NEW BOT Телеграм, страница

More on Uncovering 2020's Voter Fraud

From the excellent graph Dr. Frank has produced, we can see that there are probably 2 maybe 3 different ways of rigging the election. (See image in the next post.)

As @LibertyOverwatch accurately described in this post, not all states have inflated voter rolls.

Allocating "fake" votes to real people who never voted is enough.

The statements about people analyzing voter rolls is also accurate.

⚠️ You should print his post and and read is carefully over the next few days.

# But there is more...

Fabricating votes and assigning them to people who don't vote is only part of the problem.

Another part involves deleting votes that are inconvenient.

Please carefully read Liz Harris' Maricopa canvassing report. There are about 165,000 to 180,000 registrants in Maricopa, who voted, but their votes were never officially recorded.

>>> Their votes didn't count! <<<

How can this be possible?

Here is one example:

- Start counting "early" votes ahead of election day to establish trends
- If you don't like where is it headed, create a new database and copy records from the old database to the new database and purposely "forget" to copy the inconvenient records.
- You now have a brand new database with no history of the inconvenient records.
- Start fabricating ballots if necessary.
- Destroy the real "inconvenient" ballots. (Burning down chicken farms seems to work well.)
- Corrupt the digital ballot images so no one can open them or just simply fabricate new ones.
- (Optional) Wipe out the hard drives a day before any forensic audits are due to take place, just to be sure.

# But it get's even better...

Before we dive in, we need to point out that the best strategy to fix the 2020 election is 📣 CANVASSING 📣

We need to recruit, train and unleash an army of canvassers.

Patriots everywhere must rise and unite to #SwampTheSwamp. No one else will.

However, some people are not able or don't have time to physically go canvassing. We have you covered. 😎

If you really want to make a difference, become a "cyber canvasser" or more precisely, a "cyber adjudicator", and join project Polaris and join the Lone Raccone channel for updates.

You can make a real difference from the comfort of your own home in your own time.🥳

NOTE: See our original post to get started.

Now, back to the main thread. Project Polaris has already recounted a small county (Harding) in New Mexico and the report is troubling.

LadyDraza summarized it best in this post.

We will repeat it here because it is crucial to understand.

Imagine 10 people voted. 7 voted for "A", and 3 voted for "B". The "A"s won by 70%. Nothing complicated here.

Now, let's fabricate 20 votes, and give 10 to the "A"s and 10 to the "B"s. Seems fair?

We now have a total of 30 votes. The "A"s have 17 votes and the "B"s have 13 votes.

But... the "A"s winning percentage is now only 57% (instead of 70%).

Why is this important?

It is a lot easier to rig elections without raising too many suspicions, if everyone has been led to believe that elections are supposed to be "tight" with small winning margins. It is called "plausible deniability" 😉.

It is easier to build a plausible narrative for why one party lost and the other won, when elections are tight. It is also a lot easier to manipulate results without being noticed. (Just sayin).

Hmm... Where have we seen very tight elections recently? ... Coincidence?

> "But! didn't the huge Republican turnout make a difference?"

Maybe, maybe not. The margins are so small that anything could happen at the next elections and no one will know any different... and that is the point.

When margins are tight, everything is "plausible" 🤷‍♂️.

# Solution

We need to #Fix2020First and we need to #CleanTheVoterRolls at the same time.

Canvassing is the best solution.

-----

Please subscribe to these channels if you haven't already:

- LibertyOverwatch
- Dr.Frank
- TheLoneRaccon
- LadyDraza
- Bobby Piton
- LizHarris
- ElectionFraud20_org

P.S: Check Bobby Piton latest post on ghost registrants.

Follow the Data with Dr Frank

Follow the Data with Dr Frank!

4.2K viewsHarold Wren, 01:47