🌎 𝗖𝗥𝗜𝗠𝗘𝗦 𝗔𝗚𝗔𝗜𝗡𝗦𝗧 𝗛𝗨𝗠𝗔𝗡𝗔𝗜𝗧𝗬

🇩🇪 𝗟𝗮𝘄𝘆𝗲𝗿𝘀 𝘁𝗼 𝘀𝘂𝗲 𝗪𝗛𝗢 𝗳𝗼𝗿 '𝗺𝗶𝘀𝗹𝗲𝗮𝗱𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝘄𝗼𝗿𝗹𝗱 𝗼𝘃𝗲𝗿 𝗖𝗢𝗩𝗜𝗗-𝟭𝟵 𝗼𝘂𝘁𝗯𝗿𝗲𝗮𝗸'
𝗖𝗼𝗻𝘀𝘂𝗺𝗲𝗿 𝗽𝗿𝗼𝘁𝗲𝗰𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻 𝘁𝗿𝗶𝗮𝗹 𝗹𝗮𝘄𝘆𝗲𝗿 𝗥𝗲𝗶𝗻𝗲𝗿 𝗙𝘂𝗲𝗹𝗹𝗺𝗶𝗰𝗵 𝘀𝗮𝘆𝘀 𝗮𝗴𝗲𝗻𝗰𝗶𝗲𝘀 '𝗸𝗻𝗼𝘄𝗶𝗻𝗴𝗹𝘆 𝗺𝗶𝘀𝗹𝗲𝗱 𝗴𝗼𝘃𝗲𝗿𝗻𝗺𝗲𝗻𝘁𝘀 𝗮𝗰𝗿𝗼𝘀𝘀 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝘄𝗼𝗿𝗹𝗱.'

Patrick Bet-David has a virtual sit down with consumer protection trial lawyer Reiner Fuellmich to talk about the Coronavirus and his work on the German Corona investigation committee. Panic Paper https://bit.ly/3f3IZRF​ Link to his website: https://www.fuellmich.com/​

About: Dr Reiner Fuellmich is one of four members of the German Corona Investigative Committee, which since July 10, 2020, has been listening to large number of international scientists’ and experts’ testimonies, to find answers to questions about the pandemic, being asked by people worldwide. About Patrick Bet-David: CEO, author and Founder of Valuetainment Media. Patrick has interviewed athletes, notorious individuals, politicians, authors and entrepreneurs from all walks of life.

Follow 👇Unite https://news.1rj.ru/str/Truth_Awakening_Channel

🇺🇲 𝗧𝗵𝗶𝘀 𝗶𝘀 𝘀𝗼 𝗰𝗿𝗮𝘇𝘆 - 𝗶𝘁'𝘀 𝗻𝗼𝘁 𝗮𝗯𝗼𝘂𝘁 𝗼𝘂𝗿 𝘀𝗮𝗳𝗲𝘁𝘆, 𝗶𝘁 𝗶𝘀 𝗮𝗯𝗼𝘂𝘁 𝗰𝗼𝗻𝘁𝗿𝗼𝗹!

✔𝗦𝗲𝗲 𝗺𝗼𝗿𝗲 - 🔗𝗖𝗿𝗲𝗱𝗶𝘁: 𝗕𝗲𝗻𝗻𝘆 𝗝𝗼𝗵𝗻𝘀𝗼𝗻

🔗𝗙𝗼𝗹𝗹𝗼𝘄, 𝗦𝘂𝗯𝘀𝗰𝗿𝗶𝗯𝗲👇👇 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝘂𝗻𝗶𝘁𝗲:
https://news.1rj.ru/str/Truth_Awakening_Channel
𝙒𝙝𝙚𝙧𝙚 𝙥𝙚𝙤𝙥𝙡𝙚 𝙘𝙤𝙢𝙚 𝙩𝙤𝙜𝙚𝙩𝙝𝙚𝙧 𝙩𝙤 𝙙𝙚𝙗𝙖𝙩𝙚 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝙧𝙚𝙖𝙡 𝙩𝙧𝙪𝙩𝙝.🤝

🇬🇧🌎𝗨𝗞 𝗖𝗼𝗹𝘂𝗺𝗻 𝗡𝗲𝘄𝘀 - 𝟭𝟮𝘁𝗵 𝗠𝗮𝗿𝗰𝗵 𝟮𝟬𝟮𝟭

𝗠𝗶𝗸𝗲 𝗥𝗼𝗯𝗶𝗻𝘀𝗼𝗻 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝗣𝗮𝘁𝗿𝗶𝗰𝗸 𝗛𝗲𝗻𝗻𝗶𝗻𝗴𝘀𝗲𝗻 𝘄𝗶𝘁𝗵 𝘁𝗼𝗱𝗮𝘆'𝘀 𝗨𝗞 𝗖𝗼𝗹𝘂𝗺𝗻 𝗡𝗲𝘄𝘀. 𝟬𝟬:𝟮𝟯​ - 𝗔𝘀𝘁𝗿𝗮𝘇𝗲𝗻𝗲𝗰𝗮 𝗩𝗮𝗰𝗰𝗶𝗻𝗲𝘀 𝗦𝘂𝘀𝗽𝗲𝗻𝗱𝗲𝗱 𝗜𝗻 𝗘𝘂𝗿𝗼𝗽𝗲?

