None of this is legal after the latest SCOTUS ruling on #2A ⬇️

WARNING: This will piss you off

You could literally drive a truck through the potential abuse here. This is all subjective criteria which left in the hands of Dems would absolutely allow them to discriminate based on ideological differences.

They're basically making it so ANY REASON can be cited to then deny people from lawfully obtaining a carry license.

And if you don't think this isn't aimed directly at Conservatives you're a fool.

--

State Atty General Suggests Considering Applicants' Ideological Viewpoints in Denying Carry Licenses

The CA AG endorses denying licenses based on the applicant's "hatred" or "racism."

Subjective Criteria Includes:
Good moral character
Honesty
Trustworthiness
Reliability
Respect for the law
Integrity
Candor
Discretion
Observance of fiduciary duty
Respect for the rights of others
Absence of hatred & racism
Fiscal stability

https://reason.com/volokh/2022/06/26/state-attorney-general-suggests-considering-applicants-ideological-viewpoints-in-denying-carry-licenses/

This has been the night from Hell. Teddy had an accident overnight & we are waiting to be seen by his vet. Please pray like crazy. 💔

So Teddy was able to take 3 small steps on his leg that was operated on & he went to the bathroom for the second time in 12 hours. I think he got lucky & his knee is ok, and it seems like the issue relieving himself is now passed too. He is waiting for the vet to call once they open to tell us what time to arrive to get checked out. We’re going in to get checked out anyway, just as a precaution. #stress

Courtesy SCOTUSblog 🏛 ⚖️ .@SCOTUSblog

Today at SCOTUS: Opinions at 10 a.m. EDT. Four cases remain, covering the following topics: Native American sovereignty, state sovereign immunity, the "remain in Mexico" policy, and EPA's power to combat climate change. https://twitter.com/SCOTUSblog/status/1542111288289017856?s=20&t=kRUUgDc6BP9eLWl-yl2Big

Teddy Update: he is resting comfortably at the vet after x-rays, we are waiting for his surgeon to evaluate the x-rays make a determination if everything is good.

Fingers crossed & prayers up

Soooo . . . . . . . . the there were 2. Climate change:
West Virginia v EPA

Immigration:
Biden v. Texas *Remain in Mexico twitter.com/Ivanka_Jade/st…

The Supreme Court has added Thursday (tomorrow) as an Opinion Issuance Day. 10:00 a.m EDT, The 2 remaining cases are on climate change and immigration:
West Virginia v EPA
Biden v. Texas *Remain in Mexico
supremecourt.gov

Convenient how China is absolutely forgotten in all this. ⬇️

JUST IN - NATO declares the Russian Federation as the "most significant and direct threat" to the bloc.

https://www.nato.int/nato_static_fl2014/assets/pdf/2022/6/pdf/290622-strategic-concept.pdf

@disclosetv

“I hope that the American people will know how to treasure this historic opportunity, and that they will understand that there cannot be justice anywhere the right to abortion is recognized, there cannot be peace and prosperity in a society that massacres its own children, and there cannot be liberty wherever license, vice and pride subvert God’s Commandments.”

https://remnantnewspaper.com/web/index.php/headline-news-around-the-world/item/6022-vigano-s-declaration-on-the-scotus-decision-to-overturn-roe

Beginning tomorrow at 10am, SCOTUS will hand down it’s remaining opinions with one important one potentially having big impacts on Biden’s energy agenda

“The U.S. Supreme Court is expected to issue a ruling this week that will determine the degree to which the Environmental Protection Agency can regulate greenhouse gas emissions as an air pollutant.

The decision may have enormous implications for President Joe Biden's administration and its lofty ambitions to fight global climate change.”

https://www.reuters.com/world/us/how-us-supreme-court-could-hobble-bidens-climate-efforts-2022-06-28/

@ChiefNerd