1 Peter 4:10 KJVS
[10] As every man hath received the gift, even so minister the same one to another, as good stewards of the manifold grace of God.


You have so much more than you know.

Schumann Resonance as of 0645 hrs PT / 0945 hrs ET / 1345 hrs GMT

Can you see the chessboard?

https://rumble.com/vnn3i2-bill-wood-panic-in-dc.html?mref=8ldad&mc=8bix8

And I learned what is obvious to a child.
That life is simply a collection of little lives, each lived one day at a time.
That each day should be spent finding beauty in flowers and poetry and talking to animals.
That a day spent with dreaming and sunsets and refreshing breezes cannot be bettered ..

~ Nicholas Sparks ~

Artist Credit : Robert Hagan

My take on the Tulsi Gabbard flip:
I find it intriguing that she does this right before the most important midterm in our lifetime. 
According to Q, we are watching the systematic destruction of the old guard. So what better way to red pill normies than through someone who is a Dem? 
And yes, I understand that she is WEF but trust is overblown in anon circles. If someone speaks a truth, then it's probably worth highlighting. You don't have to trust her or anyone else but God.
But when a normie hears her speak things like: "The Democrat party is an elitist cabal of war mongers" how can I not support that? It doesn't mean I trust her. But sheep will see this and it will possibly fuel aspects of the awakening. 
Could she turn on us in the future? Sure.
But right now, she's dropping red pills right at the outset of the most important midterms in our lifetime. 
And I can't help but support truth.

https://news.1rj.ru/str/WokeSocieties/11388

Trump's Truth Social Post Blows Up the Internet

"Every once in a while, the lion has to show the jackals who he is."

Source: truthsocial.com/users/realDonaldTrump/statuses/109146629067309078

Follow @VigilantFox 🦊
Rumble | Substack | Website | Other Socials

If Clinesmith had gotten the full measure of the potential sentence under 18 USC 1001 (False Statements), which would be Five Years Imprisonment plus a fine, how much would that have mattered to you?

If Sussmann had gotten the same, five years in prison plus a fine, how much of a win would that have been?

If Danchenko gets even half the available maximum sentence, ~12yrs in prison plus fine, would you regard that as a knockout blow to the Deep State?

The convictions of the minor players would be nice, I’d celebrate it bigly, but it wouldn’t carry forward the overall dismantling of the Deep State and Swamp nearly as much as what we HAVE gotten out of these cases.

Clinesmith got a deal because he talked.

Sussmann case forever DESTROYED the Alfa Bank Hoax, got Marc Elias, Robby Mook, and a number of other people (including FBI Agents) before a grand jury and on the witness stand. Mook admitted Hillary approved the sharing of the hoax with corrupt media. We learned of Joffe (who is still under investigation) and his companies, the researchers, the spying on the EOP, and we got FBI agents on the stand where we learned they too were under investigation. Most importantly, the Sussmann case/trial busted down the attorney-client privilege wall that these corrupt people have used for decades to hide their criminality.

The Danchenko case is no different. I don’t expect a conviction, though i do expect Durham will successfully prove his case and do WANT a conviction; I expect, and have seen in the filings to date, the further dismantling of the Steele Dossier, the exposure of longtime Clinton apparatchik Chuck Dolan (who was referred for investigation), the absolute BOMBSHELL that Danchenko was made a CHS and then informed on Dolan (and others), and now Dolan is going to testify AGAINST Danchenko! The Danchenko case has given us the REAL Russian collusion, which was between Hillary, the Dems, their PR firms, Steele, and the Ukrainian-Born, suspected Russian asset Danchenko and his source, Russian Swamp loving Chuck Dolan.

This is mob trial stuff. Durham is working his way up. Getting the right people before grand juries, on witness stands, getting the docs, and getting the filings he NEEDS in the court record for future prosecutions of corrupt players higher up.

Dismantling a criminal syndicate cannot be done within just one trial. It takes many investigations, many cases, many trials. Danchenko is an important one, but it is just one of many.

Epoch Times reporter John Haughey is threading about the Danchenko case here: https://twitter.com/JFHaughey58/status/1579878124904648704

Durham Notes

This exchange between Durham and Danchenko’s defense reveals quite a lot.

Danchenko’s defense are trying to play the ‘plausible deniability’ game, pretending like Danchenko was not wittingly involved in any sort of conspiracy with the FBI to frame Trump.

Durham nips that in the bud and shuts down their defense by declaring “there was no misunderstanding”.

Danchenko’s defense are already caught acting shady, and Durham confirms that he found cooperation/coordination.

-Clandestine

Are they actually going to charge hunter Biden? Is this the show Trump was talking about?
All of this seems kind of noscripted. Hopefully it’s finally time for the truth to come out

Link:
Jesse Watters: This is about to get ugly

@disclosurehub

Everything seems noscripted….because it is. The only question is where the Director is sitting.

I vividly remember receiving flak from the community for pointing out that Tulsi on our side.

She was the ONLY politician to speak out on the reality of US funded biolabs in Ukraine.

She just called the Dems a “warmongering cabal”.

Hell she guest-hosted Tucker 😂

Tulsi may have had a D next to her name this whole time, but she was echoing pro-Trump narratives the ENTIRE TIME.

