Forwarded from Alex
Friends, we received information that something was delivered to one of the Odessa ports that changed the radiation background.
Prior to that, the scanners that record the increase in radiation danger in the port were disabled.
Following this, several people who had been in contact with the cargo "got sick".
https://news.1rj.ru/str/odessa_typical/25686
Prior to that, the scanners that record the increase in radiation danger in the port were disabled.
Following this, several people who had been in contact with the cargo "got sick".
https://news.1rj.ru/str/odessa_typical/25686
Telegram
Типичная Одесса
⚡️Друзья, нам поступила информация, что в один из одесских портов доставили что-то, что изменило радиационный фон.
До этого были отключены сканеры, фиксирующие повышение радиационной опасности в порту.
Вслед за этим "заболели" несколько человек, контактировавших…
До этого были отключены сканеры, фиксирующие повышение радиационной опасности в порту.
Вслед за этим "заболели" несколько человек, контактировавших…
🙏1
Information from Russian MOD, concerning the Ukrainian provocation involving radioactive substances is confirmed by a TG channel from Odessa.
Join us 👉 @TrFormer 💤
Become a member of the @TransFormerChat
Join us 👉 @TrFormer 💤
Become a member of the @TransFormerChat
🤬4👍2
‼️💤🛠👁#TransFormatorBuzzes : 💤
First year or the Russia-Ukrainian war is almost over
Part 2 (in Part 1 we were analysing the changes in informational warfare)
Almost a year has passed since the beginning of the Special Military Operation. What has changed on the battlefield?
Until now strategical military initiative remains in hands of US and NATO. After the first assault (which was not successful, now there is no secret in admitting it), decisions on what to do, what weapons to supply, where to strike (from HIMARS or anything else), were made in the NATO headquarters. Gradually the tactical initiative was overtaken, first in defence, and recently in slow and hard offensive operations. The commander of the Vostok battalion in the DPR Ministry of Internal Affairs, Alexander Khodakovsky (aka“Skif) explains what determines the tactics of the Russian Army.
Even now USA are dictating what will happen next and are determining the time-line of the future events. The vague promises to supply tanks, fighter jets or long range missiles are just tools of manipulation. And the aim is to push Russia to go for a new bloody offensive now, because in several months it would be even more difficult as the new weapons and trained Ukrainian crews will arrive. Or will they? It doesn't matter. Decisions should be made now. Russia does not need those bloody offensives, they mean losses and even losses among AFU are not what Russia needs, because each killed Ukrainian soldier mean that there will be more people in Ukraine hating Russia and ready for vengeance.
Economic situation in Russia is generally stable, while Ukrainian economy doesn't exist anymore. Time is working for Russia, because with every month Ukraine is becoming a heavier burden for the collective West to maintain. Economic war has been won by Russia. Only one thing may spoil it. It is a social unrest, caused by heavy losses at the front. That is why US-led coalition continues to provoke Russia for unnecessary offensive.
More over, Russian army needs more time to learn and to prepare for a decisive battle. That is a normal situation for any army, that has not been fighting for real for decades. Those, who can read Russian, could have seen many angry articles about what is wrong with the Russian regular army published in the most patriotic pro-Russian channels.
I have got some close contacts with military and used to serve in the Soviet Army myself. Most of the ordinary Army units in the USSR were not battle-ready. Certainly, the "strategic triad" was prepared and could destroy the entire world. The Airborne troops and Marines were supposed to solve any problem. Thought I remember, how a MANPAD launched by a representative of a renowned Airborne division hit the birch grove during a "competition" in Central Military Region in late 80s. Overall, then out of a dozen of launches were registered only two hits, and only one of them was a direct one (performed by your humble #TransFormator). Most of the ordinary army regiments were poorly equipped, even worse trained. The logic behind it was simple — if there would be a war it would be a nuclear war... So, who cares... Similar things are happening in Germany, there is also a very revealing letter from a French officer.
I hoped that all of this has been lost in time with the Soviet Union and that the modern Russian army, consisting of professionals on the contracts is completely different. Well, different — yes, but completely — no. It has inherited many issues from those long gone days.
Join us 👉 @TrFormer 💤
Continued here
Please, feel free to repost
First year or the Russia-Ukrainian war is almost over
Part 2 (in Part 1 we were analysing the changes in informational warfare)
Almost a year has passed since the beginning of the Special Military Operation. What has changed on the battlefield?
