This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
𝗚𝗥𝗔𝗣𝗛𝗜𝗖: 𝘁𝗵𝗶𝘀 𝗶𝘀 𝘄𝗵𝘆 𝗼𝘂𝗿 𝗽𝗮𝗿𝗲𝗻𝘁𝘀 𝘁𝗲𝗹𝗹 𝘂𝘀 𝗻𝗼𝘁 𝘁𝗼 𝘀𝘁𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝘂𝗻𝗱𝗲𝗿 𝗮 𝘁𝗿𝗲𝗲 𝘄𝗵𝗲𝗻 𝗶𝘁'𝘀 𝗿𝗮𝗶𝗻𝗶𝗻𝗴.
🔗𝗙𝗼𝗹𝗹𝗼𝘄, 𝗦𝘂𝗯𝘀𝗰𝗿𝗶𝗯𝗲👇👇 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝘂𝗻𝗶𝘁𝗲:
https://news.1rj.ru/str/Truth_Awakening_Channel
𝙒𝙝𝙚𝙧𝙚 𝙥𝙚𝙤𝙥𝙡𝙚 𝙘𝙤𝙢𝙚 𝙩𝙤𝙜𝙚𝙩𝙝𝙚𝙧 𝙩𝙤 𝙙𝙚𝙗𝙖𝙩𝙚 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝙧𝙚𝙖𝙡 𝙩𝙧𝙪𝙩𝙝.🤝
🔗𝗙𝗼𝗹𝗹𝗼𝘄, 𝗦𝘂𝗯𝘀𝗰𝗿𝗶𝗯𝗲👇👇 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝘂𝗻𝗶𝘁𝗲:
https://news.1rj.ru/str/Truth_Awakening_Channel
𝙒𝙝𝙚𝙧𝙚 𝙥𝙚𝙤𝙥𝙡𝙚 𝙘𝙤𝙢𝙚 𝙩𝙤𝙜𝙚𝙩𝙝𝙚𝙧 𝙩𝙤 𝙙𝙚𝙗𝙖𝙩𝙚 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝙧𝙚𝙖𝙡 𝙩𝙧𝙪𝙩𝙝.🤝
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
𝗧𝗵𝗲 𝗗𝗶𝗺𝗺𝗶𝗻𝗴, 𝗙𝘂𝗹𝗹 𝗟𝗲𝗻𝗴𝘁𝗵 𝗖𝗹𝗶𝗺𝗮𝘁𝗲 𝗘𝗻𝗴𝗶𝗻𝗲𝗲𝗿𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗗𝗼𝗰𝘂𝗺𝗲𝗻𝘁𝗮𝗿𝘆
𝗠𝗮𝗿𝗰𝗵 𝟭𝟬, 𝟮𝟬𝟮𝟭
🔗GeoeongineeringWatch.org
is pleased to announce the release of our groundbreaking documentary that conclusively exposes the existence of global climate engineering operations.
Global climate engineering operations are a reality. Atmospheric particle testing conducted by GeoengineeringWatch.org has now proven that the lingering, spreading jet aircraft trails, so commonly visible in our skies, are not just condensation as we have officially been told. Over 75 years ago global powers committed the planet and populations to a climate engineering experiment from which there is no return. The intentional dimming of direct sunlight by aircraft dispersed particles, a form of global warming mitigation known as “Solar Radiation Management”, has and is causing catastrophic damage to the planet's life support systems. The highly toxic fallout from the ongoing geoengineering operations is also inflicting unquantifiable damage to human health.
𝗠𝗮𝗿𝗰𝗵 𝟭𝟬, 𝟮𝟬𝟮𝟭
🔗GeoeongineeringWatch.org
is pleased to announce the release of our groundbreaking documentary that conclusively exposes the existence of global climate engineering operations.
Global climate engineering operations are a reality. Atmospheric particle testing conducted by GeoengineeringWatch.org has now proven that the lingering, spreading jet aircraft trails, so commonly visible in our skies, are not just condensation as we have officially been told. Over 75 years ago global powers committed the planet and populations to a climate engineering experiment from which there is no return. The intentional dimming of direct sunlight by aircraft dispersed particles, a form of global warming mitigation known as “Solar Radiation Management”, has and is causing catastrophic damage to the planet's life support systems. The highly toxic fallout from the ongoing geoengineering operations is also inflicting unquantifiable damage to human health.
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
𝗖𝗼𝘃𝗶𝗱-𝟭𝟵 𝗩𝗮𝗰𝗰𝗶𝗻𝗲𝘀 𝗔𝗿𝗲 𝗪𝗲𝗮𝗽𝗼𝗻𝘀 𝗼𝗳 𝗠𝗮𝘀𝘀 𝗗𝗲𝘀𝘁𝗿𝘂𝗰𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻 - 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝗖𝗼𝘂𝗹𝗱 𝗪𝗶𝗽𝗲 𝗼𝘂𝘁 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗛𝘂𝗺𝗮𝗻 𝗥𝗮𝗰𝗲
Dr Coleman says this is the most crucial video he's ever made about covid-19. Please share this video widely.
For further unbiased information about other important matters, please visit https://www.vernoncoleman.com https://www.vernoncoleman.org
🔗𝗙𝗼𝗹𝗹𝗼𝘄, 𝗦𝘂𝗯𝘀𝗰𝗿𝗶𝗯𝗲👇👇 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝘂𝗻𝗶𝘁𝗲:
https://news.1rj.ru/str/Truth_Awakening_Channel
𝙒𝙝𝙚𝙧𝙚 𝙥𝙚𝙤𝙥𝙡𝙚 𝙘𝙤𝙢𝙚 𝙩𝙤𝙜𝙚𝙩𝙝𝙚𝙧 𝙩𝙤 𝙙𝙚𝙗𝙖𝙩𝙚 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝙧𝙚𝙖𝙡 𝙩𝙧𝙪𝙩𝙝.🤝
Dr Coleman says this is the most crucial video he's ever made about covid-19. Please share this video widely.
For further unbiased information about other important matters, please visit https://www.vernoncoleman.com https://www.vernoncoleman.org
🔗𝗙𝗼𝗹𝗹𝗼𝘄, 𝗦𝘂𝗯𝘀𝗰𝗿𝗶𝗯𝗲👇👇 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝘂𝗻𝗶𝘁𝗲:
https://news.1rj.ru/str/Truth_Awakening_Channel
𝙒𝙝𝙚𝙧𝙚 𝙥𝙚𝙤𝙥𝙡𝙚 𝙘𝙤𝙢𝙚 𝙩𝙤𝙜𝙚𝙩𝙝𝙚𝙧 𝙩𝙤 𝙙𝙚𝙗𝙖𝙩𝙚 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝙧𝙚𝙖𝙡 𝙩𝙧𝙪𝙩𝙝.🤝
𝗦𝗘𝗥𝗖𝗢 𝗨𝗞/𝗨𝗦𝗔
𝗠𝗼𝗿𝗲 𝗼𝗻 𝗦𝗘𝗥𝗖𝗢, 𝗤𝗜𝗡𝗘𝗧𝗜𝗤 𝗔𝗡𝗗 𝗠𝗢𝗥𝗘 𝗢𝗡 𝗚𝗢𝗩𝗘𝗥𝗡𝗠𝗘𝗡𝗧 𝗖𝗢𝗥𝗥𝗨𝗣𝗧𝗜𝗢𝗡💥💣
https://cutt.ly/JkCyGdJ
Quote: "Big, breaking intelligence inside this video. We will be linking our research, which is extensive and will contain all of the source docs:
Government Corruption (Rothchild/Serco)
BOMBSHELL UK GOVERNMENT CORRUPTION IS WIDESPREAD.💥 SERCO is part of this.
Make sure you download this video and upload to your own video channel. This intelligence drop will be useful to researchers around the world. Nice to have you join our global truth community. Make sure you are tuned in to all of our sites. http://aim4truth.org (Home of the daily Cat Report) http://patriots4truth.org
𝗠𝗼𝗿𝗲 𝗼𝗻 𝗦𝗘𝗥𝗖𝗢, 𝗤𝗜𝗡𝗘𝗧𝗜𝗤 𝗔𝗡𝗗 𝗠𝗢𝗥𝗘 𝗢𝗡 𝗚𝗢𝗩𝗘𝗥𝗡𝗠𝗘𝗡𝗧 𝗖𝗢𝗥𝗥𝗨𝗣𝗧𝗜𝗢𝗡💥💣
https://cutt.ly/JkCyGdJ
Quote: "Big, breaking intelligence inside this video. We will be linking our research, which is extensive and will contain all of the source docs:
Government Corruption (Rothchild/Serco)
BOMBSHELL UK GOVERNMENT CORRUPTION IS WIDESPREAD.💥 SERCO is part of this.
Make sure you download this video and upload to your own video channel. This intelligence drop will be useful to researchers around the world. Nice to have you join our global truth community. Make sure you are tuned in to all of our sites. http://aim4truth.org (Home of the daily Cat Report) http://patriots4truth.org
AIM Truth Bits
SERCO and the Qinetiq & Carlyle Groups
The Queen’s military-industrial QinetiQ Group Plc (adjacent to The Pirbright Institute) was founded in Nov. 11, 2002 by: 62% UK Ministry of Defence (MOD) — UK 34% The Carlyle Gr…
🌎 🔗 𝗧𝗵𝗲 𝗜𝗻𝘁𝗲𝗿𝗻𝗮𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻𝗮𝗹 𝗖𝗿𝗶𝗺𝗶𝗻𝗮𝗹 𝗖𝗼𝘂𝗿𝘁 𝗛𝗮𝘀 𝗔𝗰𝗰𝗲𝗽𝘁𝗲𝗱 𝗖𝗹𝗮𝗶𝗺 𝗼𝗳 𝗩𝗶𝗼𝗹𝗮𝘁𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗡𝘂𝗿𝗲𝗺𝗯𝗲𝗿𝗴 𝗖𝗼𝗱𝗲 𝗯𝘆 𝗜𝘀𝗿𝗮𝗲𝗹𝗶 𝗚𝗼𝘃𝘁
𝗠𝗮𝗿𝗰𝗵 𝟭𝟰, 𝟮𝟬𝟮𝟭
UK - No Mandatory Vaccines - Medical Freedom, [12.03.21 05:20]
The court in The Hague accepted the complaint for violating the Nuremberg Code of the Israeli government
The complaint filed last week in the Hague tribunal for violating the Israeli government's Nuremberg Code has been accepted. Now waiting for a decision
Ruth Kiryati 27 Adar 5741 | Friday 11 March 2021 | Israel News system
Last weekend, a complaint was filed in the Hague tribunal by attorneys Ruth Makhachovsky and Aryeh Suchowolski regarding violations of the Nuremberg Code of the Israeli government and other parties. As you may recall, the "People of Truth" organization filed the complaint against the Israeli government, which is conducting illegal experiments on Israeli citizens through Pfizer.
"This is a founding party, whose members are lawyers, doctors, public activists and the general public, who have chosen to exercise their democratic right not to receive the experimental medical treatment (Corona vaccine), and feel that they are under great, severe and illegal pressure from the Israeli government, MKs, ministers. , Senior Public Representatives, Mayors, etc. Therefore, and taking into account the above, we address in your honor two main requirements:
1. Stop the medical experiment and the administration of vaccines to the Israeli public immediately.
2. Order the Government to take all legislative procedures that violate the principle of informed consent of a person to receive the medical treatment described above, which denies the legal status in Israel and Israeli democracy, including avoiding the green passport legislature, giving names of those not vaccinated to local authorities, or any other harm legislature.
3. Act with the utmost severity against any public, business and employment entity that violates state laws on labor or other issues required to prevent coercion, coercion or solicitation for vaccination, as well as the issue of discrimination, against those who choose not to receive the innovative medical care mentioned above.
4. We would like to note that a copy of this document will also be forwarded to media outlets around the world for breach of the Nuremberg Code. Relevant in all countries of the free world. 5.
Also,as a final remark it should be noted that only recently a decision was reached in the European Parliament on 77/1/21, ordering all authorities not to exert pressure or solicitation on people to take the vaccine in Corona in any way. Therefore, everything that is good for the advanced European countries is definitely good for Israel as well - and the balance is self-explanatory. "
Advocate Ruth Makhachovsky told Israel News:
"The experiment that Pfizer is conducting in the State of Israel was conducted in violation of the Nuremberg Code, which belongs to international criminal law and is under the jurisdiction of the court in The Hague. We are now waiting for a decision. "
🔗𝗙𝗼𝗹𝗹𝗼𝘄, 𝗦𝘂𝗯𝘀𝗰𝗿𝗶𝗯𝗲👇👇 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝘂𝗻𝗶𝘁𝗲:
https://news.1rj.ru/str/Truth_Awakening_Channel
𝙒𝙝𝙚𝙧𝙚 𝙥𝙚𝙤𝙥𝙡𝙚 𝙘𝙤𝙢𝙚 𝙩𝙤𝙜𝙚𝙩𝙝𝙚𝙧 𝙩𝙤 𝙙𝙚𝙗𝙖𝙩𝙚 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝙧𝙚𝙖𝙡 𝙩𝙧𝙪𝙩𝙝.