The timing of this flip is 100% to maximize damage to the DNC before the midterms.

Double agents go both ways.

-Clandestine

https://youtu.be/H4Z1x8Ou8VU

Folks, I see so many people in the community use the word "trust".

As in you don't "trust" Elon, or don't "trust" Tulsi, etc.

Who said anything about "trusting" anyone? And what is it you are "trusting" them with, exactly?

I am merely pointing out realities. And the reality is, characters like Elon and Tulsi have been pulverizing our enemies, and appear to be doing so DELIBERATELY.

Tulsi is swinging centrist voters red, and providing headlines and narratives beneficial to us, leading up to the midterms.

She's an ally. That does not mean that I “trust” her, or anyone for that matter.

I’m merely observing who’s actions are benefiting us, and recognizing trends.

And let’s say, theoretically, one was to “trust” Tulsi, or Elon, or Trump, and it turns out they were actually Deep State rat like many of you all claim.

What would you have lost from putting your “trust” in them? What would you have gained? Absolutely nothing either way.

We are all completely powerless bystanders when it comes to the events that are unfolding. NCSWIC is not just a catch phrase, it means NOTHING can stop what is coming, and that includes the high improbability that Tulsi is a Deep State agent looking gain your “trust”.

All we can do is point out what is actually happening, and what is actually happening is Tulsi just dealt a well-timed, calculated blow to the DNC before the midterms, with time for the media cycle to influence centrist voters, and is doing so by rightfully calling the Biden regime a “warmongering cabal” and denouncing pushing us into proxy wars and pushing us into nuclear destruction, etc.

This situation is the same as you being jumped on the streets, and some stranger jumps in and throws a haymaker to one of the guys jumping you.

You don’t know this guy, but he just punched your assailant right in the face. You don’t necessarily “trust” him, but he just showed you he’s on your side by defending you. If he wasn’t on your side, he would have punched you instead. Or left you to get beaten.

If Tulsi wanted to deal damage to Trump/MAGA before the midterms, she would have done so. She also could have just remained silent. But instead, she intentionally inflicted damage to Biden and the Dems. And she’s been doing so rather consistently for years now.

If her dealing massive damage to the Dems before the most important election in history, is just a ruse to trick you into “trusting” her… well I’d say we win that exchange 😂

-Clandestine

It has come to my attention over the last couple days that people are still rather desperate for outside adjudication on their information.
By this I mean that I see a lot of judgement about who’s who in the zoo. This person is “bad”, “good”, “controlled opposition”, etc.

Although I think those categories do exist and it’s always good to analyze your sources, I’ve had a real moment of clarity about just how different people’s perspectives can be in all of this. And someone can be coming from a very valid, honest place and still be quite “other” for what your own views are.

For instance someone can be highly supportive of President Trump and the fight against the Deep State and still be worlds away from you philosophically or religiously, etc. doesn’t make them “bad”. And it doesn’t invalidate their message.

I feel like we need a reminder about message over messenger. The truth is permeating our world. It is saturating The Field. That’s what we want. Don’t stifle that. Don’t denigrate someone who is on a different path. If they are working for the Light (aka GOD, in case you’re new to my channel) and searching for truth, then you’re on the same team. Not everyone arrives at the same place at the same time. If they did, we probably wouldn’t be going through all of this.

We all need to stop trying to label everything and everyone. It doesn’t work like that. That’s the VERY thing we are trying to get away from. Use your gift of Discernment. Practice.
Learn.

MESSAGE
——————
MESSENGER

☝️ love her so much. This has very much been on my mind as well.

This is why I'm so very happy that at the end of this lifetime, God is the one who gets to decide who is "good" and "bad". We only know everything from a very limited perspective. We are very subjective. Who here gets to decide how much "good" counteracts "bad" and how much "bad" it takes to overrule the "good".

I believe it truly comes down to what's in our hearts. And the bottom line is, we don't truly know the depths of each other's hearts. Some struggle with even knowing their own.

So when it comes to "that person is bad" and "that person is good" I feel and have always felt that when the last leaves are shaken off the tree, we will all be surprised by who fell and who is still standing.

The above 2 posts were from just over a year ago.

Find them very relevant to this whole Gabbard thing.

Wouldn't be surprised to see that one Chihuahua who cried over being "traumatized" at the capital during J6 flipping next. Can't remember her name. Don't really care 🤣

Both ladies have given me the "they're red pilling ppl" vibe 🤷🏼‍♀️

Thank you for finding those posts, Ash and for pointing out this very important issue.

We have an ADDICTION to the idea that we have to judge and label everyone and everything.

When you realize that you can observe the world and the happenings around you while WITHHOLDING judgement, you will feel in your soul that this is preferable to what we have been conditioned to do.

Sometimes fear creeps up on us when we don’t expect it.

Understand that we judge out of FEAR.
Fear of being categorized as the same thing we are judging. It is a form of projection. It is an attempt to distance ourselves from the “other”.

Let the judgement go bc in reality, you are the one who suffers from that action. Jesus taught us not to judge and so did many other Masters. When are we going to let that message truly sink in?

Soon, I hope.

@TruthRascalHQ ✨💕✨