Until now strategical military initiative remains in hands of US and NATO. After the first assault (which was not successful, now there is no secret in admitting it), decisions on what to do, what weapons to supply, where to strike (from HIMARS or anything else), were made in the NATO headquarters. Gradually the tactical initiative was overtaken, first in defence, and recently in slow and hard offensive operations. The commander of the Vostok battalion in the DPR Ministry of Internal Affairs, Alexander Khodakovsky (aka“Skif) explains what determines the tactics of the Russian Army.
Even now USA are dictating what will happen next and are determining the time-line of the future events. The vague promises to supply tanks, fighter jets or long range missiles are just tools of manipulation. And the aim is to push Russia to go for a new bloody offensive now, because in several months it would be even more difficult as the new weapons and trained Ukrainian crews will arrive. Or will they? It doesn't matter. Decisions should be made now. Russia does not need those bloody offensives, they mean losses and even losses among AFU are not what Russia needs, because each killed Ukrainian soldier mean that there will be more people in Ukraine hating Russia and ready for vengeance.
Economic situation in Russia is generally stable, while Ukrainian economy doesn't exist anymore. Time is working for Russia, because with every month Ukraine is becoming a heavier burden for the collective West to maintain. Economic war has been won by Russia. Only one thing may spoil it. It is a social unrest, caused by heavy losses at the front. That is why US-led coalition continues to provoke Russia for unnecessary offensive.
More over, Russian army needs more time to learn and to prepare for a decisive battle. That is a normal situation for any army, that has not been fighting for real for decades. Those, who can read Russian, could have seen many angry articles about what is wrong with the Russian regular army published in the most patriotic pro-Russian channels.
I have got some close contacts with military and used to serve in the Soviet Army myself. Most of the ordinary Army units in the USSR were not battle-ready. Certainly, the "strategic triad" was prepared and could destroy the entire world. The Airborne troops and Marines were supposed to solve any problem. Thought I remember, how a MANPAD launched by a representative of a renowned Airborne division hit the birch grove during a "competition" in Central Military Region in late 80s. Overall, then out of a dozen of launches were registered only two hits, and only one of them was a direct one (performed by your humble #TransFormator). Most of the ordinary army regiments were poorly equipped, even worse trained. The logic behind it was simple — if there would be a war it would be a nuclear war... So, who cares... Similar things are happening in Germany, there is also a very revealing letter from a French officer.
I hoped that all of this has been lost in time with the Soviet Union and that the modern Russian army, consisting of professionals on the contracts is completely different. Well, different — yes, but completely — no. It has inherited many issues from those long gone days.
Join us 👉 @TrFormer 💤
Continued here
Please, feel free to repost
Telegram
MoD Russia
Our guns won’t cool down!
Western MD’s 152mm Giantsint-B guns inflict fire damage on concentration of AFU hardware and manpower
💥 A 152mm Giatsint-B artillery battery of the Western MD inflicted a fire damage on a concentration of armour and manpower, and…
Western MD’s 152mm Giantsint-B guns inflict fire damage on concentration of AFU hardware and manpower
💥 A 152mm Giatsint-B artillery battery of the Western MD inflicted a fire damage on a concentration of armour and manpower, and…
👍5👏1😁1
First year or the Russia-Ukrainian war is almost over
Continuation from above ⬆️⬆️⬆️
Certainly, it should be more efficient because many officers and soldiers have got combat experience? Well, as it appears, combat experience from Syria of some of the commanders was to some extent a reason of heavy losses at the beginning of the campaign. They have got used to move in compact convoys, that would be able to respond with a overwhelming fire power to a possible ambush (of ISIS fighters). However, they were just a comfortable targets for Ukrainian artillery. Only on the third day, the convoys were spread out at the surrounding terrain and started using parallel country roads. There are many other issues, especially in coordination, communication, decision-making and logistics. And what about Ukrainian army — well, their defeat in 2014 was prevented by the notorious Minsk agreements and since then they were working hard on the deadly lessons they have learned...
As far as Russia is concerned, there are many problems and difficulties, but they all may be solved only from inside and in a timely manner. Any interference from outside would be rejected and would only consolidate Russian people.
Join us 👉 @TrFormer 💤
Become a member of the @TransFormerChat
To be continued...
