(1 of 4) From the net: As for the good LtCol Vindman, it seems as though he thinks he’s a LtGen, which is still not a high enough rank to usurp the President.

Trivia: Robert Luskin, who is the Sondland lawyer sitting to his right, is also representing Stefan Halper.

What happened to the uniform? Or does that only get brought out when TV cameras are clearly in view? https://t.co/vXQmty4VUa

Finally, a news organization looked at the facts in my reporting and not the spin about my stories. Thanks @EpochTimes for a fair story about my Ukraine reporting.
https://t.co/zYudu6SNqf

BIDEN ON ADDRESSING DOMESTIC VIOLENCE: "We have to keep punching at it, & punching at it, & punching at it." “No. I really mean it!” #DemocraticDebate https://t.co/WOamYa9sWn

🚨NEW: In a previously undisclosed text on July 27 2016 (when Trump joked about Russians finding Hillary’s 30K emails) Page & Strzok had the following exchange: PAGE: Have we opened on him yet? STRZOK: Opened on Trump? If Hillary did, you know 5 field offices…

IMPORTANT: —Only 4 days later, Crossfire Hurricane (CH) opened —“Him” by Page refers to Trump personally, shown by Strzok’s response —Comey denied under oath CH was an investigation into *Trump*, saying it was “enterprise” investigation into Russia & any…

The Special Counsel legal advisor to the Deputy Director of the FBI really shouldn’t be asking if investigations have been opened into presidential candidates they don’t like, and investigations should be into potential *crimes* not specific *people*

Given Strzok opened Crossfire Hurricane himself, it’s legitimate to question whether he was motivated by a desire to investigate Trump *personally*, rather than any genuine investigative leads into Russian interference and potential links to the campaign…

N.B. The Strzok response has previously been reported, but I couldn’t find any prior reporting of Lisa Page’s question (“Have we opened on him yet?”) that prompted Strzok’s response. If you have seen it before, please let me know /ENDS

Source is DOJ's motion to dismiss Strzok's wrongful dismissal lawsuit, Exhibit 4. The text message exchange does not seem to appear in the texts disclosed to Congress, even redacted.

The @JusticeOIG report (https://t.co/7n1A6PMZDB; see p399) does not include this text message even though this section is headed "Text Messages Commenting on Trump or Clinton" which "highlight[s] examples of text messages of a political nature commenting…

CNN is forced to change their chyron in REAL TIME as Amb. Sondland directly rebuts it in his testimony. Rep. Turner: "...the president did not tie aid to investigations?" Amb Sondland: "That is correct" https://t.co/oXYPlMZViX

Dems are BROKE https://t.co/QZ0vdpXvpt

Tonight’s @seanhannity Thread. @RepMikeTurner what said they’re still moving forward with impeachment with no evidence at all. https://t.co/vSlvCj3Jxn

This should terrify every American. The FBI, Justice Department, & the Federal Courts used falsified documents from foreign sources to prosecute & jail American citizens. And the stupid people on the jury went along with it. https://t.co/9Ad8gZg8AO

Impeachment theater has a pattern. Every morning, media receive and dutifully regurgitate their "WOW!" talking points, followed by, as @marcthiessen puts it, unexploded ordnance. https://t.co/8n8SgDkOFS