𝗠𝗮𝗿𝗰𝗵 𝟭𝟰, 𝟮𝟬𝟮𝟭
UK - No Mandatory Vaccines - Medical Freedom, [12.03.21 05:20]
The court in The Hague accepted the complaint for violating the Nuremberg Code of the Israeli government
The complaint filed last week in the Hague tribunal for violating the Israeli government's Nuremberg Code has been accepted. Now waiting for a decision
Ruth Kiryati 27 Adar 5741 | Friday 11 March 2021 | Israel News system
Last weekend, a complaint was filed in the Hague tribunal by attorneys Ruth Makhachovsky and Aryeh Suchowolski regarding violations of the Nuremberg Code of the Israeli government and other parties. As you may recall, the "People of Truth" organization filed the complaint against the Israeli government, which is conducting illegal experiments on Israeli citizens through Pfizer.
"This is a founding party, whose members are lawyers, doctors, public activists and the general public, who have chosen to exercise their democratic right not to receive the experimental medical treatment (Corona vaccine), and feel that they are under great, severe and illegal pressure from the Israeli government, MKs, ministers. , Senior Public Representatives, Mayors, etc. Therefore, and taking into account the above, we address in your honor two main requirements:
1. Stop the medical experiment and the administration of vaccines to the Israeli public immediately.
2. Order the Government to take all legislative procedures that violate the principle of informed consent of a person to receive the medical treatment described above, which denies the legal status in Israel and Israeli democracy, including avoiding the green passport legislature, giving names of those not vaccinated to local authorities, or any other harm legislature.
3. Act with the utmost severity against any public, business and employment entity that violates state laws on labor or other issues required to prevent coercion, coercion or solicitation for vaccination, as well as the issue of discrimination, against those who choose not to receive the innovative medical care mentioned above.
4. We would like to note that a copy of this document will also be forwarded to media outlets around the world for breach of the Nuremberg Code. Relevant in all countries of the free world. 5.
Also,as a final remark it should be noted that only recently a decision was reached in the European Parliament on 77/1/21, ordering all authorities not to exert pressure or solicitation on people to take the vaccine in Corona in any way. Therefore, everything that is good for the advanced European countries is definitely good for Israel as well - and the balance is self-explanatory. "
Advocate Ruth Makhachovsky told Israel News:
"The experiment that Pfizer is conducting in the State of Israel was conducted in violation of the Nuremberg Code, which belongs to international criminal law and is under the jurisdiction of the court in The Hague. We are now waiting for a decision. "
🔗𝗙𝗼𝗹𝗹𝗼𝘄, 𝗦𝘂𝗯𝘀𝗰𝗿𝗶𝗯𝗲👇👇 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝘂𝗻𝗶𝘁𝗲:
https://news.1rj.ru/str/Truth_Awakening_Channel
𝙒𝙝𝙚𝙧𝙚 𝙥𝙚𝙤𝙥𝙡𝙚 𝙘𝙤𝙢𝙚 𝙩𝙤𝙜𝙚𝙩𝙝𝙚𝙧 𝙩𝙤 𝙙𝙚𝙗𝙖𝙩𝙚 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝙧𝙚𝙖𝙡 𝙩𝙧𝙪𝙩𝙝.
The Liberty Beacon | Bringing Alternative Media Sources Together™
The International Criminal Court Has Accepted Claim of Violating Nuremberg Code by Israeli Govt | The Liberty Beacon
The court at The Hague has accepted the claim filed against the Israeil govt, of violating the Nuremberg Code in its medical apartheid system using vaccines.
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🇬🇧 𝗢𝘂𝗿 𝗥𝗶𝗴𝗵𝘁 𝘁𝗼 𝗣𝗿𝗼𝘁𝗲𝘀𝘁 𝗺𝘂𝘀𝘁 𝗿𝗲𝗺𝗮𝗶𝗻 𝗼𝘂𝗿 𝗥𝗜𝗚𝗛𝗧..
𝗦𝗔𝗧𝗨𝗥𝗗𝗔𝗬 𝟮𝟬𝗧𝗛 𝗠𝗔𝗥𝗖𝗛 𝟮𝟬𝟮𝟭, 𝗧𝗢𝗚𝗘𝗧𝗛𝗘𝗥 𝗪𝗘 𝗠𝗨𝗦𝗧 𝗠𝗔𝗞𝗘 𝗢𝗨𝗥 𝗠𝗔𝗥𝗞!
𝗦𝗔𝗧𝗨𝗥𝗗𝗔𝗬 𝟮𝟬𝗧𝗛 𝗠𝗔𝗥𝗖𝗛 𝟮𝟬𝟮𝟭, 𝗧𝗢𝗚𝗘𝗧𝗛𝗘𝗥 𝗪𝗘 𝗠𝗨𝗦𝗧 𝗠𝗔𝗞𝗘 𝗢𝗨𝗥 𝗠𝗔𝗥𝗞!
🇬🇧 𝗪𝗵𝗲𝘁𝗵𝗲𝗿 𝘆𝗼𝘂 𝗹𝗶𝗸𝗲 𝗵𝗶𝗺 𝗼𝗿 𝗻𝗼𝘁, 𝘆𝗼𝘂 𝗵𝗮𝘃𝗲 𝘁𝗼 𝗵𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝗶𝘁 𝘁𝗼 𝗵𝗶𝗺. 𝗟𝗮𝗺𝗺𝘆, 𝗵𝗲 𝘂𝗻𝗱𝗲𝗿𝘀𝘁𝗮𝗻𝗱𝘀 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗿𝗶𝗴𝗵𝘁 𝘁𝗼 𝗽𝗿𝗼𝘁𝗲𝘀𝘁.
🔗𝗙𝗼𝗹𝗹𝗼𝘄, 𝗦𝘂𝗯𝘀𝗰𝗿𝗶𝗯𝗲👇👇 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝘂𝗻𝗶𝘁𝗲:
https://news.1rj.ru/str/Truth_Awakening_Channel
𝙒𝙝𝙚𝙧𝙚 𝙥𝙚𝙤𝙥𝙡𝙚 𝙘𝙤𝙢𝙚 𝙩𝙤𝙜𝙚𝙩𝙝𝙚𝙧 𝙩𝙤 𝙙𝙚𝙗𝙖𝙩𝙚 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝙧𝙚𝙖𝙡 𝙩𝙧𝙪𝙩𝙝.🤝
🔗𝗙𝗼𝗹𝗹𝗼𝘄, 𝗦𝘂𝗯𝘀𝗰𝗿𝗶𝗯𝗲👇👇 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝘂𝗻𝗶𝘁𝗲:
https://news.1rj.ru/str/Truth_Awakening_Channel
𝙒𝙝𝙚𝙧𝙚 𝙥𝙚𝙤𝙥𝙡𝙚 𝙘𝙤𝙢𝙚 𝙩𝙤𝙜𝙚𝙩𝙝𝙚𝙧 𝙩𝙤 𝙙𝙚𝙗𝙖𝙩𝙚 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝙧𝙚𝙖𝙡 𝙩𝙧𝙪𝙩𝙝.🤝
𝗨𝗦𝗔 𝗡𝗘𝗪𝗦 - 𝗩𝗜𝗘𝗪𝗣𝗢𝗜𝗡𝗧𝗦
𝗧𝗵𝗲 𝗙𝗼𝘂𝗻𝗱𝗲𝗿𝘀 𝗪𝗮𝗿𝗻𝗲𝗱 𝗨𝘀 𝗔𝗯𝗼𝘂𝘁 𝗔𝗯𝘂𝘀𝗲𝘀 𝗟𝗶𝗸𝗲 𝗛.𝗥. 𝟭
Rob Natelson - March 11, 2021
Commentary
H.R. 1, the bill that would seize control of federal elections from the states, comes with an unusual twist. It supposedly promotes “access.” But it says anyone challenging its constitutionality is barred from every court in the nation but a single federal trial court in Washington, D.C.!
Under H.R. 1, some citizens get more access than others.
Mark Twain is said to have quipped that history doesn’t repeat itself, but often rhymes. And here’s one of those rhymes: Limiting challengers to one court in the nation sounds a lot like Founding-Era warnings that if Congress could regulate its own elections it might limit voters to one polling place per state. More on that shortly.
As my last essay noted, H.R. 1 claims to rely on three sections of the Constitution, two of which probably are irrelevant. The third is the Elections Clause (Article I, Section 4, Clause 1)—more appropriately called the Times, Places, and Manner Clause. It reads as follows:
“𝑻𝒉𝒆 𝑻𝒊𝒎𝒆𝒔, 𝑷𝒍𝒂𝒄𝒆𝒔 𝒂𝒏𝒅 𝑴𝒂𝒏𝒏𝒆𝒓 𝒐𝒇 𝒉𝒐𝒍𝒅𝒊𝒏𝒈 𝑬𝒍𝒆𝒄𝒕𝒊𝒐𝒏𝒔 𝒇𝒐𝒓 𝑺𝒆𝒏𝒂𝒕𝒐𝒓𝒔 𝒂𝒏𝒅 𝑹𝒆𝒑𝒓𝒆𝒔𝒆𝒏𝒕𝒂𝒕𝒊𝒗𝒆𝒔, 𝒔𝒉𝒂𝒍𝒍 𝒃𝒆 𝒑𝒓𝒆𝒔𝒄𝒓𝒊𝒃𝒆𝒅 𝒊𝒏 𝒆𝒂𝒄𝒉 𝑺𝒕𝒂𝒕𝒆 𝒃𝒚 𝒕𝒉𝒆 𝑳𝒆𝒈𝒊𝒔𝒍𝒂𝒕𝒖𝒓𝒆 𝒕𝒉𝒆𝒓𝒆𝒐𝒇; 𝒃𝒖𝒕 𝒕𝒉𝒆 𝑪𝒐𝒏𝒈𝒓𝒆𝒔𝒔 𝒎𝒂𝒚 𝒂𝒕 𝒂𝒏𝒚 𝒕𝒊𝒎𝒆 𝒃𝒚 𝑳𝒂𝒘 𝒎𝒂𝒌𝒆 𝒐𝒓 𝒂𝒍𝒕𝒆𝒓 𝒔𝒖𝒄𝒉 𝑹𝒆𝒈𝒖𝒍𝒂𝒕𝒊𝒐𝒏𝒔 ….”
H.R. 1 quotes some out-of-context Supreme Court language to the effect that the italicized language gives Congress broad authority to overrule state election law.
But the text of the Elections Clause tells a very different story, as does its history.
The text tells us that Congress’s power applies only to congressional elections. It doesn’t apply to presidential contests, as the drafters of H.R. 1 pretend.
In addition, the text focuses principally on the power of state legislatures. It adds Congress’s authority only in a subordinate clause. This subordinate clause is what lawyers and judges—both in the Founding Era and in modern times—call a “proviso.” Provisos traditionally are interpreted narrowly, leaving the earlier language (the state legislatures’ power) to be interpreted broadly. In this case, narrow interpretation means that if there’s reasonable doubt about whether Congress has authority, the issue is decided against Congress.
Now let’s look at the history:
When the Constitution was publicly debated, the proviso giving Congress power to revise state election laws was highly controversial. Even many of the Constitution’s supporters wanted it taken out. Dr. James McClurg of Virginia, who had served at the Constitutional Convention, was one of these. Another was Noah Webster, later famous for his American dictionary. Webster wrote an influential pamphlet strongly supporting the Constitution—but demanding that the proviso be removed.
Why the concern? They understood the danger of allowing incumbent politicians to dictate the laws governing their own re-election. Experience shows that if incumbents write the rules, they write the rules to suit themselves. A glaring example is how the Democrat sponsors of H.R. 1 seek to alter state voter registration systems to their own advantage.
Skeptical Founding-Era writers explained in detail how the proviso could be abused. They pointed out, for instance, that if Congress could fix a “Place” for election, it might severely limit the number of polling places and locate them to benefit incumbents. Thus, a congressman from Philadelphia might induce his colleagues to locate only one polling place in Pennsylvania—in the congressman’s own neighborhood in Philadelphia.
Sound familiar? It’s a lot like Democrat partisans providing that the one court where H.R. 1 can be challenged is in heavily Democrat Washington, D.C.
During the constitutional debates, there was so much public resistance to the proviso that advocates became very concerned. What if these few words led the public to reject the entire Constitution?
Page 1 of 2
𝗧𝗵𝗲 𝗙𝗼𝘂𝗻𝗱𝗲𝗿𝘀 𝗪𝗮𝗿𝗻𝗲𝗱 𝗨𝘀 𝗔𝗯𝗼𝘂𝘁 𝗔𝗯𝘂𝘀𝗲𝘀 𝗟𝗶𝗸𝗲 𝗛.𝗥. 𝟭
Rob Natelson - March 11, 2021
Commentary
H.R. 1, the bill that would seize control of federal elections from the states, comes with an unusual twist. It supposedly promotes “access.” But it says anyone challenging its constitutionality is barred from every court in the nation but a single federal trial court in Washington, D.C.!