Continuation from above ⬆️⬆️⬆️
Certainly, it should be more efficient because many officers and soldiers have got combat experience? Well, as it appears, combat experience from Syria of some of the commanders was to some extent a reason of heavy losses at the beginning of the campaign. They have got used to move in compact convoys, that would be able to respond with a overwhelming fire power to a possible ambush (of ISIS fighters). However, they were just a comfortable targets for Ukrainian artillery. Only on the third day, the convoys were spread out at the surrounding terrain and started using parallel country roads. There are many other issues, especially in coordination, communication, decision-making and logistics. And what about Ukrainian army — well, their defeat in 2014 was prevented by the notorious Minsk agreements and since then they were working hard on the deadly lessons they have learned...
As far as Russia is concerned, there are many problems and difficulties, but they all may be solved only from inside and in a timely manner. Any interference from outside would be rejected and would only consolidate Russian people.
Join us 👉 @TrFormer 💤
Become a member of the @TransFormerChat
To be continued...
Telegram
MoD Russia
Russian Air Force's Su-25 attack aircraft within special operation area
🔥 Russian brave pilots once again have carried out missile strikes against the AFU military facilities and equipment.
☁️ The missiles have been launched in pairs from low altitudes.…
🔥 Russian brave pilots once again have carried out missile strikes against the AFU military facilities and equipment.
☁️ The missiles have been launched in pairs from low altitudes.…
👍1
Forwarded from Archived.
National Unity.
National Unity does not necessarily require that the culture, ethnicity, race, and so on, of inhabitants of a specific country be homogenous - while it certainly helps to a very great degree, just because the people look like each other and have the same traditions does not mean that they'll be united.
Take America for example.
Yes, the culture is not the same, American culture is the abomination you get that when you mix traditional European beliefs, with secularization and Masonic thought thrown in the boiler, then you insert the mass migrations from Latin America, and then you add the political polarization - Left v Right, Democrat v Republican, all ignoring the one true enemy, and you end up with a highly polarized society that can be engulfed in civil war at a moment's notice, there are no kinsmen in America, but loyalties to whatever political/cultural group you find yourself in.
For another example, take Egypt, I'm not going to debate this - but Egyptians are genetically the same to a very large extent, and we still carry on some cultural traditions from our ancestors - some traditional plates, cultural events (Sham El Neseem), etc, we have Egyptians, Nubians, Europeans who settled here (Magyarab, Greeks, etc), there is no political or cultural polarization, they view themselves as Egyptians, if you speak the language with our dialect and you're born here, then really - welcome home!
Religious polarization, while sometimes it did exist, was never a very serious threat, I believe the fact that a sizeable minority of Christians who've lived in Muslim lands for over 1300 years (they're 20% of the population) yet still exist should speak for itself, in Europe entire religious or ethnic minorities were exterminated, but here they view this as their land, so why would they be hostile to it? They refused to aid the crusaders, Napoleon, the British, and the Israelis, simply put, they proved themselves.
So how can National Unity be achieved?
It's not some overnight process, you need to have centuries - even millennia of work to achieve some semblance of National Unity, where political, ethnic, and religious polarization is not severe enough to cause secession or conflict, a country should also have its traditional beliefs that are rooted and not influenced by foreign ones, IE, separation of religion from Europe to the Middle East, and most importantly, never be a fabricated entity, because you're doomed to die off, could be in 10 years or could be in a 100, if you've made up - you'll never win in the long run.
@mediterraneanman
National Unity does not necessarily require that the culture, ethnicity, race, and so on, of inhabitants of a specific country be homogenous - while it certainly helps to a very great degree, just because the people look like each other and have the same traditions does not mean that they'll be united.
Take America for example.
Yes, the culture is not the same, American culture is the abomination you get that when you mix traditional European beliefs, with secularization and Masonic thought thrown in the boiler, then you insert the mass migrations from Latin America, and then you add the political polarization - Left v Right, Democrat v Republican, all ignoring the one true enemy, and you end up with a highly polarized society that can be engulfed in civil war at a moment's notice, there are no kinsmen in America, but loyalties to whatever political/cultural group you find yourself in.
