You edited and changed 302s to violate and railroad an innocent man in commission of a seditious plot, while commiting adultery with multiple coworkers. https://t.co/wisSSgBDhX

@NatSecLisa Hi Lisa. Columnist for the Epoch Times. Are you able at this time to comment on the grammatical edits you didn't remember making to the Flynn FD-302 launch thing until the OIG investigators showed you your own text messages about it?

YouTube totally sold out. The top searches are all rigged to put corporate news at the top. They are socially engineering people by funneling them directly to a few corporations. Their algorithms are designed to redistribute billions of views from creators…

Who benefits massively? Fox News. CNN. MSNBC. Most major media & a few chosen channels. Who loses big? Literally everyone else. Their algorithm scheme has inorganically driven billions of views away from the best & funneled them to corporate media via search…

The entire 60 minutes YouTube segment was about preparing the public for the massive Dec 10th purge of “politically incorrect“ creators on Dec 10th and beyond.

We know... Lisa Page edited General Flynn’s 302. Lisa Page is no victim. Lisa is a criminal. Flynn is a victim. Trump is a victim. Lisa Page and her group of conspirators are guilty of sedition. LOCK HER UP!

Impeachment Motivations Part 2 – Hiding Links to Corruption https://t.co/RjtAnamQbD via @NewBookOfDaniel

Thread - “Harold Finch” Sifts Through the Desperate Legacy Media Spin Campaign 1. What to make of the first of likely many leaks from the forthcoming DoJ OIG report on FISA abuse that will reported be released on 9 December?

.@parscale: “Since [Bloomberg has] declared their bias openly, the Trump campaign will no longer credential representatives of Bloomberg News for rallies or other campaign events.” @TeamTrump statement below ⬇️

Important thread on DOJ reply to order from federal judge regarding the release of Grand Jury testimony. https://t.co/5zDoeusj4P

How many freaking times? How many times does WAPO start a "sources said" piece of fake news garbage to have it spread far and wide to other sources? It's a SOURCES SAID article. At this point NO ONE knows what is in the report except for the players - and…

Thread: If this article is true, it is actually time to applaud that justice will be done. Because if Barr disagrees with Horowitz ALLEGED conclusion - that there was enough information to predicate an investigation- there WILL he indictments. https://t.co/GzClDJxXPL

I’m not buying the WaPo report- I trust nothing these people say - however, this would explain why all of these deep state swamp rats are crawling out of the woodwork to state their innocence and play victim of “big bad mean Trump”.

Remember, Horowitz can not interview people who have left the Department of Justice or anyone outside of it. He can not review the CIA or NSA etc, and he doesn’t have subpoena power. If what the article says is true, Barr and Durham have found significant…

...other departments, likely Brennan and the CIA as well as the use of Mifsud, Stefan Halper, and evening folks at the State Department who played a role in targeting a political campaign. So, to conclude, we do not have the FISA report yet. (Cont)

...We will have it in a week. There will be significant malfeasance identified in it. There have already been criminal referrals - HOWEVER - if for some reason Horowitz has made the conclusion that the investigation was predicated (THERE IS NO WAY IT WAS)…

...that Barr DISAGREES that it was? That means people are getting indicted, folks. And it likely isn’t the small fry either. This is what we have been waiting for all this time. Some damn justice and accountability. It looks like we will get it.