Under H.R. 1, some citizens get more access than others.
Mark Twain is said to have quipped that history doesn’t repeat itself, but often rhymes. And here’s one of those rhymes: Limiting challengers to one court in the nation sounds a lot like Founding-Era warnings that if Congress could regulate its own elections it might limit voters to one polling place per state. More on that shortly.
As my last essay noted, H.R. 1 claims to rely on three sections of the Constitution, two of which probably are irrelevant. The third is the Elections Clause (Article I, Section 4, Clause 1)—more appropriately called the Times, Places, and Manner Clause. It reads as follows:
“𝑻𝒉𝒆 𝑻𝒊𝒎𝒆𝒔, 𝑷𝒍𝒂𝒄𝒆𝒔 𝒂𝒏𝒅 𝑴𝒂𝒏𝒏𝒆𝒓 𝒐𝒇 𝒉𝒐𝒍𝒅𝒊𝒏𝒈 𝑬𝒍𝒆𝒄𝒕𝒊𝒐𝒏𝒔 𝒇𝒐𝒓 𝑺𝒆𝒏𝒂𝒕𝒐𝒓𝒔 𝒂𝒏𝒅 𝑹𝒆𝒑𝒓𝒆𝒔𝒆𝒏𝒕𝒂𝒕𝒊𝒗𝒆𝒔, 𝒔𝒉𝒂𝒍𝒍 𝒃𝒆 𝒑𝒓𝒆𝒔𝒄𝒓𝒊𝒃𝒆𝒅 𝒊𝒏 𝒆𝒂𝒄𝒉 𝑺𝒕𝒂𝒕𝒆 𝒃𝒚 𝒕𝒉𝒆 𝑳𝒆𝒈𝒊𝒔𝒍𝒂𝒕𝒖𝒓𝒆 𝒕𝒉𝒆𝒓𝒆𝒐𝒇; 𝒃𝒖𝒕 𝒕𝒉𝒆 𝑪𝒐𝒏𝒈𝒓𝒆𝒔𝒔 𝒎𝒂𝒚 𝒂𝒕 𝒂𝒏𝒚 𝒕𝒊𝒎𝒆 𝒃𝒚 𝑳𝒂𝒘 𝒎𝒂𝒌𝒆 𝒐𝒓 𝒂𝒍𝒕𝒆𝒓 𝒔𝒖𝒄𝒉 𝑹𝒆𝒈𝒖𝒍𝒂𝒕𝒊𝒐𝒏𝒔 ….”
H.R. 1 quotes some out-of-context Supreme Court language to the effect that the italicized language gives Congress broad authority to overrule state election law.
But the text of the Elections Clause tells a very different story, as does its history.
The text tells us that Congress’s power applies only to congressional elections. It doesn’t apply to presidential contests, as the drafters of H.R. 1 pretend.
In addition, the text focuses principally on the power of state legislatures. It adds Congress’s authority only in a subordinate clause. This subordinate clause is what lawyers and judges—both in the Founding Era and in modern times—call a “proviso.” Provisos traditionally are interpreted narrowly, leaving the earlier language (the state legislatures’ power) to be interpreted broadly. In this case, narrow interpretation means that if there’s reasonable doubt about whether Congress has authority, the issue is decided against Congress.
Now let’s look at the history:
When the Constitution was publicly debated, the proviso giving Congress power to revise state election laws was highly controversial. Even many of the Constitution’s supporters wanted it taken out. Dr. James McClurg of Virginia, who had served at the Constitutional Convention, was one of these. Another was Noah Webster, later famous for his American dictionary. Webster wrote an influential pamphlet strongly supporting the Constitution—but demanding that the proviso be removed.
Why the concern? They understood the danger of allowing incumbent politicians to dictate the laws governing their own re-election. Experience shows that if incumbents write the rules, they write the rules to suit themselves. A glaring example is how the Democrat sponsors of H.R. 1 seek to alter state voter registration systems to their own advantage.
Skeptical Founding-Era writers explained in detail how the proviso could be abused. They pointed out, for instance, that if Congress could fix a “Place” for election, it might severely limit the number of polling places and locate them to benefit incumbents. Thus, a congressman from Philadelphia might induce his colleagues to locate only one polling place in Pennsylvania—in the congressman’s own neighborhood in Philadelphia.
Sound familiar? It’s a lot like Democrat partisans providing that the one court where H.R. 1 can be challenged is in heavily Democrat Washington, D.C.
During the constitutional debates, there was so much public resistance to the proviso that advocates became very concerned. What if these few words led the public to reject the entire Constitution?
Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2
So advocates assured the public that Congress’s power over congressional elections would be extremely limited. They said the proviso was designed only for emergencies. As I reported in my 2010 study of the Elections Clause:
“[𝑻]𝒉𝒆 𝒑𝒓𝒐𝒑𝒐𝒏𝒆𝒏𝒕𝒔’ 𝒅𝒆𝒄𝒊𝒔𝒊𝒗𝒆 𝒂𝒓𝒈𝒖𝒎𝒆𝒏𝒕 … 𝒘𝒂𝒔 𝒐𝒏𝒆 𝒕𝒉𝒂𝒕 𝒉𝒂𝒅 𝒇𝒊𝒓𝒔𝒕 𝒃𝒆𝒆𝒏 𝒓𝒂𝒊𝒔𝒆𝒅 𝒂𝒕 𝒕𝒉𝒆 𝒇𝒆𝒅𝒆𝒓𝒂𝒍 𝒄𝒐𝒏𝒗𝒆𝒏𝒕𝒊𝒐𝒏: 𝒕𝒉𝒂𝒕 𝒕𝒉𝒆 𝑻𝒊𝒎𝒆𝒔, 𝑷𝒍𝒂𝒄𝒆𝒔 𝒂𝒏𝒅 𝑴𝒂𝒏𝒏𝒆𝒓 𝑪𝒍𝒂𝒖𝒔𝒆 𝒘𝒂𝒔 𝒏𝒆𝒆𝒅𝒆𝒅 𝒕𝒐 𝒆𝒏𝒂𝒃𝒍𝒆 𝑪𝒐𝒏𝒈𝒓𝒆𝒔𝒔 𝒕𝒐 𝒑𝒓𝒆𝒔𝒆𝒓𝒗𝒆 𝒊𝒕𝒔 𝒐𝒘𝒏 𝒆𝒙𝒊𝒔𝒕𝒆𝒏𝒄𝒆. 𝑰𝒏 𝒂𝒃𝒔𝒆𝒏𝒄𝒆 𝒐𝒇 𝒂 𝒄𝒐𝒏𝒈𝒓𝒆𝒔𝒔𝒊𝒐𝒏𝒂𝒍 𝒑𝒐𝒘𝒆𝒓 𝒕𝒐 𝒓𝒆𝒈𝒖𝒍𝒂𝒕𝒆 𝒄𝒐𝒏𝒈𝒓𝒆𝒔𝒔𝒊𝒐𝒏𝒂𝒍 𝒆𝒍𝒆𝒄𝒕𝒊𝒐𝒏𝒔, 𝒂 𝒈𝒓𝒐𝒖𝒑 𝒐𝒇 𝒔𝒕𝒂𝒕𝒆𝒔 𝒄𝒐𝒖𝒍𝒅 𝒅𝒆𝒔𝒕𝒓𝒐𝒚 𝒕𝒉𝒆 𝑯𝒐𝒖𝒔𝒆 𝒐𝒇 𝑹𝒆𝒑𝒓𝒆𝒔𝒆𝒏𝒕𝒂𝒕𝒊𝒗𝒆𝒔 𝒃𝒚 𝒓𝒆𝒇𝒖𝒔𝒊𝒏𝒈 𝒕𝒐 𝒑𝒓𝒐𝒗𝒊𝒅𝒆 𝒇𝒐𝒓 𝒕𝒉𝒐𝒔𝒆 𝒆𝒍𝒆𝒄𝒕𝒊𝒐𝒏𝒔 𝒐𝒓 𝒃𝒚 𝒄𝒓𝒆𝒂𝒕𝒊𝒏𝒈 𝒓𝒆𝒈𝒖𝒍𝒂𝒕𝒊𝒐𝒏𝒔 𝒅𝒆𝒔𝒊𝒈𝒏𝒆𝒅 𝒕𝒐 𝒔𝒂𝒃𝒐𝒕𝒂𝒈𝒆 𝒕𝒉𝒆𝒎. 𝑨𝒔 𝒂 𝒑𝒓𝒆𝒄𝒆𝒅𝒆𝒏𝒕, 𝒕𝒉𝒆 𝑭𝒆𝒅𝒆𝒓𝒂𝒍𝒊𝒔𝒕𝒔 𝒂𝒍𝒍𝒆𝒈𝒆𝒅 𝒕𝒉𝒂𝒕 𝑹𝒉𝒐𝒅𝒆 𝑰𝒔𝒍𝒂𝒏𝒅 𝒉𝒂𝒅 𝒅𝒂𝒎𝒂𝒈𝒆𝒅 𝒕𝒉𝒆 𝒐𝒑𝒆𝒓𝒂𝒕𝒊𝒐𝒏𝒔 𝒐𝒇 𝒕𝒉𝒆 𝑪𝒐𝒏𝒇𝒆𝒅𝒆𝒓𝒂𝒕𝒊𝒐𝒏 𝑪𝒐𝒏𝒈𝒓𝒆𝒔𝒔 𝒃𝒚 𝒓𝒆𝒇𝒖𝒔𝒊𝒏𝒈 𝒕𝒐 𝒔𝒆𝒏𝒅 𝒅𝒆𝒍𝒆𝒈𝒂𝒕𝒆𝒔 𝒕𝒐 𝒕𝒉𝒂𝒕 𝒃𝒐𝒅𝒚. 𝑻𝒉𝒆 𝑭𝒆𝒅𝒆𝒓𝒂𝒍𝒊𝒔𝒕𝒔 𝒎𝒂𝒅𝒆 𝒕𝒉𝒊𝒔 𝒂𝒓𝒈𝒖𝒎𝒆𝒏𝒕 𝒐𝒗𝒆𝒓 𝒂𝒏𝒅 𝒐𝒗𝒆𝒓, 𝒖𝒔𝒊𝒏𝒈 𝒊𝒕 𝒕𝒐 𝒔𝒘𝒂𝒚 𝒗𝒐𝒕𝒆𝒔 𝒊𝒏 𝒄𝒓𝒖𝒄𝒊𝒂𝒍 𝒔𝒕𝒂𝒕𝒆𝒔.”
Moreover:
“𝑰𝒏 𝑴𝒂𝒓𝒚𝒍𝒂𝒏𝒅, 𝒄𝒐𝒏𝒗𝒆𝒏𝒕𝒊𝒐𝒏 𝒅𝒆𝒍𝒆𝒈𝒂𝒕𝒆 𝑱𝒂𝒎𝒆𝒔 𝑴𝒄𝑯𝒆𝒏𝒓𝒚 𝒂𝒅𝒅𝒆𝒅 𝒕𝒉𝒂𝒕 … 𝒂𝒏 𝒊𝒏𝒔𝒖𝒓𝒓𝒆𝒄𝒕𝒊𝒐𝒏 𝒐𝒓 𝒓𝒆𝒃𝒆𝒍𝒍𝒊𝒐𝒏 𝒎𝒊𝒈𝒉𝒕 𝒑𝒓𝒆𝒗𝒆𝒏𝒕 𝒂 𝒔𝒕𝒂𝒕𝒆 𝒍𝒆𝒈𝒊𝒔𝒍𝒂𝒕𝒖𝒓𝒆 𝒇𝒓𝒐𝒎 𝒂𝒅𝒎𝒊𝒏𝒊𝒔𝒕𝒆𝒓𝒊𝒏𝒈 𝒂𝒏 𝒆𝒍𝒆𝒄𝒕𝒊𝒐𝒏. 𝑨𝒔 𝑱𝒂𝒎𝒆𝒔 𝑰𝒓𝒆𝒅𝒆𝒍𝒍 𝒕𝒐𝒍𝒅 𝒕𝒉𝒆 𝑵𝒐𝒓𝒕𝒉 𝑪𝒂𝒓𝒐𝒍𝒊𝒏𝒂 𝒓𝒂𝒕𝒊𝒇𝒚𝒊𝒏𝒈 𝒄𝒐𝒏𝒗𝒆𝒏𝒕𝒊𝒐𝒏, ‘[𝒂]𝒏 𝒐𝒄𝒄𝒂𝒔𝒊𝒐𝒏 𝒎𝒂𝒚 𝒂𝒓𝒊𝒔𝒆 𝒘𝒉𝒆𝒏 𝒕𝒉𝒆 𝒆𝒙𝒆𝒓𝒄𝒊𝒔𝒆 𝒐𝒇 𝒕𝒉𝒊𝒔 𝒖𝒍𝒕𝒊𝒎𝒂𝒕𝒆 𝒑𝒐𝒘𝒆𝒓 𝒊𝒏 𝑪𝒐𝒏𝒈𝒓𝒆𝒔𝒔 𝒎𝒂𝒚 𝒃𝒆 𝒏𝒆𝒄𝒆𝒔𝒔𝒂𝒓𝒚 … 𝒊𝒇 𝒂 𝒔𝒕𝒂𝒕𝒆 𝒔𝒉𝒐𝒖𝒍𝒅 𝒃𝒆 𝒊𝒏𝒗𝒐𝒍𝒗𝒆𝒅 𝒊𝒏 𝒘𝒂𝒓, 𝒂𝒏𝒅 𝒊𝒕𝒔 𝒍𝒆𝒈𝒊𝒔𝒍𝒂𝒕𝒖𝒓𝒆 𝒄𝒐𝒖𝒍𝒅 𝒏𝒐𝒕 𝒂𝒔𝒔𝒆𝒎𝒃𝒍𝒆, (𝒂𝒔 𝒘𝒂𝒔 𝒕𝒉𝒆 𝒄𝒂𝒔𝒆 𝒐𝒇 𝑺𝒐𝒖𝒕𝒉 𝑪𝒂𝒓𝒐𝒍𝒊𝒏𝒂, 𝒂𝒏𝒅 𝒐𝒄𝒄𝒂𝒔𝒊𝒐𝒏𝒂𝒍𝒍𝒚 𝒐𝒇 𝒔𝒐𝒎𝒆 𝒐𝒕𝒉𝒆𝒓 𝒔𝒕𝒂𝒕𝒆𝒔, 𝒅𝒖𝒓𝒊𝒏𝒈 𝒕𝒉𝒆 𝒍𝒂𝒕𝒆 𝒘𝒂𝒓).’”
