Listen live

https://youtu.be/KlMLVB8LcKA

Update:
1.) the high def video the prosecutors deliberately withheld had-
A.) entirely different filename
B.) entirely different creation date
C.) altered/different metadata
D.) much larger file size
E.) different file type/extension.

It’s undeniable that the prosecutors just lied to the judge about withholding evidence. Exculpatory evidence they KNEW destroys their closing arguments & their case.

2.) the current legal team for Kyle attempted to verify & get the video from the drone company. The company owner lied to the investigator the defense team sent, refused to provide it, and later dissolved the company to avoid efforts by Kyle’s defense to gain the evidence.

3.) the prosecutors lied about knowing about the video quality difference. Kraus himself said during closing arguments and i quote “our video is better quality”.

4.) this judge is weak: there is ample technical & testimonial cause to dismiss this case RIGHT NOW with prejudice due to prosecutorial misconduct. Even if you chalk this up to incompetence it doesn’t excuse the Brady failure. This judge is holding back out of fear of the mob because hes weak.

5.) The jury WILL SEE the high definition drone footage proving that:
A.) kyle did not point his rifle at anyone except the the people attacking him
B.) that he did not point or fire until he was attacked in all cases.

This is a huge development.

Big Questions:

does mob threats win out?

does the judge refer the prosecutors for misconduct?

BREAKING: Judge says he wants to take testimony under oath about the compressed video given to the defense

Binger's face when the judge said he wants to take testimony about the compressed video

As an IT Professional i want these two UNDER OATH explaining the obvious differences in the files.

And i know what to look for, so l’ll be able to point out their lies.

Reminder: We still have never seen the FBI's HD surveillance footage that they 'lost'

FYI: kraus admitted sending files to the defense FROM HIS GMAIL. Why is a state official handling evidence WITH IN HIS PERSONAL EMAIL ACCOUNT?!?!👇 This is illegal & breaks the chain of custody.

Lunchbox: It was her Android, your Honor! I'm an iPhone guy!

Defense: I used a Lenovo laptop to open my Gmail. This had nothing to do with an Android.

As i just got done saying, this judge’s actions are being influenced by his fear of mob violence. This is not a fair trial. 👇

Judge very upset about media coverage of this case, including personal attacks on himself. Took a lot of time in court today expressing how upset he was about how media is portraying him

NEW - Chaos at Rittenhouse trial: Defense says the filename of video sent earlier was not similar to the filename given over the weekend. Judge suggests an evidentiary hearing will be needed.

@disclosetv

The Prosecutors knowingly sent a much lower quality of video hoping the defense would never find out, in order to hide exculpatory evidence from the defendant. They intentionally violated his brady rights.

This is a screenshot of a settings taken from an iphone during file send. The prosecution admits sending from an iphone.

Question: What do you see?

Answer: the possible method the prosecution used to deliberately hide exculpatory evidence from the defendant.

RITTENHOUSE Update: ADA lists the videos requested by the jury (which do not include the drone footage):

Mr. Grosskreutz interview of Kyle during his livestream

BG on the Scene video of the Grosskreutz shooting in both regular and slow motion.

Attempts are being made to solidify plan for jury to view materials as it does not include the videos still being questioned.

RITTENHOUSE Update: Court to take a break while a laptop is prepared with the jury requested files on a thumb drive to be viewed in their chambers, not in the courtroom. Judge Schroeder clarifies that the drone video in question has not yet been requested by the jurors for viewing.

More: