Binger and Lunchbreak refused to call Ziminski or any witness to testify that Kyle raised his gun

"This is hocus pocus and added pixels, and that's what they're basing their prosecution on!"

DA Lunchbreak: Rittenhouse showed utter disregard for human life

Judge: He testified every time that his actions were always taken to defend his life

DA Lunchbreak: Rittenhouse fired 4 shots in a hapless manner (at Rosenbaum)

Poso-check: All 4 arrived at intended target

Want to know why the prosecution is trying to nitpick every single moment and every single word so hard?

The same reason they introduced tampered evidence

They have no case and they never did