Maryland’s famous jurist, Alexander Contee Hanson, added that Congress would exercise its “times, places, and manner” authority only in cases of invasion, legislative neglect, or obstinate refusal to pass election laws, or if a state crafted its election laws with a “sinister purpose” or to injure the general government. “It was never meant,” he wrote, “that congress should at any time interfere, unless on the failure of a state legislature, or to alter such regulations as may be obviously improper.”
Based on these assurances, the public accepted the proviso and ratified the Constitution.
Of course, the Constitution doesn’t actually say the proviso is limited to emergencies. But courts routinely consider the history behind a document’s words when deciding how broadly to interpret them. I explained above that the text tells us to construe the proviso narrowly. History backs this up.
Here’s an illustration of how the courts should apply Congress’s Election Clause authority. Suppose the question arises of whether “the manner of holding Elections” extends only to mechanics such as the form of the ballot, or also includes regulating campaigns. Narrow construction would give force to the Founding-Era evidence that “manner of holding” does not include campaigns.
Bottom line: The drafters of H.R. 1 were wrong to proclaim unlimited power to regulate federal elections and campaigns. On the contrary, the Elections Clause grants Congress only limited authority. A runaway Congress should never be permitted to seize more power than the Constitution gives it.
Robert G. Natelson, a former constitutional law professor, is a leading originalist scholar and senior fellow in constitutional jurisprudence at the Independence Institute in Denver. The Texas attorney general twice relied on his 2010 study of the Elections Clause in Supreme Court litigation earlier this year, and Chief Justice John Roberts used it in a 2015 Supreme Court case.
🔗 𝗥𝗲𝗮𝗱 𝗺𝗼𝗿𝗲: 𝗧𝗵𝗲 𝗘𝗽𝗼𝗰𝗵 𝗧𝗶𝗺𝗲𝘀
🔗𝗙𝗼𝗹𝗹𝗼𝘄, 𝗦𝘂𝗯𝘀𝗰𝗿𝗶𝗯𝗲👇👇 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝘂𝗻𝗶𝘁𝗲:
https://news.1rj.ru/str/Truth_Awakening_Channel
𝙒𝙝𝙚𝙧𝙚 𝙥𝙚𝙤𝙥𝙡𝙚 𝙘𝙤𝙢𝙚 𝙩𝙤𝙜𝙚𝙩𝙝𝙚𝙧 𝙩𝙤 𝙙𝙚𝙗𝙖𝙩𝙚 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝙧𝙚𝙖𝙡 𝙩𝙧𝙪𝙩𝙝.🤝
So advocates assured the public that Congress’s power over congressional elections would be extremely limited. They said the proviso was designed only for emergencies. As I reported in my 2010 study of the Elections Clause:
“[𝑻]𝒉𝒆 𝒑𝒓𝒐𝒑𝒐𝒏𝒆𝒏𝒕𝒔’ 𝒅𝒆𝒄𝒊𝒔𝒊𝒗𝒆 𝒂𝒓𝒈𝒖𝒎𝒆𝒏𝒕 … 𝒘𝒂𝒔 𝒐𝒏𝒆 𝒕𝒉𝒂𝒕 𝒉𝒂𝒅 𝒇𝒊𝒓𝒔𝒕 𝒃𝒆𝒆𝒏 𝒓𝒂𝒊𝒔𝒆𝒅 𝒂𝒕 𝒕𝒉𝒆 𝒇𝒆𝒅𝒆𝒓𝒂𝒍 𝒄𝒐𝒏𝒗𝒆𝒏𝒕𝒊𝒐𝒏: 𝒕𝒉𝒂𝒕 𝒕𝒉𝒆 𝑻𝒊𝒎𝒆𝒔, 𝑷𝒍𝒂𝒄𝒆𝒔 𝒂𝒏𝒅 𝑴𝒂𝒏𝒏𝒆𝒓 𝑪𝒍𝒂𝒖𝒔𝒆 𝒘𝒂𝒔 𝒏𝒆𝒆𝒅𝒆𝒅 𝒕𝒐 𝒆𝒏𝒂𝒃𝒍𝒆 𝑪𝒐𝒏𝒈𝒓𝒆𝒔𝒔 𝒕𝒐 𝒑𝒓𝒆𝒔𝒆𝒓𝒗𝒆 𝒊𝒕𝒔 𝒐𝒘𝒏 𝒆𝒙𝒊𝒔𝒕𝒆𝒏𝒄𝒆. 𝑰𝒏 𝒂𝒃𝒔𝒆𝒏𝒄𝒆 𝒐𝒇 𝒂 𝒄𝒐𝒏𝒈𝒓𝒆𝒔𝒔𝒊𝒐𝒏𝒂𝒍 𝒑𝒐𝒘𝒆𝒓 𝒕𝒐 𝒓𝒆𝒈𝒖𝒍𝒂𝒕𝒆 𝒄𝒐𝒏𝒈𝒓𝒆𝒔𝒔𝒊𝒐𝒏𝒂𝒍 𝒆𝒍𝒆𝒄𝒕𝒊𝒐𝒏𝒔, 𝒂 𝒈𝒓𝒐𝒖𝒑 𝒐𝒇 𝒔𝒕𝒂𝒕𝒆𝒔 𝒄𝒐𝒖𝒍𝒅 𝒅𝒆𝒔𝒕𝒓𝒐𝒚 𝒕𝒉𝒆 𝑯𝒐𝒖𝒔𝒆 𝒐𝒇 𝑹𝒆𝒑𝒓𝒆𝒔𝒆𝒏𝒕𝒂𝒕𝒊𝒗𝒆𝒔 𝒃𝒚 𝒓𝒆𝒇𝒖𝒔𝒊𝒏𝒈 𝒕𝒐 𝒑𝒓𝒐𝒗𝒊𝒅𝒆 𝒇𝒐𝒓 𝒕𝒉𝒐𝒔𝒆 𝒆𝒍𝒆𝒄𝒕𝒊𝒐𝒏𝒔 𝒐𝒓 𝒃𝒚 𝒄𝒓𝒆𝒂𝒕𝒊𝒏𝒈 𝒓𝒆𝒈𝒖𝒍𝒂𝒕𝒊𝒐𝒏𝒔 𝒅𝒆𝒔𝒊𝒈𝒏𝒆𝒅 𝒕𝒐 𝒔𝒂𝒃𝒐𝒕𝒂𝒈𝒆 𝒕𝒉𝒆𝒎. 𝑨𝒔 𝒂 𝒑𝒓𝒆𝒄𝒆𝒅𝒆𝒏𝒕, 𝒕𝒉𝒆 𝑭𝒆𝒅𝒆𝒓𝒂𝒍𝒊𝒔𝒕𝒔 𝒂𝒍𝒍𝒆𝒈𝒆𝒅 𝒕𝒉𝒂𝒕 𝑹𝒉𝒐𝒅𝒆 𝑰𝒔𝒍𝒂𝒏𝒅 𝒉𝒂𝒅 𝒅𝒂𝒎𝒂𝒈𝒆𝒅 𝒕𝒉𝒆 𝒐𝒑𝒆𝒓𝒂𝒕𝒊𝒐𝒏𝒔 𝒐𝒇 𝒕𝒉𝒆 𝑪𝒐𝒏𝒇𝒆𝒅𝒆𝒓𝒂𝒕𝒊𝒐𝒏 𝑪𝒐𝒏𝒈𝒓𝒆𝒔𝒔 𝒃𝒚 𝒓𝒆𝒇𝒖𝒔𝒊𝒏𝒈 𝒕𝒐 𝒔𝒆𝒏𝒅 𝒅𝒆𝒍𝒆𝒈𝒂𝒕𝒆𝒔 𝒕𝒐 𝒕𝒉𝒂𝒕 𝒃𝒐𝒅𝒚. 𝑻𝒉𝒆 𝑭𝒆𝒅𝒆𝒓𝒂𝒍𝒊𝒔𝒕𝒔 𝒎𝒂𝒅𝒆 𝒕𝒉𝒊𝒔 𝒂𝒓𝒈𝒖𝒎𝒆𝒏𝒕 𝒐𝒗𝒆𝒓 𝒂𝒏𝒅 𝒐𝒗𝒆𝒓, 𝒖𝒔𝒊𝒏𝒈 𝒊𝒕 𝒕𝒐 𝒔𝒘𝒂𝒚 𝒗𝒐𝒕𝒆𝒔 𝒊𝒏 𝒄𝒓𝒖𝒄𝒊𝒂𝒍 𝒔𝒕𝒂𝒕𝒆𝒔.”
Moreover:
“𝑰𝒏 𝑴𝒂𝒓𝒚𝒍𝒂𝒏𝒅, 𝒄𝒐𝒏𝒗𝒆𝒏𝒕𝒊𝒐𝒏 𝒅𝒆𝒍𝒆𝒈𝒂𝒕𝒆 𝑱𝒂𝒎𝒆𝒔 𝑴𝒄𝑯𝒆𝒏𝒓𝒚 𝒂𝒅𝒅𝒆𝒅 𝒕𝒉𝒂𝒕 … 𝒂𝒏 𝒊𝒏𝒔𝒖𝒓𝒓𝒆𝒄𝒕𝒊𝒐𝒏 𝒐𝒓 𝒓𝒆𝒃𝒆𝒍𝒍𝒊𝒐𝒏 𝒎𝒊𝒈𝒉𝒕 𝒑𝒓𝒆𝒗𝒆𝒏𝒕 𝒂 𝒔𝒕𝒂𝒕𝒆 𝒍𝒆𝒈𝒊𝒔𝒍𝒂𝒕𝒖𝒓𝒆 𝒇𝒓𝒐𝒎 𝒂𝒅𝒎𝒊𝒏𝒊𝒔𝒕𝒆𝒓𝒊𝒏𝒈 𝒂𝒏 𝒆𝒍𝒆𝒄𝒕𝒊𝒐𝒏. 𝑨𝒔 𝑱𝒂𝒎𝒆𝒔 𝑰𝒓𝒆𝒅𝒆𝒍𝒍 𝒕𝒐𝒍𝒅 𝒕𝒉𝒆 𝑵𝒐𝒓𝒕𝒉 𝑪𝒂𝒓𝒐𝒍𝒊𝒏𝒂 𝒓𝒂𝒕𝒊𝒇𝒚𝒊𝒏𝒈 𝒄𝒐𝒏𝒗𝒆𝒏𝒕𝒊𝒐𝒏, ‘[𝒂]𝒏 𝒐𝒄𝒄𝒂𝒔𝒊𝒐𝒏 𝒎𝒂𝒚 𝒂𝒓𝒊𝒔𝒆 𝒘𝒉𝒆𝒏 𝒕𝒉𝒆 𝒆𝒙𝒆𝒓𝒄𝒊𝒔𝒆 𝒐𝒇 𝒕𝒉𝒊𝒔 𝒖𝒍𝒕𝒊𝒎𝒂𝒕𝒆 𝒑𝒐𝒘𝒆𝒓 𝒊𝒏 𝑪𝒐𝒏𝒈𝒓𝒆𝒔𝒔 𝒎𝒂𝒚 𝒃𝒆 𝒏𝒆𝒄𝒆𝒔𝒔𝒂𝒓𝒚 … 𝒊𝒇 𝒂 𝒔𝒕𝒂𝒕𝒆 𝒔𝒉𝒐𝒖𝒍𝒅 𝒃𝒆 𝒊𝒏𝒗𝒐𝒍𝒗𝒆𝒅 𝒊𝒏 𝒘𝒂𝒓, 𝒂𝒏𝒅 𝒊𝒕𝒔 𝒍𝒆𝒈𝒊𝒔𝒍𝒂𝒕𝒖𝒓𝒆 𝒄𝒐𝒖𝒍𝒅 𝒏𝒐𝒕 𝒂𝒔𝒔𝒆𝒎𝒃𝒍𝒆, (𝒂𝒔 𝒘𝒂𝒔 𝒕𝒉𝒆 𝒄𝒂𝒔𝒆 𝒐𝒇 𝑺𝒐𝒖𝒕𝒉 𝑪𝒂𝒓𝒐𝒍𝒊𝒏𝒂, 𝒂𝒏𝒅 𝒐𝒄𝒄𝒂𝒔𝒊𝒐𝒏𝒂𝒍𝒍𝒚 𝒐𝒇 𝒔𝒐𝒎𝒆 𝒐𝒕𝒉𝒆𝒓 𝒔𝒕𝒂𝒕𝒆𝒔, 𝒅𝒖𝒓𝒊𝒏𝒈 𝒕𝒉𝒆 𝒍𝒂𝒕𝒆 𝒘𝒂𝒓).’”
