Savage Angel Kari Lake just dropped the MOAB on RINO Karrin Taylor Robson, scamming 1000s of American Citizens with false donation claims. Woooo Lawd! Get ‘em, Kari!

Hi Everybody! I posted an update on Teddy over at GiveSendGo.

https://www.givesendgo.com/HelpTeddyGetKneeSurgery

If the Bannon case continues, and he is found guilty, it will certainly be appealed, and will likely move its way all the way up the chain to set precedent that stops this from ever happening again.

The gist? The government is using evidence from members of the committee, but members of the committee have invoked the speech and debate clause to quash the defendants ability to call them as witnesses. The judge granted that motion to quash. So, basically the members of the committee will be testifying against Bannon, without Bannon having the ability to cross examine them. More interestingly? They made themselves a party to the case when they filed an amicus brief in support of the charges.

If you want a nice round summary of the case, read here. The judge has taken this motion under advisement.

https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.dcd.237438/gov.uscourts.dcd.237438.116.0_3.pdf

@TracyBeanzOfficial

It takes a real piece of trash to ostracize someone like @therealdirty for fundraising. The guy creates incredible content & does great work.

ATF Agents are thugs. Treat them accordingly. YOU NEED TO SEE THIS.

https://youtu.be/OFE9Yl2X57A

Ok can I take a second to say how absolutely BRUTAL the above video is? Don’t mess with a journalist. Just don’t. Not only that, but all of these folks conned out of their money are going to call their CC companies and cause chargebacks. Stop scamming people, RINO’s

Here comes the final push
https://news.1rj.ru/str/drawandstrikechannel/48549

NeverTrump’s Latest Attempt To Dismiss Election Concerns Is Particularly Dishonest

READ: https://thefederalist.com/2022/07/19/nevertrumps-latest-attempt-to-dismiss-election-concerns-is-particularly-dishonest/ • @FDRLSTT

Dictator. Tyrant. #wewillnotcomply #FuckJoeBiden

Here we go...
tinyurl.com/mtzwpr4u

🧵 COURTESY Joe Nierman aka Good Lawgic
INSIDE THE BANNON TRIAL:
We expected that today would start with peremptory challenges designed to trim pool from 22 to 12 + 2 Alt. That is not what happened.

Instead we are treated to motions in limine.

In light of last week's rulings regarding limitations on permitted defenses, specifically as his belief in executive privilege is an invalid defense. The government had an issue with the language incorporated in a letter that is expected to be admitted into evidence.

Court clarified it's position to state that Executive privilege could be referenced as it relates to Bannon mistake of fact that he thought the subpoena dates were not fixed.

Schoen inflamed that this contradicts his ruling from last week. Judge claims this was the ruling.

Court stresses that if there is a proffer by Bannon that his reason for believing that the date was not fixed was because of discussions that accommodations on appearing would be made for him because of executive privilege, that would be acceptable.

Side note:

A defendant CANNOT rely of mistake of LAW, but he CAN defend based upon mistake of FACT.

Both the government and defense seem confounded about what is admissible when a mistake of fact arises from a mistake of law.

The Court is attempting to walk that line.

Vaughn said that the Government would be fine with testimony that Bannon's attorney told him not to appear because of EP. "It shows his willfullness".

Nichols started yelling at her that the Government brought a motion ages ago to exclude all testimony about that.

Vaughn: Our motion was to exclude that as a viable defense because it would be mistake of law.

Court: No. You specifically wanted ALL testimony excluded.

Discussions held about what this case is about.

Court breaks down 4 questions to be established by government for conviction.

1. Was Bannon legally excused?
2. Estoppel by entrapment?
3. Was there a default?
4. Was default willful?

Government must prove beyond reasonable doubt "no" on 1 and 2 and "yes" on 3 and 4.
. https://twitter.com/NiermanJoe/status/1549401401922670595?s=20&t=06W-Ttk76j5uKdp-FZGwkw

Corcoran asks for 30 day continuance because there are so many moving parts. Suggests keeping the jury work completed and asking them to not follow social media.

Judge calls for 10 minute recess.

After recess, Court reads trannoscripts from last week where he made rulings on motions. Repeats Courts position that given a proffer from Bannon that he misunderstood the dates based on an expectation that EP results in accommodations regularly made that's admissible.

Warns defense, "If Bannon makes such a proffer, that opens up doorway for Vaughn to introduce unredacted letters showing he is lying and knew otherwise".
Court starts reviewing letter and recognizing that language in there is really dicey to air before a jury.

Tells parties to spend next hour working out language issues of admissible portions of letter.

Denies motion for 30 day continuance. Corcoran asks for continuance til Monday to sort this stuff. Court says, I'd like to try plowing through, but I may grant a brief continuance along what you're requesting. Let's see where you are after lunch.

Come back @ 1 PM.

END THREAD