In an interview with the AP, Attorney General William Barr said neither Justice Department attorneys nor the FBI have found evidence of widespread voter fraud in the 2020 election, contradicting President Trump's false claims of widespread fraud. trib.al/HmDFdDV
— See More

Looks like journalism to me, but CNN wouldn’t know anything about that. twitter.com/cnnpr/status/1…
— See More

Well, It would help if they actually looked, but the Democrats don’t want them to so they won’t bother.
They were too busy sending 15 people to investigate a garage pull. twitter.com/nprpolitics/st…
— See More

Fact
— See More

Hahahahah. CNN = 🤡🤡🤡 twitter.com/anangbhai/stat…
— See More

Note to @GOP who want to run for higher office - you most likely can’t pack an arena like this and if @realDonaldTrump didn’t win by delivering on his promises, packing arenas like this all over - you will have zero chance. Stand behind him and follow the facts about voter fraud pic.twitter.com/o6oVyWI6Gl
— See More

It’s amazing that CNN had no problem aggressively running with secretly recorded audio tapes of the First Lady non-stop for weeks, but has a serious problem when someone does the exact same thing to them!
If it wasn’t for double standards, they would have no standards at all. twitter.com/cnnpr/status/1…
— See More

@JamesOKeefeIII @CNN @marcusmabry @FoxNews @TuckerCarlson James & Tucker, the voice you ID’d tonight as “Marcus Mabry” is actually GA resident & CNN General Counsel David Vigilante. We’re certain you’ll want to correct the record and apologize to the Black executive for assuming he was the voice raising concerns over white supremacy.
— See More

Tucker Carlson's segment did not have anything to do with the clip that CNN is referencing
Here is Tucker's segment from tonight. He did not misidentify Marcus Mabry. twitter.com/CNNPR/status/1… pic.twitter.com/YwdhfP3wqb
Video
— See More

From Tucker Carlson Tonight PR: This is a lie. We never ID'd any voice or aired audio recordings of CNN executives. Check out tonight's segment which is of Marcus Mabry on camera. Facts First, right? twitter.com/cnnpr/status/1…
— See More

Tucker, you should ask them about running secretly recorded audio of the First Lady since they seem to have had no problem doing that for weeks. I wonder what changed?🙄 twitter.com/tuckercarlson/…
— See More

Section 230, which is a liability shielding gift from the U.S. to “Big Tech” (the only companies in America that have it - corporate welfare!), is a serious threat to our National Security & Election Integrity. Our Country can never be safe & secure if we allow it to stand.....
— See More

The President is right twitter.com/realDonaldTrum…
— See More

This case raises major questions about the legality of Pennsylvania’s mail-in balloting changes. The Supreme Court should hear the case on an emergency basis usatoday.com/story/news/202…
— See More

@ByronYork You’re a smart guy. Do you really see a parallel here given the text of the Mueller and SSCI reports?
— See More

Thanks. Yes, I do. Mueller knew by end of 2017 that he could not establish conspiracy or coordination. Handling of Flynn case was an outrage. 1/6/17 dossier briefing followed by leaks followed by Buzzfeed publication, too. Examples go on and on...
twitter.com/benjaminwittes…
— See More

California taxpayers shelled out $1.7 million to a man linked to a Chinese espionage program, making him the state government’s highest-paid worker. freebeacon.com/politics/calif…
— See More

ADAM SCHIFTS:
A prominent supporter of Special Counsel Mueller opposes Special Counsel Durham. dailycaller.com/2020/12/02/ada…
— See More

I can’t think of anything more California than this these days. twitter.com/politicalshort…
— See More

🤡 twitter.com/chuckrossdc/st…
— See More

The claim: Several Democratic politicians are urging social distancing and issuing stay-at-home advisories while hosting or attending gatherings themselves. ✅
Our rating: Missing context ➖bit.ly/3ofwLcc
— See More