Maryland’s famous jurist, Alexander Contee Hanson, added that Congress would exercise its “times, places, and manner” authority only in cases of invasion, legislative neglect, or obstinate refusal to pass election laws, or if a state crafted its election laws with a “sinister purpose” or to injure the general government. “It was never meant,” he wrote, “that congress should at any time interfere, unless on the failure of a state legislature, or to alter such regulations as may be obviously improper.”
Based on these assurances, the public accepted the proviso and ratified the Constitution.
Of course, the Constitution doesn’t actually say the proviso is limited to emergencies. But courts routinely consider the history behind a document’s words when deciding how broadly to interpret them. I explained above that the text tells us to construe the proviso narrowly. History backs this up.
Here’s an illustration of how the courts should apply Congress’s Election Clause authority. Suppose the question arises of whether “the manner of holding Elections” extends only to mechanics such as the form of the ballot, or also includes regulating campaigns. Narrow construction would give force to the Founding-Era evidence that “manner of holding” does not include campaigns.
Bottom line: The drafters of H.R. 1 were wrong to proclaim unlimited power to regulate federal elections and campaigns. On the contrary, the Elections Clause grants Congress only limited authority. A runaway Congress should never be permitted to seize more power than the Constitution gives it.
Robert G. Natelson, a former constitutional law professor, is a leading originalist scholar and senior fellow in constitutional jurisprudence at the Independence Institute in Denver. The Texas attorney general twice relied on his 2010 study of the Elections Clause in Supreme Court litigation earlier this year, and Chief Justice John Roberts used it in a 2015 Supreme Court case.
🔗 𝗥𝗲𝗮𝗱 𝗺𝗼𝗿𝗲: 𝗧𝗵𝗲 𝗘𝗽𝗼𝗰𝗵 𝗧𝗶𝗺𝗲𝘀
🔗𝗙𝗼𝗹𝗹𝗼𝘄, 𝗦𝘂𝗯𝘀𝗰𝗿𝗶𝗯𝗲👇👇 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝘂𝗻𝗶𝘁𝗲:
https://news.1rj.ru/str/Truth_Awakening_Channel
𝙒𝙝𝙚𝙧𝙚 𝙥𝙚𝙤𝙥𝙡𝙚 𝙘𝙤𝙢𝙚 𝙩𝙤𝙜𝙚𝙩𝙝𝙚𝙧 𝙩𝙤 𝙙𝙚𝙗𝙖𝙩𝙚 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝙧𝙚𝙖𝙡 𝙩𝙧𝙪𝙩𝙝.🤝
The Epoch Times
The Founders Warned Us About Abuses Like H.R. 1
Commentary H.R. 1, the bill that would seize control of federal elections from the states, comes with an ...
𝗨𝗦𝗔 𝗡𝗘𝗪𝗦 - 𝗖𝗢𝗡𝗚𝗥𝗘𝗦𝗦
𝗚𝗢𝗣 𝗛𝗼𝘂𝘀𝗲 𝗠𝗲𝗺𝗯𝗲𝗿𝘀 𝗜𝗻𝘁𝗿𝗼𝗱𝘂𝗰𝗲 𝗕𝗶𝗹𝗹 𝘁𝗼 𝗥𝗲𝗶𝗻 𝗶𝗻 𝗕𝗶𝗱𝗲𝗻’𝘀 𝗥𝗲𝗴𝘂𝗹𝗮𝘁𝗼𝗿𝘆 𝗣𝗹𝗮𝗻𝘀
𝗕𝗬 𝗝𝗔𝗡𝗜𝗧𝗔 𝗞𝗔𝗡 𝗠𝗮𝗿𝗰𝗵 𝟭𝟮, 𝟮𝟬𝟮𝟭
A group of Republican House members this week introduced a bill aimed at preventing overreach by the executive branch in substituting Congress-passed laws with its own rulemaking. This comes about two months after the Senate introduced an identical bill.
The bill, known as the Regulations from the Executive In Need of Scrutiny (REINS) Act of 2021, seeks to affirm Congress’s legislative power by requiring every new “major rule” proposed by federal agencies be approved by both the House and Senate before they can be enforced.
The proposed law defines “major rule” as any federal rule or regulation that may result in an annual effect on the economy of $100 million or more; a major increase in costs or prices for consumers, individual industries, government agencies, or geographic regions; or cause significant adverse effects on competition, employment, investment, productivity, innovation, or the ability of U.S.-based enterprises to compete with foreign-based enterprises.
The bill was introduced by Rep. Kat Cammack (R-Fla.) and co-sponsored by more than two dozen House lawmakers, including Judiciary Committee Ranking Member Jim Jordan (R-Ohio) and Rep. Matt Gaetz (R-Fla.).
“The REINS Act is a measure that ensures Congress is the only lawmaker in the United States. This bill reasserts Article I authority that vests all legislative power in Congress and provides necessary oversight of the executive rulemaking process,” Cammack said in a statement on Wednesday.
“It’s about making sure the executive branch does not unduly overstep its vested authority through a necessary system of checks and balances.”
Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) introduced an identical Senate version of the bill in January. His office explained at the time that under the REINS Act, once a major rule is drafted, it would trigger a process that would require both chambers of Congress to approve and then be signed by the president. This requirement, he said, would satisfy the “bicameralism and presentment requirements of the Constitution.”
“For too long, an ever-growing federal bureaucracy has piled regulations and red tape on the backs of the American people without any approval by Americans’ elected representatives,” Paul said in the statement.
The White House did not immediately respond to a request for comment from The Epoch Times.
In an interview with The Epoch Times’ American Thought Leaders last year, Sen. Mike Lee (R-Utah) said Congress has itself to blame for overreach by the judicial and executive branches.
Congress has in many instances surrendered its legislating authority to the executive branch of government, he said. This has led to the executive, the judiciary, and administrative agencies expanding their reach in order to fill the void left by lawmakers.
“The far more common type involves a delegation to the executive branch. We pass a law that says, in effect, we shall have good law in area X and we hereby delegate to commission or department or division Y the power to make and interpret and enforce rules carrying the force of generally applicable federal law in that area,” Lee said. “And from that moment forward, that division or department, or commission, is the lawmaker, and is also the law enforcer.”
Meanwhile, states have also cautioned Biden and his administration from engaging in federal overreach that could contravene the state’s authority to enact laws or violate various constitutional rights.
Six attorneys general wrote a letter to Biden in January to put his administration on notice that any actions that might exceed their statutory authority, are inconsistent with constitutional tenets, or place civil liberties at risk could trigger legal action by the states.
Page 1 of 2
𝗚𝗢𝗣 𝗛𝗼𝘂𝘀𝗲 𝗠𝗲𝗺𝗯𝗲𝗿𝘀 𝗜𝗻𝘁𝗿𝗼𝗱𝘂𝗰𝗲 𝗕𝗶𝗹𝗹 𝘁𝗼 𝗥𝗲𝗶𝗻 𝗶𝗻 𝗕𝗶𝗱𝗲𝗻’𝘀 𝗥𝗲𝗴𝘂𝗹𝗮𝘁𝗼𝗿𝘆 𝗣𝗹𝗮𝗻𝘀
𝗕𝗬 𝗝𝗔𝗡𝗜𝗧𝗔 𝗞𝗔𝗡 𝗠𝗮𝗿𝗰𝗵 𝟭𝟮, 𝟮𝟬𝟮𝟭
A group of Republican House members this week introduced a bill aimed at preventing overreach by the executive branch in substituting Congress-passed laws with its own rulemaking. This comes about two months after the Senate introduced an identical bill.
The bill, known as the Regulations from the Executive In Need of Scrutiny (REINS) Act of 2021, seeks to affirm Congress’s legislative power by requiring every new “major rule” proposed by federal agencies be approved by both the House and Senate before they can be enforced.
The proposed law defines “major rule” as any federal rule or regulation that may result in an annual effect on the economy of $100 million or more; a major increase in costs or prices for consumers, individual industries, government agencies, or geographic regions; or cause significant adverse effects on competition, employment, investment, productivity, innovation, or the ability of U.S.-based enterprises to compete with foreign-based enterprises.
The bill was introduced by Rep. Kat Cammack (R-Fla.) and co-sponsored by more than two dozen House lawmakers, including Judiciary Committee Ranking Member Jim Jordan (R-Ohio) and Rep. Matt Gaetz (R-Fla.).
“The REINS Act is a measure that ensures Congress is the only lawmaker in the United States. This bill reasserts Article I authority that vests all legislative power in Congress and provides necessary oversight of the executive rulemaking process,” Cammack said in a statement on Wednesday.
“It’s about making sure the executive branch does not unduly overstep its vested authority through a necessary system of checks and balances.”
Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) introduced an identical Senate version of the bill in January. His office explained at the time that under the REINS Act, once a major rule is drafted, it would trigger a process that would require both chambers of Congress to approve and then be signed by the president. This requirement, he said, would satisfy the “bicameralism and presentment requirements of the Constitution.”
“For too long, an ever-growing federal bureaucracy has piled regulations and red tape on the backs of the American people without any approval by Americans’ elected representatives,” Paul said in the statement.
The White House did not immediately respond to a request for comment from The Epoch Times.
In an interview with The Epoch Times’ American Thought Leaders last year, Sen. Mike Lee (R-Utah) said Congress has itself to blame for overreach by the judicial and executive branches.
Congress has in many instances surrendered its legislating authority to the executive branch of government, he said. This has led to the executive, the judiciary, and administrative agencies expanding their reach in order to fill the void left by lawmakers.
“The far more common type involves a delegation to the executive branch. We pass a law that says, in effect, we shall have good law in area X and we hereby delegate to commission or department or division Y the power to make and interpret and enforce rules carrying the force of generally applicable federal law in that area,” Lee said. “And from that moment forward, that division or department, or commission, is the lawmaker, and is also the law enforcer.”
Meanwhile, states have also cautioned Biden and his administration from engaging in federal overreach that could contravene the state’s authority to enact laws or violate various constitutional rights.
Six attorneys general wrote a letter to Biden in January to put his administration on notice that any actions that might exceed their statutory authority, are inconsistent with constitutional tenets, or place civil liberties at risk could trigger legal action by the states.
Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2
“We stand ready to meet with your administration to discuss more how the issues below affect our States; litigation is never first option, and we would like to help your team in its important job on behalf of all Americans, consistent with the Constitution and the rule of law,” West Virginia Attorney General Patrick Morrisey, who is leading the group, wrote in the letter addressed to the White House (pdf).
“Yet, if you sign unconstitutional laws passed by Congress, it will be our responsibility and duty to challenge those laws in court. If cabinet officials, executive officers, and agencies go beyond the bounds of their statutory authority, fail to follow legally required procedures, or fall short of the bedrock Administrative Procedure Act obligation of reasoned decision making, it will likewise be our responsibility to take action.”
The Administrative Procedure Act is a federal law that governs the process for agency rulemaking and has been frequently invoked to challenge executive branch rules and regulations.
Follow Janita on Twitter: @janitakan
🔗 𝗥𝗲𝗮𝗱 𝗺𝗼𝗿𝗲: 𝗧𝗵𝗲 𝗘𝗽𝗼𝗰𝗵 𝗧𝗶𝗺𝗲𝘀
🔗𝗙𝗼𝗹𝗹𝗼𝘄, 𝗦𝘂𝗯𝘀𝗰𝗿𝗶𝗯𝗲👇👇 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝘂𝗻𝗶𝘁𝗲:
https://news.1rj.ru/str/Truth_Awakening_Channel
𝙒𝙝𝙚𝙧𝙚 𝙥𝙚𝙤𝙥𝙡𝙚 𝙘𝙤𝙢𝙚 𝙩𝙤𝙜𝙚𝙩𝙝𝙚𝙧 𝙩𝙤 𝙙𝙚𝙗𝙖𝙩𝙚 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝙧𝙚𝙖𝙡 𝙩𝙧𝙪𝙩𝙝.🤝
“We stand ready to meet with your administration to discuss more how the issues below affect our States; litigation is never first option, and we would like to help your team in its important job on behalf of all Americans, consistent with the Constitution and the rule of law,” West Virginia Attorney General Patrick Morrisey, who is leading the group, wrote in the letter addressed to the White House (pdf).
“Yet, if you sign unconstitutional laws passed by Congress, it will be our responsibility and duty to challenge those laws in court. If cabinet officials, executive officers, and agencies go beyond the bounds of their statutory authority, fail to follow legally required procedures, or fall short of the bedrock Administrative Procedure Act obligation of reasoned decision making, it will likewise be our responsibility to take action.”
The Administrative Procedure Act is a federal law that governs the process for agency rulemaking and has been frequently invoked to challenge executive branch rules and regulations.
Follow Janita on Twitter: @janitakan
🔗 𝗥𝗲𝗮𝗱 𝗺𝗼𝗿𝗲: 𝗧𝗵𝗲 𝗘𝗽𝗼𝗰𝗵 𝗧𝗶𝗺𝗲𝘀
🔗𝗙𝗼𝗹𝗹𝗼𝘄, 𝗦𝘂𝗯𝘀𝗰𝗿𝗶𝗯𝗲👇👇 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝘂𝗻𝗶𝘁𝗲:
https://news.1rj.ru/str/Truth_Awakening_Channel
𝙒𝙝𝙚𝙧𝙚 𝙥𝙚𝙤𝙥𝙡𝙚 𝙘𝙤𝙢𝙚 𝙩𝙤𝙜𝙚𝙩𝙝𝙚𝙧 𝙩𝙤 𝙙𝙚𝙗𝙖𝙩𝙚 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝙧𝙚𝙖𝙡 𝙩𝙧𝙪𝙩𝙝.🤝
The Epoch Times
GOP House Members Introduce Bill to Rein in Biden’s Regulatory Plans
A group of Republican House members this week introduced a bill aimed at preventing overreach by the executive branch in substituting Congress-passed laws with its rulemaking.
🌎 𝗖𝗼𝗹𝗹𝗲𝗰𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻 𝗼𝗳 𝗘𝘃𝗶𝗱𝗲𝗻𝗰𝗲 𝗢𝗳 𝗖𝗼𝘃𝗶𝗱-𝟭𝟵 𝗩𝗮𝗰𝗰𝗶𝗻𝗲 𝗔𝗱𝘃𝗲𝗿𝘀𝗲 𝗥𝗲𝗮𝗰𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻𝘀 𝗔𝗻𝗱 𝗗𝗲𝗮𝘁𝗵𝘀:
(Official Data)
COVID-19 vaccine AstraZeneca analysis print (as of 31/01/21) -
https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/960151/COVID-19_AstraZeneca_Vaccine_Analysis_Print.pdf
(Official Data)
COVID-19 mRNA Pfizer- BioNTech vaccine analysis print (as of 31/01/21) -
https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/962405/COVID-19_mRNA_Pfizer-_BioNTech_Vaccine_Analysis_Print.pdf
(Official Data)
UK Yellowcard Reporting Scheme -
https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/coronavirus-covid-19-vaccine-adverse-reactions/coronavirus-vaccine-summary-of-yellow-card-reporting
(Official Data)
VAERS US Reporting System (as of 12/02/21) -
https://cutt.ly/JzKyx3T
(Official Data)
CDC Covid-19 vaccine reactions and adverse events -
https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/covid-19/info-by-product/moderna/reactogenicity.html
(Peer-Reviewed Study)
(Informed consent disclosure to vaccine trial subjects of risk of COVID-19 vaccines worsening clinical disease) -
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33113270/
(Peer-Reviewed Study)
(Pathogenic priming likely contributes to serious and critical illness and mortality in COVID-19 via autoimmunity) -
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7142689/
(Video)
India 580 adverse reactions, 7 hospitalised and 2 deaths on day 3 of Covid-19 vaccine roll-out -
https://www.bitchute.com/video/F6A68ffcTWom/
(Video)
Doctors and health experts advising against having the Covid-19 vaccines -
https://www.bitchute.com/video/21d5Z6GIxeAj/
(Video)
Panel of doctors with the backing of 87,000+ doctors and nurses exposing the pandemic hoax -
https://www.bitchute.com/video/GrAmcLjZymKa/
(Video)
Doctors in Germany warning not to get the vaccine -
https://brandnewtube.com/watch/doctors-in-germany-warning-do-not-get-vaccinated_QaXxH1yZmmWe8wt.html
(Video)
Doctor Carrie Madej warning about the potential horrors of the experimental Covid-19 vaccines -
https://ourtube.co.uk/watch/NrdNL9ri9van4sS
(Video)
Molecular Biologist/Immunologist Professor Dolores Cahill warning of why people will potentially start dying enmasse due to having the Covid-19 vaccines -
https://ourtube.co.uk/watch/hh3xX37bWh5NFdT
(Video)
Woman suffering serious adverse reaction from Moderna Covid-19 Vaccine -
https://ourtube.co.uk/watch/BE4ZzloPXNKtb4J
(Video)
Woman suffering serious adverse reaction from Pfizer Covid-19 vaccine -
https://ourtube.co.uk/watch/TBlW18XZo6YU3sC
(Video)
Woman injured in the Covid-19 vaccine trials -
https://ourtube.co.uk/watch/BbftE8ZG6HGtIwZ
(Video)
Multiple people having adverse reactions to the Covid-19 vaccines -
https://ourtube.co.uk/watch/Budd
(News Article)
46 Residents in Spanish nursing home die after receiving Covid-19 vaccine -
https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/46-residents-in-spanish-nursing-home-die-after-receiving-covid-19-vaccine
(News Article)
23 Covid-19 vaccine deaths elderly residents of Norwegian care home -
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-9151341/Norway-adjusts-advice-vaccine-deaths-isnt-alarmed.html
(News Article)
"Pfizer Covid-19 vaccine is causing more allergic reactions than expected" - Top scientist with Operation Warp Speed -
https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/13572052/pfizer-covid-vaccine-allergic-reactions-study-more-expected/
(News Article)
CDC: Moderna's Covid-19 vaccine can cause allergic reaction in some people -
https://www.marketwatch.com/story/cdc-modernas-covid-19-vaccine-can-cause-allergic-reaction-in-some-people-2021-01-25?utm_source=zergnet.com&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=zergnet_6197094
(News Article)
Gibraltar 53 dead in 10 days after having Pfizer Covid-19 vaccine -
https://healthimpactnews.com/2021/53-dead-in-gibraltar-in-10-days-after-experimental-pfizer-mrna-covid-injections-started/print/
Page 1 of 2
(Official Data)
COVID-19 vaccine AstraZeneca analysis print (as of 31/01/21) -
https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/960151/COVID-19_AstraZeneca_Vaccine_Analysis_Print.pdf
(Official Data)
COVID-19 mRNA Pfizer- BioNTech vaccine analysis print (as of 31/01/21) -
https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/962405/COVID-19_mRNA_Pfizer-_BioNTech_Vaccine_Analysis_Print.pdf
(Official Data)
UK Yellowcard Reporting Scheme -
https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/coronavirus-covid-19-vaccine-adverse-reactions/coronavirus-vaccine-summary-of-yellow-card-reporting
(Official Data)
VAERS US Reporting System (as of 12/02/21) -
https://cutt.ly/JzKyx3T
(Official Data)
CDC Covid-19 vaccine reactions and adverse events -
https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/covid-19/info-by-product/moderna/reactogenicity.html
(Peer-Reviewed Study)
(Informed consent disclosure to vaccine trial subjects of risk of COVID-19 vaccines worsening clinical disease) -
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33113270/
(Peer-Reviewed Study)
(Pathogenic priming likely contributes to serious and critical illness and mortality in COVID-19 via autoimmunity) -
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7142689/
(Video)
India 580 adverse reactions, 7 hospitalised and 2 deaths on day 3 of Covid-19 vaccine roll-out -
https://www.bitchute.com/video/F6A68ffcTWom/
(Video)
Doctors and health experts advising against having the Covid-19 vaccines -
https://www.bitchute.com/video/21d5Z6GIxeAj/
(Video)
Panel of doctors with the backing of 87,000+ doctors and nurses exposing the pandemic hoax -
https://www.bitchute.com/video/GrAmcLjZymKa/
(Video)
Doctors in Germany warning not to get the vaccine -
https://brandnewtube.com/watch/doctors-in-germany-warning-do-not-get-vaccinated_QaXxH1yZmmWe8wt.html
(Video)
Doctor Carrie Madej warning about the potential horrors of the experimental Covid-19 vaccines -
https://ourtube.co.uk/watch/NrdNL9ri9van4sS
(Video)
Molecular Biologist/Immunologist Professor Dolores Cahill warning of why people will potentially start dying enmasse due to having the Covid-19 vaccines -
https://ourtube.co.uk/watch/hh3xX37bWh5NFdT
(Video)
Woman suffering serious adverse reaction from Moderna Covid-19 Vaccine -
https://ourtube.co.uk/watch/BE4ZzloPXNKtb4J
(Video)
Woman suffering serious adverse reaction from Pfizer Covid-19 vaccine -
https://ourtube.co.uk/watch/TBlW18XZo6YU3sC
(Video)
Woman injured in the Covid-19 vaccine trials -
https://ourtube.co.uk/watch/BbftE8ZG6HGtIwZ
(Video)
Multiple people having adverse reactions to the Covid-19 vaccines -
https://ourtube.co.uk/watch/Budd
(News Article)
46 Residents in Spanish nursing home die after receiving Covid-19 vaccine -
https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/46-residents-in-spanish-nursing-home-die-after-receiving-covid-19-vaccine
(News Article)
23 Covid-19 vaccine deaths elderly residents of Norwegian care home -
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-9151341/Norway-adjusts-advice-vaccine-deaths-isnt-alarmed.html
(News Article)
"Pfizer Covid-19 vaccine is causing more allergic reactions than expected" - Top scientist with Operation Warp Speed -
https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/13572052/pfizer-covid-vaccine-allergic-reactions-study-more-expected/
(News Article)
CDC: Moderna's Covid-19 vaccine can cause allergic reaction in some people -
https://www.marketwatch.com/story/cdc-modernas-covid-19-vaccine-can-cause-allergic-reaction-in-some-people-2021-01-25?utm_source=zergnet.com&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=zergnet_6197094
(News Article)
Gibraltar 53 dead in 10 days after having Pfizer Covid-19 vaccine -
https://healthimpactnews.com/2021/53-dead-in-gibraltar-in-10-days-after-experimental-pfizer-mrna-covid-injections-started/print/
Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2
(News Article)
Doctor in Florida dies after getting Pfizer Covid-19 vaccine - https://www.nytimes.com/2021/01/12/health/covid-vaccine-death.html
(News Article)
Healthcare worker dies after 2nd dose of Covid-19 Vaccine -
https://www.ocregister.com/2021/01/26/health-care-worker-dies-after-second-dose-of-covid-vaccine-investigations-underway/
(News Article)
Elderly man in Michigan dies after getting Moderna Covid-19 vaccine -
https://www.msn.com/en-us/health/medical/macomb-county-man-90-dies-after-covid-19-vaccine-e2-80-94-but-doctors-say-shots-are-safe/ar-BB1dNBfi
(News Article)
Elderly man collapses and dies shortly after getting Covid-19 vaccine at Javits Center NY -
https://nypost.com/2021/02/07/elderly-man-collapses-dies-shortly-after-getting-covid-19-vaccine-at-javits-center/
🔗𝗙𝗼𝗹𝗹𝗼𝘄, 𝗦𝘂𝗯𝘀𝗰𝗿𝗶𝗯𝗲👇👇 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝘂𝗻𝗶𝘁𝗲:
https://news.1rj.ru/str/Truth_Awakening_Channel
𝙒𝙝𝙚𝙧𝙚 𝙥𝙚𝙤𝙥𝙡𝙚 𝙘𝙤𝙢𝙚 𝙩𝙤𝙜𝙚𝙩𝙝𝙚𝙧 𝙩𝙤 𝙙𝙚𝙗𝙖𝙩𝙚 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝙧𝙚𝙖𝙡 𝙩𝙧𝙪𝙩𝙝.🤝
(News Article)
Doctor in Florida dies after getting Pfizer Covid-19 vaccine - https://www.nytimes.com/2021/01/12/health/covid-vaccine-death.html
(News Article)
Healthcare worker dies after 2nd dose of Covid-19 Vaccine -
https://www.ocregister.com/2021/01/26/health-care-worker-dies-after-second-dose-of-covid-vaccine-investigations-underway/
(News Article)
Elderly man in Michigan dies after getting Moderna Covid-19 vaccine -
https://www.msn.com/en-us/health/medical/macomb-county-man-90-dies-after-covid-19-vaccine-e2-80-94-but-doctors-say-shots-are-safe/ar-BB1dNBfi
(News Article)
Elderly man collapses and dies shortly after getting Covid-19 vaccine at Javits Center NY -
https://nypost.com/2021/02/07/elderly-man-collapses-dies-shortly-after-getting-covid-19-vaccine-at-javits-center/
🔗𝗙𝗼𝗹𝗹𝗼𝘄, 𝗦𝘂𝗯𝘀𝗰𝗿𝗶𝗯𝗲👇👇 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝘂𝗻𝗶𝘁𝗲:
https://news.1rj.ru/str/Truth_Awakening_Channel
𝙒𝙝𝙚𝙧𝙚 𝙥𝙚𝙤𝙥𝙡𝙚 𝙘𝙤𝙢𝙚 𝙩𝙤𝙜𝙚𝙩𝙝𝙚𝙧 𝙩𝙤 𝙙𝙚𝙗𝙖𝙩𝙚 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝙧𝙚𝙖𝙡 𝙩𝙧𝙪𝙩𝙝.🤝
NY Times
Doctor’s Death After Covid Vaccine Is Being Investigated (Published 2021)
A Florida physician developed an unusual blood disorder shortly after he received the Pfizer vaccine. It is not yet known if the shot is linked to the illness.
