HUGE WIN FOR ELECTION INTEGRITY: Supreme Court Greenlights Lawsuits Against Late Mail-In Ballots — Opens Door to Nationwide Challenges to Democrat Schemes

Read

Excellent news for election integrity.

There is more that still needs to be done but this is a good step toward protecting one of the most important privileges we have as well as the one thing that makes our system of government better than all others.

A fair system of elections.

Thank you Julie Kelly for staying on these cases.

Today, 2:30 PM MT.

Provided by Tina’s para- legal:

Oral Argument in Tina Peters’ Appeal: January 14, 2:30 PM
Ralph L. Carr Colorado Judicial Center
1st Floor Courtroom
2 East 14th Avenue
Denver, CO 80203
“Space in the first floor courtroom is limited and will be available on a first-come, first-served basis. Once the courtroom has reached maximum capacity, individuals wishing to observe the oral arguments may do so via livestream on the Court’s website at this link: coloradojudicial.gov/court-appeals/…

Tina Peters asks the Colorado Court of Appeals to reverse her convictions and sentence based on core legal and constitutional errors:

1.Federal Immunity / Supremacy Clause
As a federally defined “officer of election,” Peters acted to preserve federally protected election records. The State lacked authority to criminalize conduct taken to comply with federal law. The trial court wrongly denied immunity and failed to properly adjudicate it.
2.Insufficient Evidence
The State failed to prove essential elements—intent, deception, conspiracy, or personal gain. On the trial record, no rational jury could lawfully convict.
3.Denial of Due Process (Including Juror Bias)
Peters was denied a fair trial: the court excluded intent evidence, barred proof of election-record destruction and witness bias, refused proper jury instructions on execution of public duty and immunity, allowed misleading prosecution arguments, and refused to investigate credible allegations of a biased juror, undermining the verdict’s integrity.
4.Unconstitutional Sentencing
The nine-year prison sentence for nonviolent conduct is grossly disproportionate, punished protected speech, and reflects arbitrary sentencing—violating the First, Eighth, and Fourteenth Amendments.
5.Pardon / Jurisdiction
If the court has not ruled on the pending jurisdictional motion beforehand, the judges may also address the legal effect of the Presidential Pardon and its impact on jurisdiction and continued proceedings.
Bottom line: The appeal challenges a prosecution that criminalized lawful official conduct, denied a fair trial—including by ignoring juror bias—and imposed an extreme sentence inconsistent with constitutional limits.

~ TruthSleuth1776

LIES THE MEDIA CONTINUES TO TELL ABOUT TINA PETERS

LIE #1: Tina “breached” election machines

Tina’s charges do not including “breaching" ANYTHING!
The SOS Jena Griswold DELETED 29,000 election records including log files Tina Peters preserved as required by law.

LIE #2: Tina allowed “unauthorized” access to the machines.
Election Rule 20.5.3B provides that the Clerk may grant consultant access to equipment if they supervise the consultant. Conan Hayes was supervised at all times.

LIE #3: Jena Griswold was Tina Peters “boss”

Tina Peters was elected by the PEOPLE.
She acted under her oath and authority as the elected clerk to fulfill her duty to the people and the Colorado and US Constitution.

LIE #4: Tina Peters was convicted by a jury of her peers.

The jury was not allowed hear 41 motions for Tina’s defense including instructions regarding her duty to preserve election records under 52 USC 20701.
The jury was TAINTED and nothing was done!

LIE #5: Tina was convicted by a “Republican” DA in a Republican county.

The Republican DA and Commissioners were corrupt!
The judge was clearly biased and DA Dan Rubinstein was actively communicating with the Biden DOJ regarding Mesa County since 2021.

For official updates from Tina Peters and to support her legal defense, visit tinapeters.us

~ Team Tina Peters on X

Another Victory for Tom Fitton and Judicial Watch – Oregon Agrees to Clean 800,000 Names of Inactive Voters from Voter Rolls

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2026/01/another-victory-tom-fitton-judicial-watch-oregon-agrees/

" We're going to hold both Clintons in criminal contempt of Congress." - Rep James Comer

Bill didn't show up. Hillary didn't show up. Democrats didn't show up. Jeffrey Epstein claimed to help set up the Clinton Foundation.

They're not above the law. Contempt is coming.

~ Oversight Committee

Here’s my gut assessment of the Clintons blowing off Congress today.

They hold so much information on everyone from judges to members of Congress to business executives to world leaders.

I pray they’re held accountable, but trying to analyze why they were no shows today tells me they’re feeling pretty untouchable about now.

JUST IN: Federal Prosecutors Are Investigating Democrat Senator Elissa Slotkin After She Urged Military Members to Defy Trump’s Orders

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2026/01/just-federal-prosecutors-are-investigating-democrat-senator-elissa/

The Clintons would rather risk prison for 12 months, than testify about their relationship with Epstein.

And it’s been all crickets from the Dems/MSM and the anti-Trumpers.

Why? Because they don’t actually care about the victims or justice. They just wanted to “get” Trump.

If the shoe were on the other foot, and Trump or one of his allies was subpoenaed to testify about Epstein and he refused, the Dems/MSM would be foaming at the mouth, wall-to-wall coverage, you’d be getting alerts to your phone, the claims of “cover-up” would be running rampant, the internet would be in a frenzy, and Massie/MTG would be holding an anti-Trump photo op somewhere.

But when a former Democrat President and a former DNC Presidential candidate do it, all the sudden nobody is interested? The same people who have been squealing about the Epstein files all day everyday, are not interested in this at all?

It’s because they know that Epstein is a Democrat/Clinton scandal, and have been desperate to convince the public otherwise. They failed.

🧵 Looks like someone, perhaps more than one person, got caught with their hand in the TS/SCI cookie jar.

Aurelio Luis Perez-Lugones, a US Navy vet and US Gov't contractor, accessed, searched for, printed, and transcribed classified intelligence reports and other sensitive information.

He took that information home. And it appears he may have shared it with a Washington Post reporter, Hannah Natanson. Her home was searched this morning, and her devices were seized.

Perez-Lugones is now in US custody and is charged with one count of 18 US 793(e)—Retention of National Defense Information.

Thread
https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/2011505036896190767.html

Wonderful!

Now go swat the many felons who both leaked and reported my very sensitive and classified conversations with Russian Ambassador Kislyak (which stopped WWIII). And you can start with the #1 WaPo Leaker David Ignatius!🤬

This was described by Devin Nunes as the greatest crime of the century at that point. It started Russia-Gate!!!

Jonathan Ross, the agent who shot Good three times in the face on January 7 during an anti-ICE protest in Minneapolis, Michigan, endured internal bleeding to his torso, two US officials familiar with his medical condition said, according to CBS News. 

NATO: Tell Denmark to get them out of here, NOW! Two dogsleds won’t do it! Only the USA can!!!

Danish intel warned last year about Russian and Chinese military goals toward Greenland and Arctic