𝗦𝗼𝘂𝗿𝗰𝗲𝘀:

MHRA Statement: - https://bit.ly/3rFUHaM​ Dr Sukharit Bhakdi Statement: - https://bit.ly/3rGIRgD​
Open Letter To The EMA: - https://bit.ly/3rFUHaM​
Nuremberg Code on Medication: - https://cutt.ly/6zI3jiS​
09:18​ - Novavax Vaccine Released As Homeless Targetted For Vaccination

𝗦𝗼𝘂𝗿𝗰𝗲𝘀:
Matt Hancock Tweet: - https://cutt.ly/OzDtuQg
Novavax Press Release: - https://cutt.ly/HzI8dxn
Matt Hancock Tweet 002 - https://cutt.ly/szDt8f6
Times Article: - https://archive.is/MdJDh​

🔗𝗥𝗲𝗮𝗱 𝗺𝗼𝗿𝗲: 𝗨𝗞 𝗖𝗢𝗟𝗨𝗠𝗡

🔗𝗙𝗼𝗹𝗹𝗼𝘄, 𝗦𝘂𝗯𝘀𝗰𝗿𝗶𝗯𝗲👇👇 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝘂𝗻𝗶𝘁𝗲:
https://news.1rj.ru/str/Truth_Awakening_Channel
𝙒𝙝𝙚𝙧𝙚 𝙥𝙚𝙤𝙥𝙡𝙚 𝙘𝙤𝙢𝙚 𝙩𝙤𝙜𝙚𝙩𝙝𝙚𝙧 𝙩𝙤 𝙙𝙚𝙗𝙖𝙩𝙚 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝙧𝙚𝙖𝙡 𝙩𝙧𝙪𝙩𝙝.🤝

𝗠𝗼𝗿𝗲 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝗺𝗼𝗿𝗲 𝗽𝗲𝗼𝗽𝗹𝗲 𝗮𝗿𝗲 𝘄𝗮𝗸𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝘂𝗽 🥰
𝗠𝗼𝗿𝗲 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝗺𝗼𝗿𝗲 𝗽𝗲𝗼𝗽𝗹𝗲 𝘄𝗼𝗿𝗹𝗱𝘄𝗶𝗱𝗲 𝗮𝗿𝗲 𝗿𝗲𝗳𝘂𝘀𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝘁𝗼 𝘁𝗮𝗸𝗲 𝗖𝗢𝗩𝗜𝗗𝟭𝟵 𝗯𝗶𝗼-𝗶𝗻𝗷𝗲𝗰𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻𝘀!

Thanks to all the people in the world who care and share... Keep on going to spread the truth!!  You are all hero’s.

Thank you♥️♥️

🔗𝗙𝗼𝗹𝗹𝗼𝘄, 𝗦𝘂𝗯𝘀𝗰𝗿𝗶𝗯𝗲👇👇 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝘂𝗻𝗶𝘁𝗲:
https://news.1rj.ru/str/Truth_Awakening_Channel
𝙒𝙝𝙚𝙧𝙚 𝙥𝙚𝙤𝙥𝙡𝙚 𝙘𝙤𝙢𝙚 𝙩𝙤𝙜𝙚𝙩𝙝𝙚𝙧 𝙩𝙤 𝙙𝙚𝙗𝙖𝙩𝙚 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝙧𝙚𝙖𝙡 𝙩𝙧𝙪𝙩𝙝.🤝

🇺🇲 𝗟𝗮𝘂𝗿𝗲𝗻 𝗕𝗼𝗲𝗯𝗲𝗿𝘁 🇺🇲

𝗦𝗽𝗲𝗮𝗸𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝘂𝗽 𝗳𝗼𝗿 𝗽𝗮𝘁𝗿𝗶𝗼𝘁𝗶𝗰 𝗔𝗺𝗲𝗿𝗶𝗰𝗮𝗻𝘀...

𝗗𝗲𝗺𝗼𝗰𝗿𝗮𝘁𝘀 𝘁𝗮𝗸𝗲 𝗱𝗼𝘄𝗻 𝘆𝗼𝘂𝗿 𝗯𝗮𝗿𝗯𝗲𝗱 𝘄𝗮𝗹𝗹; 𝘁𝗵𝗶𝘀 𝗶𝘀 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗽𝗲𝗼𝗽𝗹𝗲𝘀 𝗵𝗼𝘂𝘀𝗲!

🔗𝗙𝗼𝗹𝗹𝗼𝘄, 𝗦𝘂𝗯𝘀𝗰𝗿𝗶𝗯𝗲👇👇 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝘂𝗻𝗶𝘁𝗲:
https://news.1rj.ru/str/Truth_Awakening_Channel
𝙒𝙝𝙚𝙧𝙚 𝙥𝙚𝙤𝙥𝙡𝙚 𝙘𝙤𝙢𝙚 𝙩𝙤𝙜𝙚𝙩𝙝𝙚𝙧 𝙩𝙤 𝙙𝙚𝙗𝙖𝙩𝙚 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝙧𝙚𝙖𝙡 𝙩𝙧𝙪𝙩𝙝.🤝

🇺🇲 𝗙𝗮𝘂𝗰𝗶 𝗴𝗲𝘁𝘀 𝗴𝗿𝗶𝗹𝗹𝗲𝗱 𝗯𝘆 𝗠𝗲𝘅𝗶𝗰𝗮𝗻 𝗖𝗼𝗺𝗲𝗱𝗶𝗮𝗻
𝗠𝗮𝗿𝗰𝗵 𝟭𝟭𝘁𝗵, 𝟮𝟬𝟮𝟭

🔗𝗢𝗱𝘆𝘀𝘀𝗲𝘆 𝗟𝗶𝗻𝗸

🔗𝗙𝗼𝗹𝗹𝗼𝘄, 𝗦𝘂𝗯𝘀𝗰𝗿𝗶𝗯𝗲👇👇 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝘂𝗻𝗶𝘁𝗲:
https://news.1rj.ru/str/Truth_Awakening_Channel
𝙒𝙝𝙚𝙧𝙚 𝙥𝙚𝙤𝙥𝙡𝙚 𝙘𝙤𝙢𝙚 𝙩𝙤𝙜𝙚𝙩𝙝𝙚𝙧 𝙩𝙤 𝙙𝙚𝙗𝙖𝙩𝙚 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝙧𝙚𝙖𝙡 𝙩𝙧𝙪𝙩𝙝.🤝

🇬🇧 𝗕𝗮𝘀𝗶𝗻𝗴𝘀𝘁𝗼𝗸𝗲 𝗣𝗼𝗹𝗶𝗰𝗲 𝗢𝗳𝗳𝗶𝗰𝗲𝗿 𝗴𝗲𝘁𝘀 𝗼𝘄𝗻𝗲𝗱, 𝘄𝗵𝗲𝗻 𝗵𝗲 𝘁𝗿𝗶𝗲𝘀 𝘁𝗼 𝗶𝗻𝘁𝗶𝗺𝗶𝗱𝗮𝘁𝗲 𝗮𝗻 𝗲𝘅𝗲𝗺𝗽𝘁 𝗰𝘂𝘀𝘁𝗼𝗺𝗲𝗿 𝗳𝗼𝗿 𝗻𝗼𝘁 𝘄𝗲𝗮𝗿𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗮 𝗺𝗮𝘀𝗸...🤣🤣


🔗𝗙𝗼𝗹𝗹𝗼𝘄, 𝗦𝘂𝗯𝘀𝗰𝗿𝗶𝗯𝗲👇👇 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝘂𝗻𝗶𝘁𝗲:
https://news.1rj.ru/str/Truth_Awakening_Channel
𝙒𝙝𝙚𝙧𝙚 𝙥𝙚𝙤𝙥𝙡𝙚 𝙘𝙤𝙢𝙚 𝙩𝙤𝙜𝙚𝙩𝙝𝙚𝙧 𝙩𝙤 𝙙𝙚𝙗𝙖𝙩𝙚 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝙧𝙚𝙖𝙡 𝙩𝙧𝙪𝙩𝙝.🤝

𝗚𝘂𝗲𝘀𝘀 𝘄𝗵𝗮𝘁?
𝗪𝗲 𝗮𝗿𝗲 𝗻𝗼 𝗹𝗼𝗻𝗴𝗲𝗿 𝗰𝗼𝗻𝘀𝗽𝗶𝗿𝗮𝗰𝘆 𝘁𝗵𝗲𝗼𝗿𝗶𝘀𝘁𝘀 𝗻𝗼𝘄...

𝗜𝘁'𝘀 𝗼𝗻 𝗖𝗕𝗦 𝗻𝗲𝘄𝘀.. 𝗽𝗮𝘀𝘀 𝘁𝗵𝗶𝘀 𝘁𝗼 𝗮𝗹𝗹 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝘂𝗻𝗮𝘄𝗮𝗸𝗲𝗻𝗲𝗱... 𝘀𝗲𝗲 𝗵𝗼𝘄 𝘁𝗵𝗼𝘀𝗲 𝗶𝗻 𝘁𝗵𝗲𝗶𝗿 𝘀𝗹𝘂𝗺𝗯𝗲𝗿 𝗵𝗮𝗻𝗱𝗹𝗲 𝘁𝗵𝗶𝘀 𝗻𝗲𝘄𝘀; 𝘀𝗲𝗲 𝘁𝗵𝗲𝗶𝗿 𝗳𝗮𝗰𝗲𝘀 𝗱𝗿𝗼𝗽!

🔗𝗙𝗼𝗹𝗹𝗼𝘄, 𝗦𝘂𝗯𝘀𝗰𝗿𝗶𝗯𝗲👇👇 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝘂𝗻𝗶𝘁𝗲:
https://news.1rj.ru/str/Truth_Awakening_Channel
𝙒𝙝𝙚𝙧𝙚 𝙥𝙚𝙤𝙥𝙡𝙚 𝙘𝙤𝙢𝙚 𝙩𝙤𝙜𝙚𝙩𝙝𝙚𝙧 𝙩𝙤 𝙙𝙚𝙗𝙖𝙩𝙚 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝙧𝙚𝙖𝙡 𝙩𝙧𝙪𝙩𝙝.🤝

𝗚𝗥𝗔𝗣𝗛𝗜𝗖: 𝘁𝗵𝗶𝘀 𝗶𝘀 𝘄𝗵𝘆 𝗼𝘂𝗿 𝗽𝗮𝗿𝗲𝗻𝘁𝘀 𝘁𝗲𝗹𝗹 𝘂𝘀 𝗻𝗼𝘁 𝘁𝗼 𝘀𝘁𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝘂𝗻𝗱𝗲𝗿 𝗮 𝘁𝗿𝗲𝗲 𝘄𝗵𝗲𝗻 𝗶𝘁'𝘀 𝗿𝗮𝗶𝗻𝗶𝗻𝗴.


🔗𝗙𝗼𝗹𝗹𝗼𝘄, 𝗦𝘂𝗯𝘀𝗰𝗿𝗶𝗯𝗲👇👇 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝘂𝗻𝗶𝘁𝗲:
https://news.1rj.ru/str/Truth_Awakening_Channel
𝙒𝙝𝙚𝙧𝙚 𝙥𝙚𝙤𝙥𝙡𝙚 𝙘𝙤𝙢𝙚 𝙩𝙤𝙜𝙚𝙩𝙝𝙚𝙧 𝙩𝙤 𝙙𝙚𝙗𝙖𝙩𝙚 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝙧𝙚𝙖𝙡 𝙩𝙧𝙪𝙩𝙝.🤝

𝗧𝗵𝗲 𝗗𝗶𝗺𝗺𝗶𝗻𝗴, 𝗙𝘂𝗹𝗹 𝗟𝗲𝗻𝗴𝘁𝗵 𝗖𝗹𝗶𝗺𝗮𝘁𝗲 𝗘𝗻𝗴𝗶𝗻𝗲𝗲𝗿𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗗𝗼𝗰𝘂𝗺𝗲𝗻𝘁𝗮𝗿𝘆
𝗠𝗮𝗿𝗰𝗵 𝟭𝟬, 𝟮𝟬𝟮𝟭

🔗GeoeongineeringWatch.org 
is pleased to announce the release of our groundbreaking documentary that conclusively exposes the existence of global climate engineering operations. 
Global climate engineering operations are a reality. Atmospheric particle testing conducted by GeoengineeringWatch.org has now proven that the lingering, spreading jet aircraft trails, so commonly visible in our skies, are not just condensation as we have officially been told. Over 75 years ago global powers committed the planet and populations to a climate engineering experiment from which there is no return. The intentional dimming of direct sunlight by aircraft dispersed particles, a form of global warming mitigation known as “Solar Radiation Management”, has and is causing catastrophic damage to the planet's life support systems. The highly toxic fallout from the ongoing geoengineering operations is also inflicting unquantifiable damage to human health.

𝗖𝗼𝘃𝗶𝗱-𝟭𝟵 𝗩𝗮𝗰𝗰𝗶𝗻𝗲𝘀 𝗔𝗿𝗲 𝗪𝗲𝗮𝗽𝗼𝗻𝘀 𝗼𝗳 𝗠𝗮𝘀𝘀 𝗗𝗲𝘀𝘁𝗿𝘂𝗰𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻 - 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝗖𝗼𝘂𝗹𝗱 𝗪𝗶𝗽𝗲 𝗼𝘂𝘁 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗛𝘂𝗺𝗮𝗻 𝗥𝗮𝗰𝗲

Dr Coleman says this is the most crucial video he's ever made about covid-19. Please share this video widely.

For further unbiased information about other important matters, please visit https://www.vernoncoleman.com https://www.vernoncoleman.org


🔗𝗙𝗼𝗹𝗹𝗼𝘄, 𝗦𝘂𝗯𝘀𝗰𝗿𝗶𝗯𝗲👇👇 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝘂𝗻𝗶𝘁𝗲:
https://news.1rj.ru/str/Truth_Awakening_Channel
𝙒𝙝𝙚𝙧𝙚 𝙥𝙚𝙤𝙥𝙡𝙚 𝙘𝙤𝙢𝙚 𝙩𝙤𝙜𝙚𝙩𝙝𝙚𝙧 𝙩𝙤 𝙙𝙚𝙗𝙖𝙩𝙚 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝙧𝙚𝙖𝙡 𝙩𝙧𝙪𝙩𝙝.🤝

𝗦𝗘𝗥𝗖𝗢 𝗨𝗞/𝗨𝗦𝗔

𝗠𝗼𝗿𝗲 𝗼𝗻 𝗦𝗘𝗥𝗖𝗢, 𝗤𝗜𝗡𝗘𝗧𝗜𝗤 𝗔𝗡𝗗 𝗠𝗢𝗥𝗘 𝗢𝗡 𝗚𝗢𝗩𝗘𝗥𝗡𝗠𝗘𝗡𝗧 𝗖𝗢𝗥𝗥𝗨𝗣𝗧𝗜𝗢𝗡💥💣
https://cutt.ly/JkCyGdJ

Quote: "Big, breaking intelligence inside this video. We will be linking our research, which is extensive and will contain all of the source docs:

Government Corruption (Rothchild/Serco)

BOMBSHELL UK GOVERNMENT CORRUPTION IS WIDESPREAD.💥 SERCO is part of this.

Make sure you download this video and upload to your own video channel. This intelligence drop will be useful to researchers around the world. Nice to have you join our global truth community. Make sure you are tuned in to all of our sites. http://aim4truth.org (Home of the daily Cat Report) http://patriots4truth.org

🌎 🔗 𝗧𝗵𝗲 𝗜𝗻𝘁𝗲𝗿𝗻𝗮𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻𝗮𝗹 𝗖𝗿𝗶𝗺𝗶𝗻𝗮𝗹 𝗖𝗼𝘂𝗿𝘁 𝗛𝗮𝘀 𝗔𝗰𝗰𝗲𝗽𝘁𝗲𝗱 𝗖𝗹𝗮𝗶𝗺 𝗼𝗳 𝗩𝗶𝗼𝗹𝗮𝘁𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗡𝘂𝗿𝗲𝗺𝗯𝗲𝗿𝗴 𝗖𝗼𝗱𝗲 𝗯𝘆 𝗜𝘀𝗿𝗮𝗲𝗹𝗶 𝗚𝗼𝘃𝘁
𝗠𝗮𝗿𝗰𝗵 𝟭𝟰, 𝟮𝟬𝟮𝟭

UK - No Mandatory Vaccines - Medical Freedom, [12.03.21 05:20]

The court in The Hague accepted the complaint for violating the Nuremberg Code of the Israeli government
The complaint filed last week in the Hague tribunal for violating the Israeli government's Nuremberg Code has been accepted. Now waiting for a decision
Ruth Kiryati 27 Adar 5741 | Friday 11 March 2021 | Israel News system
Last weekend, a complaint was filed in the Hague tribunal by attorneys Ruth Makhachovsky and Aryeh Suchowolski regarding violations of the Nuremberg Code of the Israeli government and other parties. As you may recall, the "People of Truth" organization filed the complaint against the Israeli government, which is conducting illegal experiments on Israeli citizens through Pfizer.

"This is a founding party, whose members are lawyers, doctors, public activists and the general public, who have chosen to exercise their democratic right not to receive the experimental medical treatment (Corona vaccine), and feel that they are under great, severe and illegal pressure from the Israeli government, MKs, ministers. , Senior Public Representatives, Mayors, etc. Therefore, and taking into account the above, we address in your honor two main requirements:

1. Stop the medical experiment and the administration of vaccines to the Israeli public immediately.

2. Order the Government to take all legislative procedures that violate the principle of informed consent of a person to receive the medical treatment described above, which denies the legal status in Israel and Israeli democracy, including avoiding the green passport legislature, giving names of those not vaccinated to local authorities, or any other harm legislature.

3. Act with the utmost severity against any public, business and employment entity that violates state laws on labor or other issues required to prevent coercion, coercion or solicitation for vaccination, as well as the issue of discrimination, against those who choose not to receive the innovative medical care mentioned above.

4. We would like to note that a copy of this document will also be forwarded to media outlets around the world for breach of the Nuremberg Code. Relevant in all countries of the free world. 5.

Also,as a final remark it should be noted that only recently a decision was reached in the European Parliament on 77/1/21, ordering all authorities not to exert pressure or solicitation on people to take the vaccine in Corona in any way. Therefore, everything that is good for the advanced European countries is definitely good for Israel as well - and the balance is self-explanatory. "
Advocate Ruth Makhachovsky told Israel News:

"The experiment that Pfizer is conducting in the State of Israel was conducted in violation of the Nuremberg Code, which belongs to international criminal law and is under the jurisdiction of the court in The Hague. We are now waiting for a decision. "

🔗𝗙𝗼𝗹𝗹𝗼𝘄, 𝗦𝘂𝗯𝘀𝗰𝗿𝗶𝗯𝗲👇👇 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝘂𝗻𝗶𝘁𝗲:
https://news.1rj.ru/str/Truth_Awakening_Channel
𝙒𝙝𝙚𝙧𝙚 𝙥𝙚𝙤𝙥𝙡𝙚 𝙘𝙤𝙢𝙚 𝙩𝙤𝙜𝙚𝙩𝙝𝙚𝙧 𝙩𝙤 𝙙𝙚𝙗𝙖𝙩𝙚 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝙧𝙚𝙖𝙡 𝙩𝙧𝙪𝙩𝙝.

🇬🇧 𝗢𝘂𝗿 𝗥𝗶𝗴𝗵𝘁 𝘁𝗼 𝗣𝗿𝗼𝘁𝗲𝘀𝘁 𝗺𝘂𝘀𝘁 𝗿𝗲𝗺𝗮𝗶𝗻 𝗼𝘂𝗿 𝗥𝗜𝗚𝗛𝗧..

𝗦𝗔𝗧𝗨𝗥𝗗𝗔𝗬 𝟮𝟬𝗧𝗛 𝗠𝗔𝗥𝗖𝗛 𝟮𝟬𝟮𝟭, 𝗧𝗢𝗚𝗘𝗧𝗛𝗘𝗥 𝗪𝗘 𝗠𝗨𝗦𝗧 𝗠𝗔𝗞𝗘 𝗢𝗨𝗥 𝗠𝗔𝗥𝗞!

🇬🇧 𝗪𝗵𝗲𝘁𝗵𝗲𝗿 𝘆𝗼𝘂 𝗹𝗶𝗸𝗲 𝗵𝗶𝗺 𝗼𝗿 𝗻𝗼𝘁, 𝘆𝗼𝘂 𝗵𝗮𝘃𝗲 𝘁𝗼 𝗵𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝗶𝘁 𝘁𝗼 𝗵𝗶𝗺. 𝗟𝗮𝗺𝗺𝘆, 𝗵𝗲 𝘂𝗻𝗱𝗲𝗿𝘀𝘁𝗮𝗻𝗱𝘀 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗿𝗶𝗴𝗵𝘁 𝘁𝗼 𝗽𝗿𝗼𝘁𝗲𝘀𝘁.

🔗𝗙𝗼𝗹𝗹𝗼𝘄, 𝗦𝘂𝗯𝘀𝗰𝗿𝗶𝗯𝗲👇👇 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝘂𝗻𝗶𝘁𝗲:
https://news.1rj.ru/str/Truth_Awakening_Channel
𝙒𝙝𝙚𝙧𝙚 𝙥𝙚𝙤𝙥𝙡𝙚 𝙘𝙤𝙢𝙚 𝙩𝙤𝙜𝙚𝙩𝙝𝙚𝙧 𝙩𝙤 𝙙𝙚𝙗𝙖𝙩𝙚 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝙧𝙚𝙖𝙡 𝙩𝙧𝙪𝙩𝙝.🤝

𝗨𝗦𝗔 𝗡𝗘𝗪𝗦 - 𝗩𝗜𝗘𝗪𝗣𝗢𝗜𝗡𝗧𝗦
𝗧𝗵𝗲 𝗙𝗼𝘂𝗻𝗱𝗲𝗿𝘀 𝗪𝗮𝗿𝗻𝗲𝗱 𝗨𝘀 𝗔𝗯𝗼𝘂𝘁 𝗔𝗯𝘂𝘀𝗲𝘀 𝗟𝗶𝗸𝗲 𝗛.𝗥. 𝟭

Rob Natelson - March 11, 2021

Commentary

H.R. 1, the bill that would seize control of federal elections from the states, comes with an unusual twist. It supposedly promotes “access.” But it says anyone challenging its constitutionality is barred from every court in the nation but a single federal trial court in Washington, D.C.!

Under H.R. 1, some citizens get more access than others.

Mark Twain is said to have quipped that history doesn’t repeat itself, but often rhymes. And here’s one of those rhymes: Limiting challengers to one court in the nation sounds a lot like Founding-Era warnings that if Congress could regulate its own elections it might limit voters to one polling place per state. More on that shortly.

As my last essay noted, H.R. 1 claims to rely on three sections of the Constitution, two of which probably are irrelevant. The third is the Elections Clause (Article I, Section 4, Clause 1)—more appropriately called the Times, Places, and Manner Clause. It reads as follows:

“𝑻𝒉𝒆 𝑻𝒊𝒎𝒆𝒔, 𝑷𝒍𝒂𝒄𝒆𝒔 𝒂𝒏𝒅 𝑴𝒂𝒏𝒏𝒆𝒓 𝒐𝒇 𝒉𝒐𝒍𝒅𝒊𝒏𝒈 𝑬𝒍𝒆𝒄𝒕𝒊𝒐𝒏𝒔 𝒇𝒐𝒓 𝑺𝒆𝒏𝒂𝒕𝒐𝒓𝒔 𝒂𝒏𝒅 𝑹𝒆𝒑𝒓𝒆𝒔𝒆𝒏𝒕𝒂𝒕𝒊𝒗𝒆𝒔, 𝒔𝒉𝒂𝒍𝒍 𝒃𝒆 𝒑𝒓𝒆𝒔𝒄𝒓𝒊𝒃𝒆𝒅 𝒊𝒏 𝒆𝒂𝒄𝒉 𝑺𝒕𝒂𝒕𝒆 𝒃𝒚 𝒕𝒉𝒆 𝑳𝒆𝒈𝒊𝒔𝒍𝒂𝒕𝒖𝒓𝒆 𝒕𝒉𝒆𝒓𝒆𝒐𝒇; 𝒃𝒖𝒕 𝒕𝒉𝒆 𝑪𝒐𝒏𝒈𝒓𝒆𝒔𝒔 𝒎𝒂𝒚 𝒂𝒕 𝒂𝒏𝒚 𝒕𝒊𝒎𝒆 𝒃𝒚 𝑳𝒂𝒘 𝒎𝒂𝒌𝒆 𝒐𝒓 𝒂𝒍𝒕𝒆𝒓 𝒔𝒖𝒄𝒉 𝑹𝒆𝒈𝒖𝒍𝒂𝒕𝒊𝒐𝒏𝒔 ….”

H.R. 1 quotes some out-of-context Supreme Court language to the effect that the italicized language gives Congress broad authority to overrule state election law.

But the text of the Elections Clause tells a very different story, as does its history.

The text tells us that Congress’s power applies only to congressional elections. It doesn’t apply to presidential contests, as the drafters of H.R. 1 pretend.