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
𝗧𝗵𝗲 𝗘𝘃𝗶𝗹 𝗼𝗳 𝗚𝗮𝘁𝗲𝘀 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝗘𝗽𝘀𝘁𝗲𝗶𝗻...
🔗𝗙𝗼𝗹𝗹𝗼𝘄, 𝗦𝘂𝗯𝘀𝗰𝗿𝗶𝗯𝗲👇👇 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝘂𝗻𝗶𝘁𝗲:
https://news.1rj.ru/str/Truth_Awakening_Channel
𝙒𝙝𝙚𝙧𝙚 𝙥𝙚𝙤𝙥𝙡𝙚 𝙘𝙤𝙢𝙚 𝙩𝙤𝙜𝙚𝙩𝙝𝙚𝙧 𝙩𝙤 𝙙𝙚𝙗𝙖𝙩𝙚 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝙧𝙚𝙖𝙡 𝙩𝙧𝙪𝙩𝙝.🤝
🔗𝗙𝗼𝗹𝗹𝗼𝘄, 𝗦𝘂𝗯𝘀𝗰𝗿𝗶𝗯𝗲👇👇 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝘂𝗻𝗶𝘁𝗲:
https://news.1rj.ru/str/Truth_Awakening_Channel
𝙒𝙝𝙚𝙧𝙚 𝙥𝙚𝙤𝙥𝙡𝙚 𝙘𝙤𝙢𝙚 𝙩𝙤𝙜𝙚𝙩𝙝𝙚𝙧 𝙩𝙤 𝙙𝙚𝙗𝙖𝙩𝙚 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝙧𝙚𝙖𝙡 𝙩𝙧𝙪𝙩𝙝.🤝
𝗨𝗦𝗔 𝗡𝗘𝗪𝗦 - 𝗣𝗿𝗲𝘀𝗶𝗱𝗲𝗻𝘁 𝗗𝗼𝗻𝗮𝗹𝗱 𝗧𝗿𝘂𝗺𝗽’𝘀 𝗱𝗲𝗽𝗮𝗿𝘁𝘂𝗿𝗲 𝗳𝗿𝗼𝗺 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗪𝗵𝗶𝘁𝗲 𝗛𝗼𝘂𝘀𝗲 𝗵𝗮𝘀 𝗰𝗼𝗶𝗻𝗰𝗶𝗱𝗲𝗱 𝘄𝗶𝘁𝗵 𝗮 𝘀𝗵𝗮𝗿𝗽 𝗱𝗲𝗰𝗹𝗶𝗻𝗲 𝗶𝗻 𝘃𝗶𝗲𝘄𝗲𝗿𝘀𝗵𝗶𝗽 𝗳𝗼𝗿 𝗻𝘂𝗺𝗲𝗿𝗼𝘂𝘀 𝗽𝗿𝗶𝗺𝗲𝘁𝗶𝗺𝗲 𝗰𝗮𝗯𝗹𝗲 𝗻𝗲𝘄𝘀 𝘀𝗵𝗼𝘄𝘀, 𝗮 𝗩𝗜𝗣 𝗮𝗻𝗮𝗹𝘆𝘀𝗶𝘀 𝘀𝗵𝗼𝘄𝗲𝗱.
The size of the audience watching “CNN Tonight With Don Lemon” between March 1-5 was down by -32.5% compared to the average audience between Nov. 30-Dec. 4, 2020, before President Joe Biden’s inauguration and Trump’s impeachment trial, VIP showed in its analysis.
🔗 𝗥𝗘𝗔𝗗 𝗠𝗢𝗥𝗘: 𝗗𝗮𝗶𝗹𝘆 𝗖𝗮𝗹𝗹𝗲𝗿
🔗𝗙𝗼𝗹𝗹𝗼𝘄, 𝗦𝘂𝗯𝘀𝗰𝗿𝗶𝗯𝗲👇👇 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝘂𝗻𝗶𝘁𝗲:
@Truth_Awakening_Channel
𝙒𝙝𝙚𝙧𝙚 𝙥𝙚𝙤𝙥𝙡𝙚 𝙘𝙤𝙢𝙚 𝙩𝙤𝙜𝙚𝙩𝙝𝙚𝙧 𝙩𝙤 𝙙𝙚𝙗𝙖𝙩𝙚 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝙧𝙚𝙖𝙡 𝙩𝙧𝙪𝙩𝙝.🤝
The size of the audience watching “CNN Tonight With Don Lemon” between March 1-5 was down by -32.5% compared to the average audience between Nov. 30-Dec. 4, 2020, before President Joe Biden’s inauguration and Trump’s impeachment trial, VIP showed in its analysis.
🔗 𝗥𝗘𝗔𝗗 𝗠𝗢𝗥𝗘: 𝗗𝗮𝗶𝗹𝘆 𝗖𝗮𝗹𝗹𝗲𝗿
🔗𝗙𝗼𝗹𝗹𝗼𝘄, 𝗦𝘂𝗯𝘀𝗰𝗿𝗶𝗯𝗲👇👇 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝘂𝗻𝗶𝘁𝗲:
@Truth_Awakening_Channel
𝙒𝙝𝙚𝙧𝙚 𝙥𝙚𝙤𝙥𝙡𝙚 𝙘𝙤𝙢𝙚 𝙩𝙤𝙜𝙚𝙩𝙝𝙚𝙧 𝙩𝙤 𝙙𝙚𝙗𝙖𝙩𝙚 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝙧𝙚𝙖𝙡 𝙩𝙧𝙪𝙩𝙝.🤝
The Daily Caller
The Numbers Are In: Trump’s Exit From The World Stage Led To A Network Ratings Bloodletting
Former President Donald Trump’s departure from the White House has coincided with sharp audience decreases for numerous prime time cable news shows.
𝗜𝗢𝗖 𝗔𝗰𝗰𝗲𝗽𝘁𝘀 𝗖𝗖𝗣’𝘀 𝗢𝗳𝗳𝗲𝗿 𝗼𝗳 𝗖𝗵𝗶𝗻𝗮-𝗠𝗮𝗱𝗲 𝗩𝗮𝗰𝗰𝗶𝗻𝗲𝘀, 𝗧𝗲𝗮𝗺 𝗝𝗮𝗽𝗮𝗻 𝗪𝗼𝗻’𝘁 𝗧𝗮𝗸𝗲 𝗧𝗵𝗲𝗺
𝗕𝗬 𝗔𝗟𝗘𝗫 𝗪𝗨
𝗠𝗮𝗿𝗰𝗵 𝟭𝟰, 𝟮𝟬𝟮𝟭
President of the International Olympic Committee (IOC) Thomas Bach announced on March 11 that the IOC has agreed to purchase China’s COVID-19 vaccine to administer to willing participants of the Tokyo Olympics this summer and the Beijing Winter Olympics in 2022.
The Japanese Olympic Committee said Japan was not consulted regarding the decision by the IOC and later announced that Team Japan will not be taking the China-made vaccines. The vaccine is not approved for use in Japan.
Two Olympic events will be held in the next eight months—the postponed Tokyo Games and the 2022 Beijing Winter Games. The IOC has said it will pay for Chinese vaccines for the teams participating in the Olympic games but didn’t give any information regarding the cost or quantity. Bach also said that distribution of China vaccine will be through international agencies or existing vaccine agreements that countries have with China, according to The Associated Press.
There are about 11,000 athletes participating in the Summer Olympics not counting their coaches, media, volunteers, and officials. Bach said that the Chinese Olympic Committee had promised it would provide as many vaccines as needed.
The Chinese regime made the vaccine offer to the IOC amidst internationals call for boycotting the Beijing Winter Olympics in light of its genocidal campaign against Uyghurs and other minorities in China’s Xinjiang. Alongside the United States designating the persecution of Uyghurs as genocide by the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), more than 100 international human rights organizations and many politicians in the Western countries have called on countries around the world to boycott the Beijing Winter Olympics.
China has been actively pushing efforts of vaccine diplomacy using doses made by Chinese companies Sinovac and Sinopharm. A government spokesman said early this month during the regime’s annual “two sessions” national government meetings that China has already provided COVID-19 vaccines to more than 60 countries.
🔗𝗥𝗘𝗔𝗗 𝗠𝗢𝗥𝗘: 𝗘𝗽𝗼𝗰𝗵 𝗧𝗶𝗺𝗲𝘀
🔗𝗙𝗼𝗹𝗹𝗼𝘄, 𝗦𝘂𝗯𝘀𝗰𝗿𝗶𝗯𝗲👇👇 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝘂𝗻𝗶𝘁𝗲:
@Truth_Awakening_Channel
𝙒𝙝𝙚𝙧𝙚 𝙥𝙚𝙤𝙥𝙡𝙚 𝙘𝙤𝙢𝙚 𝙩𝙤𝙜𝙚𝙩𝙝𝙚𝙧 𝙩𝙤 𝙙𝙚𝙗𝙖𝙩𝙚 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝙧𝙚𝙖𝙡 𝙩𝙧𝙪𝙩𝙝.🤝
𝗕𝗬 𝗔𝗟𝗘𝗫 𝗪𝗨
𝗠𝗮𝗿𝗰𝗵 𝟭𝟰, 𝟮𝟬𝟮𝟭
President of the International Olympic Committee (IOC) Thomas Bach announced on March 11 that the IOC has agreed to purchase China’s COVID-19 vaccine to administer to willing participants of the Tokyo Olympics this summer and the Beijing Winter Olympics in 2022.
The Japanese Olympic Committee said Japan was not consulted regarding the decision by the IOC and later announced that Team Japan will not be taking the China-made vaccines. The vaccine is not approved for use in Japan.
Two Olympic events will be held in the next eight months—the postponed Tokyo Games and the 2022 Beijing Winter Games. The IOC has said it will pay for Chinese vaccines for the teams participating in the Olympic games but didn’t give any information regarding the cost or quantity. Bach also said that distribution of China vaccine will be through international agencies or existing vaccine agreements that countries have with China, according to The Associated Press.
There are about 11,000 athletes participating in the Summer Olympics not counting their coaches, media, volunteers, and officials. Bach said that the Chinese Olympic Committee had promised it would provide as many vaccines as needed.
The Chinese regime made the vaccine offer to the IOC amidst internationals call for boycotting the Beijing Winter Olympics in light of its genocidal campaign against Uyghurs and other minorities in China’s Xinjiang. Alongside the United States designating the persecution of Uyghurs as genocide by the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), more than 100 international human rights organizations and many politicians in the Western countries have called on countries around the world to boycott the Beijing Winter Olympics.
China has been actively pushing efforts of vaccine diplomacy using doses made by Chinese companies Sinovac and Sinopharm. A government spokesman said early this month during the regime’s annual “two sessions” national government meetings that China has already provided COVID-19 vaccines to more than 60 countries.
🔗𝗥𝗘𝗔𝗗 𝗠𝗢𝗥𝗘: 𝗘𝗽𝗼𝗰𝗵 𝗧𝗶𝗺𝗲𝘀
🔗𝗙𝗼𝗹𝗹𝗼𝘄, 𝗦𝘂𝗯𝘀𝗰𝗿𝗶𝗯𝗲👇👇 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝘂𝗻𝗶𝘁𝗲:
@Truth_Awakening_Channel
𝙒𝙝𝙚𝙧𝙚 𝙥𝙚𝙤𝙥𝙡𝙚 𝙘𝙤𝙢𝙚 𝙩𝙤𝙜𝙚𝙩𝙝𝙚𝙧 𝙩𝙤 𝙙𝙚𝙗𝙖𝙩𝙚 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝙧𝙚𝙖𝙡 𝙩𝙧𝙪𝙩𝙝.🤝
The Epoch Times
IOC Accepts CCP’s Offer of China-Made Vaccines, Team Japan Won’t Take Them
President of the International Olympic Committee (IOC) Thomas Bach announced on March 11 that the IOC has agreed ...
