Onward with the case. Jen Psaki: Now, this is something. Psaki was originally a defendant but left government. Then, the WH said they knew nothing about anything Psaki said and couldn’t return any responsive documents. The judge ordered her deposed.

Psaki didn't like that, so she started fighting it, with the government helping her. However, the government has maintained there is no replacement for Psaki. If you recall, I covered this one extensively.

@TracyBeanzOfficial

Here is why I say there is nothing that this judge is doing that leads me to believe that he will dismiss the case. He basically tells defendants here that their motion to dismiss is bunk, while scolding them about the time they took to file it, and the fact that they asked a higher court to force him to halt discovery for a motion to dismiss that hadn’t even been filed yet!

He also reminds everyone that this discovery is ONLY so he can rule on the temporary injunction, and that since the plaintiffs do have standing (a central argument of the motion to dismiss) they may move to trial, where MORE deposition and discovery will be necessary.

The seriousness of this can’t be overstated. The judge just basically ruled on their motion to dismiss and told the government their argument is moot, as he has already ruled on it.

@TracyBeanzOfficial

Mark your calendars, the absolute SMACKDOWN of an out of control government continues…

@TracyBeanzOfficial