They have a cyber expert who spent years testing voting machines on behalf of the same lab that certified Maricopa, who will detail how what happened on Election Day couldn’t have happened without intentional misconduct.

@TracyBeanzOfficial

I am dual threading on Truth Social, and Truth Social is having issues. I may need to come back to this later…..

Testimony by whistleblowers and witnesses with first hand knowledge will show chain of custody violations and signature verification issues which call into question the legality of over 300k votes..

@TracyBeanzOfficial

They have included a 2020 mail in ballot that had a signature match issue. In case you missed it, UncoverDC did a piece explaining the importance of signature matching, written by @AdamCarter

https://www.uncoverdc.com/2022/10/18/focus-on-the-signatures/

@TracyBeanzOfficial

Kari Lake is taking an interesting avenue on this lawsuit. She alleging misconduct by officials, AND she is stating that HER right to vote was disenfranchised, thereby skirting one potential standing issue.


@TracyBeanzOfficial

The next portion goes through applicable law; this is legal jumbo jumbo for the most part, citing applicable cases and precedent, but I wanted to include some of this for you, because so often these things are just discarded in these cases.

If there was latitude on following the law, it wouldn’t be law at all.

@TracyBeanzOfficial

“Maricopa’s Outsized Ability to Dictate the Outcome of the AZ Governors Race”

Maricopa accounted for 60% of the votes in the 2022 election. The difference between Hobbs and Lake in Maricopa is greater than the difference in the margin of victory for Hobbs, which incidentally is merely 17,177 votes.

@TracyBeanzOfficial

Mail in ballots in Maricopa County were printed on Runbeck paper. UncoverDC has done a lot of reporting on Runbeck, because there are massive problems with Runbeck.

For one such article that references Maricopa County, see: https://www.uncoverdc.com/2021/10/25/fulton-county-massive-last-minute-order-of-over-1m-ballots-discovered/

@TracyBeanzOfficial

They will detail the process a vote takes here, specifically with vendor Runbeck. Drop box ballots are taken daily from drop boxes, follow a process of chain of custody, are taken to the counting center- all of this should be documented on forms, preserving the Chain of Custody. Then, a Maricopa county courier takes those ballots, swings by USPS to pick up mail in ballots, and brings them to Runbeck, where Runbeck fills out a form and scans envelopes and signatures for verification later.

@TracyBeanzOfficial

Scanned ballot signatures are electronically sent back to MCTEC, where they are compared to signatures on file, matched and approved (or not) and then they let Runbeck know which they were, so they can gather up the envelopes from approved ballots and send them back to MCTEC.

(I am sure there are never ANY mistakes made here in this cumbersome process, said no one ever)

@TracyBeanzOfficial

“Tens of Thousands of Ballots with Mismatched Signatures Were Illegally Counted in Violation of Arizona Law”

Early ballots have to have an affidavit that certifies a number of criteria and has them acknowledge they can’t cast more than one ballot.

When the county recorder gets an early ballot they have to compare signatures. If they match it’s counted. If they don’t, it isn’t .

@TracyBeanzOfficial

If a signature doesn’t match, a voter has an opportunity to cure their ballot within 5 days.

In 2020, Brnovich released a report which stated that the early signature verification process, specifically in Maricopa, is not sufficient to guard against abuse, and that “signature matching is the single most important election integrity measure when it comes to early ballots”

@TracyBeanzOfficial

Introducing, WPAA- an organization staffed with experts and brought in by Ken Bennett to be deputy state liaisons to the audit in 2020.

@TracyBeanzOfficial

WPAA continued to investigate election fraud after the audit ended. They reported multiple instances of voters stating their records had been changed, etc. WPAA brought this to Karen Fann on 6/20/22, and Fann provided them access to an external drive they had received under subpoena from Maricopa. This would allow WPAA to further investigate their findings by using the data Maricopa had…

I can be corrected, but I don’t think anyone knew this was happening, or it wasn’t widely reported.

@TracyBeanzOfficial

As WPAA was doing this, they noticed severe irregularities, including hidden files, etc. Then, a group of senators authorized a full scale investigation of the voter signatures on ballot envelopes used in the 2020 election, using actual control signatures found on the hard drives for comparison, just as Maricopa was supposed to have done…

Hold on to your hats.


@TracyBeanzOfficial

They reviewed over 230K of the signatures in Maricopa.

1. 18,022 had egregious signature mismatches, and when proportioned, that represents a staggering potential 156,000 ballot envelopes with egregious mismatch. (What was the margin of victory for Biden again?)

2. 19,631 signatures failed the SOS standards, which means that 165,000 ballots would likely fail the standards.

Maricopa rejected just 587 for mismatched signatures.

Chew on that for a second.

@TracyBeanzOfficial

So, what does this have to do with 2022? Even though the full 2022 file wasn’t available, they wanted to see if some of those same voters with bad signatures voted again. Of course, they did. A lot of them.

So Hobbs could say “Well their signatures changed!” Or “We don’t have an updated signature on file”

Doesn’t matter under the law, if it is adjudicated properly. In free countries, that is something you hope the courts will do. Adjudicate the law.


@TracyBeanzOfficial

32 workers did signature validation in the 2022 election. Of those, 3 have stepped forward and signed sworn declarations about their experience this go round. They were rejecting 30% but would only see 1000 or so for curing, when that stack should’ve been MUCH bigger.

They held them back.

@TracyBeanzOfficial

The most likely explanation, is that the level two folks were approving previously rejected signatures. They were supposed to record if they were doing this.

@TracyBeanzOfficial

Even ballots that had already been rejected 3 times were sent through in a desperate search to find a signature — any signature - to match the ballot.

@TracyBeanzOfficial

Maricopa County was handing out “approved” curing stickers like candy. These stickers could be affixed to a ballot to have it pass through the process. There were no observers watching to make sure that signature was actually cured. They were just hanging piles of these to any level employee, who were then instructed not even to sign that they’d cured it, just date, which prevents accountability and tracing who did what.

Criminal. This is something,.

@TracyBeanzOfficial