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🇬🇧 𝟭𝟰/𝟬𝟯/𝟮𝟬𝟮𝟭 - 𝗔𝗿𝗿𝗲𝘀𝘁𝘀 𝘁𝗼𝗱𝗮𝘆 𝗶𝗻 𝗘𝗻𝗴𝗹𝗮𝗻𝗱'𝘀 𝘀𝗲𝗰𝗼𝗻𝗱 𝗹𝗮𝗿𝗴𝗲𝘀𝘁 𝗰𝗶𝘁𝘆 𝗕𝗶𝗿𝗺𝗶𝗻𝗴𝗵𝗮𝗺 𝗮𝘀 𝗹𝗼𝗰𝗮𝗹𝘀 𝗽𝗿𝗼𝘁𝗲𝘀𝘁𝗲𝗱 𝗮𝗴𝗮𝗶𝗻𝘀𝘁 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗱𝗿𝗮𝗰𝗼𝗻𝗶𝗮𝗻 𝗖𝗼𝗿𝗼𝗻𝗮𝘃𝗶𝗿𝘂𝘀 𝗹𝗼𝗰𝗸𝗱𝗼𝘄𝗻 𝗺𝗲𝗮𝘀𝘂𝗿𝗲𝘀 𝗯𝗲𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗶𝗺𝗽𝗹𝗲𝗺𝗲𝗻𝘁𝗲𝗱 𝗯𝘆 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗪𝗼𝗿𝗹𝗱 𝗘𝗰𝗼𝗻𝗼𝗺𝗶𝗰 𝗙𝗼𝗿𝘂𝗺 (𝗼𝗽𝗽𝘀!! 𝗗𝗶𝗱 𝗜 𝘀𝗮𝘆 𝘁𝗵𝗮𝘁 𝗼𝘂𝘁 𝗹𝗼𝘂𝗱?
March 20TH, many countries are uniting in protest against these murderous authoritarianism enforcing governments.
🔗𝗙𝗼𝗹𝗹𝗼𝘄, 𝗦𝘂𝗯𝘀𝗰𝗿𝗶𝗯𝗲👇👇 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝘂𝗻𝗶𝘁𝗲:
https://news.1rj.ru/str/Truth_Awakening_Channel
𝙒𝙝𝙚𝙧𝙚 𝙥𝙚𝙤𝙥𝙡𝙚 𝙘𝙤𝙢𝙚 𝙩𝙤𝙜𝙚𝙩𝙝𝙚𝙧 𝙩𝙤 𝙙𝙚𝙗𝙖𝙩𝙚 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝙧𝙚𝙖𝙡 𝙩𝙧𝙪𝙩𝙝.🤝
March 20TH, many countries are uniting in protest against these murderous authoritarianism enforcing governments.
🔗𝗙𝗼𝗹𝗹𝗼𝘄, 𝗦𝘂𝗯𝘀𝗰𝗿𝗶𝗯𝗲👇👇 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝘂𝗻𝗶𝘁𝗲:
https://news.1rj.ru/str/Truth_Awakening_Channel
𝙒𝙝𝙚𝙧𝙚 𝙥𝙚𝙤𝙥𝙡𝙚 𝙘𝙤𝙢𝙚 𝙩𝙤𝙜𝙚𝙩𝙝𝙚𝙧 𝙩𝙤 𝙙𝙚𝙗𝙖𝙩𝙚 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝙧𝙚𝙖𝙡 𝙩𝙧𝙪𝙩𝙝.🤝
🌎 𝗨𝗽𝗱𝗮𝘁𝗲 𝗼𝗻 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗰𝗼𝘂𝗻𝘁𝗿𝗶𝗲𝘀 𝘁𝗵𝗮𝘁 𝗵𝗮𝘃𝗲 𝗯𝗮𝗻𝗻𝗲𝗱 🚫 𝗔𝗦𝗧𝗥𝗔𝗭𝗘𝗡𝗘𝗖𝗔 💉 ! 𝗜𝗿𝗲𝗹𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝗵𝗮𝘀 𝗮𝗹𝘀𝗼 𝗯𝗲𝗲𝗻 𝗮𝗱𝗱𝗲𝗱 𝘁𝗼 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗹𝗶𝘀𝘁:
🔗𝗙𝗼𝗹𝗹𝗼𝘄, 𝗦𝘂𝗯𝘀𝗰𝗿𝗶𝗯𝗲👇👇 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝘂𝗻𝗶𝘁𝗲:
https://news.1rj.ru/str/Truth_Awakening_Channel
𝙒𝙝𝙚𝙧𝙚 𝙥𝙚𝙤𝙥𝙡𝙚 𝙘𝙤𝙢𝙚 𝙩𝙤𝙜𝙚𝙩𝙝𝙚𝙧 𝙩𝙤 𝙙𝙚𝙗𝙖𝙩𝙚 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝙧𝙚𝙖𝙡 𝙩𝙧𝙪𝙩𝙝.🤝
🔗𝗙𝗼𝗹𝗹𝗼𝘄, 𝗦𝘂𝗯𝘀𝗰𝗿𝗶𝗯𝗲👇👇 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝘂𝗻𝗶𝘁𝗲:
https://news.1rj.ru/str/Truth_Awakening_Channel
𝙒𝙝𝙚𝙧𝙚 𝙥𝙚𝙤𝙥𝙡𝙚 𝙘𝙤𝙢𝙚 𝙩𝙤𝙜𝙚𝙩𝙝𝙚𝙧 𝙩𝙤 𝙙𝙚𝙗𝙖𝙩𝙚 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝙧𝙚𝙖𝙡 𝙩𝙧𝙪𝙩𝙝.🤝
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🇺🇲 𝗠𝗮𝗿𝗶𝗮𝗻𝗻𝗲 𝗪𝗲𝗯𝘀𝘁𝗲𝗿 𝗗𝗶𝗰𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻𝗮𝗿𝘆 𝗶𝘀 𝗰𝗵𝗮𝗻𝗴𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗱𝗲𝗳𝗶𝗻𝗶𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻𝘀 𝘁𝗼 𝗳𝗶𝘁 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗹𝗲𝗳𝘁 𝗻𝗮𝗿𝗿𝗮𝘁𝗶𝘃𝗲... 𝗲𝗿𝗿 𝗲𝗿𝗿?
𝗦𝗔𝗥𝗔𝗛 𝗖𝗢𝗥𝗥𝗜𝗛𝗘𝗥 (𝟭𝟰 𝗠𝗔𝗥 𝟮𝟬𝟮𝟭) "𝗗𝗶𝗰𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻𝗮𝗿𝘆 𝗥𝗲-𝗱𝗲𝗳𝗶𝗻𝗲𝘀
🔗𝗙𝗼𝗹𝗹𝗼𝘄, 𝗦𝘂𝗯𝘀𝗰𝗿𝗶𝗯𝗲👇👇 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝘂𝗻𝗶𝘁𝗲:
https://news.1rj.ru/str/Truth_Awakening_Channel
𝙒𝙝𝙚𝙧𝙚 𝙥𝙚𝙤𝙥𝙡𝙚 𝙘𝙤𝙢𝙚 𝙩𝙤𝙜𝙚𝙩𝙝𝙚𝙧 𝙩𝙤 𝙙𝙚𝙗𝙖𝙩𝙚 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝙧𝙚𝙖𝙡 𝙩𝙧𝙪𝙩𝙝.🤝 𝗩𝗮𝗰𝗰𝗶𝗻𝗲 𝗪𝗿𝗼𝗻𝗴-𝘁𝗵𝗶𝗻𝗸"
𝗦𝗔𝗥𝗔𝗛 𝗖𝗢𝗥𝗥𝗜𝗛𝗘𝗥 (𝟭𝟰 𝗠𝗔𝗥 𝟮𝟬𝟮𝟭) "𝗗𝗶𝗰𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻𝗮𝗿𝘆 𝗥𝗲-𝗱𝗲𝗳𝗶𝗻𝗲𝘀
🔗𝗙𝗼𝗹𝗹𝗼𝘄, 𝗦𝘂𝗯𝘀𝗰𝗿𝗶𝗯𝗲👇👇 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝘂𝗻𝗶𝘁𝗲:
https://news.1rj.ru/str/Truth_Awakening_Channel
𝙒𝙝𝙚𝙧𝙚 𝙥𝙚𝙤𝙥𝙡𝙚 𝙘𝙤𝙢𝙚 𝙩𝙤𝙜𝙚𝙩𝙝𝙚𝙧 𝙩𝙤 𝙙𝙚𝙗𝙖𝙩𝙚 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝙧𝙚𝙖𝙡 𝙩𝙧𝙪𝙩𝙝.🤝 𝗩𝗮𝗰𝗰𝗶𝗻𝗲 𝗪𝗿𝗼𝗻𝗴-𝘁𝗵𝗶𝗻𝗸"
🇷🇺 𝗣𝘂𝘁𝗶𝗻 𝗮𝗻𝗻𝗼𝘂𝗻𝗰𝗲𝘀:
𝗶𝘁'𝘀 𝗼𝘃𝗲𝗿!
🔗 𝗧𝗵𝗲 𝗯𝗿𝗶𝗰𝗸𝗹𝗮𝘆𝗲𝗿𝘀 𝗳𝗮𝗶𝗹𝗲𝗱!
𝗧𝗵𝗲 𝗻𝗲𝘄 𝘄𝗼𝗿𝗹𝗱 𝗼𝗿𝗱𝗲𝗿 𝗵𝗮𝘀 𝗳𝗮𝗶𝗹𝗲𝗱!
𝗥𝘂𝘀𝘀𝗶𝗮𝗻 𝗣𝗿𝗲𝘀𝗶𝗱𝗲𝗻𝘁 𝗩𝗹𝗮𝗱𝗶𝗺𝗶𝗿 𝗣𝘂𝘁𝗶𝗻 announced on Russian television that the New World Order had collapsed, arguing that the world was now the final contraction after the death of the elite regime. Putin told the Russian broadcaster NTV that the new global world order had failed because people around the world had awakened who had realized the insidious truth about the plans of the elite.
🔗𝗙𝗼𝗹𝗹𝗼𝘄, 𝗦𝘂𝗯𝘀𝗰𝗿𝗶𝗯𝗲👇👇 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝘂𝗻𝗶𝘁𝗲:
https://news.1rj.ru/str/Truth_Awakening_Channel
𝙒𝙝𝙚𝙧𝙚 𝙥𝙚𝙤𝙥𝙡𝙚 𝙘𝙤𝙢𝙚 𝙩𝙤𝙜𝙚𝙩𝙝𝙚𝙧 𝙩𝙤 𝙙𝙚𝙗𝙖𝙩𝙚 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝙧𝙚𝙖𝙡 𝙩𝙧𝙪𝙩𝙝.🤝
𝗶𝘁'𝘀 𝗼𝘃𝗲𝗿!
🔗 𝗧𝗵𝗲 𝗯𝗿𝗶𝗰𝗸𝗹𝗮𝘆𝗲𝗿𝘀 𝗳𝗮𝗶𝗹𝗲𝗱!
𝗧𝗵𝗲 𝗻𝗲𝘄 𝘄𝗼𝗿𝗹𝗱 𝗼𝗿𝗱𝗲𝗿 𝗵𝗮𝘀 𝗳𝗮𝗶𝗹𝗲𝗱!
𝗥𝘂𝘀𝘀𝗶𝗮𝗻 𝗣𝗿𝗲𝘀𝗶𝗱𝗲𝗻𝘁 𝗩𝗹𝗮𝗱𝗶𝗺𝗶𝗿 𝗣𝘂𝘁𝗶𝗻 announced on Russian television that the New World Order had collapsed, arguing that the world was now the final contraction after the death of the elite regime. Putin told the Russian broadcaster NTV that the new global world order had failed because people around the world had awakened who had realized the insidious truth about the plans of the elite.
🔗𝗙𝗼𝗹𝗹𝗼𝘄, 𝗦𝘂𝗯𝘀𝗰𝗿𝗶𝗯𝗲👇👇 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝘂𝗻𝗶𝘁𝗲:
https://news.1rj.ru/str/Truth_Awakening_Channel
𝙒𝙝𝙚𝙧𝙚 𝙥𝙚𝙤𝙥𝙡𝙚 𝙘𝙤𝙢𝙚 𝙩𝙤𝙜𝙚𝙩𝙝𝙚𝙧 𝙩𝙤 𝙙𝙚𝙗𝙖𝙩𝙚 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝙧𝙚𝙖𝙡 𝙩𝙧𝙪𝙩𝙝.🤝