In addition, the text focuses principally on the power of state legislatures. It adds Congress’s authority only in a subordinate clause. This subordinate clause is what lawyers and judges—both in the Founding Era and in modern times—call a “proviso.” Provisos traditionally are interpreted narrowly, leaving the earlier language (the state legislatures’ power) to be interpreted broadly. In this case, narrow interpretation means that if there’s reasonable doubt about whether Congress has authority, the issue is decided against Congress.

Now let’s look at the history:

When the Constitution was publicly debated, the proviso giving Congress power to revise state election laws was highly controversial. Even many of the Constitution’s supporters wanted it taken out. Dr. James McClurg of Virginia, who had served at the Constitutional Convention, was one of these. Another was Noah Webster, later famous for his American dictionary. Webster wrote an influential pamphlet strongly supporting the Constitution—but demanding that the proviso be removed.

Why the concern? They understood the danger of allowing incumbent politicians to dictate the laws governing their own re-election. Experience shows that if incumbents write the rules, they write the rules to suit themselves. A glaring example is how the Democrat sponsors of H.R. 1 seek to alter state voter registration systems to their own advantage.

Skeptical Founding-Era writers explained in detail how the proviso could be abused. They pointed out, for instance, that if Congress could fix a “Place” for election, it might severely limit the number of polling places and locate them to benefit incumbents. Thus, a congressman from Philadelphia might induce his colleagues to locate only one polling place in Pennsylvania—in the congressman’s own neighborhood in Philadelphia.

Sound familiar? It’s a lot like Democrat partisans providing that the one court where H.R. 1 can be challenged is in heavily Democrat Washington, D.C.

During the constitutional debates, there was so much public resistance to the proviso that advocates became very concerned. What if these few words led the public to reject the entire Constitution?

Page 1 of 2

Page 2 of 2

So advocates assured the public that Congress’s power over congressional elections would be extremely limited. They said the proviso was designed only for emergencies. As I reported in my 2010 study of the Elections Clause:

“[𝑻]𝒉𝒆 𝒑𝒓𝒐𝒑𝒐𝒏𝒆𝒏𝒕𝒔’ 𝒅𝒆𝒄𝒊𝒔𝒊𝒗𝒆 𝒂𝒓𝒈𝒖𝒎𝒆𝒏𝒕 … 𝒘𝒂𝒔 𝒐𝒏𝒆 𝒕𝒉𝒂𝒕 𝒉𝒂𝒅 𝒇𝒊𝒓𝒔𝒕 𝒃𝒆𝒆𝒏 𝒓𝒂𝒊𝒔𝒆𝒅 𝒂𝒕 𝒕𝒉𝒆 𝒇𝒆𝒅𝒆𝒓𝒂𝒍 𝒄𝒐𝒏𝒗𝒆𝒏𝒕𝒊𝒐𝒏: 𝒕𝒉𝒂𝒕 𝒕𝒉𝒆 𝑻𝒊𝒎𝒆𝒔, 𝑷𝒍𝒂𝒄𝒆𝒔 𝒂𝒏𝒅 𝑴𝒂𝒏𝒏𝒆𝒓 𝑪𝒍𝒂𝒖𝒔𝒆 𝒘𝒂𝒔 𝒏𝒆𝒆𝒅𝒆𝒅 𝒕𝒐 𝒆𝒏𝒂𝒃𝒍𝒆 𝑪𝒐𝒏𝒈𝒓𝒆𝒔𝒔 𝒕𝒐 𝒑𝒓𝒆𝒔𝒆𝒓𝒗𝒆 𝒊𝒕𝒔 𝒐𝒘𝒏 𝒆𝒙𝒊𝒔𝒕𝒆𝒏𝒄𝒆. 𝑰𝒏 𝒂𝒃𝒔𝒆𝒏𝒄𝒆 𝒐𝒇 𝒂 𝒄𝒐𝒏𝒈𝒓𝒆𝒔𝒔𝒊𝒐𝒏𝒂𝒍 𝒑𝒐𝒘𝒆𝒓 𝒕𝒐 𝒓𝒆𝒈𝒖𝒍𝒂𝒕𝒆 𝒄𝒐𝒏𝒈𝒓𝒆𝒔𝒔𝒊𝒐𝒏𝒂𝒍 𝒆𝒍𝒆𝒄𝒕𝒊𝒐𝒏𝒔, 𝒂 𝒈𝒓𝒐𝒖𝒑 𝒐𝒇 𝒔𝒕𝒂𝒕𝒆𝒔 𝒄𝒐𝒖𝒍𝒅 𝒅𝒆𝒔𝒕𝒓𝒐𝒚 𝒕𝒉𝒆 𝑯𝒐𝒖𝒔𝒆 𝒐𝒇 𝑹𝒆𝒑𝒓𝒆𝒔𝒆𝒏𝒕𝒂𝒕𝒊𝒗𝒆𝒔 𝒃𝒚 𝒓𝒆𝒇𝒖𝒔𝒊𝒏𝒈 𝒕𝒐 𝒑𝒓𝒐𝒗𝒊𝒅𝒆 𝒇𝒐𝒓 𝒕𝒉𝒐𝒔𝒆 𝒆𝒍𝒆𝒄𝒕𝒊𝒐𝒏𝒔 𝒐𝒓 𝒃𝒚 𝒄𝒓𝒆𝒂𝒕𝒊𝒏𝒈 𝒓𝒆𝒈𝒖𝒍𝒂𝒕𝒊𝒐𝒏𝒔 𝒅𝒆𝒔𝒊𝒈𝒏𝒆𝒅 𝒕𝒐 𝒔𝒂𝒃𝒐𝒕𝒂𝒈𝒆 𝒕𝒉𝒆𝒎. 𝑨𝒔 𝒂 𝒑𝒓𝒆𝒄𝒆𝒅𝒆𝒏𝒕, 𝒕𝒉𝒆 𝑭𝒆𝒅𝒆𝒓𝒂𝒍𝒊𝒔𝒕𝒔 𝒂𝒍𝒍𝒆𝒈𝒆𝒅 𝒕𝒉𝒂𝒕 𝑹𝒉𝒐𝒅𝒆 𝑰𝒔𝒍𝒂𝒏𝒅 𝒉𝒂𝒅 𝒅𝒂𝒎𝒂𝒈𝒆𝒅 𝒕𝒉𝒆 𝒐𝒑𝒆𝒓𝒂𝒕𝒊𝒐𝒏𝒔 𝒐𝒇 𝒕𝒉𝒆 𝑪𝒐𝒏𝒇𝒆𝒅𝒆𝒓𝒂𝒕𝒊𝒐𝒏 𝑪𝒐𝒏𝒈𝒓𝒆𝒔𝒔 𝒃𝒚 𝒓𝒆𝒇𝒖𝒔𝒊𝒏𝒈 𝒕𝒐 𝒔𝒆𝒏𝒅 𝒅𝒆𝒍𝒆𝒈𝒂𝒕𝒆𝒔 𝒕𝒐 𝒕𝒉𝒂𝒕 𝒃𝒐𝒅𝒚. 𝑻𝒉𝒆 𝑭𝒆𝒅𝒆𝒓𝒂𝒍𝒊𝒔𝒕𝒔 𝒎𝒂𝒅𝒆 𝒕𝒉𝒊𝒔 𝒂𝒓𝒈𝒖𝒎𝒆𝒏𝒕 𝒐𝒗𝒆𝒓 𝒂𝒏𝒅 𝒐𝒗𝒆𝒓, 𝒖𝒔𝒊𝒏𝒈 𝒊𝒕 𝒕𝒐 𝒔𝒘𝒂𝒚 𝒗𝒐𝒕𝒆𝒔 𝒊𝒏 𝒄𝒓𝒖𝒄𝒊𝒂𝒍 𝒔𝒕𝒂𝒕𝒆𝒔.”