For another example, take Egypt, I'm not going to debate this - but Egyptians are genetically the same to a very large extent, and we still carry on some cultural traditions from our ancestors - some traditional plates, cultural events (Sham El Neseem), etc, we have Egyptians, Nubians, Europeans who settled here (Magyarab, Greeks, etc), there is no political or cultural polarization, they view themselves as Egyptians, if you speak the language with our dialect and you're born here, then really - welcome home!
Religious polarization, while sometimes it did exist, was never a very serious threat, I believe the fact that a sizeable minority of Christians who've lived in Muslim lands for over 1300 years (they're 20% of the population) yet still exist should speak for itself, in Europe entire religious or ethnic minorities were exterminated, but here they view this as their land, so why would they be hostile to it? They refused to aid the crusaders, Napoleon, the British, and the Israelis, simply put, they proved themselves.
So how can National Unity be achieved?
It's not some overnight process, you need to have centuries - even millennia of work to achieve some semblance of National Unity, where political, ethnic, and religious polarization is not severe enough to cause secession or conflict, a country should also have its traditional beliefs that are rooted and not influenced by foreign ones, IE, separation of religion from Europe to the Middle East, and most importantly, never be a fabricated entity, because you're doomed to die off, could be in 10 years or could be in a 100, if you've made up - you'll never win in the long run.
@mediterraneanman
👍4
Deputy Chairman of the Security Council of the Russian Federation Dmitry Medvedev reacted to the words of Stoltenberg:
"Well, how did they screw up there in NATO. Stoltenberg said that the risk of Russia's victory is much higher than the risk of an escalation of the conflict in Ukraine. I translate into understandable Russian: the risk of a third world war is much less than the risk of our country's victory. Freaks. They hate and fear Russia "
👉Join us @TrFormer💤
"Well, how did they screw up there in NATO. Stoltenberg said that the risk of Russia's victory is much higher than the risk of an escalation of the conflict in Ukraine. I translate into understandable Russian: the risk of a third world war is much less than the risk of our country's victory. Freaks. They hate and fear Russia "
👉Join us @TrFormer💤
👍11
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
The US is run by crazy people with crazy goals.
This was stated by an American journalist, social and political activist Daniel Kovalik.
👉Join us @TrFormer💤
This was stated by an American journalist, social and political activist Daniel Kovalik.
👉Join us @TrFormer💤
💯7👎1
Eastern Europe In Political And Military Optics (I)
In recent years, the Eastern European countries that have become members of NATO have shown excessive zeal in promoting Atlanticism, becoming more pro-American than the old guard from Western Europe. The logic can be explained not only by the desire to please the patron from Washington, but also by Halford Mackinder’s famous geopolitical imperative – whoever controls Eastern Europe controls Eurasia, and whoever controls Eurasia controls the world.
By Leonid Savin
👉Join us @TrFormer💤
In recent years, the Eastern European countries that have become members of NATO have shown excessive zeal in promoting Atlanticism, becoming more pro-American than the old guard from Western Europe. The logic can be explained not only by the desire to please the patron from Washington, but also by Halford Mackinder’s famous geopolitical imperative – whoever controls Eastern Europe controls Eurasia, and whoever controls Eurasia controls the world.
By Leonid Savin
👉Join us @TrFormer💤
Geopolitica.RU
Eastern Europe In Political And Military Optics (I)
In recent years, the Eastern European countries that have become members of NATO have shown excessive zeal in promoting Atlanticism, becoming more pro-American than the old guard from Western Europe.
What Russia was like in 1943
The year 1943 was one of the heaviest years of World War II. The Battle of Stalingrad, the Battle of Kursk, the biggest tank battle in history, the breakthrough of the Leningrad Siege… People were exhausted, but hope of an upcoming victory was already appearing.
Take a peek below at how the country looked 80 years ago. And, alongside historical events, also see how regular people lived.
👉Join us @TrFormer💤
The year 1943 was one of the heaviest years of World War II. The Battle of Stalingrad, the Battle of Kursk, the biggest tank battle in history, the breakthrough of the Leningrad Siege… People were exhausted, but hope of an upcoming victory was already appearing.
Take a peek below at how the country looked 80 years ago. And, alongside historical events, also see how regular people lived.
👉Join us @TrFormer💤
Russia Beyond
What Russia was like in 1943 (PHOTOS)
Let’s take a look at the revealing photos depicting how the Soviet Union looked 80 years ago, in the midst of World War II.
