So here, we notice that Sussman is playing a bit of a game of cat and mouse with The SC (Special Counsel). The SC says that if Sussman will concede or not dispute that there was no secret channel of communication between Trump servers and Russia, then the SC won’t seek to prove the allegation false. Ie- If Sussman concedes it was BS, Durham won’t prove that he’s a liar in court. If Sussman uses the the data as if it’s legit, the SC wants to be able to prove how wrong he is.

@TracyBeanzOfficial

Here the judge says - “that’s great and all, but it’s much more nuanced than that, because the accuracy of that data is important.” The court will allow SC to show evidence that ultimately the FBI decided the data provided was bunk, as well as what steps the FBI needed to take to prove that because that lends to materiality, the basis of the charge. The SC argues that because Sussman lied to the FBI about the origin and didn’t say he was there on behalf of a political client that the FBI took steps it otherwise wouldn’t have taken, hence materiality. This is where my biggest qualm is, because I think the FBI knew and was in on it, and this is where I lean that Durham is protecting the institution. I digress. Next slide.

@TracyBeanzOfficial

Here the judge is saying (and revealing I think) that the owners of the companies where the servers purportedly involved won’t be able to take the stand and also, the “other agency” (I believe the CIA) also won’t be able to submit testimony, UNLESS the other agencies investigation had some bearing on what the FBI did. So judge is narrowing scope.

@TracyBeanzOfficial

Now we get juicy, because this REALLY hamstrings any possible defense that Sussman may have. Sussman doesn’t want any of the “validity” issues litigated at all. The SC and the judge say “fine” BUT (and it’s a big one). If the government can establish what Sussman knew about the accuracy of the data, it goes to state of mind when he presented to the FBI under the guise of being a good citizen. Similarly, if he says he believed it was true (see where the issue is for him?) the government could say “well Mr. Sussman? We know that’s unreasonable because A. B. C. D.” As an example “we know that isn’t true because we have emails where you discuss how fast and loose this is and how you only needed it to be a house of cards in a breeze because it was meant for both LE cover AND public perception.”

He leaves other bits about this up for debate after further hearings - there’s a lot more to discuss. This order is very narrow. Next slide.

@TracyBeanzOfficial

This paragraph is basically telling Sussman he loses on the FBI expert witness that the SC wants to question, because the topics the SC wants to ask about fall within three specific categories the judge will allow- ie: proving that Sussmans lie was material. The jury needs to hear what goes into investigating claims like this, which means there’s some latitude on what comes out based on how the SC questions the witness. Crafty questioning could give us juice.

@TracyBeanzOfficial

Basically this order stops the bad actors in their tracks from trying to argue there was a Trump Server/Russia connection. If Sussman even DARE put his toe in that water the judge is saying that the prosecution can offer more on the data. Sussman is not going to be able to keep the lie going as a defense. He’s in a corner. There’s a lot more still to come and this is a VERY narrow ruling, but it’s fair.


@TracyBeanzOfficial

News Station Falls To Pieces After Kari Lake Brings Her Own Camera to the Interview

Original article.  The motives are obvious here.KariLake  Published April 22, 2022 11,911 Views

The Fake Media will splice and dice interviews to smear Conservatives… which is why EVERYONE should record the entire interview.

Channel 3/5 obviously had something to hide. Why should they care if there’s another camera in the room?

https://www.karilake.com/donate

** End **

https://crimeofthecentury2020.com/news-station-falls-to-pieces-after-kari-lake-brings-her-own-camera-to-the-interview

JUST IN - Twitter's source code has now been locked down to make it harder for current employees to make unauthorized changes to the platform, Bloomberg reports.

@disclosetv

Elon Musk *will* win. This is the beginning of a very entertaining game.

JUST IN - Twitter employees apparently added a public and empty repository called "the-algorithm" on the platform's Github account shortly before the source code was locked.

Musk said he wanted to make the Twitter algorithm open source.

For non-techies: It seems that some developers at Twitter wanted to send a message to Elon Musk by uploading this empty software repository.

@disclosetv

BREAKING: TWITTER TRADING HALTED DUE TO PENDING NEWS

BREAKING: Elon Musk has purchased Twitter

I love it. Let the mass firings commence

Cue the nuclear bomb GIFS... this is massive

https://news.1rj.ru/str/disclosetv/7716

Court Blocks Biden Administration From Ending Title 42 Border Order https://www.theepochtimes.com/court-blocks-biden-administration-from-ending-noscript-42-border-order_4426604.html?utm_source=ref_share&utm_campaign=copy&rs=SHRDLPNZ&

Just had a conversation with someone who knows Miranda.

Was told bear in mind who owns the Post

The election fraud waters have to be waded into carefully.

https://nypost.com/2022/04/24/biden-is-up-to-old-election-tricks/?utm_campaign=iphone_nyp&utm_source=twitter_app

Miranda Devine article on 2000mules.

She goes through the numbers of votes from the states, and which ones would have flipped based on just this evidence.

3- AZ, GA and PA

I dont agree with her wrapup.

The mantra seems to be we don't know if the votes were fraudulent or not.

So what? They were posted ILLEGALLY.

Stacey Abrams group was involved.

Accountability needs to occur or it will happen again.

One of the things Miranda said in the article.

She mentioned Stacey by name.

That should be the death knell for Kemp.

He DID NOTHING.