Moreover:

“𝑰𝒏 𝑴𝒂𝒓𝒚𝒍𝒂𝒏𝒅, 𝒄𝒐𝒏𝒗𝒆𝒏𝒕𝒊𝒐𝒏 𝒅𝒆𝒍𝒆𝒈𝒂𝒕𝒆 𝑱𝒂𝒎𝒆𝒔 𝑴𝒄𝑯𝒆𝒏𝒓𝒚 𝒂𝒅𝒅𝒆𝒅 𝒕𝒉𝒂𝒕 … 𝒂𝒏 𝒊𝒏𝒔𝒖𝒓𝒓𝒆𝒄𝒕𝒊𝒐𝒏 𝒐𝒓 𝒓𝒆𝒃𝒆𝒍𝒍𝒊𝒐𝒏 𝒎𝒊𝒈𝒉𝒕 𝒑𝒓𝒆𝒗𝒆𝒏𝒕 𝒂 𝒔𝒕𝒂𝒕𝒆 𝒍𝒆𝒈𝒊𝒔𝒍𝒂𝒕𝒖𝒓𝒆 𝒇𝒓𝒐𝒎 𝒂𝒅𝒎𝒊𝒏𝒊𝒔𝒕𝒆𝒓𝒊𝒏𝒈 𝒂𝒏 𝒆𝒍𝒆𝒄𝒕𝒊𝒐𝒏. 𝑨𝒔 𝑱𝒂𝒎𝒆𝒔 𝑰𝒓𝒆𝒅𝒆𝒍𝒍 𝒕𝒐𝒍𝒅 𝒕𝒉𝒆 𝑵𝒐𝒓𝒕𝒉 𝑪𝒂𝒓𝒐𝒍𝒊𝒏𝒂 𝒓𝒂𝒕𝒊𝒇𝒚𝒊𝒏𝒈 𝒄𝒐𝒏𝒗𝒆𝒏𝒕𝒊𝒐𝒏, ‘[𝒂]𝒏 𝒐𝒄𝒄𝒂𝒔𝒊𝒐𝒏 𝒎𝒂𝒚 𝒂𝒓𝒊𝒔𝒆 𝒘𝒉𝒆𝒏 𝒕𝒉𝒆 𝒆𝒙𝒆𝒓𝒄𝒊𝒔𝒆 𝒐𝒇 𝒕𝒉𝒊𝒔 𝒖𝒍𝒕𝒊𝒎𝒂𝒕𝒆 𝒑𝒐𝒘𝒆𝒓 𝒊𝒏 𝑪𝒐𝒏𝒈𝒓𝒆𝒔𝒔 𝒎𝒂𝒚 𝒃𝒆 𝒏𝒆𝒄𝒆𝒔𝒔𝒂𝒓𝒚 … 𝒊𝒇 𝒂 𝒔𝒕𝒂𝒕𝒆 𝒔𝒉𝒐𝒖𝒍𝒅 𝒃𝒆 𝒊𝒏𝒗𝒐𝒍𝒗𝒆𝒅 𝒊𝒏 𝒘𝒂𝒓, 𝒂𝒏𝒅 𝒊𝒕𝒔 𝒍𝒆𝒈𝒊𝒔𝒍𝒂𝒕𝒖𝒓𝒆 𝒄𝒐𝒖𝒍𝒅 𝒏𝒐𝒕 𝒂𝒔𝒔𝒆𝒎𝒃𝒍𝒆, (𝒂𝒔 𝒘𝒂𝒔 𝒕𝒉𝒆 𝒄𝒂𝒔𝒆 𝒐𝒇 𝑺𝒐𝒖𝒕𝒉 𝑪𝒂𝒓𝒐𝒍𝒊𝒏𝒂, 𝒂𝒏𝒅 𝒐𝒄𝒄𝒂𝒔𝒊𝒐𝒏𝒂𝒍𝒍𝒚 𝒐𝒇 𝒔𝒐𝒎𝒆 𝒐𝒕𝒉𝒆𝒓 𝒔𝒕𝒂𝒕𝒆𝒔, 𝒅𝒖𝒓𝒊𝒏𝒈 𝒕𝒉𝒆 𝒍𝒂𝒕𝒆 𝒘𝒂𝒓).’”

Maryland’s famous jurist, Alexander Contee Hanson, added that Congress would exercise its “times, places, and manner” authority only in cases of invasion, legislative neglect, or obstinate refusal to pass election laws, or if a state crafted its election laws with a “sinister purpose” or to injure the general government. “It was never meant,” he wrote, “that congress should at any time interfere, unless on the failure of a state legislature, or to alter such regulations as may be obviously improper.”