❤3
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Finnish Prime Minister Sanna Marin thanked the United States for participating in the war in Ukraine.
👉Join us @TrFormer💤
👉Join us @TrFormer💤
🤮8
❗️The Prime Minister of the Netherlands said that Russia will not disappear anywhere and that relations will have to be built.
💬It will always be the largest country in the world, it will always remain on the map... No matter what we think, but it is there.
From SolovievLive
👉Join us @TrFormer💤
💬It will always be the largest country in the world, it will always remain on the map... No matter what we think, but it is there.
From SolovievLive
👉Join us @TrFormer💤
Telegram
СОЛОВЬЁВ
❗️Премьер Нидерландов заявил, что Россия никуда не пропадет и что отношения придется выстраивать.
💬Она всегда будет самой большой страной в мире, она всегда будет оставаться на карте... Что бы мы ни думали, но она там есть.
💬Она всегда будет самой большой страной в мире, она всегда будет оставаться на карте... Что бы мы ни думали, но она там есть.
💯5
Forwarded from ResistanceTrench (ㅤ)
🇺🇸 Biden decided to go to Kiev and not Ohio which is telling about US regime priorities.
First video is a sunny day in Kiev and second video is a sunny day in Ohio.
🚩 @ResistanceTrench
First video is a sunny day in Kiev and second video is a sunny day in Ohio.
🚩 @ResistanceTrench
🔥6
The United States notified Russia of Biden's upcoming visit to Kiev hours before departure, the White House said*. They did not comment on how Moscow reacted.
Before Biden's trip to Kyiv, the United States contacted Russia to rule out miscalculations that could lead to a confrontation between the two nuclear powers, writes AP.
The trip was planned for months, with the participation of the White House, the Pentagon and the Secret Service, the US presidential administration said.
#TransFormatorBuzzes 💤 :
*Russia did not mind.
Join us 👉 @TrFormer 💤
Become a member of the @TransFormerChat
Before Biden's trip to Kyiv, the United States contacted Russia to rule out miscalculations that could lead to a confrontation between the two nuclear powers, writes AP.
The trip was planned for months, with the participation of the White House, the Pentagon and the Secret Service, the US presidential administration said.
#TransFormatorBuzzes 💤 :
*Russia did not mind.
Join us 👉 @TrFormer 💤
Become a member of the @TransFormerChat
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
The real purpose of the "Minsk Agreements" was to get time to form Ukrainian armies. Kiev has been preparing for a military conflict with the Russian Federation for seven years. This was told by former German Chancellor Merkel to pranksters Vovan and Lexus, who introduced themselves as former Ukrainian President Petro Poroshenko.
"The Minsk agreements gave Ukraine more time to develop between 2014 and 2021. And now Ukraine can not only give an answer, but also get the necessary support. We postponed the start of the war and received the necessary support," Merkel said.
The former German Chancellor asked to leave their dialogue "without details for the media." "Everything is complicated enough as it is. And now it is very important that we do not open some kind of opposition line," she told Poroshenko.
Translated from URA.RU
Join us 👉 @TrFormer 💤
Become a member of the @TransFormerChat
"The Minsk agreements gave Ukraine more time to develop between 2014 and 2021. And now Ukraine can not only give an answer, but also get the necessary support. We postponed the start of the war and received the necessary support," Merkel said.
The former German Chancellor asked to leave their dialogue "without details for the media." "Everything is complicated enough as it is. And now it is very important that we do not open some kind of opposition line," she told Poroshenko.
Translated from URA.RU
Join us 👉 @TrFormer 💤
Become a member of the @TransFormerChat
🤡3🤬1
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
The TV presenter asks John Kirby. When will US commitments on the Ukrainian issue end?
Watch here 👈 the American journalist is already reminding the forgetful Kirby that it wasn't Russia that methodically approached NATO's borders for decades.
👉Join us @TrFormer💤
Watch here 👈 the American journalist is already reminding the forgetful Kirby that it wasn't Russia that methodically approached NATO's borders for decades.
👉Join us @TrFormer💤
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Tulsi Gabbard, former member of the US House of Representatives, retired US Army officer and political commentator at the Washington. Rage Against The War Machine rally. Anti- war rally
From SolovievLive
👉Join us @TrFormer💤
From SolovievLive
👉Join us @TrFormer💤
🕊4👍3