Based on these assurances, the public accepted the proviso and ratified the Constitution.

Of course, the Constitution doesn’t actually say the proviso is limited to emergencies. But courts routinely consider the history behind a document’s words when deciding how broadly to interpret them. I explained above that the text tells us to construe the proviso narrowly. History backs this up.

Here’s an illustration of how the courts should apply Congress’s Election Clause authority. Suppose the question arises of whether “the manner of holding Elections” extends only to mechanics such as the form of the ballot, or also includes regulating campaigns. Narrow construction would give force to the Founding-Era evidence that “manner of holding” does not include campaigns.

Bottom line: The drafters of H.R. 1 were wrong to proclaim unlimited power to regulate federal elections and campaigns. On the contrary, the Elections Clause grants Congress only limited authority. A runaway Congress should never be permitted to seize more power than the Constitution gives it.

Robert G. Natelson, a former constitutional law professor, is a leading originalist scholar and senior fellow in constitutional jurisprudence at the Independence Institute in Denver. The Texas attorney general twice relied on his 2010 study of the Elections Clause in Supreme Court litigation earlier this year, and Chief Justice John Roberts used it in a 2015 Supreme Court case.

🔗 𝗥𝗲𝗮𝗱 𝗺𝗼𝗿𝗲: 𝗧𝗵𝗲 𝗘𝗽𝗼𝗰𝗵 𝗧𝗶𝗺𝗲𝘀

🔗𝗙𝗼𝗹𝗹𝗼𝘄, 𝗦𝘂𝗯𝘀𝗰𝗿𝗶𝗯𝗲👇👇 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝘂𝗻𝗶𝘁𝗲:
https://news.1rj.ru/str/Truth_Awakening_Channel
𝙒𝙝𝙚𝙧𝙚 𝙥𝙚𝙤𝙥𝙡𝙚 𝙘𝙤𝙢𝙚 𝙩𝙤𝙜𝙚𝙩𝙝𝙚𝙧 𝙩𝙤 𝙙𝙚𝙗𝙖𝙩𝙚 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝙧𝙚𝙖𝙡 𝙩𝙧𝙪𝙩𝙝.🤝

𝗨𝗦𝗔 𝗡𝗘𝗪𝗦 - 𝗖𝗢𝗡𝗚𝗥𝗘𝗦𝗦
𝗚𝗢𝗣 𝗛𝗼𝘂𝘀𝗲 𝗠𝗲𝗺𝗯𝗲𝗿𝘀 𝗜𝗻𝘁𝗿𝗼𝗱𝘂𝗰𝗲 𝗕𝗶𝗹𝗹 𝘁𝗼 𝗥𝗲𝗶𝗻 𝗶𝗻 𝗕𝗶𝗱𝗲𝗻’𝘀 𝗥𝗲𝗴𝘂𝗹𝗮𝘁𝗼𝗿𝘆 𝗣𝗹𝗮𝗻𝘀
𝗕𝗬 𝗝𝗔𝗡𝗜𝗧𝗔 𝗞𝗔𝗡 𝗠𝗮𝗿𝗰𝗵 𝟭𝟮, 𝟮𝟬𝟮𝟭

A group of Republican House members this week introduced a bill aimed at preventing overreach by the executive branch in substituting Congress-passed laws with its own rulemaking. This comes about two months after the Senate introduced an identical bill.

The bill, known as the Regulations from the Executive In Need of Scrutiny (REINS) Act of 2021, seeks to affirm Congress’s legislative power by requiring every new “major rule” proposed by federal agencies be approved by both the House and Senate before they can be enforced.

The proposed law defines “major rule” as any federal rule or regulation that may result in an annual effect on the economy of $100 million or more; a major increase in costs or prices for consumers, individual industries, government agencies, or geographic regions; or cause significant adverse effects on competition, employment, investment, productivity, innovation, or the ability of U.S.-based enterprises to compete with foreign-based enterprises.

The bill was introduced by Rep. Kat Cammack (R-Fla.) and co-sponsored by more than two dozen House lawmakers, including Judiciary Committee Ranking Member Jim Jordan (R-Ohio) and Rep. Matt Gaetz (R-Fla.).

“The REINS Act is a measure that ensures Congress is the only lawmaker in the United States. This bill reasserts Article I authority that vests all legislative power in Congress and provides necessary oversight of the executive rulemaking process,” Cammack said in a statement on Wednesday.

“It’s about making sure the executive branch does not unduly overstep its vested authority through a necessary system of checks and balances.”

Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) introduced an identical Senate version of the bill in January. His office explained at the time that under the REINS Act, once a major rule is drafted, it would trigger a process that would require both chambers of Congress to approve and then be signed by the president. This requirement, he said, would satisfy the “bicameralism and presentment requirements of the Constitution.”

“For too long, an ever-growing federal bureaucracy has piled regulations and red tape on the backs of the American people without any approval by Americans’ elected representatives,” Paul said in the statement.

The White House did not immediately respond to a request for comment from The Epoch Times.

In an interview with The Epoch Times’ American Thought Leaders last year, Sen. Mike Lee (R-Utah) said Congress has itself to blame for overreach by the judicial and executive branches.

Congress has in many instances surrendered its legislating authority to the executive branch of government, he said. This has led to the executive, the judiciary, and administrative agencies expanding their reach in order to fill the void left by lawmakers.

“The far more common type involves a delegation to the executive branch. We pass a law that says, in effect, we shall have good law in area X and we hereby delegate to commission or department or division Y the power to make and interpret and enforce rules carrying the force of generally applicable federal law in that area,” Lee said. “And from that moment forward, that division or department, or commission, is the lawmaker, and is also the law enforcer.”

Meanwhile, states have also cautioned Biden and his administration from engaging in federal overreach that could contravene the state’s authority to enact laws or violate various constitutional rights.

Six attorneys general wrote a letter to Biden in January to put his administration on notice that any actions that might exceed their statutory authority, are inconsistent with constitutional tenets, or place civil liberties at risk could trigger legal action by the states.

Page 1 of 2